What Germany's election means for the Western left
Germany's Social Democrats are one of the West's oldest political parties, with a legacy of advocating parliamentary democracy, opposing Nazism and leading the modernization of postwar Germany. In addition to the many notable labor, economic and human rights reforms that the party has implemented over the years, former Social Democratic Party leader and West German Chancellor Willy Brandt's 'Ostpolitik' in the 1970s laid the groundwork for Germany's reunification in 1990.
But today's party is a shadow of its former self: it won only 16.4 percent of the vote in Sunday's federal election, putting it behind both the Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union and the far-right Alternative for Germany. It is worth considering how this defeat came about and what it means for the future of Western social democratic forces.
Support for the SPD began to fall toward the end of the 2000s. In the 2005 and 2009 federal elections, the party received 34.2 percent and 23 percent of the vote, respectively — a drastic decline from the 1998 federal election, when it won nearly 41 percent.
This drop-off can be largely attributed to the 'Agenda 2010' and 'Hartz' reforms that Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder introduced in the early 2000s. Schroeder's neoliberal project, which sought to revive a stagnant German economy by deregulating the labor market and reducing welfare benefits, put the SPD at odds with its working-class base, organized in powerful trade unions. It also led the charismatic finance minister and former party leader Oskar Lafontaine to defect to a left-wing alliance, taking the SPD's socialist faction with him.
Despite this exodus of voters, the SPD could rest on its laurels as the junior coalition partner to the CDU/CSU — its main competitor — under Angela Merkel. When Merkel retired in 2021, the SPD won that year's election with a quarter of German votes. But party leader and Chancellor Olaf Scholz had to form a 'traffic-light coalition' (so named for the parties' colors) with the Greens and the liberal, market-oriented Free Democrats. This led his government to pursue conflicting goals, such as advancing social justice and lowering taxes; constructing social housing and boosting support for entrepreneurs; and combating climate change and protecting Germany's automotive industry. Such a wide-ranging agenda did little to win back the trust of workers, especially with fear of globalization on the rise.
In the lead-up to Sunday's election, neither Scholz nor his party seemed to gauge German voters' primary concerns accurately. According to one survey, 37 percent of Germans consider immigration to be the most important problem facing the country — an issue on which the SPD has been ambivalent and indecisive.
The party tacitly supported Merkel's 'open-door policy' in 2015, when Germany accepted more than 1 million asylum seekers from Syria, Afghanistan and other countries in the Middle East and North Africa. And yet, Scholz has advocated deporting 'serious criminals' to Syria and Afghanistan following terror attacks. Instead of winning over voters, this muddled approach to migration and security has bolstered the anti-immigration AfD.
The second most important issue for voters, according to the recent survey, is the economy, with 34 percent of respondents agreeing that it should be the government's top priority. As an article about Scholz in Der Spiegel recently pointed out, the German economy contracted for the second consecutive year in 2024, the number of unemployed people is rising, industry is cutting jobs and consumer confidence has tanked.
The fact that this occurred on Scholz's watch undermined his image as a successful economic steward, burnished during Merkel's term. This resulted in a devastating loss of working-class support for the SPD. According to Infratest dimap's exit poll, the AfD won 38 percent of workers' votes, compared to just 12 percent for the SPD.
The SPD's electoral disaster is reminiscent of the Democrats' defeat in the 2024 US presidential election.
Bartosz M. Rydlinski
Scholz fell short in other areas, too. The much-heralded turning point ('Zeitenwende') in foreign policy and national security after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has not materialized. Germany barely meets NATO's 2 percent defense spending target and has not honored its commitments to Ukraine. As Benjamin Tallis concluded in his German Council on Foreign Relations report titled 'The End of the Zeitenwende,' Scholz's project has been a failure.
The SPD's electoral disaster is reminiscent of the Democrats' defeat in the 2024 US presidential election. Both parties failed to formulate an effective response to migration concerns, win over working-class voters and adopt major progressive economic reforms. Instead, they chose to emphasize cultural liberalism, which appealed to the winners of globalization — people who do not fear for their future.
But fear of being left behind economically and socially proved to be potent fuel for both Donald Trump and the AfD. So long as social democrats fail to address this fear, the far right will continue to exploit it. If center-left parties want to regain their relevance, they must confront and analyze their electoral failures and declining support while finding new ways to make inroads with workers and shield them from the effects of deindustrialization, automation and artificial intelligence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
13 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Protests in Ukraine as Zelensky signs bill targeting anti-corruption bodies
KYIV — President Volodymyr Zelensky has signed a bill that critics say weakens the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption bodies, sparking protests in several cities and drawing international criticism. The new law grants the prosecutor general control of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Nabu) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (Sapo), and critics say it undermines their authority. In an address on Wednesday, Zelensky said both agencies would still "work" but needed to be cleared of "Russian influence". After the bill passed, hundreds of people gathered in Kyiv for the biggest anti-government protest since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Demonstrations were also seen in the cities of Lviv, Dnipro and Odesa. "We chose Europe, not autocracy," said a poster held by one demonstrator. "My father did not die for this," said another. Ukraine's chief prosecutor, Zelensky loyalist Ruslan Kravchenko, will now be able to reassign corruption probes to potentially more pliant investigators, and even to close them. In his overnight address, Zelensky criticised the efficiency of Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure, saying cases had been "lying dormant". "There is no rational explanation for why criminal proceedings worth billions have been 'hanging' for years," he said. He added that the prosecutor general would ensure "the inevitability of punishment" for those who broke the law. To critics of the legislation, this is at odds with more than a decade of pro-democracy and anti-corruption efforts. It is such aspirations that led to the Euromaidan uprising and the downfall of pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych in 2014, followed by Russia's invasion and the deaths of hundreds of thousands people. The Ukrainian government has cited Russian influence for curtailing Nabu's powers. The day before the controversial law was passed, Ukraine's Security Service and the prosecutor general's office carried out searches and arrests targeting alleged Russian spies at Nabu. The move has sparked concern among Ukraine's Western allies. The Ukrainian independent anti-corruption system was set up at their insistence and under their supervision 10 years ago. It was a key precondition for their aid and stronger ties as Ukraine declared a pro-democracy course amid Russia's initial invasion of 2014. "The European Union is concerned about Ukraine's recent actions with regard to its anti-corruption institutions," says European Commission spokesperson Guillaume Mercier. "The EU provides significant financial assistance to Ukraine, conditional on progress in transparency, judicial reform, and democratic governance." Stamping out corruption is also a key requirement for Ukraine's application to join the EU. The European commissioner for enlargement, Marta Kos, criticised the bill's adoption. "The dismantling of key safeguards protecting Nabu's independence is a serious step back," Kos wrote on social media, saying the two bodies were "essential" for Ukraine's EU path. Ukraine's deputy prime minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration, Taras Kachka, said he had assured Marta Kos there would be no compromise on anti-corruption, and that "all core functions remain intact". Dmytro Kuleba, who stood down as foreign minister last year, said it was a "bad day for Ukraine" and that the president had a choice — either to stand on the side of the people or not. Ambassadors from the G7 group of nations have said they would like to discuss the pressure on Nabu and Sapo with the Ukrainian leadership. However, Ukraine's allies would be extremely reluctant to roll back the aid and co-operation at a time when its troops are struggling on the frontline. — BBC
Al Arabiya
16 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Macron-Merz to hold talks over NATO, EU-US trade row
French President Emmanuel Macron is to meet German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin on Wednesday to discuss NATO security, the US-EU trade row and other key issues. Macron and Merz, who took power in May, have been at pains to boost the bilateral partnership at the heart of the European Union as US President Donald Trump has rocked transatlantic ties. 'The most important message is: the Franco-German couple is back at work,' the French presidency said ahead of Macron's planned dinner with Merz. Paris and Berlin, along with London and Warsaw, have pushed efforts to support Ukraine against Russia and build up the defense capabilities of NATO's European member states. But while Paris has signaled a willingness to send peacekeeping troops to monitor a possible Ukraine ceasefire, Berlin has so far voiced no plans to contribute. Merz and Macron were also expected to discuss the trade dispute with the United States after Trump threatened 30-percent tariffs against the EU if no deal is reached by August 1. Combat jet discord 'In the tariff dispute with the USA, we are now approaching the decisive phase,' Merz said Tuesday, urging 'a fair and reliable agreement with low tariff rates' that strengthens the transatlantic market. The two leaders also have to discuss bilateral stumbling blocks, from a joint defense project to energy and trade policy. There has been disagreement over a combat aircraft to be made jointly with Spain. Merz has objected to the idea of a greater leadership role for France while expressing confidence an agreement can be reached. The head of French defense company Dassault, Eric Trappier, on Tuesday suggested that the viability of the project was in doubt. 'We have to question the effectiveness of a project which is run by three countries ... where there isn't one real leader but three,' he told a press conference. Another tricky area is energy, where France relies heavily on nuclear power, which Germany has decided to phase out as it shifts to solar and wind power. Paris wants Berlin to commit to 'technology neutrality' and effectively classify nuclear energy as climate friendly. Germany's previous government of the Social Democrats and Greens rejected this, but Merz's center-right CDU/CSU may be more open to the idea. In a joint newspaper article in May, both leaders pledged a 'restart in energy policy' and 'equal treatment at the EU level for all low-emission energies'. Another area of discord has been an EU trade deal long in the works with South America's Mercosur bloc. While Germany strongly favors it, France has expressed fears it will badly impact its farming sector. French sources said a way forward is emerging, and that an additional protocol could add a 'robust safeguard clause for agriculture'. Merz will welcome Macron at 6:30 pm (1630 GMT) at Villa Borsig, the former residence of the commander of the post-war French occupation troops on the outskirts of Berlin. The program includes press statements, without journalists' questions, a jazz performance and a working dinner.
Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Al Arabiya
Germany's Merz faces pressure to toughen stance on Israel
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is under pressure to take a firmer stance towards Israel, with members of his own coalition calling for Berlin to join a statement by dozens of Western nations condemning the 'inhumane killing' of Palestinians. Merz, who leads Germany's center-right CDU, has been increasingly critical of Israel. But Germany was notably absent from the joint statement issued on Monday by the EU and 28 Western countries including Britain and France, which called on Israel to immediately end the war. The countries condemned what they called the 'drip feeding of aid' to Palestinians in Gaza and said it was 'horrifying' that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking aid. Reem Alabali Radovan, international development minister in Merz's cabinet and a member of the center-left SPD junior coalition partners, said on Tuesday she was unhappy with Germany's decision not to sign it. 'The demands in the letter from the 29 partners to the Israeli government are understandable to me. I would have wished for Germany to join the signal sent by the 29 partners,' she said. Merz's office says Germany's criticism of Israel is similar to that of other allies. Merz said on Tuesday he had told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'very clearly and very explicitly that we do not share the Israeli government's policy on Gaza.' 'Above all we see the great suffering of the civilian population there. That is why I would like to once again renew my call to truly provide the necessary humanitarian aid to the civilian population in the Gaza Strip. The way the Israeli army is operating there is not acceptable,' he said. Government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said that although Germany did not sign the joint declaration, Merz and his foreign minister 'expressed very critical views of Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip yesterday – and in terms of substance and significance, said the same thing.' 'Their statements are in no way inferior to the joint declaration,' Kornelius said. But the decision to withhold Germany's signature from the declaration follows many months in which Germany has taken particular care in public to restrain its criticism of Israeli actions. German officials say their approach to Israel is governed by a special responsibility, known as the Staatsraeson, arising from the legacy of the Nazi Holocaust. They believe they can achieve more through diplomatic back channels than public statements. German statements on Gaza typically include a demand for the immediate release of hostages held by Hamas. The joint statement that Merz declined to sign to this week stopped short of such a demand, although it noted that the hostages were suffering under worsening conditions. Merz is one of the few European leaders who has publicly offered to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, without arresting him on a warrant for suspected war crimes issued by the International Criminal Court in the Hague. Israel rejects the charges against Netanyahu and says they are political motivated. The ICC says all signatories of the court's founding statute, which include all 27 EU members, are obliged to arrest Netanyahu if he enters their territory. Critics of Merz's approach, including within the SPD coalition partners, say the legacy of the Holocaust cannot be an excuse for ignoring Israeli crimes, and, on the contrary, the post-Holocaust motto of 'never again' should apply to Gaza now. 'The situation in Gaza is catastrophic and represents a humanitarian abyss,' said a joint statement by two senior SPD lawmakers - foreign policy spokesperson Adis Ahmetovic and rapporteur for the Middle East Rolf Mützenich - who called for Berlin to join the joint declaration. There should be 'clear and immediate consequences' for Israel, including the suspension of a pact governing EU-Israeli relations and a halt to the export of weapons to Israel that are used in violation of international law, they said.
