Lawsuit filed against Kansas law nullifying end-of-life choices for pregnant women
The plaintiffs — one of whom is currently pregnant — are challenging the constitutionality of a clause in the state's Natural Death Act that denies pregnant women the option to make advance directives to accept or refuse healthcare if they become incapacitated or terminally ill.
Patient plaintiffs Emma Vernon, Abigail Ottaway and Laura Stratton and physician plaintiffs Michele Bennett and Lynley Holman filed the lawsuit on Thursday. It argues that the clause violates the right to personal autonomy, privacy, equal treatment and freedom of speech by ignoring the end-of-life decisions of pregnant women.
Cdc Removes Covid Vaccine Recommendation For Healthy Children, Pregnant Mothers
Vernon, the pregnant plaintiff, wrote an advance healthcare directive stating that, if pregnant and diagnosed with a terminal condition, she would only like to receive life-sustaining treatment if "there is a reasonable medical certainty" that her child would reach full term and be born "with a meaningful prospect of sustained life and without significant conditions that would substantially impair its quality of life."
The lawsuit says her directive has not been "given the same deference the law affords to others who complete directives because of the Pregnancy Exclusion, and therefore she does not benefit from the same level of certainty that the directive otherwise provides."
Read On The Fox News App
All states have laws allowing people to write advance directives on the medical care they would like to receive if they become unable to make their own health decisions. Nine states, including Kansas, have clauses to invalidate a pregnant woman's advance directive.
The physicians who joined the lawsuit said the law requires them to provide pregnant patients with a lower standard of care than other patients and opens them up to civil and criminal lawsuits as well as professional penalties.
The lawsuit says the doctors "are deeply committed to the foundational medical principle that patients have a fundamental right to determine what treatment they receive, and that providing treatment without a patient's informed consent violates both medical ethics and the law."
New Mom Furious At Husband For Choosing Friends And Barbecue Over Her And Their Newborn
"Yet Kansas law compels them to disregard their patients' clearly expressed end-of-life decisions, forcing them to provide their pregnant patients with a lower standard of care than any of their other patients receive," it continues. "It demands this diminished care without offering any clarity on what end-of-life treatment they are required to provide—leaving them to guess at what the law expects while exposing them to civil, criminal, and professional consequences for getting it wrong."
The defendants in the lawsuit are Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, Kansas State Board of Healing Arts President Richard Bradbury and Douglas County District Attorney Dakota Loomis.Original article source: Lawsuit filed against Kansas law nullifying end-of-life choices for pregnant women
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Evening Edition: Texas Dems Flee State To Avoid Redistricting Vote
Dozens of Texas House Democrats have fled the state in an attempt to avoid or prevent a vote in the state legislature that would push forward a GOP redistricting effort. Redrawing the congressional maps in Texas is a President Trump-led effort to net Republicans up to five new US House seats in next year's midterm elections. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to arrest and expel the House Democrats if they do not return by today. FOX's Eben Brown speaks with Hans A. von Spakovsky, Manager of Election Law Reform Initiative and Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who says the Governor and the Texas Attorney General can take action to force their return to finalize the vote. Click Here To Follow 'The FOX News Rundown: Evening Edition' Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Chemical Makers to Pay N.J. $875 Million to Settle ‘Forever Chemicals' Claims
In what officials say is the largest environmental settlement ever won by a state, chemical giants Chemours, DuPont and Corteva agreed on Monday to pay New Jersey $875 million over the next quarter-century to settle claims linked to pollution from so-called 'forever chemicals.' Under the deal, the companies are required to fund the cleanup of four former industrial sites, create a remediation fund of up to $1.2 billion and set aside a reserve of $475 million to ensure that the cleanup will be completed if any of the companies go bankrupt or default. The agreement brings to justice 'corporate polluters who, for decades, have knowingly contaminated our land and water with PFAS and other dangerous chemicals,' said New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin in a statement, referring to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, which are also known as 'forever chemicals.' 'PFAS are particularly insidious,' Mr. Platkin wrote. 'These dangerous chemicals build up and accumulate everywhere, and New Jersey has some of the highest levels of PFAS in the country.' PFAS are a class of nearly 15,000 chemicals that are highly resistant to heat, water and oil, and persist in the environment, earning them the name 'forever chemicals.' They are found in everyday items like nonstick cookware, water-repellent clothing, stain-resistant carpets and cosmetics, and are also used widely in firefighting foam. They enter the environment — and drinking water supplies — in myriad ways, including from spills, landfills, factories and wastewater treatment plants. In humans, exposure to PFAS can cause damage to the liver and immune system, and the chemicals have also been linked to low birth weight, birth defects and developmental delays as well as increased risk of some prostate, kidney and testicular cancers. In recent years, states across the country have sued PFAS manufacturers, accusing them of widespread environmental contamination. The lawsuits have also charged that the companies hid evidence of the dangers of PFAS for decades. Some companies are starting to settle these cases. In one early deal announced in 2018, 3M agreed to pay Minnesota $850 million to settle PFAS contamination claims. But New Jersey has been particularly aggressive. In May, it secured a settlement with 3M of up to $450 million over 25 years to settle claims it contaminated the state with PFAS, affecting its drinking water. That came after the state reached a $393 million deal with the U.S. branch of the Belgian chemicals company Solvay in 2023, and a $33 million settlement with Arkema Inc., both over PFAS. The latest agreement addresses contamination at four manufacturing sites previously operated by the companies, including the Pompton Lakes Works site in Passaic County, where DuPont previously manufactured explosives components, and the Chambers Works facility in Salem County, where the company produced dyes, refrigerants and other chemicals. Chemours, which was created through a spinoff from DuPont in 2015, will cover half of the settlement, DuPont will pay approximately 36 percent, and Corteva will contribute the remaining 14 percent, the companies said in a statement. 'The settlement will resolve all legacy contamination claims related to the companies' current and former operating sites,' they said. Separately, the chemical companies have entered into multi-billion-dollar agreements with public water systems across the country to tackle widespread contamination of drinking water with PFAS.
CBS News
a minute ago
- CBS News
Shortage of volunteer firefighters could force more towns to move to paid firehouses, costing taxpayers
Nearly 70% of the fire crews working in departments across the country are volunteers, according to the National Fire Department Registry. These dedicated civil servants serve on the frontline, keeping smaller communities safe, but that safety net is shrinking due to a growing shortage of volunteers. Albert Osterman, 21, has trained for more than 150 hours to become a firefighter. A volunteer in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, he does the job with a deep sense of purpose. "My father passed away in 2020, and the EMS crew that helped was from this fire department," Osterman told CBS News. "And so after that, I was like, 'Yeah, I wanna help people the way they helped me.'" He works at one of nearly 20,000 volunteer firehouses nationwide, which save taxpayers an estimated $46.9 billion a year — $4.7 billion just in New York State, according to the Association of Fire Districts of the State of New York. "Were it not for the fire departments, those communities would simply fall apart. We're gonna rely on volunteer firefighters forever in this nation," said Steve Hirsch, chair of the National Volunteer Fire Council. But between 1985 and 2020, the number of volunteers dropped by more than 20%, according to the NVFC. At the same time, the number of emergencies they're called to has more than tripled. "There are fire departments across this nation that are responding to thousands of calls every year. They're wearing out people. They're burning them out," Hirsch said Osterman said that in some cases, a lack of resources has "led to, unfortunately, more deaths." Some lawmakers have been fighting to recruit young people through incentives, such as proposed legislation that would provide student loan forgiveness for volunteer firefighters. When asked if he thought those initiatives could help, Osterman seemed optimistic. "If there's a financial incentive that can help to get education, I'm sure it would boost numbers tremendously," he said. "I think it's a fantastic idea," Osterman added. "As a student, and a student that knows a lot of other students that are firefighters, it would be a big de-stressor for a lot of people." Some towns have already converted from volunteer to paid crews. Without more volunteers, towns like Hastings-on-Hudson could face a similar choice. For now, Osterman is still answering the call — motivated not for a check, but to fulfill his civic duty. "He was a Navy man," Osterman said of his father. "He was a big fan of serving his country and serving his community. I think he'd be proud of me for it. Call me crazy, for sure, for doing it, but he'd be happy."
