Most valuable coins you can find in your change revealed – do you have one in your wallet?
If you have stashes of loose change lying around, it's worth checking to see if any of these rare finds are lurking in your collection.
3
3
One of the most sought-after coins wanted by collectors is the Kew Gardens 50p.
Just 210,000 coins of this 2009 design were released into circulation - and almost all are in private hands according to The Royal Mint.
But the lucky holders of these coins, which feature the Chinese Pagoda at Kew, could sell them for as much as £150 each.
Another rare coin that could fetch £1,000 or more came into existence through a famous error on its wording.
Dating the 1983, these 2p coins read "new pence" instead of "two pence" on its tails side.
TikTok account coincollectingwizard says these decades old 2ps are "a very hard coin to find".
The account advises collectors and coin enthusiasts to check their Royal Mint sets - or "even luckier" find one in their change - if they hope to source one.
While the 1983 date on the coin is a sign to look out for, the key unique feature is that "new pence" writing on the reverse side.
The rarest and most valuable 50p coins in circulation
In addition, the ornate 2002-dated Commonwealth Games coins can also fetch a decent price.
There are separate designs for each of the four countries of the United Kingdom - with the Northern Ireland coin being the rarest.
The rarest version can go for around £35.
The reverse of these coins shows a triumphant looking figure raising a banner over their head.
It was minted to mark the Commonwealth Games hosted in Manchester in 2002.
Among coins in circulation, 50p pieces are one of the most popular to collect.
This is largely thanks their surface area, which gives them enough space to include new intricate designs.
Errors that make a coin unique are likely to increase its value.
The rarer the coin, the more sought after and valuable it will be to collectors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Royal Mail reaches three-year pay deal with workers union
July 3 (Reuters) - International Distribution Services ( opens new tab said on Thursday Royal Mail and the Communication Workers Union (CWU) have agreed on a three-year pay deal. Royal Mail, whose iconic red post boxes with the Royal Crest dot the country, has struggled with labour strikes, competition and loss of market share. CWU, the largest union of the UK's Royal Mail, has held multiple strikes in 2022 and 2023, with workers as well as businesses grappling with soaring inflation. The CWU will shortly issue a ballot with a recommendation to accept and the agreement that includes a three-year basic pay increase made up of a 4.2% increase in 2025, an inflation-linked increase of at least 2% in 2026 and 2% in 2027, IDS said. Subject to a positive ballot outcome, the increase will be backdated to 1 April 2025. IDS agreed to a takeover by Czech billionaire Kretinsky in May 2024. The deal was cleared in December after Britain secured commitments from Kretinsky to protect the more than 500-year-old company and the future of thousands of workers and customers. In late June, EP Group said Kretinsky will become the chairman of Royal Mail. The CWU did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Times
43 minutes ago
- Times
Chelsea must sell to register new signings for Champions League
Chelsea are on course to hit the jackpot at the Club World Cup: their victory over Palmeiras in the quarter-final was worth £15.6million alone and took their total earnings so far to almost £60million. It is a handy windfall, particularly after Uefa inflicted its largest fine on the west London club last week — £27million unconditionally with the threat of a further £51.8million, part of a settlement agreement for breaching the body's financial rules. Yet it is not the fines that may have a particularly punitive impact on Chelsea. Rather, it is the sporting sanction to which the club have agreed, as have Aston Villa, who were similarly sanctioned, that poses an interesting dynamic for the rest of the summer transfer window — and likely ups the pressure on selling players. Chelsea will not be able to add players to their squad for the Champions League next season unless their 'List A transfer balance is positive'. That's a requirement in place for at least two seasons. In short, it means that any spending to add to their Uefa-registered squad list must be covered by the income of outgoing players. No Club World Cup bonus can help with that. Chelsea have a lot of players still to register, having signed Liam Delap, João Pedro and Jamie Gittens, while Estêvão Willian, Dario Essugo, Andrey Santos, Mamadou Sarr and Mike Penders — should they not go on loan — may also need to be added. On Friday Enzo Maresca, the Chelsea head coach, said it was not something 'he had paid attention to'. But that may not be so easy. Chelsea's 'List A' refers to the last squad they registered with Uefa, which was delivered in February for the knockout phase of the Conference League. Crucially, that means Romeo Lavia and Wesley Fofana will need to be registered too, as they were not on that List A. They, along with new signings, will add costs to the incoming column. The cost of registering a new signing takes into account the salary and amortised transfer fee. So Delap's £30million signing, spread over his five-year contract, amounts to £6million for this year. Uefa does not accept contract lengths of more than five years, which it limited back in 2023. A rough calculation of amortised transfer fees alone, not including salary costs, suggests Chelsea may need to find north of £60million to register all the players mentioned above and achieve Uefa's 'positive balance' requirement. Notwithstanding any new deals for players like Fofana or Lavia, which could bring their amortised transfer fee numbers down, the pressure turns to sales. Fortunately for Chelsea, it appears outgoings do not have to be solely from last season's List A. Those that were left out of Chelsea's Club World Cup squad and are due back in training at Cobham from Monday — including João Félix, Raheem Sterling, Ben Chilwell, Renato Veiga and Axel Disasi — can count towards improving their transfer balance. They can be added to List A before the September 2 submission deadline and thus income from their sales will count. It is only if Chelsea's overall transfer balance is negative after the list is submitted that new players could be prevented from registering. But moving unwanted players for permanent sums can be troublesome, as Chelsea know well. So others may fall into the picture. Christopher Nkunku's future is already uncertain, and he is expected to court offers this summer. Noni Madueke, meanwhile, who has been one of Maresca's better performers and an important player en route to Champions League qualification last season, will not see the club stand in his way should he want to leave, amid interest from Arsenal. 'Noni has been very important for us during this season,' Maresca said. 'But my message to the players and to the club is that I want just players that are happy to be with us. The ones that are not happy, they are free to go. It's not for Noni, it's for all the players we have.' Another key performer during the second half of last season is the new England international Trevoh Chalobah, and an exit for him cannot be ruled out either, despite some high praise from Maresca. 'All the players that are here with us, I don't want to lose them,' Maresca said last week. 'We made the Champions League and that's also because of Trevoh. He helped us a lot. We are happy with him. Unfortunately, when the window is open, anything can happen.' Chelsea sources remain confident that they will not be adversely affected by this settlement agreement. They stress they are not forced to sell players like Madueke — unless they want to go — and are not concerned about registering players for the Champions League. Indeed, they have not ruled out further moves in the window either. West Ham United's Mohamed Kudus is of particular interest and should Madueke go, a move for the Ghanaian is set to become more likely. 'He is not our player, so I cannot say anything,' Maresca said. 'The only thing is I have known about Kudus since he was in Ajax.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Why I kick down Peak District stone stacks
BBC Stone stacks are a common sight along hiking trails up and down the UK. But one walker is on a mission to highlight the damage they can do to the environment - by kicking them over. Stuart Cox says some people have been building the stacks - some as tall as 6ft (1.8m) - using stones taken from an old wall near Mam Tor in the Peak District in Derbyshire. A recent video he filmed of himself kicking down the stacks has been watched more than a million times on social media. And the Peak District National Park Authority says the structures are "detrimental" to the area, and have become more prevalent in recent years. "Look at this," Stuart says, before swearing in frustration during his Facebook video on 20 May. "Destroy the lot of them." He then proceeds to kick down a stone stack. The 57-year-old, who works as a chartered engineer, lives in the Derbyshire village of Castleton, a short drive from Mam Tor. He's passionate about the area, and regularly documents his hikes on his Peak District Viking page. But his post about the dozens of stacks, built next to the busy Great Ridge footpath - about a 15-minute hike from the summit of Mam Tor - has received the most engagement. "The majority of people have been quite supportive saying: 'Yeah, I hate them. We reduce them back to their natural state if we see them. Totally agree with you'," he said. "Then I had the opposite reaction which was: 'Don't tell me what to do. I'll build them if I want and I'll carry on regardless'. "I even had a couple of threats by private message, but I don't worry about those." The Peak District is far from the only location where stone stacks have proven problematic. For example, campaigners said towers of stones on a Scottish beach were a worrying trend. Stuart says the stacks in his video have been built using stones taken from a former boundary wall, which ran alongside the popular Great Ridge walk. He is concerned this has damaged the habitats of the small creatures - such as frogs, toads and insects - that lived inside the wall. It is a view shared by the National Trust. "The majority of the stone stacks featured in this video are not on National Trust land," a spokesperson said. "However, there have been stacks created on parts of Mam Tor, and staff and volunteers will infrequently disassemble any found." The trust says stone stacks have also been an issue on land it is responsible for. It added rangers had carried out extensive work to protect and preserve the hillfort at Mam Tor, which is a "scheduled monument and is of great archaeological importance". "The Peak Forest Wall is also historically significant, itself dating back to 1579," a spokesperson added. "Sadly, the stone stacks are not only impacting the history of the site, but they are also affecting the natural habitats of wildlife that live and feed within these ancient walls. "In the longer-term, it will disrupt the delicate balance of the landscape." Stuart says there is evidence of stones being removed from paths, which he says could lead to further erosion at an already popular walking spot. According to The Countryside Code, visitors should "leave rocks, stone, plants and trees as you find them and take care not to disturb wildlife including birds that nest on the ground". Anna Badcock, cultural heritage manager at the national park authority, says the stacks damage the "special qualities" of the national park and that the problem has got worse in recent years. "[Stone stacks] are created by stone removed from historic features," she said. "They are very detrimental to the historic environment which we have a statutory duty to conserve. "Like walkers' cairns [a marker along a trail], once one is created, it encourages more." The authority says its rangers generally do not remove the stacks "unless they are dangerous or causing an obstruction on a right of way". "We're aware that the National Trust rangers have removed some at Mam Tor for this very reason," a spokesperson added. Stuart said he had tried to make contact with the owner of the land on which the stacks are located, and had offered to help rebuild the wall. And while his video has attracted some debate on social media, he hopes it might make a small difference to the place he loves. He added: "I'm very passionate about the area, it's an area people live and work in, and to see it being trashed, you know, it does rile you a bit. "The more important element [of reaction to his video] was: 'I thought you were a bit of a fool when I first watched the start of the video but by the time I got to the end of it I realised, actually I didn't know that and from now on I will not build the stacks'. "That's the important bit for me. Even if a handful of people have realised the error of their ways, then that made it all the more worthwhile." Follow BBC Derby on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
