logo
Jamf report finds phishing & infostealers surge on Apple devices

Jamf report finds phishing & infostealers surge on Apple devices

Techday NZ18-06-2025

Jamf has released its Security 360 Report, highlighting significant security trends and risks for mobile and Mac devices within organisational environments worldwide.
The report, which examines both mobile and macOS platforms, identifies phishing, infostealers, and operating system vulnerabilities as major concerns and areas where enterprises need to focus their cybersecurity efforts.
According to Josh Stein, Vice President of Product Strategy at Jamf, the aim of the research is to help security professionals understand and manage the challenges posed by both longstanding and emerging threats. "Our goal with this research is to inform security leaders about the risks impacting their organizations – whether those risks impact Mac or mobile – and provide tangible recommendations for safeguarding their organizations against increasingly sophisticated attacks," said Josh Stein, VP of Product Strategy at Jamf. "Age-old threats like phishing remain extremely prevalent and cannot be overlooked…nor can threats skyrocketing in popularity like infostealers. Jamf remains deeply committed to continuous threat research to not only protect our customers but also contribute valuable insights to the broader security community."
Mobile threats
The report notes that mobile devices are frequently the sole tools used by employees to access work resources, emphasising the need for robust defences across a variety of threat vectors.
Jamf segmented its analysis of mobile device threats into four key areas: phishing, vulnerability management, application risk and malware, and spyware.
Phishing attacks remain especially prevalent, with Jamf identifying approximately 10 million such attacks in the past year. The company reported that 25% of organisations experienced a social engineering incident and that one in ten users clicked on a malicious phishing link. The report suggests security training programmes and the adoption of layered, zero-trust security models can help mitigate these risks.
In terms of vulnerability management, Jamf found that 32% of organisations had at least one device with critical vulnerabilities, and that 55.1% of mobile devices in use within workplaces were running on a vulnerable operating system. The company highlighted the importance of timely updates to patch known vulnerabilities, as provided by both Apple and Google.
The research further discussed application risk, referencing Jamf's previous identification of a Transparency, Consent and Control (TCC) bypass flaw on iOS. The company demonstrated how side-loaded apps can compromise user privacy and emphasised the need for security controls that extend beyond just keeping operating systems up to date.
Spyware and advanced malware were identified as threats that, though less frequent than on some platforms, are extremely sophisticated when they do emerge. High-profile individuals, including journalists, politicians, and diplomats, are at particular risk, with Apple sending compromise notifications to users in around 100 countries last year. The report recommends treating mobile devices with the same level of security as other endpoints in the enterprise environment.
Threats to macOS
Mac devices, which were once principally used by executives and creatives, have become common fixtures in enterprises across a range of sectors. According to the report, this proliferation has broadened the attack surface and increased the diversity of threats targeting the platform.
Jamf outlined three principal areas of concern for macOS: application risk and malware, vulnerability management, and social engineering.
Infostealers have become the dominant form of malware on Macs, accounting for 28.36% of all Mac malware analysed by Jamf, compared to just 0.25% in the previous year's findings. The report singles out employees in industries such as cryptocurrency as needing to be particularly alert, advocating for both ongoing training and adequate technological defences.
The report also addresses myths about macOS security, noting that vulnerabilities persist despite perceptions of invulnerability. Jamf highlighted a recently discovered flaw in Gatekeeper, a mechanism intended to stop unverified apps from being run. The report notes the requirement for both effective technical controls and regular employee training to counter risks posed by software vulnerabilities.
Social engineering threats, including phishing, exploit the widespread adoption of Macs in the workplace. Jamf cited campaigns that use professional social media platforms such as LinkedIn as initial attack vectors, rather than the email channels typically associated with phishing. The company recommends comprehensive employee training on all forms of phishing relevant to Mac users.
Methodology
The findings in the Security 360 Report are based on the analysis of 1.4 million devices protected by Jamf, conducted in the first quarter of 2025. The scope of analysis covered the previous year, included users in 90 countries, and spanned multiple mobile and desktop platforms, including iOS, iPadOS, Android, and macOS devices. The report draws on Jamf's proprietary Threat Intelligence, incorporating data from original research, device usage metrics, and analysis of news and external data feeds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Pretty damn average': Google's AI Overviews underwhelm
'Pretty damn average': Google's AI Overviews underwhelm

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

'Pretty damn average': Google's AI Overviews underwhelm

Photo: JAAP ARRIENS Most searches online are done using Google. Traditionally, they've returned long lists of links to websites carrying relevant information. Depending on the topic, there can be thousands of entries to pick from or scroll through. Last year Google started incorporating its Gemini AI tech into its searches . Google's Overviews now inserts Google's own summary of what it's scraped from the internet ahead of the usual list of links to sources in many searches. Some sources say Google's now working towards replacing the lists of links with its own AI-driven search summaries. RNZ's Kathryn Ryan's not a fan. "Pretty damn average I have to say, for the most part," she said on Nine to Noon last Monday during a chat about AI upending the business of digital marketing. But Kathryn Ryan is not the only one underwhelmed by Google's Overviews. Recently, online tech writers discovered you can trick it into thinking that made up sayings are actually idioms in common usage that are meaningful. The Sydney Morning Herald 's puzzle compiler David Astle - under the headline 'Idiom or Idiot?' reckoned Google's AI wasn't about to take his job making cryptic crosswords anytime soon. "There is a strange bit of human psychology which says that we expect a very high bar from machines in a way that we don't from humans," the BBC's head of technology forecasting Laura Ellis told Mediawatch last month. "But if you've got a machine making a mistake, where does that accountability fall? We've just not tested this out yet." UK Sky News deputy political editor Sam Coates tried to make ChatGPT accountable after it made up an entire episode of his own politics podcast when he used it to help archive transcripts of it recently. "AI had told a lie that it had got the transcript. And rather than back down it invented an entire fake episode without flagging that it's fake." When challenged on this, the technology insisted Coates had created the episode himself. When ChatGPT can't find an answer or the right data to draw on, it can 'hallucinate' or just make up a misleading response. "Chat GTP is gaslighting me. No such thing exists. It's all a complete fake," Coates spluttered. After turning ChatGPT off and on again in 'conversation mode', it did eventually own up. "It said; 'Look, you're absolutely right to challenge that. I can't remember the exact time that you uploaded.' And then: 'What I can confirm is that I did it and you're holding me to account,'" Coates told viewers. He went on to challenge ChatGPT about its hallucinations getting worse. "The technology is always improving, and newer versions tend to do a better job at staying accurate," ChatGPT replied. But Coates - armed with data that suggested the opposite - asked ChatGPT for specific stats. The response: "According to recent internal tests from OpenAI, the newer models have shown higher hallucination rates. For instance, the model known as o3 had about a 33 percent hallucination rate, while the 04 mini model had around 48 percent." "I get where you're coming from, and I'm sorry for the mixed messages. The performance of these models can vary." When Coates aired his experience as a warning for journalists, some reacted with alarm. "The hallucination rate of advanced models... is increasing. As journos, we really should avoid it," said Sunday Times writer and former BBC diplomatic editor Mark Urban. But some tech experts accused Coates of misunderstanding and misusing the technology. "The issues Sam runs into here will be familiar to experienced users, but it illustrates how weird and alien Large Language Model (LLM) behaviour can seem for the wider public," said Cambridge University AI ethicist Henry Shevlin. "We need to communicate that these are generative simulators rather than conventional programmes," he added. Others were less accommodating on social media. "All I am seeing here is somebody working in the media who believes they understand how technology works - but [he] doesn't - and highlighting the dangers of someone insufficiently trained in technology trying to use it." "It's like Joey from Friends using the thesaurus function on Word." Mark Honeychurch is a programmer and long serving stalwart of the NZ Skeptics, a non profit body promoting critical thinking and calling out pseudoscience. The Skeptics' website said they confront practices that exploit a lack of specialist knowledge among people. That's what many people use Google for - answers to things they don't know or things they don't understand. Mark Honeychurch described putting overviews to the test in a recent edition of the Skeptics' podcast Yeah, Nah . "The AI looked like it was bending over backwards to please people. It's trying to give an answer that it knows that the customer wants," Honeychurch told Mediawatch . Honeychurch asked Google for the meaning of: 'Better a skeptic than two geese.' "It's trying to do pattern-matching and come out with something plausible. It does this so much that when it sees something that looks like an idiom that it's never heard before, it sees a bunch of idioms that have been explained and it just follows that pattern." "It told me a skeptic is handy to have around because they're always questioning - but two geese could be a handful and it's quite hard to deal with two geese." "With some of them, it did give me a caveat that this doesn't appear to be a popular saying. Then it would launch straight into explaining it. Even if it doesn't make sense, it still gives it its best go because that's what it's meant to do." In time, would AI and Google detect the recent articles pointing out this flaw - and learn from them? "There's a whole bunch of base training where (AI) just gets fed data from the Internet as base material. But on top of that, there's human feedback. "They run it through a battery of tests and humans can basically mark the quality of answers. So you end up refining the model and making it better. "By the time I tested this, it was warning me that a few of my fake idioms don't appear to be popular phrases. But then it would still launch into trying to explain it to me anyway, even though it wasn't real." Things got more interesting - and alarming - when Honeychurch tested Google Overviews with real questions about religion, alternative medicine and skepticism. "I asked why you shouldn't be a skeptic. I got a whole bunch of reasons that sounded plausible about losing all your friends and being the boring person at the party that's always ruining stories." "When I asked it why you should be a skeptic, all I got was a message saying it cannot answer my question." He also asked why one should be religious - and why not. And what reasons we should trust alternative medicines - and why we shouldn't. "The skeptical, the rational, the scientific answer was the answer that Google's AI just refused to give." "For the flip side of why I should be religious, I got a whole bunch of answers about community and a feeling of warmth and connecting to my spiritual dimension. "I also got a whole bunch about how sometimes alternative medicine may have turned out to be true and so you can't just dismiss it." "But we know why we shouldn't trust alternative medicine. It's alternative so it's not been proven to work. There's a very easy answer." But not one Overview was willing or able to give, it seems. Google does answer the neutral question 'Should I trust alternative medicine?' by saying there is "no simple answer" and "it's crucial to approach alternative medicine with caution and prioritise evidence-based conventional treatments." So is Google trying not to upset people with answers that might concern them? "I don't want to guess too much about that. It's not just Google but also OpenAI and other companies doing human feedback to try and make sure that it doesn't give horrific answers or say things that are objectionable." "But it's always conflicting with the fact that this AI is just trained to give you that plausible answer. It's trying to match the pattern that you've given in the question." Journalists use Google, just like anyone who's in a hurry and needs information quickly. Do journalists need to ensure they don't rely on the Overviews summary right at the top of the search page? "Absolutely. This is AI use 101. If you're asking something of a technical question, you really need to be well enough versed in what you're asking that you can judge whether the answer is good or not." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Ceasefire Holds, But Experts Warn Cyber Tensions Between Iran And The West May Be Far From Over
Ceasefire Holds, But Experts Warn Cyber Tensions Between Iran And The West May Be Far From Over

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

Ceasefire Holds, But Experts Warn Cyber Tensions Between Iran And The West May Be Far From Over

As a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran holds for now, cybersecurity experts are urging vigilance—noting that while military activity may have paused, cyber tensions are likely to continue simmering beneath the surface. 'In light of recent developments, the likelihood of disruptive cyberattacks against U.S. targets by Iranian actors has increased,' said John Hultquist, chief analyst at Google's Threat Intelligence Group. 'Iran already targets the U.S. with cyberespionage… and individuals associated with Iran policy should be on the lookout for social engineering schemes.' A new report from cybersecurity firm Radware adds weight to those concerns, warning that the Israel-Iran conflict has seen an evolution into a hybrid war that includes cyberspace. According to their latest advisory: Nearly 40% of global DDoS activity recently targeted Israel, with signs of spillover affecting the U.S., U.K., and Jordan. Hacker groups such as DieNet, Arabian Ghosts, and Sylhet Gang have issued warnings or taken credit for attacks, some aimed at Western nations. AI-generated disinformation and deepfakes have appeared across digital platforms, contributing to confusion and information warfare. 'Critical infrastructure, supply chains, and global businesses could become collateral targets if cyber tensions escalate further,' said Pascal Geenens, Director of Threat Intelligence at Radware. 'The Israel-Iran conflict of 2025 is a stark illustration of how modern hybrid warfare plays out online as much as in the real world.' While the ceasefire has reduced the immediate risk of open military confrontation, experts believe that cyberspace may remain a domain for ongoing friction—especially as cyber operations allow for plausible deniability and targeted disruption. Hultquist cautioned that while Iranian cyber operations may sometimes exaggerate their impact, the risk for individual organisations remains serious. 'We should be careful not to overestimate these incidents and inadvertently assist the actors,' he said. 'The impacts may still be very serious for individual enterprises, which can prepare by taking many of the same steps they would to prevent ransomware.' For now, the digital front may be quiet—but beneath the surface, it's likely that espionage and influence operations are still underway.

Avast launches free AI scam protection in antivirus for NZ users
Avast launches free AI scam protection in antivirus for NZ users

Techday NZ

time3 days ago

  • Techday NZ

Avast launches free AI scam protection in antivirus for NZ users

Avast has integrated its AI-powered scam protection features into its range of cyber safety products, including free access for customers in New Zealand via Avast Free Antivirus. The new offering, known as Avast Scam Guardian, is now available to users worldwide at no additional charge. There is also a premium tier, Avast Scam Guardian Pro, which enhances protection against email scams and is included in Avast Premium Security. Scam landscape Recent data highlight the scale and sophistication of the threat. According to the Q1/2025 Gen Threat Report, the number of breached personal records rose by more than 186% between January and March 2025. This data includes sensitive information such as passwords, email addresses, and credit card details. In the same three-month period, phishing scams increased by 466% compared to the previous quarter, accounting for almost a third of all scam submissions identified by Gen. Avast notes that cybercriminals are using artificial intelligence to develop scams that are more convincing than ever before and harder to detect. The integration of Scam Guardian aims to provide more robust protection at a time when the risk to consumers is growing. "Today's scams aren't crude or obvious – they're tailored, targeted, and AI-enhanced, making it harder than ever to tell the difference between truth and deception," said Leena Elias, Chief Product Officer at Gen. "As scammers take advantage of rising data breaches and leaked personal information, anyone anywhere can become a victim of scams. That's why it's never been more important to make powerful AI-powered scam protection available to everyone, everywhere. We're levelling the playing field with world class scam defense that helps people strengthen their digital and financial safety." Scam Guardian is powered by proprietary AI models trained on scam data from Gen Threat Labs, going beyond the detection of malicious URLs to include analysis of context and language cues. This enables a more nuanced assessment of websites, emails, and other digital content, as well as the ability to identify deceptive or harmful intent in communications. Feature set There are several key features included in Avast Scam Guardian for Avast Free Antivirus users. Avast Assistant operates around the clock to provide AI-driven guidance on suspicious online activity, covering websites, SMS, emails, links, and offers. Users can interact with this assistant to discuss concerns about potential scams and receive clear, practical advice on how to proceed. This service is available on both Windows and Mac platforms. Another component, Web Guard, leverages telemetry from Gen Threat Labs and AI analysis of millions of websites to detect hidden scams within content and code. This offers additional visibility into dangerous URLs. Web Guard covers Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS systems, although content and code scanning is only available on Windows and Mac. The premium Avast Scam Guardian Pro includes all the standard protections and adds Email Guard. This feature uses AI to interpret the context and meaning within email messages, flagging suspicious or safe emails before the user opens them. It works across devices including Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS. However, while Email Guard is included for mobile platforms, they do not feature the Scam Guardian user interface found on desktop versions. Looking ahead Avast said that further AI-powered features would be added to Scam Guardian Pro later in the year, addressing new vectors of attack such as SMS and phone call scams. These forthcoming tools are intended to strengthen protection against the evolving and increasingly sophisticated nature of cyber scams. Both Scam Guardian and Scam Guardian Pro are currently available to download within Avast Free Antivirus and Avast Premium Security products. In New Zealand, Scam Guardian features are included in the free offering without extra cost.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store