logo
Life on Mars? Mysterious 'mushroom' is spotted on the Red Planet in photo snapped by NASA's Curiosity rover

Life on Mars? Mysterious 'mushroom' is spotted on the Red Planet in photo snapped by NASA's Curiosity rover

Daily Mail​17-06-2025
Scientists have spent decades scouring the Martian surface for any signs of life.
Now, a photo snapped by NASA 's Curiosity rover has sparked speculation that the hunt might finally be over.
A picture taken from the Martian surface appears to show a 'mushroom' growing on the Red Planet.
The strange discovery has led some alien hunters to declare: 'Life...has been found!'
The photo was taken by the Curiosity rover on September 19, 2013, but was spotted in the archives by UFO hunter Scott Waring.
Mr Waring says: 'This object has a curved bottom part of a stem, same as those on Earth.
'I'm not sure how or why NASA could overlook such a thing...since NASA's mission is to find life on other planets and moons.'
However, scientists say there is a much simpler explanation.
NASA's Curiosity rover was launched to Mars in 2011 with the goal of discovering whether the planet had the right conditions to support microscopic life.
To help this search, the rover is equipped with multiple cameras, a drill to gather rock samples, and sets of tools to analyse the chemical compositions of samples.
However, despite a decade of searching, Curiosity has never found any evidence that Mars is or ever was home to any form of alien life.
But that hasn't stopped wild speculation following many of the rover's discoveries.
Following his discovery of this archived image, Mr Waring claims that the rocky structure is a mushroom that has 'clearly pushed up out of the Mars dirt.'
He adds: 'NASA should have poked it, bumped it, knocked it over, cut it open with their tools on Curiosity rover or at least use that million dollar laser they burn rocks and dirt with.'
And Mr Waring isn't the only one who agrees. Commenters on social media flocked to share their support for his claims.
One wrote: Looks like a mushroom to me! NASA know far more about MARS than they let on.'
While another boldly claimed: 'What people fail to realize is if life is found on just one other planet in the solar system, then that basically means there is life everywhere in the Universe mathematically.'
However, scientists are not convinced by this supposed evidence.
Dr Gareth Dorrian, a planetary physicist from the University of Birmingham, told MailOnline that this is simply a 'flat roughly disc-shaped rock sitting atop a smaller stone at the bottom.'
'My best guess would be they were not originally in that position, but like two rocks lying in the desert, one just below the surface and the other on the surface above it,' he explained.
'Over time the wind could gradually blow the sand and dust away and the top one would gradually settle onto the bottom one.'
Dr Dorrian points out that wind-driven processes like this on Earth often produce remarkable and strange formations.
Alternatively, these 'mushrooms' could be geological structures called concretions, which formed billions of years ago when there was liquid water on Mars.
As water flows through sediment, it dissolves the minerals and rearranges them in a more compact form to leave behind a solid block.
Since these are harder than the surrounding rock, they are often left standing above the surface.
Just like the hoodoo rock spires of the American southwest, these structures often take on a mushroom-like shape as the wind carves away the softer bedrock to leave a thin 'stem'.
Part of the reason that Curiosity didn't stop to take any more measurements, as Mr Waring suggests, is that these are common on the Martian surface.
Additionally, Dr Dorrian points out that, even if there were life on Mars, the chances of a living organism being found on the Martian surface are extremely low.
The atmospheric pressure at the Martian surface is roughly equivalent to that found 20 miles above the surface of Earth, meaning the atmosphere is very thin.
This allows a constant stream of ultraviolet and particle radiation in the form of cosmic rays to bombard the surface.
Dr Dorrian says: 'This unhealthy combination of radiation is well known to damage complex molecules like DNA and would quickly sterilise the surface where this image was taken.'
As if that wasn't bad enough, Dr Dorrian notes that temperature above ground would make it impossible for any organism to survive.
Temperatures swing from a comfortable 20°C (68°F) during the day to -100°C (-148°F) at night, well below the freezing point of water and far colder than anywhere on Earth.
'No known forms of life can simultaneously tolerate these extremes of temperatures, radiation levels, and low atmospheric pressure, including mushrooms,' says Dr Dorrian.
'If life does exist on Mars, it is more likely to be found below ground, such as in underground reserves of water, where it would be shielded from the harsh environment at the surface.'
That means this photograph almost certainly shows a common and naturally occurring rock formation, rather than life growing in an impossibly harsh environment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘The film wouldn't even be made today': the story behind Back to the Future at 40
‘The film wouldn't even be made today': the story behind Back to the Future at 40

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

‘The film wouldn't even be made today': the story behind Back to the Future at 40

The actor Lea Thompson has had a distinguished screen career but hesitated to share it with her daughters when they were growing up. 'I did not show them most of my stuff because I end up kissing people all the time and it was traumatic to my children,' she recalls. 'Even when they were little the headline was, 'Mom is kissing someone that's not Dad and it's making me cry!'' Thompson's most celebrated role would be especially hard to explain. As Lorraine Baines in Back to the Future, she falls in lust with her own son, Marty McFly, a teenage time traveller from 1985 who plunges into 1955 at the wheel of a DeLorean car. Back to the Future, released 40 years ago on Thursday, is both entirely of its time and entirely timeless. It was a box office summer smash, set a benchmark for time travel movies and was quoted by everyone from President Ronald Reagan to Avengers: Endgame. It is arguably a perfect film, without a duff note or a scene out of place, a fantastic parable as endlessly watchable as It's a Wonderful Life or Groundhog Day. It also, inevitably, reflects the preoccupations of its day. An early sequence features Libyan terrorists from the era of Muammar Gaddafi, a caricature wisely dropped from a stage musical adaptation. In one scene the young George McFly turns peeping tom as he spies on Lorraine getting undressed. To some, the film's ending equates personal fulfilment with Reagan-fuelled materialism. It caught lightning in a bottle in a way that is unrepeatable. 'If you made Back to the Future in 2025 and they went back 30 years, it would be 1995 and nothing would look that different,' Thompson, 64, says by phone from a shoot in Vancouver, Canada. 'The phones would be different but it wouldn't be like the strange difference between the 80s and the 50s and how different the world was.' Bob Gale, co-writer of the screenplay, agrees everything fell into the right place at the right time, including the central partnership between young Marty (Michael J Fox) and white-haired scientist Doc Brown (Christopher Lloyd). The 74-year-old says from Los Angeles: 'Oh man, the film wouldn't even be made today. We'd go into the studio and they'd say, what's the deal with this relationship between Marty and Doc? They'd start interpreting paedophilia or something. There would be a lot of things they have problems with.' Gale had met the film's director, Robert Zemeckis, at the USC School of Cinema in 1972 and together they sold several TV scripts to Universal Studios, caught the eye of Steven Spielberg and John Milius and collaborated on three films. The pair had always wanted to make a time travel movie but couldn't find the right hook. Then Gale had an epiphany. 'We put a time travel story on the back burner until I found my dad's high school yearbook and boom, that was when the lightning bolt hit me and I said, ha, this would be cool: kid goes back in time and ends up in high school with his dad!' Gale and Zemeckis pitched the script more than 40 times over four years but studios found it too risky or risque. But Spielberg saw its potential and came in as executive producer. After Zemeckis scored a hit with Romancing the Stone in 1984, Universal gave the green light. The character of Doc Brown was inspired by Gale's childhood neighbour, a photographer who showed him the 'magic' of developing pictures in a darkroom, and the educational TV show Mr Wizard which demonstrated scientific principles. Then Lloyd came in and added an interpretation based on part Albert Einstein, part Leopold Stokowski. Thompson was cast as Lorraine after a successful audition. She felt that her background as a ballet and modern dancer gave her a strong awareness of the movement and physicality required to play both versions of Lorraine: one young and airy, the other middle-aged and beaten down by life. 'I was perfectly poised for that character,' she says. 'I understood both the dark and the light of Lorraine McFly and understood the hilarity of being super sexually attracted to your son. I thought that was frickin' hilarious. I understood the subversive comedy of it.' Thompson has previously worked with Eric Stoltz, who was cast in the lead role of Marty at the behest of Sidney Sheinberg, a Universal executive who had nurtured Spielberg and put Jaws into production. But over weeks of filming, starting in November 1984, it became apparent that Stoltz's serious tone was not working. Gale recalls: 'He wasn't giving us the kind of humour that we thought the character should have. He actually thought the movie turned out to be a tragedy because he ends up in a 1985 where a lot of his life is different. People can argue about that: did the memories of his new past ripple into his brain, did he remember both his lives? That's an interesting conversation to have and it gets more interesting the more beer you drink.' Eventually it fell to Zemeckis to inform Stoltz that his services were no longer required. Gale continues: 'He said he thought that possibly Eric was relieved: it was not like a devastating blow to him. This is just hindsight and speculation but maybe Eric's agents thought that it would be a good career move for him to do a movie like this that had Spielberg involved. Who knows?' Stoltz's abrupt departure came as a shock to the rest of the cast. Thompson says: 'It was horrible. He was my friend and obviously a wonderful actor. Everybody wants to think that making a movie is fun and that we're laughing for the 14 hours we're standing in the middle of a street somewhere. 'But it's also scary because you need to feel like you've made a little family for that brief amount of time. So the minute someone gets fired, you're like, oh wait, this is a big business, this is serious, this is millions of dollars being spent.' Stoltz was replaced by the young Canadian actor Michael J Fox, whom Zemeckis and Gale had wanted in the first place, and several scenes had to be reshot. Fox was simultaneously working on the sitcom Family Ties so was often sleep-deprived. But his boundless charm, frazzled energy and comic timing – including ad libs – were the missing piece of the jigsaw. Thompson comments: 'He is gifted but he also worked extremely hard at his shtick like the great comedians of the 20s, 30s and 40s: the falling over, the double take, the spit take, the physical comedy, the working on a bit for hours and hours like the greats, like Laurel and Hardy and Charlie Chaplin. Michael understood that. 'Being a dancer, I was fascinated and kind of weirdly repelled because it didn't seem like the acting that we were all trying to emulate: the De Niro kind of super reality-based acting that we were in awe of in the 80s, coming out of the great films of the 70s. I feel like Eric Stoltz, who is a brilliant actor, was trying to do more of that. Michael was the face of this new acting, especially comedy acting, which was in a way a throwback and a different energy.' It was this lightness of touch that enabled Fox and Thompson to carry off moments that might otherwise have seemed weird, disturbing and oedipal. When 1950s Lorraine – who has no idea that Marty is her future son – eventually kisses him inside a car, she reports that it is like 'kissing my brother' and the romantic tension dissolves, much to the audience's relief. Thompson says: 'It was a difficult part and it was a very dangerous thread to put through a needle. I have to fall out of love with him just by kissing him and I remember Bob Zemeckis obsessing about that moment. It was also a hard shot to get because it was a vintage car and they couldn't take it apart. Bob was also worried about the moment when I had to fall back in love with George [Marty's father] after he punches Biff. 'For those moments to be so important is part of the beauty of the movie. These are 'small' people; these are not 'great' people; they're not doing 'great' things. These are people who live in a little tiny house in Hill Valley and to make the moments of falling out of love and falling in love so beautiful with that incredible score is fascinating.' Back to the Future was the biggest hit of the year, grossing more than $200m in the US and entering the cultural mainstream. When Doc asks Marty who is president in 1985, Marty replies Ronald Reagan and Brown says in disbelief: 'Ronald Reagan? The actor? Then who's vice-president? Jerry Lewis?' Reagan, a voracious film viewer, was so amused by the joke that he made the projectionist stop and rewind it. He went on to name-check the film and quote its line, 'Where we're going, we don't need roads,' in his 1986 State of the Union address. Thompson, whose daughters are the actors Madelyn Deutch and Zoey Deutch, was amazed by Back to the Future's success. 'But when I look at the movie, I do understand the happy accident of why it's become the movie it's become to generation after generation. The themes are powerful. The execution was amazing. The casting was great. The idea was brilliant. It was a perfect script. Those things don't come together usually.' And if she had her own time machine, where would she go? 'If I could be a man, I might go back to Shakespeare but as a woman you don't want to go anywhere in time. Time has been hard on women. So for me, whenever I'm asked this question, it's not a lighthearted answer. I can only give you a political answer.' The film ends with Doc whisking Marty and girlfriend Jennifer into the DeLorean and taking off into the sky. But Gale points out that the message 'to be continued' was added only for the home video release, as a way to announce a sequel, rather than being in the original theatrical run. Back to the Future Part II, part of which takes place in 2015, brought back most of the main characters including the villain Biff Tannen, who becomes a successful businessman who opens a 27-storey casino and uses his money to gain political influence. Many viewers have drawn a comparison with Donald Trump. Gale explains: 'Biff in the first movie is not based on Donald Trump; Biff is just an archetype bully. When Biff owns a casino, there was a Trump influence in that, absolutely. Trump had to put his name on all of his hotels and his casinos and that's what Biff does too. 'But when people say, oh, Biff was based on Donald Trump, well, no, that wasn't the inspiration for the character. Everybody has a bully in their life and that's who Biff was. There's nothing that resembles Donald Trump in Biff in Part I.' Back to the Future Part III, in which Marty and Doc and thrown back to the old west, was released in 1990. A year later Fox was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease at the age of 29. He went public with his diagnosis in 1998 and became a prominent advocate for research and awareness. He also continued acting, with roles in shows such as The Good Wife and Curb Your Enthusiasm, and in October will publish a Back to the Future memoir entitled Future Boy. Thompson, whose brothers both have Parkinson's, sees Fox twice a year. 'He's endlessly inspiring. He's very smart and he's done the spiritual work, the psychological work on himself to not be bitter about something awful happening to him but also be honest: this sucks.' Time's arrow moves in one direction but Back to the Future found a way to stage a comeback. One night after seeing the Mel Brooks musical The Producers in New York, Zemeckis's wife Leslie suggested that Back to the Future would make a good musical. Gale duly wrote the book and was a producer of the show, which premiered in Manchester in 2020 and has since played in London, New York and around the world. Gale says: 'It was total euphoria. The first time I saw the dress rehearsal with the DeLorean, before we had an audience, I went out of my mind how great it was, and then to see the audience going completely out of their minds with everything was just such a joyous validation. 'I'm so blessed to have a job where I get to make people happy. That's a great thing to be able to do and get paid for that. I don't ever take any of this for granted. I'm having a great time and the idea that Back to the Future is still with us after all these years, as popular as it ever was, is a blessing. I think about it all the time that if we had not put Michael J Fox in the movie, you and I probably wouldn't even be having this conversation right now.' Why, indeed, are we still talking about Back to the Future four decades later? 'Every person in the world wonders, how did I get here, how did my parents meet? The idea that your parents were once children is staggering when you realise it when you're about seven or eight years old. 'Your parents are these godlike creatures, and they're always saying, well, when I was your age, and you're going, what are they talking about, how could they have ever been my age? Then at some point it all comes together. If you have a younger sibling and you're watching them grow up, you realise, oh, my God, my parents were once screw-ups like me!' And if Gale had a time machine, where would he go? 'I don't think I would go to the future because I'd be too scared,' he says. 'We all see what happens when you know too much about the future. My mom, before she was married, was a professional musician, a violinist, and she had a nightclub act in St Louis called Maxine and Her Men. I'd like to travel back in time to 1947 and see my mother performing in a nightclub. That's what I would do.'

Low-fat vegan diet may be better for weight loss than a Mediterranean diet
Low-fat vegan diet may be better for weight loss than a Mediterranean diet

Medical News Today

time5 hours ago

  • Medical News Today

Low-fat vegan diet may be better for weight loss than a Mediterranean diet

Dietary acid load has to do with how a person's food patterns contribute to the acid-base balance in the body. Research is ongoing about dietary acid load and how it impacts health outcomes. A recent analysis found that following a low-fat vegan diet may lower dietary acid load and that this effect may help with weight loss. Dietary acid load has become a focus of recent research. It has to do with how diet contributes to the body's acid-base balance.A high dietary acid load is potentially dangerous and may affect components like kidney function and weight. A recent secondary analysis published in Frontiers in Nutrition explored how following a low-fat vegan diet affected dietary acid load and how this related to weight found that compared to the Mediterranean diet, following a low-fat vegan diet led to a lower dietary acid results suggest that decreasing the dietary acid load via this diet may help with weight loss. How a low-fat vegan diet leads to weight lossSome foods contribute to a higher dietary acid load while others decrease it. Study author Hana Kahleova, MD, PhD explained the following to Medical News Today: 'Animal products including meat, fish, eggs, and cheese cause the body to produce more acid, increasing dietary acid load, which is linked to chronic inflammation that disrupts metabolism and can lead to increased body weight. Plant-based diets, on the other hand, which are more alkaline, are associated with weight loss, improved insulin sensitivity, and lower blood pressure.' This research was a secondary analysis of a previous study involving overweight adult participants who followed the Mediterranean diet and a low-fat vegan diet. In the current analysis, researchers sought to look at dietary acid load in these diets and how it related to weight. The original study was of a group of 62 overweight adults. The participants were divided into two groups. One group was on a Mediterranean diet, and the other was on a low-fat vegan diet for 16 weeks. After a 4-week break, the groups switched to the other diet. Participants kept track of what they ate via food diaries at certain weeks, and researchers also had data on physical activity and body composition. Researchers used two scoring systems to calculate participant dietary acid load. The authors explain that one estimation looks at five nutrients, and the other does as well but also takes into account weight and height. Overall, both dietary acid load scores decreased on the low-fat vegan diet but stayed the same on the Mediterranean also found that participants lost weight, likely primarily from decreased body fat, while on the low-fat vegan diet but did not lose weight while on the Mediterranean diet. Researchers also found that changes in dietary acid load were positively associated with weight changes. So, a decrease in dietary acid load was associated with a decrease in body associations did decrease when researchers adjusted 'for changes in energy intake' in the first 16 weeks of the study. However, in the second 16 weeks of the study, the associations were still significant after the adjustment. Thus, researchers conclude that 'compared with the Mediterranean diet, dietary acid load significantly decreased on a vegan diet and was associated with weight loss, independent of energy intake.'Further research required to confirm findingsThis research does have certain limitations. Firstly, the original study had limitations such as a small number of participants, a short intervention time, and data from only one center. However, researchers note that the time on each diet was long enough for adaptation to occur. Since the participants were volunteers, the authors acknowledge that the study sample 'may not represent the general population.' The other major limitation was that the analysis relied on dietary reports from participants. Data on physical activity was also participant-reported. Researchers also acknowledge the risk of attrition in studies about diet and that 16% of participants did not finish the they also note that there was high dietary adherence throughout the study. Kahleova explained that 'future studies can focus on the most effective strategies to alkalize the diet and look at possible links with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic diseases.'The authors of the study also note that there is a need for randomized trials that examine how the Mediterranean diet impacts dietary acid load. Mir Ali, MD, a board-certified general surgeon, bariatric surgeon and medical director of MemorialCare Surgical Weight Loss Center at Orange Coast Medical Center in Fountain Valley, CA, who was not involved in the study, also noted that it 'shows that a low-fat vegan diet may be superior to a diet containing animal products; again, further research is required to further elucidate the benefits and mechanism.' Who most benefits from a low-fat vegan diet?This research suggests that diets that contribute to a lower dietary acid load offer certain benefits and that the alkalizing effect of a low-fat vegan diet might help with weight loss. It highlights another potential benefit of following a low-fat vegan diet, which people can do with guidance from dietary experts. Alexander S. Ford, DO, a board-certified osteopathic family physician and registered dietitian, not involved in the current research, noted the following about the study to MNT: 'While a low-fat vegan diet may not be appropriate for every individual, the results of this study showed lower dietary acid loads in low-fat vegan diets versus the Mediterranean diet, a benefit linked to weight loss, independent of caloric intake, while promoting an alkalizing effect on the body that could benefit individuals with chronic diseases like morbid obesity and other conditions such as gout, arterial diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis, that have pro-inflammatory linkages.' Ford also noted that the study also supports the importance of following a well-balanced diet: 'This study also reemphasizes the importance of consuming a balanced diet, adequate in fruits, vegetables, and other plant-based foods. This emphasis should reassure you that regardless of your diet preference, a balanced diet is good for maintaining great health.'

Real reason emojis can improve your relationships revealed by boffins… and which you can use
Real reason emojis can improve your relationships revealed by boffins… and which you can use

The Sun

time11 hours ago

  • The Sun

Real reason emojis can improve your relationships revealed by boffins… and which you can use

EMOJIS can improve your relationships as they make you seem more emotionally involved, scientists say. A study found people rated their partners as more attentive if they used the icons in messages. 2 We are most fond of the 'crying laughing face' emoji, but researchers claim it does not appear to matter which symbol senders use. Even icons without a face or emotion, such as fire, were found to be linked to higher relationship satisfaction. Study author and PhD student Eun Huh, at the University of Texas in Austin, said: 'The study revealed that emojis signal emotional attentiveness. 'Interestingly, it's not the type of emoji but simply their presence that makes people feel closer to a partner.' The study questioned 260 people, aged between 23 and 67. They were shown 15 text exchanges, then asked to imagine the other sender was their partner and rate their responses. People scored as more engaged and responsive to emotions in chats that contained emojis. Ms Huh said: 'Emojis help recipients clarify ambiguous messages. 'Given that the human brain can recognise images in just 13 milliseconds, they are a quick yet effective communication tool.' But Ms Huh warned: 'It is important to note that emojis do not always have a positive effect. Heart emojis meaning: A guide to using the symbols and when is best to use them 'Their interpretation depends on the emotional tone of the text message.' A separate study by the Kinsey Institute in Indiana, US, last year suggested that people who often use emojis are more emotionally intelligent. 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store