logo
3 student loan changes in Republican bill: Getting out of debt would be 'extremely hard,' advocate says

3 student loan changes in Republican bill: Getting out of debt would be 'extremely hard,' advocate says

CNBC18-06-2025

Republicans' "big beautiful" bill, if enacted as drafted, would make some of the biggest changes to the federal student loan system in decades.
GOP House and Senate lawmakers' proposals would eliminate several repayment plans, keep borrowers in debt for longer and roll back relief options for those who become unemployed or run into another financial challenge.
The House advanced its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in May. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions released its budget bill recommendations related to student loans on June 10. Senate lawmakers are preparing to debate the massive tax and spending package.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, said his party's plans would lift the burden on taxpayers of subsidizing college graduate's loan payments.
"Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college," Cassidy said in a statement on June 10. He said his committee's bill would save an estimated $300 billion from the federal budget.
More from Personal Finance:'SALT' deduction in limbo as Senate Republicans unveil tax planHow Senate GOP 'no tax on tips' proposal differs from House planSenate tax bill includes $1,000 baby bonus in 'Trump accounts'
However, consumer advocates say that the legislation will deepen a lending crisis in which millions of borrowers are already struggling to pay off the debt from their education.
"It's not about fiscal responsibility, it's about doing some funny math that justifies tax cuts," said Astra Taylor, co-founder of the Debt Collective, a union for debtors.
"It's going to be extremely hard for people to get out of debt with these changes," Taylor said.
Here are three big proposals in the GOP bills to overhaul federal student lending.
Under the Republican proposals, there would be just two repayment plan choices for new borrowers, compared with roughly a dozen options now.
Student loan borrowers could either enroll in a standard repayment plan with fixed payments, or an income-based repayment plan known as the "Repayment Assistance Plan," or RAP.
Under RAP, monthly payments would typically range from 1% to 10% of a borrower's income; the more they earn, the bigger their required payment. There would be a minimum monthly payment of $10 for all borrowers.
A typical student loan borrower with a college degree could pay an extra $2,929 per year if the Senate GOP proposal of RAP is enacted, compared to the Biden administration's now-blocked SAVE plan, according to a recent analysis by the Student Borrower Protection Center.
The new plan would fail to provide many borrowers' with an affordable monthly bill — the goal of Congress when it established income-driven repayment plans in the 90s, said Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at The Institute for College Access & Success.
"If Republicans' proposed 'Repayment Assistance Plan' is the only thing standing between borrowers and default, we can expect many to suffer the nightmarish experience of default," Zampini said.
As of now, borrowers who enroll in the standard repayment plan typically get their debt divided into 120 fixed payments, over 10 years. But the Republicans' new standard plan would provide borrowers fixed payments over a period between 10 years and 25 years, depending on how much they owe.
For example, those with a balance exceeding $50,000 would be in repayment for 15 years; if you owe over $100,000, your fixed payments will last for 25 years.
Meanwhile, current income-driven repayment plans now conclude in loan forgiveness after 20 years or 25 years. But RAP wouldn't lead to debt erasure until 30 years.
"Thirty years is your adult life," Taylor said.
If RAP becomes law, she said, "We anticipate an explosion of senior debtors."
House and Senate Republicans are also calling for the elimination of the economic hardship and unemployment deferments.
Those deferments allow federal student loan borrowers to pause their monthly bills during periods of joblessness or other financial setbacks, often without interest accruing on their debt. Under both options, which have existed for decades, borrowers can avoid payments for up to three years.
Under the Senate Republicans' proposal, student loans received on or after July 1, 2026, would no longer qualify for the unemployment deferment or economic hardship deferment. The House plan does away with both deferments a year earlier, on July 1, 2025.
"These protections enable borrowers to stay in good standing on their loans while they get back on their feet," Zampini said.
"Without them, borrowers who suddenly can't afford their payments will have little recourse, and many will likely enter delinquency and eventually default," she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most Asian stocks rise as investors eye US trade talks
Most Asian stocks rise as investors eye US trade talks

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Most Asian stocks rise as investors eye US trade talks

Asian equities mostly rose Monday following a record-breaking day on Wall Street as investors kept tabs on countries' efforts to strike trade deals with the United States before a key deadline next week. And the dollar weakened on growing expectations for more interest rate cuts, while eyes were on Donald Trump's signature tax-cutting bill -- now inching towards a Senate vote -- that some experts warn could add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished at all-time peaks Friday amid optimism governments will be able to avoid swingeing tariffs imposed by the US president in April and paused until July 9 to allow for negotiations. Officials from Japan and India have extended their stays in Washington to continue talks, raising hopes for agreements with two of the world's biggest economies. Hopes that the deadline could be extended were boosted Friday by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who told Fox Business "we have countries approaching us with very good deals" but they might not all be finalised by next week. But he added: "If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18 -- there are another important 20 relationships -- then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day," which falls on September 1. Trump said at the weekend that he did not expect to extend the deadline, telling the "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo" show: "I don't think I'll need to". "I could, no big deal," he added in the interview that was taped Friday. Meanwhile, Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said Sunday that Ottawa would rescind taxes impacting US tech firms in hopes of reaching a trade agreement with Washington after Trump called off talks in retaliation for the levy. Negotiations would resume with the aim of getting a deal by July 21, Ottawa added. After Wall Street's record day, most of Asia followed suit. Tokyo extended its recent rally fuelled by tech firms, while there were also gains in Shanghai, Sydney, Seoul, Singapore, Manila and Jakarta. But Hong Kong, Wellington and Taipei fell. There was little major reaction to data showing the contraction in Chinese factory activity eased further in June after a China-US trade truce. The dollar extended losses against its peers as traders increased bets on at least two rate cuts this year following Trump's indication he could choose a successor to Federal Reserve boss Jerome Powell within months. "Markets... are already pricing not just two Fed cuts this year, but a full-blown easing cycle stretching deep into 2026," said SPI Asset Management's Stephen Innes. "Powell may still hold the gavel, but traders are betting the next Fed chair walks, talks, and cuts like a dove in MAGA red." Senators were also debating Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill", which extends his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of $4.5 trillion and beefs up border security. The Republican president has ramped up pressure to get the package to his desk by July 4, and called out wavering lawmakers from his party. However, there are worries about the impact on the economy, with the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimating the measure would add nearly $3.3 trillion to US deficits over a decade. - Key figures at around 0230 GMT - Tokyo - Nikkei 225: UP 1.6 percent at 40,809.82 (break) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.4 percent at 24,183.73 Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.3 percent at 3,433.80 Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1724 from $1.1718 on Friday Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3723 from $1.3715 Dollar/yen: DOWN at 144.31 yen from 144.68 yen Euro/pound: UP at 85.45 pence from 85.43 pence West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 0.5 percent at $65.18 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: DOWN 0.3 percent at $67.57 per barrel New York - Dow: UP 1.0 percent at 43,819.27 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.7 percent at 8,798.91 (close) dan/sco Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

House could vote on ‘big, beautiful bill' by Wednesday morning, Emmer announces
House could vote on ‘big, beautiful bill' by Wednesday morning, Emmer announces

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House could vote on ‘big, beautiful bill' by Wednesday morning, Emmer announces

The House could vote on the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' as early as Wednesday morning, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer's (R-Minn.) office announced Sunday, officially notifying members that they will have to return to Washington, D.C., to vote on the megabill. The beacon came as Senate Republicans were racing to pass the sprawling tax cuts and spending package, with GOP leaders hoping to send President Trump the measure by their self-imposed July 4 deadline. Once the Senate approves the bill, the House has to give it a final stamp of approval. 'Members are advised that votes are now expected in the House as early as 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, July 2. Please stay tuned to future updates for additional information regarding this week's schedule. This is a change from the previously announced schedule,' the whip's office wrote in a notice Sunday night. The House was scheduled to be on recess this week for July 4. If the Senate clears the legislation and sends it across the Capitol, the measure will first head to the House Rules Committee, where the panel will hold a vote to set parameters for debate. Then, the entire chamber will have to adopt a procedural rule for the legislation — which could happen as early as Wednesday morning — followed by general debate and a final passage vote. It remains unclear when the House will get its hands on the package. The Senate is scheduled to begin what is known as a vote-a-rama Monday morning at 9 a.m., giving senators in both parties an opportunity to introduce and vote on an unlimited number of amendments to the package. It remains unclear when the process will wrap up. Afterward, the chamber will hold a final passage vote. It is not yet certain that the legislation will have enough support to clear the upper chamber. Moderate Republicans have raised concerns about cuts to Medicaid, and conservatives have gripes about the level of spending cuts, prompting uncertainty about the measure's odds in the Senate. The bill, however, could change during the vote-a-rama process to shore up support. Senate Republicans can only lose three members and still clear the package, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. The dynamics are similar in the House, where at least six moderate Republicans have said they will not support the bill in its current form, The Hill has learned, because of Medicaid language and the rollback of green-energy tax credits, among other provisions. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of the two Republicans to vote against the House version of the bill last month, is also expected to vote against the bill, bringing the current number of opponents to seven. House Republicans can also only lose three of their own members and still pass the bill if there is full attendance and all Democrats vote 'no.'

NC Sen. Thom Tillis' isn't running for 3rd term. What Trump, others are saying
NC Sen. Thom Tillis' isn't running for 3rd term. What Trump, others are saying

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NC Sen. Thom Tillis' isn't running for 3rd term. What Trump, others are saying

North Carolina Republican U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis made an unexpected decision not to seek a third term Sunday morning. And it drew a sharp reaction from President Donald Trump: 'Great News! 'Senator' Thom Tillis will not be seeking reelection.' The day before, the Republican president had threatened to find a primary-election challenger to Tillis — a former speaker of the state House — over his opposition to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' The Huntersville resident argued the bill would hurt hospitals and rural North Carolinians with its Medicaid cuts. On his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump posted Saturday night saying he was already planning to meet with possible candidates in the weeks ahead to challenge Tillis for the 2026 midterms. 'Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!' Trump wrote in another Truth Social post Saturday night. The next morning, Tillis announced it was 'not a hard choice' to take a step back and focus on family. Attention was already on the upcoming race for Tillis' Senate seat, which is sure to be an indicator of Trump's favorability among North Carolina voters. Democrats are preparing to prioritize the campaign for the Republican-held seat in what is certain to be a costly midterm. North Carolina is a swing state, but has not elected a Democrat to the Senate since 2008. A Democratic political action committee, Senate Majority PAC, jumped on Tillis' announcement as an opportunity for change. The PAC's main objective is to win Senate races for Democratic candidates. 'Democrats were poised to win in North Carolina whether Thom Tillis' name was on the ballot in November 2026 or not. But his early retirement proves there is no space within the Republican party to dissent over taking health care away from 11.8 million people by destroying Medicaid and raising costs,' a spokesperson for the PAC, Lauren French, said in a press release. However, the National Republican Senatorial Committee's chairman, Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, said in a press release that after more than a decade of GOP representation in the Senate, North Carolina Republicans' hold on Tillis' seat would not be going away. Trump also won the state in the past three presidential elections. 'That streak will continue in 2026 when North Carolinians elect a conservative leader committed to advancing an agenda of opportunity, prosperity, and security,' the press release said. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, weighed in on X, saying that despite their political differences, he supported Tillis in voting against the 'big beautiful bill.' 'The Republican Party today is a cult. Either you do as Trump wants, or you're out,' Sanders said. 'Pathetic.' Closer to home, Democratic Reps. Alma Adams of Charlotte and Deborah Ross of Raleigh both had positive things to say about Tillis, too. Ross commended Tillis' time in the U.S. Senate and praised his decision to deny Trump's megabill as 'putting his commitment to the people of North Carolina above his loyalty to the leaders of the Republican Party.' 'It is imperative that our next senator is someone who will hold President Trump and his administration accountable,' her statement said. Adams said she wanted to commend Tillis 'for his courage and commitment in doing the right thing for our country.' His vote 'was a teachable moment to our youth about the importance of putting country before yourself,' she said. North Carolina's former lieutenant governor, Republican Mark Robinson, was aligned with the MAGA wing of the GOP and often feuded with Tillis before losing the race for governor last year. Robinson responded to a post on X that said Tillis' decision to step down 'is the final nail in the coffin of the North Carolina Republican Party of years passed [sic].' 'I couldn't have said it better,' Robinson said. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson added on X that 'the time was right' for Tillis to step down. Trump's bill would be devastating to North Carolina, he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store