Lions execs confident R360 rebel league will NOT threaten future tours as CEO talks risks of losing stars to breakaway group
Proposals for the new R360 competition could clash with the Lions' place in the sporting calendar and potentially strip them of star talent.
But CEO Ben Calveley insisted he has no concerns and discussions are already underway for the tour of New Zealand in 2029.
'We haven't had any formal discussions at all with R360 so I can't comment in any detail on their proposition and their proposal,' said Calveley.
'What I can say and you have seen these quotes come from players at every stage throughout the tour is that they remain absolutely committed to the Lions.
'We all know that we have our place in the calendar baked into [World Rugby's] regulation 9 and I wouldn't see that changing in the future.
'It's up to them who they want to make contact with. I don't really want to comment on how they manage their own business. For me, what is encouraging is that our players remain committed to the Lions.
'I think we have seen on this tour just what it means, not just to them but to the fans and the whole of the game. We are very confident that our position in the future is secure.'
Calveley added that the Lions have every intention of returning to Australia in 12 years' time, although he is keen for other nations such as Fiji to be involved in the warm-up matches.
'You are not going to do anything with the Tests,' he added. Leave the Tests alone. We are really keen in doing more in the pre-tour element. You might bring different countries into that space.
'And then you could do the same with the tour matches. Would we be interested in bringing in, for example, a Fiji or a Japan? And you can think of other countries as well. Yes we would. That is a conversation we will have with New Zealand rugby to see if that is possible.
'I would absolutely envisage returning to Australia. Just to be very clear, I know there's been loads of speculation about whether that would be the case or not, but we've had a wonderful tour here, and it is a hundred per cent our ambition to return, and we would want the next one to be bigger and better than this one. Who knows what the calendar looks like in the future.
'If nothing changes in terms of calendar configurations and so forth, then [2037] would be the expectation, yes.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fate of Victoria Park stadium in doubt after Indigenous group called for the Brisbane site to be protected
The fate of a 63,000-seat Olympic stadium is hanging in the balance after an Indigenous group lodged a long-term protection order on the site. The Yagara Magandjin Aboriginal Corporation (YMAC) on Tuesday asked the federal government to block the massive construction in Victoria Park in central Brisbane. YMAC claimed the park was one of the city's 'most significant' First Nations sites. If the application is successful, the Queensland Government would have to find a new location for the centrepiece of the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Victoria Park is managed by Brisbane City Council, but new state legislation last month determined Olympic venues are exempt from heritage and planning laws. YMAC spokeswoman and Yagarabul elder Gaja Kerry Charlton told the ABC the park, which has the Indigenous name Barrambin, is significant to local Aboriginal people. 'Barrambin is living Country. We know this place is of great significance and history. It was a complete shock when the premier came out with his stadium plans,' she said. 'We are very concerned there are ancient trees, artefacts and very important ecosystems existing there. There may be ancestral remains.' YMAC lodged the protection order application under Section 10 of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act (ATSIHP). The act allows the Commonwealth to prevent damage to 'significant Aboriginal areas' and would overrule the new state law. Yagara elder Uncle Steven said Victoria Park should be protected as there were 'not many places left around south-east Queensland that still contain that significance in cultural heritage'. 'If that [stadium] goes ahead, we lose part of our history. It's not only First Nations history, it's Australia's history, Brisbane's history,' he said. The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water confirmed it is reviewing the YMAC's application. Save Victoria Park spokeswoman Sue Bremner questioned why Indigenous groups were opposing the Olympic stadium when Victoria Park was previously used as a golf course, rifle range and encampment for WWII American soldiers. 'The park has grown up with Brisbane, and it's gone through various stages,' Ms Bremner told 4BC Radio. 'One thing about a golf course is that it doesn't change the topography as much. The ridges where the First Nations people camped for thousands of years are still there. 'That is not going to be the case if this stadium build goes ahead.' A spokeswoman for the state government, led by Premier David Crisafulli, said it was committed to 'ensuring the Games deliver a generational infrastructure legacy'. 'The new laws provide a bespoke process that recognises Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage matters - incorporating engagement, consultation with relevant parties and preparation of a cultural heritage management plan,' she said. The Federal Government in July pledged $3.4billion in funding for the Queensland Government for the Games Venue Infrastructure program. Combined funding resulted in a total of $7.1billion to be used on delivering 17 new or upgraded sporting venues across Queensland. The stadium planned for Victoria Park is set to host the Games' opening and closing ceremonies. Several athletic events would also be held at the venue. Several Queensland teams - including Brisbane Lions, Brisbane Heat and Queensland Bulls - have expressed interest in the stadium as their homeground after the Games.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Big rise in UK bosses warning of extreme weather effects
The number of British companies warning of extreme weather has risen twentyfold since 2015. References to 'extreme weather' occurred just 35 times in filings made by companies on the FTSE 350 in 2015, according to an analysis of company records on Factset. In 2024 this figure had risen to 741 mentions, with 560 references to the phrase in filings by the 350 largest listed companies in the UK so far this year. Companies across a variety of industries have pointed to extreme or unusual weather events as a reason for faltering or unexpected sales. Last month Greggs warned that operating profits at the bakery chain could be 'modestly below' 2024 due to the heatwave in June, which boosted demand for cold drinks but reduced overall shopper numbers, causing a slowdown in sales growth in the first half of the year. Rio Tinto said in April that extreme weather events had affected operations at its Pilbara iron ore mine in Western Australia, though it added last month that production had recovered well since. However, the majority of the increase in references to extreme weather in company filings over the past decade came in the form of companies warning of the risks that such events might pose to their businesses in the future. Currys and Watches of Switzerland recently warned of the potential impact of extreme weather events in their full-year results. The luxury watch seller said that their increasing frequency could lead to significant disruption of retail showrooms, offices and distribution centres through flooding and strong winds, while the electricals retailer said extreme weather events could increase footfall for consumers seeking air-conditioning in some regions during heatwaves, but could also lead consumers to shop online more than in stores. The increasing prevalence of warnings about extreme weather is not specific to the UK either. Research by Sara Mahaffy, a managing director at RBC Capital Markets who runs the bank's sustainability strategy research, found that discussions of physical climate risks on earnings calls has hit new highs in 2025 in the US and Asia. She added that the increasing prevalence of references to extreme weather underscored a wider trend occurring across the private sector, in which a premium was increasingly being placed on adapting to climate change and its impacts, rather than just mitigating them. 'What we noticed when we looked at ESG [environmental, social, and governance] debt issuance and green bond issuance, the private sector is increasingly integrating adaptation as part of the eligible criteria,' Mahaffy said. 'For so long, so much of the focus was on mitigation and renewable energy, energy efficiency, but we're starting to see adaptation creep in more. As the private sector is feeling these impacts directly, they are taking the steps themselves to build resilience.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
News Corp warns Trump AI is eviscerating sales of The Art of the Deal
News Corp is warning Donald Trump that AI is cannibalizing sales of his books, including The Art of the Deal. The company, owned by billionaire Rupert Murdoch, owns dozens of newspapers and TV channels around the world including the Wall Street Journal, the Times (in the UK), the Australian and the New York Post. News Corp also owns book publisher HarperCollins, which has published three of Trump's books, though his best-known title, The Art of the Deal, was published by Random House. Still, the company appeared keen to warn Trump about the impact AI is having on publishing. 'The AI age must cherish the value of intellectual property if we are collectively to realize our potential,' News Corp said in a statement with its fourth-quarter earnings report. 'Even the president of the United States is not immune to blatant theft. The president's books are still reporting healthy sales, but are being consumed by AI engines which profit from his thoughts by cannibalizing his concepts, thus undermining future sales of his books. 'Suddenly, The Art of the Deal has become The Art of the Steal.' Media outlets have sued AI companies, including OpenAI, operator of ChatGPT, for using their content to train AI models without permission. In May, a federal judge rejected OpenAI's request to dismiss a lawsuit from the New York Times over its usage of the newspaper's content. Dow Jones, which publishes the Wall Street Journal, and the New York Post sued Perplexity AI in October over similar copyright claims. News Corp's message to Trump also comes after the White House last month announced Trump's 'AI action plan' that would see the loosening of AI regulations that had been put in place under the Biden administration. In an earnings call Tuesday, News Corp CEO Robert Thomson said that the company is in the middle of 'advanced negotiations with several AI companies'. 'It's clear that many of them have come to recognize that the purchase of [intellectual property] is as important as the acquisition of semiconductors or the securing of stable energy sources,' he said, noting that it's a mix of 'wooing and suing'. 'We prefer the former, but we will never shy away from protecting our property rights,' he said. The warning comes at a tense moment between News Corp and the White House. Trump sued the Wall Street Journal after the newspaper published a report that the president had once sent Jeffrey Epstein an intimate birthday message that included a sexually suggestive drawing of a woman. Trump claimed that the report was false and amounted to libel. The newspaper has requested a judge dismiss the case. Murdoch, who also owns Fox News, was once friendly with Trump, though relations soured during the president's third presidential campaign. The company beat fourth-quarter expectations with Tuesday's earnings announcement, largely due to a rise in digital subscriptions from Dow Jones, which houses the company's business publications like the Wall Street Journal, Barron's and MarketWatch. On Monday, News Corp announced it will launch a sister tabloid to the New York Post in California, called the California Post, in early 2026.
