YouTube's Age-Estimation Tech Will Spot Kids Pretending to Be Adults. Here's How It Works
The streaming service announced it's rolling out age-estimation technology that will use various data to determine if someone is under the age of 18, and then use that signal "to deliver our age-appropriate product experiences and protections." Basically -- assuming it works as it should -- kids will not be able to access what YouTube deems as age-restricted content.
Google, YouTube's parent company, announced in February that it would begin deploying this type of technology, which relies on AI, to determine users' ages.
YouTube said it will test the machine-learning tech on a small set of users in the US to estimate their age. Some of the signals they will look at include "the types of videos a user is searching for, the categories of videos they have watched, or the longevity of the account." After ensuring the age-verification is working as intended, YouTube will then roll it out more widely.
The move is another step in the growing age-verification push that is being hastened by the US and other governments trying to prevent children from accessing content deemed harmful, unhealthy and not appropriate for their age.
If its age-estimation system decides someone is under 18, YouTube will then:
disable personalized advertising
turn on digital wellbeing tools
add safeguards to recommendations, including limiting repetitive views of some content
People who are actually adults but who have been wrongly identified as children will be able to verify that they are 18 or older by using a credit card or a government ID.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oppenheimer Trims Amazon (AMZN) Price Target to $245 — AI Growth Still a Bright Spot
Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is one of the On August 1, Oppenheimer analyst Jason Helfstein lowered the price target on the stock to $245.00 (from $250.00) while maintaining an 'Outperform' rating. The rating affirmation comes amid frustrated investors over a lack of positive second half 2025 AWS commentary. This is because capacity issues are anticipated to persist until at least year-end. Nevertheless, CEO Jassy has reiterated that artificial intelligence is the 'the biggest technology transformation for a lifetime.' This is already evident considering AWS AI revenue is continuing to grow triple-digits year-over-year and its usage is still early within AWS. The firm doesn't see any consumer weakness despite tariff impacts remaining. Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is an American technology company offering e-commerce, cloud computing, and other services, including digital streaming and artificial intelligence solutions. While we acknowledge the potential of AMZN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Must-Watch AI Stocks on Wall Street and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Fast Company
25 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Your next direct report might not be human. Are you ready to lead it?
BY We've spent decades building frameworks to help people lead teams: courses, certifications, coaching, culture decks. All aimed at shaping better managers of humans. But that's no longer enough. Because for many workers, their first report won't be a person. It'll be an agent. In June BNY Mellon onboarded 1,000 digital workers while JPMorgan Chase is building AI teams at scale. This isn't theoretical. The new direct reports are already clocked in and they don't need coffee, feedback, or PTO. The problem? Most organizations are still running on legacy management models built for human hierarchies and not set up to manage machines. Leading humans versus governing agents When you manage people, you guide behavior. You motivate, delegate, coach, and course correct. It's a loop built on trust and conversation. When you manage an AI, none of that applies. You don't coach a model. You govern it. You define inputs, monitor outputs, escalate issues, and answer for the consequences. And you do that in real time. In AI-led teams, leadership is less about motivation and more about judgment. The ability to assess, adjust, and act across decision chains is what separates performance from liability. It's knowing what good looks like. It's catching the drift, asking the right question before the system generates the wrong answer, and being accountable for outcomes, even when you didn't directly produce them. The HR model is out of sync HR isn't ready for this shift. Most performance frameworks still assume linear paths, human reports, and long-term role tenure. But digital agents break that logic. They don't climb ladders. They execute tasks. They can outperform junior staff one day and be outpaced by a new model the next. You don't manage their growth. You manage the conditions in which they operate. That shift puts pressure on organizational design itself. Hierarchies built for human oversight don't hold when decision loops involve systems acting faster than approvals can be processed. That means rethinking how we define productivity, collaboration, and leadership. It means building new metrics for how human employees interact with agents, not just what they produce on their own. Are they designing good prompts? Are they escalating ethical concerns? Are they reviewing outputs critically or rubber-stamping them? These are the new leadership signals. Most performance reviews aren't built to detect them. Prompting is a leadership act Prompting isn't a technical skill; it's a management one. The way you frame a prompt shapes what an agent does. Vague prompts lead to vague results. Biased prompts produce biased outcomes. And poor prompting isn't just inefficient. It can become a legal or reputational risk. Yet most companies treat prompting like its keyboard wizardry. Something for the engineers or the 'AI power users.' That's a mistake. Everyone managing agents, from interns to executives, needs to learn how to design clear, intentional instructions. Because prompts are decisions in disguise, shaped by where they sit in the organizational context and why they're being made. The ethics chain is breaking In traditional teams, ethics and escalation follow a chain of command. Something goes wrong, someone flags it, and a manager gets involved. But with agents acting independently and often invisibly, the chain breaks. You can't escalate what you don't notice. And too often, companies haven't defined what ethical escalation looks like when the actor is synthetic. Who's accountable when an AI produces a discriminatory recommendation? Or leaks sensitive information? Or makes a decision a human wouldn't? If your answer is 'the tech team,' you're not ready. Governance can't sit in the back office. It needs to be built into team workflows. The best companies are training their people to pause, question and report, not just accept what the system spits out. Chain of thought and chain of reasoning aren't just cognitive tricks. They're how human teams will spot drift, bias, and breakpoints in the AI value chain. And that skillset is only going to grow in importance. The bottom line AI won't replace all managers, but it will redefine what management means. Leading agents demands flexing a different muscle and most organizations haven't trained for it. This isn't about replacing soft skills with hard skills, but rather it's replacing passive management with active stewardship: less people-pleasing and more decision accountability, fewer status meetings and more escalation pathways. Managing machines still means leading people. But the people you lead need new tools, new rules, and a different playbook. The companies that get this right won't be the ones with the flashiest tech. They'll be the ones that know how to change the game by managing what they've built. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Brudenell (DCB) is the executive director of Decidr, Australia's only publicly listed AI company. With 25+ years of experience working across AI infrastructure, model development, and business transformation, David has held senior leadership positions in public, large private and startup companies from Sydney to San Francisco, including Appen (ASX:APX), Pureprofile (ASX:PPL), Eclipx (ASX:FPR), Flare (purchased by MYOB in 2023) and more. More
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oppenheimer Trims Amazon (AMZN) Price Target to $245 — AI Growth Still a Bright Spot
Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is one of the On August 1, Oppenheimer analyst Jason Helfstein lowered the price target on the stock to $245.00 (from $250.00) while maintaining an 'Outperform' rating. The rating affirmation comes amid frustrated investors over a lack of positive second half 2025 AWS commentary. This is because capacity issues are anticipated to persist until at least year-end. Nevertheless, CEO Jassy has reiterated that artificial intelligence is the 'the biggest technology transformation for a lifetime.' This is already evident considering AWS AI revenue is continuing to grow triple-digits year-over-year and its usage is still early within AWS. The firm doesn't see any consumer weakness despite tariff impacts remaining. Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) is an American technology company offering e-commerce, cloud computing, and other services, including digital streaming and artificial intelligence solutions. While we acknowledge the potential of AMZN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Must-Watch AI Stocks on Wall Street and Disclosure: None.
