Radical NCEA overhaul risks turning students into ‘guinea pigs'
'Previous rushed overhauls have led to students being the guinea pigs for failed change – like national standards – so we must get this right."
Stanford said the Government was making changes to the education system at pace. Under the proposal, students currently doing NCEA continue.
Students who are year 8 today will be the first affected by the changes which begin in 2028.
From 2028, year 11 students would work towards a 'foundational skills award' rather than NCEA level 1, as they do now. This would be focused on literacy and numeracy, which would remain mandatory subjects.
Year 12 students would study for the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) instead of NCEA level 2 and year 12 students would seek to attain the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE) instead of level 3.
Students would do a mix of internal and external exams that add up to a mark out of 100, replacing the current achieved, merit and excellence rankings. That figure aligns to a letter grade such as A, B or C.
For example, a student who received 85/100 in English would get an A while 50/100 in History would get them a C.
The Green Party's education spokesperson Lawrence Xu-Nan said NCEA was not perfect but it recognised learning took place in different ways.
'Today's announcement is another classic case of the Government favouring one-size-fits-all approaches. Our education system is too important to be reduced to a single, rigid framework that will leave many behind.
'We haven't seen any clear case for the scrapping of NCEA - the Government has not made it. We remain entirely unconvinced this is what our school system needs. In fact, it risks throwing the baby out with the bathwater.'
PPTA president Chris Abercrombie was mostly pleased with the changes, particularly plans to created a new and improved vocational pathway.
He was eagerly awaiting more information to understand how students would be impacted. He said the union was only told about the proposal about an hour before it was announced publicly.
Abercrombie said the NCEA system allowed for a lot of discretion when a student failed or was failing - for example, the school and the student could figure out another way to ensure they had enough credits.
'[I hope that] doesn't disappear. We effectively don't want an overcorrection or swing so far in the other direction that we end up hurting students.'
Associate Education Minister David Seymour said the changes were 'absolutely fantastic.'
'If you haven't got a compact body of knowledge rigorously tested, passing from one generation to the next, I would argue you're not doing education the way that you should.
'This is something I think the Government should go hard on and take no backwards steps.'
Julia Gabel is a Wellington-based political reporter. She joined the Herald in 2020 and has most recently focused on data journalism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
33 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Invest in public good for a sustainable future
Click here for an alternative view: Cutting red tape key to NZ's infrastructure success - Chris Bishop The Green Party is unapologetic about our commitment to the long-term benefit of our people and planet. We have a clear vision that is outlined by the action plans we have released in the past months, including our Green Emissions Reduction Plan, He Ara Anamata, as well as our Green Budget 2025 and Fiscal Strategy. We know that the status quo is not working, the truth is that it hasn't worked for a long time. In the 1980s and 1990s, many reforms saw public assets that had been built up over generations sold into private hands, like our rail network, some social housing, and some electricity generation. There was a mistaken belief that cutting public investment and jobs would make us better off as a country. Thirty-five years on, we can clearly say that approach has not worked for most of the country. Cutting down the responsibility of the state has increased inequality, which may suit the super-rich, but certainly doesn't benefit the rest of our society. Housing scarcity and unaffordability allow a gentry of landlords to exploit desperate renters without a foot to stand on. Handing the reins of our economy over to the private sector and moulding our laws around their preference makes it easy for corporates to exploit underpaid workers and our natural resources. Our people, and the planet we depend upon, pay the price. The 'privatise the benefits, socialise the cost' approach isn't fair, and it isn't working. It's time to be bold and brave. We can invest in the public infrastructure we need ourselves, rather than making ourselves dependent on the goodwill of private international financiers, who will be looking for returns. New Zealanders can be in control of our economy, our jobs and our future. We can take control of our destiny and build what we need while creating thousands of good jobs. Our people, and the planet we depend upon, pay the price. The 'privatise the benefits, socialise the cost' approach isn't fair, and it isn't working. Julie Anna Genter Over the past months, we have been across the country and have seen the harm private companies have done to communities by coming in, promising the world, and then upping sticks once the profits have dried up, leaving people without livelihoods and much hope. In the last year alone, we have seen this from the West Coast of the South Island, to Ohakune, to Tokoroa. It was the stories we heard from these communities that encouraged our Green Jobs Guarantee. This plan will create at least 40,000 jobs across Aotearoa to rebuild our infrastructure, restore nature and build the homes we so desperately need. These jobs will form the foundations of an economy that works for all of us and a society that leaves nobody behind. Before politicians took their hands off the wheel of the economy 40 years ago and sold off the assets we all used to own, we had a Ministry of Works. Our plan for a Ministry of Green Works builds on that proud tradition but is future-fit for the climate transition. With our future-focused workforce agency, Mahi Anamata, we will be able to plan for the skills we need. This will allow us to prioritise resources to the areas we need rather than allowing the private sector to dictate our job market on their terms. We have so many opportunities at our fingertips. Energy efficiency is a boon for productivity. The steps we need to take in transportation and urban development to reduce congestion will also reduce emissions, deaths and serious injuries, and petrol bills – by reducing the need to use private vehicles. We can take pressure off our hospitals and people's power bills with healthy homes, wind and solar, and walkable communities. A better world is possible. The only thing holding us back is this Government, which is firmly stuck in the past and beholden to the interests of a wealthy few. Julie Anne Genter is MP for Rongotai and Green Party spokesperson for Infrastructure, Transport, Urban Development and Building and Construction.
NZ Herald
33 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Long-term vision essential for NZ's infrastructure future
Too often, infrastructure is treated as a list of disconnected projects. A road here, a hospital wing there, a new pipe or port when the pressure gets too much. But infrastructure isn't about individual assets, it's about a network of platforms that allow people to live their lives and go about making a living. Infrastructure enables economic growth, social cohesion and environmental resilience. Every dollar spent is a down payment on the kind of country we want our children and grandchildren to inherit. Nick Leggett is the chief executive of Infrastructure NZ To get this right, we need more than planning and funding. We need a national vision. Some politicians roll their eyes at the word 'vision', seeing it as too abstract or ideological. But in fact, the absence of vision is what gets us into trouble. Without long-term thinking, we get short-term decisions. Projects chopped and changed with political cycles, reactive funding decisions, stop-start pipelines that waste money and talent. The fact that politicians don't like it is a clue as to why a vision is so valuable. They don't like it because they can't control it. With a shared vision, we gain direction and clarity. We can prioritise, align investment and policy, make the hard calls about what's most important – and importantly keep successive governments on track when they try to deviate and cut projects. For a country like New Zealand that is geographically isolated, fiscally constrained and with a small, ageing population, that's not just idealism. It's survival. New Zealand has gone from being one of the most trade-intensive economies per capita to now exporting a smaller share of GDP than the OECD median. Compared to countries like Ireland, Singapore and Denmark – similar in size, but far more focused on strategic infrastructure and economic positioning, we are massively underperforming. That matters. The roads we drive on, the schools our kids attend, the hospitals we rely on, and the green energy we need – all depend on the income we earn from offshore. Infrastructure isn't just about what's visible on our streets. It's about building the foundations for a modern, outward-facing, productive economy. We are seeing real signs of progress. The Government has introduced some of the most significant system changes in recent memory. Reforms to resource management, water services and regional planning are laying the groundwork for more integrated thinking. The Labour Party has expressed some level of cooperation in response, which is promising. The creation of Invest New Zealand is a critical step. We won't meet our infrastructure needs with public money alone. Private and offshore investment must be part of the picture; however, it must be well-targeted, guided by public interest, and attract genuinely new capital. The model must be credible and transparent, with clear rules and strong public support. The Infrastructure Priorities Programme is also promising, giving us a framework to assess and prioritise the most urgent and valuable projects. Alongside it, the first-ever National Policy Statement for Infrastructure sets the tone for future planning and delivery, which will embed infrastructure as a core part of national development. But plans alone are not enough. A vision brings these threads together and gives them meaning. To be successful it must also drive action and give business and communities the confidence to invest. It helps us stay the course. A clear, long-term pipeline of infrastructure work isn't just efficient, it's financially smart. Analysis by Infometrics shows that by reducing uncertainty and creating a stable delivery environment, New Zealand could save between $2 billion and $4.7b each year. That's money we're currently wasting through cancellations, delays, duplicated effort and poor coordination. Our obsession with short-term cost-cutting – the 'nickel and dime' approach – has undermined long-term value. We panic about cost over runs but rarely ask what the cost is of not building at all. We celebrate the cancellation of projects but don't adequately even monitor the work we have in the market or the projects in the pipeline. Growing, productive nations build good systems for funding and delivery. They also understand that infrastructure costs what it costs and that the benefits compound for generations. One of the most overlooked aspects of New Zealand's infrastructure deficit is how poorly we've maintained what we already have. We need to stop chasing only the shiny and new, and start respecting, renewing and better using existing assets. That means smarter asset management. It means investing in good data and decision-making. And it means changing our political mindset from one of celebrating project cancellations to championing long-term results from better services delivered by our infrastructure. We need to stop chasing only the shiny and new, and start respecting, renewing and better using existing assets. Nick Leggett None of this is possible without a steady, well-supported workforce. The infrastructure industry cannot keep scaling up and down with the political tides. It causes burnout, skills loss and inefficiency. We need a pipeline of skilled workers and leadership across engineering, construction, planning and asset management, backed by education and immigration policies that match. In recent years, Infrastructure New Zealand has led delegations to Denmark, Ireland and Canada. These countries face similar constraints to ours, yet they're achieving greater infrastructure productivity through one key difference – cross-party political consensus anchored by a better shared sense of where they are going as respective nations. They debate priorities, but they don't debate the need for progress. This year's Draft Infrastructure Plan lays out scenarios for New Zealand's population reaching nearly eight million by 2050. That's a big shift in demand, especially as we age. We can't pretend that today's systems will stretch to meet tomorrow's needs. We must start planning now, guided by shared goals and not fragmented politics. So, let's start the hard conversation. Let's challenge ourselves to commit to a national vision. It will provoke discussions of identity and of cultural mindset of how we make choices together – and how we get things done. Let's imagine a New Zealand that's more connected, more productive, more inclusive and more resilient. Decent infrastructure is a means to that end. · Infrastructure New Zealand is the peak body of the New Zealand infrastructure sector and is hosting the upcoming Building Nations Conference. · Infrastructure New Zealand is an advertising sponsor of the Herald's Infrastructure report.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Gisborne District Council welcomes benchmarking but says context is key
Gisborne District Council has welcomed the release of the Government's new Council Performance Profiles while urging the public to look beyond the numbers. 'These profiles give the public easier access to financial data – and that's a good thing,' Mayor Rehette Stoltz said in a media release. Metrics in the
