Posting about the L.A. protests? Apparently that can get you banned from Facebook
Rebecca Solnit 's account on Meta's social media network has been suspended, the San Francisco author and activist posted to Bluesky on Monday, June 10.
'Facebook decided to suspend my account because of a piece (below) I wrote Monday about violence which in no way advocates for it (but does point out who is violent in the current ruckus),' Solnit wrote.
She included a screenshot of Facebook's explanation of its decision, which reads, 'Your account, or activity on it, doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity.'
Solnit did not explain how, beyond timing, she believed that the essay in question, 'Some Notes on the City of Angels and the Nature of Violence,' written on her independent site Meditations in an Emergency, was the reason for her ouster.
Meta did not immediately respond to the Chronicle's request for comment.
'I think maybe it's begun, the bigger fiercer backlash against the Trump Administration,' her piece begins, referring to the clashes in Los Angeles between protesters of President Donald Trump's immigration policies and the California National Guard deployed by Trump against city and state officials' wishes.
'All they can do is punish and incite, and I hope that some of the protesters are telling them they're violating their mission and maybe the law,' the essay continues. 'We are escalating because they are escalating.'
The 'Men Explain Things to Me' author goes on to question longtime right-wing and media narratives that stereotype protesters as violent while giving law enforcement a pass for much more harm to people and property.
'One thing to remember is that they'll claim we're violent no matter what; the justification for this ongoing attack on immigrants and people who resemble immigrants in being brown is the idea that America is suffering an invasion and in essence only a certain kind of white person belongs here,' she writes.
The piece never advocates meeting fire with fire. Instead, it argues for a defiant yet nonviolent response.
'I believe ardently that nonviolent resistance is in the big picture and the long term the most effective strategy, but that doesn't mean it must be polite, placid, or please our opponents,' she writes.
Solnit concludes by enumerating the kinds of violence the Trump administration has perpetrated — against the environment, against the First Amendment, against women, against his personal enemies, against the very notion of truth.
'It is up to us to defeat that agenda,' she writes.
Solnit said she appealed the suspension. On Wednesday, June 11, she shared a screenshot of Facebook's response saying it decided to disable her account: 'It still doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity. You cannot request another review of this decision.'
Solnit noted that she doesn't think a Meta higher-up has it in for her, despite the popularity of her account. She cited 'inane algorithms that often delete posts' as the likeliest explanation. (In April, the Chronicle reported on Meta's rejection of an ad promoting a Northern California Pride festival.)
Even so, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has cozied up to the Trump administration, dining with the president at Mar-a-Lago and appointing Trump ally Dana White to his company's board. Meta also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration fund.
Meta's Community Standards on its account integrity page state that the company reserves the right to restrict or disable accounts that risk 'imminent harm to individual or public safety.'
Solnit is the author of more than 30 books, including 'Infinite City: A San Francisco Atlas' and the children's book 'Cinderella Liberator,' which Marin Shakespeare Company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
X criticises Online Safety Act - and warns it's putting free speech in the UK at risk
The Online Safety Act is putting free speech at risk and needs significant adjustments, Elon Musk's social network X has warned. New rules that came into force last week require platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and X - as well as sites hosting pornography - to bring in measures to prove that someone using them is over the age of 18. The Online Safety Act requires sites to protect children and to remove illegal content, but critics have said that the rules have been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. X has warned the act's laudable intentions were "at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach". It said: "When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'. "It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made." X claims the timetable for platforms to meet mandatory measures had been unnecessarily tight - and despite complying, sites still faced threats of enforcement and fines, "encouraging over-censorship". "A balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children. It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK," it said. A UK government spokesperson said it is "demonstrably false" that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. "As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression," they added. Users have complained about age checks that require personal data to be uploaded to access sites that show pornography, and 468,000 people have already signed a petition asking for the new law to be repealed. In response to the petition, the government said it had "no plans" to reverse the Online Safety Act. Reform UK's leader Nigel Farage likened the new rules to "state suppression of genuine free speech" and said his party would ditch the regulations. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said on Tuesday that those who wanted to overturn the act were "on the side of predators" - to which Mr Farage demanded an apology, calling Mr Kyle's comments "absolutely disgusting". Regulator Ofcom said on Thursday it had launched an investigation into how four companies - that collectively run 34 pornography sites - are complying with new age-check requirements. Read more from Sky News: These companies - 8579 LLC, AVS Group Ltd, Kick Online Entertainment S.A. and Trendio Ltd - run dozens of sites, and collectively have more than nine million unique monthly UK visitors, the internet watchdog said. The regulator said it prioritised the companies based on the risk of harm posed by the services they operated and their user numbers. It adds to the 11 investigations already in progress into 4chan, as well as an unnamed online suicide forum, seven file-sharing services, and two adult websites. Ofcom said it expects to make further enforcement announcements in the coming months.
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Sunset District group plans its own night market after bigger event canceled
Less than a month after organizers announced that the popular Sunset District summer night market would not return for its third year, a group of local businesses and community organizations have begun planning a smaller, one-night event with hopes of attracting a portion of the thousands of people who attended the neighborhood's past celebrations. The Sunset After Dark event will occupy three blocks on Irving Street on Sept. 26, offering a 'celebration of food, culture, small business and the incredible people who make the Sunset special,' said Rob Aiavao, a spokesperson for the event's organizing team, in a statement to the Chronicle. Applications for both food and non-food vendors are currently open. Organized by local advocacy group Dear Community and Sunset restaurant Smokin D's BBQ, the event was 'born out of a desire to bring neighbors together and support the local economy,' Aiavao said, adding that neighborhood residents, merchants and school partners are involved. While visitors may see familiar food vendors and activities at Sunset After Dark, the event is separate from the city-funded Sunset District Night Market, which has drawn thousands each year since its launch in 2023. Many expected the market to return to the neighborhood this summer, but event organizer Sunset Night Market Collaborative announced the celebration would not be back for its third year earlier this month. It is scheduled to return in 2026. The cancellation came amid political tension in the neighborhood, as some merchants in the area who back the recall of Supervisor Joel Engardio reportedly said they no longer support the night market. Engardio has been a vocal supporter of the night market, but he is facing a tough battle for his political position after championing Proposition K, which proposed to close part of the Upper Great Highway to cars to create a park. City-wide voters passed the measure by 54%, but local residents on the west side were furious over the two-mile closure. The massive growth of the night market and its varied impact on local businesses have raised questions about the future of the event, said Angie Petitt, co-founder of Sunset Mercantile — a member of the Sunset Night Market Collaborative. While some restaurants and vendors near Irving Street flourished, others — like dry-cleaners and salons — saw significantly less business in the daytime, Petitt said. On top of crowd management and ensuring there was enough food and activities for attendees, a lot of questions were left unanswered after last year's night markets exploded in popularity. In the meantime, Petitt said she is glad to see that businesses and local organizations are collaborating on the Sunset After Dark event, and hopes to support them in the planning process. 'While the Sunset Night Market is currently on pause, Sunset After Dark provides a fresh opportunity for the community to reimagine what a shared public celebration can be,' Aiavao said. 'We're working to ensure that it's truly rooted in local voices, organized by and for the neighborhood.' Engardio said Friday that 'politics have no role in a night market.' For him, the fact that businesses and local organizations have proactively led plans for a smaller night market demonstrates that the event was always intended to support the community. 'The residents and the merchants of the Sunset love night markets,' he said. 'I look forward to doing whatever I can to support the night market.'
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
State Department announces investigation into Harvard international visas
** This article has been updated on July 23, 2025, at 1:25 p.m. to include a comment from a Harvard spokesperson. The State Department has opened an investigation into Harvard University's use of international visas, according to an announcement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Rubio said all sponsors of the government's Exchange Visitor Program must 'fully comply' with the 'exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting, and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the program was founded.' The program is intended for foreign citizens who wish to enter the United States. It can used by anyone from a student to a professor to an au pair, according to its website. In doing so, the sponsoring institution must not conduct their programs 'in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.' 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' Rubio said. 'The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests.' A Harvard spokesperson said the investigation is 'yet another retaliatory step' taken by the administration, which violates their First Amendment rights. 'Harvard continues to enroll and sponsor international scholars, researchers and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for U.S. visas and travel to campus this fall,' the spokesperson said. Read more: 'That Harvard education is paying off for you': Judge jabs at Trump lawyer in Harvard case The announcement comes amid talks of a deal between Harvard and the Trump administration, and as two lawsuits take shape in federal court. One of the lawsuits focuses on the Trump administration's attacks on international students, including its revocation of a key certification that allows Harvard's international students to study there. What has happened between the Trump admin and Harvard? The Trump administration has gone after Harvard since April, cutting billions of dollars. Demanding an overhaul of Harvard's leadership structure, admissions and hiring, the federal government warned the school could risk losing $9 billion in funding. Harvard rejected those demands, stating the government seeks to 'invade university freedoms long recognized by the Supreme Court.' Then the fight over funding began. It started with a $2.2 billion funding freeze on April 14 after the school refused to comply with the federal administration's demands. In response, Harvard filed a lawsuit on April 21, arguing that its constitutional rights had been violated by the government's threats to pull billions of dollars in funding. Harvard President Alan Garber also signed onto a letter with hundreds of other university presidents pushing back against 'government overreach and political interference' by the Trump administration. At the beginning of May, the Trump administration said it would bar Harvard University from acquiring new federal grants while the school continues to refuse to comply with the administration's demands for change on its campus. A few days later, eight federal agencies cut $450 million in grants and then the United States Department of Health and Human Services cut $60 million in grants from the university. Harvard went on to amend its lawsuit against the Trump administration. On May 16, a wave of nearly one thousand federal research grant terminations began, amounting to more than $2.4 billion, according to an analysis by Nature. In response, Harvard established a new Presidential Priorities Fund, asking for donations in the midst of federal cuts. Some of Harvard's schools, including its School of Public Health, took to social media to ask for donations after nearly every single federal grant had been terminated. Other investigations and threats have been made against the institution, some of which have also focused on threatening the university's ability to enroll international students. That is the university's second lawsuit. More Higher Ed Brandeis gets tax-free $135 million bond for new residence hall Columbia expels, suspends students who participated in pro-Palestine protests 'That Harvard education is paying off for you': Judge jabs at Trump lawyer in Harvard case As Harvard faces federal funding cuts, its medical school secures new donations Federal judge questions cuts to Harvard's federal funding, its links to antisemitism Read the original article on MassLive.
