Corruption and crime: A recipe for food insecurity in South Africa
Image: File
As much as I do not want to add another voice to the fiasco at the recent White House meeting between Trump and President Cyril Ramaphosa it is a starting point for an article about how corruption, crime and food security end up in a concoction of another disaster for the citizens of the country.
Ramaphosa stated, in defense of farm murder and genocide accusations that it is not a unique situation as South Africa has a serious problem with crime at all levels. All crime victims and citizens will agree with that statement, although it is the last thing foreign investors want to hear who at consider us as an investment destination.
On August, 27, 2024 Minister of Agriculture John Steenhuizen launched a forensic audit into a R500 million Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP) project. OBP, which was founded in 2000, is a state-owned animal vaccine manufacturing entity whose primary mandate is to manufacture animal vaccines. The Auditor General revealed that a substantial portion of a grant given to OBP in 2013 was unspent and unaccounted for. They further highlighted that OBP is not following basic auditing standards. It is a problem at other state entities. A similar case is that of the Road Accident Fund, which refuses to adhere to the instruction from the Auditor General.
According to Steenhuisen he is concerned about the OBP project, which has been given R500 million to revamp the facility, as 'A large part of the R500 million went missing and is unaccounted for.' Former Minister of Agriculture Thoko Didiza stated that, 'A forensic report on the utilisation of some of the funds was done, and it enabled the OBP to take some of the concerns of sub-contracting to the Special Investigative Unit.'
But this is nothing new. In 2022 vaccine shortages were threatening herd immunity in the livestock due to the outbreak of foot and Mouth disease (FMD). During this period OBP dismissed Dr Baptiste Dungu as its CEO.
Dungu, who was appointed in 2019, was accused of corruption and had been on a precautionary suspension up until his dismissal. Investigation into allegations revealed evidence of 'various alleged transgressions including, (but not limited to) allowing or instigating irregular procurement procedures, dishonesty and mismanagement in contravention of OBP's policies and the laws of the Republic of South Africa.'
According to Food for Mnzanzi, 'Dungu was dogged by scandal from the start of his tenure. A Congolese national, he was found not to have passed the minimum security standards required for the role. He was also previously employed by the company, up until 2008, but was said to have left under suspicion of using company trade secrets for his own business.'
Current FMD crisis
In the past four weeks news broke of the outbreak of FMD in beef livestock farms. FMD is a highly contagious illness affecting animals. Livestock farmers warned they may soon go out of business if the government does not support those affected by the preventative measures for FMD. Onderstepoort, however, does not have vaccines available. The disease is not new in South Africa.
During the FMD outbreak in 2021, measures taken included the prohibition of slaughtering and transporting livestock. South Africa has a cattle herd of approximately 12.3 million according to Statista and the country that comes to our rescue for vaccines is Botswana with a cattle herd of only 2.3 million. The total cattle population in Ethiopia is a staggering 70 million. South Africa, however, is the largest producers of red meat at 1 038.7 metric tonnes of beef, which is more than double that of Ethiopia.
Although the most affected provinces were KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga, Limpopo and Eastern Cape, the latest news was that the disease was also detected at Karan Beef, South Africa's largest feedlot owner. At their Heidelberg feedlot Karan Beef has as many as 150 000 head of cattle. Although the disease seems to have affected only 2% of the animals the disease is so highly contagious that it may well spread quickly.
The livestock industry contributes about 50% of the agricultural gross domestic product and its hugely important export activities can easily be jeopardised by vaccination shortages.
According to Zipho Linda, OBP's communications specialist, vaccine supply challenges have been with the entity for the past ten years, 'due to equipment breakdown. Equipment is aged and is currently being replaced.'
Before Minister Steenhuizen arrived as the new Minister the problems have been highlighted and brought to the attention of thegovernment. Representatives of the National Animal Health Forum (NAHF) highlighted the dangers of inconsistent vaccine availability in a meeting with former minister Didiza. This included the threat to national herd immunity, food security, income security and the threat of zoonosis, which is the passing of animal diseases on to humans.
Daybreak
The above crises come in addition to the current Daybreak chicken farm scandal. The Public Invesment Corporation (PIC)has once again not ensured that a proper due diligence was conducted in their acquisition of 100% the broiler farm for purposes of empowering Black farmers. They allowed untrained and unskilled workers to underfeed the 490 000 birds and they allowed inhumane culling practices to take place. As many as 350 000 birds had to be culled. It needs the intervention of the SPCA to bring a court order to halt the transgressions. No one was arrested for the disaster that shames the whole country and we are yet to see accountability from the PIC that squander pensioners money in this manner.
Soon these disasters will not be other people's money or other people's cattle it will be the entire nation that will pay the price of food insecurity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
14 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
US participation in G20 Summit in Johannesburg ‘remains very important and critical', says Lamola
Most observers and analysts seem less optimistic than Lamola that the Trump administration can be kept fully on board the G20. They fear that if Trump does attend the summit, he won't sign the declaration. The South African government is still pinning its hopes on full US participation at the G20 Summit, despite intermittent attendance of US officials in the meetings preparing for the summit in Johannesburg in November. International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola said on Thursday that the US participation 'remains very critical and important' as the G20 is a consensus-based organisation and all of its members had to agree on the outcome document from the summit. The US does 'participate … fully in the finance track. And in the sherpa track, not fully; and recently, not at all,' Lamola replied to questions at a press conference in Cape Town. He added that the US had sent an apology for its sherpa not attending last week's third sherpa meeting at Sun City. Lamola's spokesperson, Chrispin Phiri, told Daily Maverick that the reason the US gave was that its sherpa was attending the Nato summit that was taking place in The Hague at the same time. Lamola said that as the G20 had to adopt its summit declaration by consensus, it needed the US vote. 'We continue to call … on the US as a member country of the G20 … to participate and make a contribution,' he said. 'Their participation remains very critical and important.' Lamola has just returned from attending the International Conference on Financing for Development in Spain, which adopted a declaration on increased financing for development, even though there was no consensus because the US didn't support it. Lamola said the difference between this and the G20 Summit was that the Financing for Development conference was not a consensus-based forum. Earlier on Thursday, Alvin Botes, the deputy minister of international relations and cooperation, said: 'It's imperative for the success of the G20 that the US, as the incoming presidency, are part of the November summit.' He appeared to be suggesting it would be critical for the US to attend the November summit to provide some continuity in the G20 agenda. He noted that SA was the last of a group of developing countries — after Indonesia, India and Brazil — that had been chairing the G20 in succession and which together had driven a developmental agenda. He suggested the US's attendance or non-attendance at the Johannesburg summit would define the US outlook for the next few years — through its presidency next year and beyond, when it is part of the troika of present, past and future presidents that helps manage the G20. He echoed Lamola in saying that the US had participated in the finance track, which was encouraging. 'But we require them to engage more deeply in the shepa track, and that is a critical issue.' The sherpa track deals with all G20 issues other than financial ones. Botes was the keynote speaker at a seminar on financial inclusion organised by the South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation. Less than wholehearted Some analysts have pointed out that the US attendance even at finance track meetings has been less than wholehearted. Though the Federal Reserve has attended most meetings, the US Treasury's participation has been patchy. The analysts said it would be interesting to see if the US Treasury attends the meeting of the deputy finance ministers and central bank governors in the week after next. Most observers and analysts seem less optimistic than Lamola and Botes that the Trump administration can be kept fully on board the G20. They fear that if Trump does attend the summit, he won't sign the declaration. This seems a logical prediction, given that SA's G20 themes of equality, inclusiveness and sustainability seem diametrically opposed to Trump's philosophy, as his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, pointed out earlier this year when he refused to attend a G20 foreign ministers meeting. If the US doesn't sign the declaration, that would force SA to either drastically dilute it to get the US in or issue a 'chairperson's statement' on the summit rather than a consensus declaration, diluting the impact of any decisions made. A foreign diplomatic source told Daily Maverick, 'We cannot stop working, or adopt the agenda to the US needs. Thus, we — SA and almost everyone else — want to continue the work, and that is happening. I think the ultimate loser of this strategy is the US. 'They also withdrew from the Financing for Development process in the 11th hour. If you are not around the table, you do not have a voice … the rest of the world moves on.' Elizabeth Sidiropoulos, the national director of the SAIIA, said at the financial inclusion seminar that even if SA could not get all that it wanted at the summit, 'What is critical is to make sure that these things are on the agenda, because they can be picked up at another time. 'We have a responsibility to drive some of these issues forward, to put some interesting ideas and perspectives on to the table and then work towards seeing them actualised, even if they do not actualise by the 30th of November [the summit date].' SA's agenda includes debt relief, reducing the cost of capital for developing countries and providing more financing for climate adaptation and disaster relief. DM
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
US Supreme Court to weigh transgender athlete bans
The US Supreme Court agreed on Thursday to wade into the hot-button issue of transgender athletes in girls and women's sports. The court said it would hear a case next term challenging state laws in Idaho and West Virginia banning transgender athletes from female competition. More than two dozen US states have passed laws in recent years barring athletes who were assigned male at birth from taking part in girls or women's sports. The conservative-dominated Supreme Court's decision to hear the case comes two weeks after it upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical treatment for transgender minors. The Supreme Court has also recently backed a move by President Donald Trump, who campaigned on the issue of transgender athletes, to have transgender troops dismissed from the military. Trump issued an executive order in February aimed at banning transgender athletes from girls and women's sports. "From now on women's sports will be only for women," Trump said. "With this executive order the war on women's sports is over." The executive order allows federal agencies to deny funding to schools that allow transgender athletes to compete on girls or women's teams. In a high-profile case, the University of Pennsylvania agreed this week to ban transgender athletes from its women's sports teams, settling a federal civil rights case stemming from the furor around swimmer Lia Thomas. The Department of Education said that UPenn had entered into a resolution agreement vowing to comply with Title IX, the federal law which prohibits sex-based discrimination in any educational program. It follows an investigation by the department's Office for Civil Rights which found the university had violated Title IX by allowing transgender swimmer Thomas to compete in women's competitions. Thomas became a lightning rod around the debate over transgender athletes in women's sport after competing in female collegiate competitions in 2022. She had earlier swam on UPenn's men's team while undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Critics and some fellow swimmers said she should not have been allowed to compete against women due to an unfair physiological advantage. The Idaho case accepted by the Supreme Court stems from the Republican-led state's "Fairness in Women's Sports Act." It was challenged by an athlete at an Idaho university and lower courts ruled that it violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. The West Virginia case was challenged by a middle school student who was not allowed to compete for the girls' track team. An appeals court ruled that the ban was a violation of Title IX. The Supreme Court will hear the case during the term beginning in October and issue a ruling next year.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
What do we know about the latest push for a Gaza truce?
Smoke billows from an Israeli airstrike that targeted the area of Jabal al-Rihan in the southern Lebanese province of Jezzine. US President Donald Trump this week urged the Palestinian militant group Hamas to seize the opportunity for a 60-day truce in Gaza, saying Israel had agreed to the proposal. After almost 21 months of devastating fighting in the Palestinian territory and following a speedy resolution to Israel's 12-day war with Iran, Trump's exhortations have reignited hopes for a third ceasefire in the Gaza war. But, with familiar obstacles to a truce still in place and an upcoming meeting between Trump and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu critical to the outcome, the likelihood of a deal remains in the balance, analysts say. What's holding up a Hamas response? Efforts to strike a deal in numerous rounds of indirect talks have repeatedly failed, with the primary point of contention centred on Hamas's calls for an enduring ceasefire in Gaza. In a Wednesday statement, Hamas said it was weighing its response to the new proposal and sought "an agreement that guarantees ending the aggression" as well as the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza and the entry of aid into the territory. Hugh Lovatt, a Middle East analyst at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), said there could be flexibility in Hamas's position if they adopt a "pragmatic understanding that this is as good as they'll get for the foreseeable future". He nonetheless noted that there were "still extremely sizable gaps" on Hamas's demands, including the path to a permanent end to the war, the re-opening of Gaza to humanitarian aid and Israel's withdrawal. "Those will be ultimately the most critical matters in deciding whether that initial 60-day period is put on," he added. Andreas Krieg, a Middle East analyst at King's College London, said Hamas's "deep mistrust of Israel's intentions -- given past ceasefires that collapsed under renewed strikes -- means Hamas would need firm guarantees before agreeing" to a deal. In January, Hamas and Israel agreed to a truce which broke down in March, with the two sides unable to agree on the next steps and Israel resuming air and ground attacks.
