logo
Who blessed pan shop? High Court pulls up Mumbai civic body for footpath stall

Who blessed pan shop? High Court pulls up Mumbai civic body for footpath stall

India Today5 days ago
The Bombay High Court has directed the Municipal Commissioner of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to investigate the role of civic officials who allegedly "blessed" the existence of an illegal pan, bidi and gutka stall set up on a footpath outside a housing society in Mumbai.The court not only ordered the immediate removal of the unauthorised structure but also instructed the Municipal Commissioner to initiate an enquiry into officials who failed to act against the encroachment for over six years.advertisementA division bench comprising Justices G S Kulkarni and Arif S Doctor was hearing a petition filed by Nirvana Housing Society.
The petition alleged that despite the BMC demolishing the illegal stall in November 2019, it had resurfaced and continued to operate without any valid license or permission. An inspection report dated July 17, 2023, confirmed the existence of the stall, which lacked both health and trade licenses.The BMC informed the court that a notice had been issued to the stall operator on July 23, 2025, under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, giving 48 hours for voluntary removal. Failing compliance, the civic body stated it would proceed with demolition.Although represented by legal counsel, the stall owner failed to file a reply affidavit. The court noted this as a tacit admission of the stall's illegality.Calling the structure a 'rank unauthorised' encroachment, the bench underscored that footpaths are public spaces meant for pedestrian use and cannot be appropriated for private profit. The court also questioned how the stall obtained an electricity connection and why BMC officials had not taken suo motu action earlier."Such lawlessness cannot be permitted," the bench observed, directing the Municipal Commissioner to issue show-cause notices to the Ward Officer, Assistant Commissioner and relevant Field Officers. The court also ordered that a compliance report be filed by September 4, 2025.The matter is scheduled for further hearing on July 29, 2025, when the court will review the status of the stall's removal and the progress of the internal enquiry.- EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Mumbai
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘If it weren't for the pothole, my father would still be alive': Son of motorist killed in accident in Mumbai's Powai
‘If it weren't for the pothole, my father would still be alive': Son of motorist killed in accident in Mumbai's Powai

Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • Indian Express

‘If it weren't for the pothole, my father would still be alive': Son of motorist killed in accident in Mumbai's Powai

After a 59-year-old motorist was killed in what was perhaps the season's first pothole-related fatality, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) launched an inspection of the site in Powai and is slated to submit a report to determine the next course of action. On Saturday, Lalu Kamble (59) fell after his scooter lost balance upon crashing into a pothole along JVLR road in Powai and was killed as he was run over by a dumper truck. Following the accident, Kamble — a civil contractor by profession—was taken to the Rajawadi Hospital by police officials, where he was declared dead. A resident of Andheri East's Sher-e-Punjab society, Kamble was on in way to meet a friend in the Hiranandani area in Powai when the mishap occurred around 2pm on Saturday. Kamble is survived by his wife, two sons and his daughter. The accident was reported in in S ward, from where incidentally, the maximum number of pothole complaints have been flagged by citizens. While 7,101 complaints have been registered by citizens through channels such as 'Pothole Quickfix' app and WhatsApp chatbot between June and July 30, 1,455 pothole woes — highest across all wards — have emerged in the S ward area, where Powai is situated. Following the accident, officials from the S ward said concerned officials from the roads department inspected the site and is currently preparing a report on the incident. 'The next course of action will be determined on the basis of the findings of the report,' said the civic body in a letter dated July 28. Meanwhile, the police has arrested the dumper driver in the case while the civic body also filled the pothole, in the aftermath of the mishap. Speaking to The Indian Express, Vijay Kamble, Lalu's younger son, called for action against the BMC contractor, whose negligence triggered the mishap. 'None of us in the family have been able to come to terms with the fact that my father is no more. He was a healthy and fit man. We just can't believe that he lost his life so suddenly because of something like a pothole. If there had been no pothole, my father would still be alive. This accident was the result of the neglect of the BMC appointed contractor and the people responsible should be held accountable,' said Vijay Kamble. Rajan Maknikar, a friend of Kamble, alleged, 'While Lalu Kamble managed to swerve and escape one pothole, his bike fell after hitting a second pothole. Due to the impact, his bike flung on one side and Lalu landed on another side, where a dumper ran through his right arm. For nearly 40 – 45 minutes, he lay on the road awaiting help and then lost another crucial hour while reaching the Rajawadi hospital.' This year, the BMC has deployed one road engineer in each of the 227 wards to proactively identify potholes and fix them within a timeframe of 24 – 48 hours. The objective, officials said, is to fix pits when they are smaller to avoid inconvenience to citizens.

SC upholds HC order directing FIR against police in Parbhani custodial death
SC upholds HC order directing FIR against police in Parbhani custodial death

Hindustan Times

time4 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

SC upholds HC order directing FIR against police in Parbhani custodial death

MUMBAI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition filed by the Maharashtra government challenging a Bombay High Court order directing the police to register a First Information Report (FIR) in the custodial death of 35-year-old Dalit law student Somnath Suryawanshi in Parbhani. Parbhani, India. 16, 2024: A 35-year-old man named Somnath Suryawanshi died in Parbhani district jail on December 15, 2024. Suryawanshi was detained alongside 50 other Dalit youths for their alleged involvement in the violence that broke out in the city following the desecration of a replica of the Constitution on December 10, 2024. Parbhani, India. Dec 16, 2024. (Photo by HT Photo) (Hindustan Times) While it is still unclear why the Supreme Court dismissed the petition, this would come as a blow to the state government, which had contended that the high court's order seeking an FIR against police officers was premature. Suryawanshi was among over 50 people arrested in Parbhani in December 2024 following violence in the city over the desecration of a replica of the Constitution. The arrested accused, mostly from marginalised communities, were slapped with stringent charges and allegedly assaulted, abused and threatened in police custody, prompting at least 23 separate complaints. On December 15, four days after his arrest, Suryawanshi died in judicial custody. While the police initially claimed he died due to a heart attack, a post-mortem report and judicial inquiry revealed that the probable cause of death was 'shock following multiple injuries'. Suryawanshi's mother, Vijayabai Suryawanshi, approached the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court in April, alleging that police brutality had caused her son's death. She sought an independent, court-monitored probe into the incident. Her petition, filed through advocates Prakash Ambedkar, Sandesh More and Hitendra Gandhi, sought the registration of an FIR against police officers and their associates responsible for Suryawanshi's custodial death. The petition referred to the chain of events, claiming that the assault on Somnath was so brutal that he died within hours of being admitted to a state-run hospital in Parbhani after being sent to judicial custody. On July 4, the high court ordered the registration of an FIR against the police officers concerned, noting that there was prima facie evidence of custodial torture and a violation of fundamental rights. The court also ordered that the investigation be handed over to a police officer of the rank of deputy superintendent of police. However, the state government moved the Supreme Court on July 10, challenging the order on several grounds. The government argued that the high court had failed to take cognisance of the detailed investigation undertaken by the state Crime Investigation Department (CID). Further, it alleged that the high court did not wait for the outcome of the investigation or grant an opportunity to the state to place its comprehensive findings on record, including medical and forensic evidence. The state government's petition also alleged factual and procedural errors in the judicial inquiry report, including the inclusion of names of police personnel who were not present during the incident. It also cited an expert opinion from Mumbai's JJ Hospital, which concluded that Suryawanshi died due to natural causes exacerbated by a pre-existing condition. Calling the order 'premature and unsustainable', the state remarked that the high court's approach was based on a 'presumption of guilt against the police authorities,' which could demoralise law enforcement institutions. However, the apex court rejected the petition and upheld the high court's order, requiring criminal action against the erring police personnel.

HC seeks Malvan police's report on seized devices of contractor in Shivaji statue collapse case
HC seeks Malvan police's report on seized devices of contractor in Shivaji statue collapse case

Hindustan Times

time6 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC seeks Malvan police's report on seized devices of contractor in Shivaji statue collapse case

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Wednesday directed the Malvan police to submit details of their last correspondence with the Kolhapur forensic lab in connection with the electronic gadgets seized from sculptor-contractor Jaydeep Apte after the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj's statue collapsed at the Rajkot Fort in Malvan on August 6, 2024. Bombay High Court at Fort (HT Archives) (Anshuman Poyrekar/HT PHOTO) The 35-foot statue was erected at a cost of ₹2.44 crore and inaugurated by the Prime Minister in December 2023. Following its collapse on August 6, 2024, the Sindhudurg police, acting on the Public Works Department's complaint, filed an FIR against Apte for negligence and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Damage to Public Property Act. Apte was on the run after this, and the police had formed seven teams to search for him. However, 10 days after the FIR registration, he surrendered to the Kalyan police on September 5, 2024. According to Apte's petition, filed by advocate Ganesh Sovani, after the investigation was completed, he had filed for bail multiple times, and the district courts rejected them. Finally, a High Court's single-bench of justice, N R Borkar, granted him bail on January 10, 2025. However, during the pendency of his bail application before the High Court, the Investigation Officer (IO) had filed the charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Malvan, on November 8, 2024, which was then transmitted to the Sindhudurg Sessions Court. During the investigation in the second week of September 2024, Apte's mobile phone and laptop were seized from his house in Kalyan. When he approached the sessions court seeking a direction for his electronic gadgets to be returned to him, the court rejected the plea on May 9, 2025. Aggrieved by this, Apte moved the Bombay High Court, stating that the sessions court rejected his plea without appreciating the factual grounds mentioned in the application. As a professional artist who earns his livelihood by carving various statues and other related work, the gadgets have all his commercial contacts and agreements, he said. The phone, which is the only way he could get in touch with data from his old customers and other commercial transactions, is in policy custody. The petition stated, 'He requires the laptop as he has to make a presentation and prepare some new or fresh projects. Moreover, his bank accounts are operated through Google Pay/PhonePe and his Debit Card is also used through the mobile,' the petition stated. The police, on the other hand, stated that the gadgets were sent to the forensic lab at Kolhapur on September 3, 2024, and have not been returned yet. On Wednesday, the court took note of Apte's counsel and noted that the seized gadgets contain data linked to his business dealings, whose continued seizure impacted his operations. While the bench acknowledged the investigating agency's right to seize the electronic devices relevant to the case, it said Apte had the right to access non-incriminating material required for his livelihood. It further said any access to the devices would depend on examination by the forensic department. The police informed the court that they did not carry the relevant documents. So the court directed the state's counsel to seek instructions from the concerned police station and clarify their last correspondence with the forensic department. The next date of the hearing is scheduled for August 14.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store