logo
New initiative to help young people with poor mental health when ‘red flags' appear

New initiative to help young people with poor mental health when ‘red flags' appear

Straits Times20-06-2025

Minister of State for Health Rahayu Mahzam (third from right) at the launch event for the new initiative. ST PHOTO: AZMI ATHNI
New initiative to help young people with poor mental health when 'red flags' appear
SINGAPORE – Young people with poor mental health will get more help through a programme that trains school counsellors and social workers to spot red flags and tackle distress before it escalates.
The initiative launched on June 20 addresses a mental health crisis among Singapore's adolescents, which had brewed silently until the Covid-19 pandemic, said Dr Angelina Ang, a senior consultant in the emergency department of KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) who heads the programme.
It comes after the hospital studied patients aged 10 to 19 who had been admitted to its emergency department in 2021 for trying to harm or kill themselves.
The study, published in February, found that about one in five of these adolescents had visited a hospital or polyclinic for medically unexplained physical symptoms like headaches and stomachaches within the year prior to attempting self-harm or suicide.
Said Dr Ang: 'Medically unexplained symptoms are red flags – symptoms of distress, anxiety, or maybe even abuse, and if we continue to sweep them under the carpet, they will crash on the child.'
Difficulties sleeping, dealing with family conflict and anxieties related to academic performance were the top challenges faced by these adolescents.
More than half the patients who attempted self-harm or suicide said they were confused or unsure about whether they truly wanted to end their lives, which suggests that their decisions can be driven by impulse and inability to process their emotions.
The price paid for ignoring such signs is huge, said Dr Ang, citing a 2023 report by Duke-NUS Medical School and the Institute of Mental Health estimating that the cost to treat a child for depression and anxiety here averaged $10,250.
To plug these gaps, the programme developed by psychologists from KKH and James Cook University (JCU) teaches community groups how to intervene when young people display these physical symptoms and have difficulty managing emotions.
Since October 2024, more than 300 school counsellors and community mental health practitioners have been trained, KKH and Temasek Foundation, said in a joint statement.
Parked under the Temasek Foundation Youth Connect programme, the initiative is complemented by screening at KKH's emergency department that coordinates care for these young people with schools and communities.
KKH chief executive Alex Sia said since such screening was implemented since October 2022, it has assessed more than 2,500 young people, and provided support to over 1,300 of them .
In addition, Dr Ang said the collaboration between KKH and JCU is developing a programme to tackle sleep habits of the young, which is an easier topic to broach than mental health.
The programme remains in the works, but the team has started training community groups and professionals to deliver these interventions.
Minister of State for Health Rahayu Mahzam said at the launch event at KKH that the Youth Connect Programme allows for a seamless care system that can minimise the risk of young people falling through the cracks.
She added: 'Today's launch is more than just a new programme for mental health support.
'It represents our collective commitment – regardless of our area of work – to support young people that we meet, in ways that best suit them.'
The programme joins a nationwide push for more to be done to address the mental health crisis plaguing Singapore's teens, with one in three young people reporting severe symptoms of depression, anxiety or stress, according to a recent nationwide survey.
Mental disorders are the leading cause of disability and death among those aged 10 to 14 in Singapore, according to a study published in The Lancet Public Health medical journal in May.
The study also ranked Singapore top in Asean for the impact of mental distress on its population.
Despite many of Singapore's adolescents reporting signs of mental distress, a nationwide study of youth mental health by the National University of Singapore flagged a gap in their parent's understanding of the issues that their children faced.
The study released in 2023 found that only about one in 10 parents observed signs of distress in their children, despite one in three reporting symptoms like depression and anxiety.
Helplines Mental well-being Institute of Mental Health's Mental Health Helpline: 6389-2222 (24 hours)
Samaritans of Singapore: 1-767 (24 hours) / 9151-1767 (24 hours CareText via WhatsApp)
Singapore Association for Mental Health: 1800-283-7019
Silver Ribbon Singapore: 6386-1928
Chat, Centre of Excellence for Youth Mental Health: 6493-6500/1
Women's Helpline (Aware): 1800-777-5555 (weekdays, 10am to 6pm) Counselling Touchline (Counselling): 1800-377-2252
Touch Care Line (for caregivers): 6804-6555
Counselling and Care Centre: 6536-6366
We Care Community Services: 3165-8017
Clarity Singapore: 6757-7990 Online resources mindline.sg
eC2.sg
tinklefriend.sg
chat.mentalhealth.sg
carey.carecorner.org.sg (for those aged 13 to 25)
limitless.sg/talk (for those aged 12 to 25)
shanyou.org.sg
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

There is no loneliness epidemic – so why do we keep talking as if there is?
There is no loneliness epidemic – so why do we keep talking as if there is?

Straits Times

time14 hours ago

  • Straits Times

There is no loneliness epidemic – so why do we keep talking as if there is?

In the short term, loneliness is an undesirable psychological state. In the long term, it is a risk factor for chronic ill health. PHOTO: ST FILE There is no loneliness epidemic – so why do we keep talking as if there is? Rates of loneliness have remained stable for decades. But alarmist framing fuels panic and distracts us from the steady, compassionate work of building connection. Most people experience periods of loneliness, isolation or solitude in their lives. But these are different things, and the proportion of people feeling lonely is stable over time. So why do we keep talking about an epidemic of loneliness? Before the Covid-19 pandemic, several studies showed that rates of loneliness were stable in England, the US, Finland, Sweden and Germany, among other places, over recent decades. While Covid-19 changed many things, loneliness levels quickly returned to pre-pandemic levels. In 2018, 34 per cent of US adults aged 50 to 80 reported a lack of companionship 'some of the time' or 'often'. That proportion rose to 42 per cent during the pandemic but fell to 33 per cent in 2024. That's a lot of lonely people, but it is not an epidemic. In some countries, such as Sweden, loneliness is in decline – at least among older adults. Despite these statistics, the idea that loneliness is increasing is pervasive. For example in 2023, the US Surgeon-General warned about an 'epidemic of loneliness and isolation'. Britain even has a government minister with an explicit responsibility for addressing loneliness. Loneliness is a problem, even if it is not an epidemic. Social connection is important for physical and mental health. Many people feel lonely in a crowd or feel crowded when alone. In 2023, the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced a 'commission on social connection'. The WHO is right: We need to reduce loneliness in our families, communities and societies. But the idea that loneliness is an 'epidemic' is misleading and it draws us away from sustainable solutions, rather than towards them. It suggests that loneliness is a new problem (it is not), that it is increasing (it is not), that it is beyond our control (it is not), and that the only appropriate reaction is an emergency one (it is not). In the short term, loneliness is an undesirable psychological state. In the long term, it is a risk factor for chronic ill health. Loneliness is not a sudden crisis that needs a short-term fix. It is a long-term challenge that requires a sustained response. An emergency reaction is not appropriate – a measured response is. Initiatives by the US Surgeon-General and WHO are welcome, but they should be long-term responses to an enduring problem, not emergency reactions to an 'epidemic'. Medicalising normal human experience Conceptual clarity is essential if true loneliness is to be addressed. Pathologising all instances of being alone risks medicalising normal human experiences such as solitude. Some people feel alive only in crowds, but others were born lighthouse keepers. In a hyper-connected world, loneliness should be solvable, but solitude must be treasured. So, if there is no loneliness epidemic, why do we keep talking as if there is? Media framing of the issue and the human tendency to panic reinforce each other. We click into news stories based on subjective resonance rather than objective evidence. Human behaviour is shaped primarily by feelings, not facts. We dramatise, panic and overstate negative trends. If trends are positive, we focus on minor counter-trends, ignore statistics and make things up. In the case of loneliness, the problem is real, even if the 'epidemic' is not. Loneliness is part of the human condition, but alleviating one another's loneliness is also part of who we are – or who we can become. Addressing loneliness is not about solving a short-term problem or halting an 'epidemic'. It means learning to live with one another in new, more integrated ways that meet our emotional needs. Loneliness is not the problem. It is a consequence of living in societies that are often disconnected and fragmented. The solution? We cannot change the essentials of human nature – and nor should we try. But we can be a little kinder to ourselves, speak to one another a little more, and cultivate compassion for ourselves and other people. We need to connect with one another better and more. We can. We should. We will. Brendan Kelly is a professor of psychiatry at Trinity College in Dublin. This article was first published in The Conversation. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

South Korea's President Lee names finance minister, makes other picks
South Korea's President Lee names finance minister, makes other picks

Straits Times

time17 hours ago

  • Straits Times

South Korea's President Lee names finance minister, makes other picks

South Korean President Lee Jae-myung has announced his picks for several positions across the goverenment. PHOTO: REUTERS South Korea President Lee Jae Myung has chosen a former vice-finance minister, Koo Yun-cheol , to be his finance minister, his office said on June 29 . Mr Koo is widely known as a policy expert, serving different positions across the government and authoring books on South Korea's innovation and growth, most recently on artificial intelligence, Mr Lee's chief of staff, Mr Kang Hoon-sik , told a briefing. Among other ministerial positions, Mr Lee named Dr Kim Jung-kwan , president of power plant builder Doosan Enerbility and a veteran bureaucrat in economics, energy and public policy, to be industry minister. Dr Kim fits the role to realise President Lee's 'energy mix philosophy', Mr Kang said, referring the new leader's aim to balance nuclear power and renewable energy. The former head of South Korea's disease control agency, Dr Jeong Eun-kyeong , was nominated for health minister. She was highly praised for her response to the Covid-19 pandemic, becoming one of the Time Magazine's 100 most influential people of 2020. Cabinet nominations in South Korea must be vetted by hearings in parliament. But presidents may appoint their nominees even without parliament approval, and Mr Lee's Democratic Party has a majority in parliament. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

WHO says probe into COVID-19 virus origin still ongoing
WHO says probe into COVID-19 virus origin still ongoing

Straits Times

time2 days ago

  • Straits Times

WHO says probe into COVID-19 virus origin still ongoing

FILE PHOTO: A test tube labelled \"COVID-19 Test Positive\" and a vial labelled \"VACCINE Coronavirus COVID-19\" are seen in this illustration taken December 11, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo WHO says probe into COVID-19 virus origin still ongoing The World Health Organization said on Friday that efforts to determine the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, are still ongoing and incomplete. The WHO Scientific Advisory Group reported progress in understanding COVID-19's origins but noted that critical information required to fully assess all hypotheses remains unavailable. The agency said it had requested China share hundreds of genetic sequences from COVID-19 patients early in the pandemic, detailed information on animals sold at Wuhan markets, and details on research and biosafety conditions at Wuhan laboratories. WHO added that China has not yet shared the information. China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store