logo
GB News being punished to appease Left-wing activists, says co-owner

GB News being punished to appease Left-wing activists, says co-owner

Telegraph20-05-2025
Ofcom is unfairly punishing GB News under pressure from Left-wing activists, the broadcaster's co-owner has said.
Sir Paul Marshall accused the regulator of unfairly targeting the start-up broadcaster with a string of investigations as it struggles to fend off an 'onslaught' of complaints from pressure groups such as Stop Funding Hate.
In a speech at Oxford University on Tuesday evening, the media tycoon was expected to say: 'Understandably, Ofcom find it difficult, just like other corporate and institutional boards, to resist the pressures from Left-wing campaigning groups and this has led them to initiate many more enquiries into GB News than could be justified.'
Ofcom has found GB News in breach of broadcasting rules a dozen times since its launch in 2021, taking issue with alleged misinformation and its use of politicians as presenters.
Sir Paul, a hedge fund tycoon who co-owns GB News alongside Dubai-based investment firm Legatum, has argued that many of the investigations against the channel stem from complaints orchestrated by campaign groups.
Even before its launch, the broadcaster was targeted by an advertising boycott led by Stop Funding Hate, which resulted in brands including Ikea and Nivea pulling their campaigns.
The boycott continues to hit GB News's bottom line, although other brands such as Marks & Spencer have started to advertise on the channel.
'Constructive relationship' with Ofcom
Sir Paul said GB News intends to have 'as constructive a relationship as possible with' the broadcasting regulator.
But he added: 'They sit within a framework full of anomalies and they are steadily assailed by invective from Left-wing activists, so it is not easy for them to resist the biases of metropolitan opinion.'
Sir Paul has weighed in on the debate after Angelos Frangopoulos, chief executive of GB News, accused Ofcom of having a 'jailer' mentality that was harming Sir Keir Starmer's growth plan.
Writing in The Telegraph earlier this month, the TV boss said Ofcom's plans to crack down on the use of politicians as presenters would make it 'even harder for budding newcomers'.
Sir Paul, a self-styled 'accidental' media owner who also owns UnHerd and bought The Spectator magazine for £100m last year, urged Ofcom to instead focus its attention on the BBC.
He argued that the public service broadcaster is held to lower standards of impartiality as it is permitted to review complaints first before they are escalated to the regulator.
Sir Paul accused the BBC of 'egregious bias' in its Arabic service and said the broadcaster had 'failed spectacularly' in its coverage of the grooming gangs scandal.
He also branded bosses 'weak, weak, weak' over the Gary Lineker anti-Semitism scandal and called for the corporation to be broken up.
The BBC has said the Match of the Day presenter made a mistake after sharing a social media post about Zionism that included an illustration of a rat, but it has repeatedly denied allegations of bias in its reporting.
An Ofcom spokesman said: 'As an independent regulator, we enforce our rules fairly and proportionately. All regulated broadcasters must comply with Ofcom's rules.
'The 'BBC First' process for complaints about BBC content is set out in the BBC Charter and Agreement and was approved by Parliament.'
In his Pharos lecture, Sir Paul also took aim at tech giants.
He said Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg should be forced to publish their algorithms and said platforms such as X and Meta should face tougher regulation to ensure they are held accountable for material posted on their sites.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Innocent 'Beast of Birkenhead' Peter Sullivan now in line for £1.3m payout but lawyers say miscarriage of justice changes 'don't go nearly far enough'
Innocent 'Beast of Birkenhead' Peter Sullivan now in line for £1.3m payout but lawyers say miscarriage of justice changes 'don't go nearly far enough'

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Innocent 'Beast of Birkenhead' Peter Sullivan now in line for £1.3m payout but lawyers say miscarriage of justice changes 'don't go nearly far enough'

Labour has announced an increase in maximum pay-outs to victims of miscarriages of justice – but the changes do not go far enough, lawyers have warned. The current cap on compensation payments for people wrongly jailed for 10 years or more will rise by £300,000 to £1.3million, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood confirmed today. The ceiling on payments to those wrongly jailed for up to 10 years will also rise by 30 per cent to £650,000. The increase is likely to mean that Peter Sullivan – whose conviction was quashed in May for a murder he did not commit – will now be due a higher pay-out. In one of Britain's worst miscarriages of justice Mr Sullivan spent 38 years behind bars before judges overturned his conviction for the 1986 murder of 21-year-old florist Diane Sindall. Erroneously dubbed the 'Beast of Birkenhead' after the brutal killing, Mr Sullivan had long protested his innocence. The sheer length of his wrongful jail term means he is expected to be awarded a sum to the limit of the new cap. In another high-profile case, Andrew Malkinson was wrongly jailed for rape for 17 years and finally freed two years ago. Months after his release he had received no pay-out and described himself as 'broke' and 'living in a tent'. In February it emerged Mr Malkinson had received a 'significant' six-figure interim pay-out – but his final application is yet to be resolved. Solicitor Toby Wilton, who is representing Mr Malkinson in his compensation claim, said Ms Mahmood's announcement 'does not go nearly far enough'. 'The current maximum cap on compensation of £1million was introduced in 2008,' Mr Wilton said. 'Before that, compensation was not capped at all and applicants received compensation broadly in line with what they would receive in a court of law. 'The government should return to this system, removing the arbitrary cap which unfairly penalises those who like Andrew Malkinson have suffered the longest lasting and most serious miscarriages of justice. 'While this proposal is welcome, it does not go nearly far enough.' He added: 'The Government and Parliament should think again. 'A 30 per cent increase in the cap, whilst welcome, does not come close to addressing this unfairness. 'Increased by RPI inflation, the measure the courts use to uprate compensation amounts, £1million in 2008 would be closer to £2million today.' Announcing the changes, Ms Mahmood said: 'Fairness is the ideal that underpins our justice system. 'Where it has failed to meet that ideal, victims of devastating miscarriages of justice must be able to rebuild their lives. 'This uplift will ensure victims are compensated for the crimes they did not commit and the years they cannot get back.' The exact amount of compensation is decided by an independent assessor. Applications must be made within two years of being pardoned or having a conviction quashed as a result of a newly-discovered fact.

Recent ‘tough period' is not the real existential threat facing the BBC
Recent ‘tough period' is not the real existential threat facing the BBC

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Recent ‘tough period' is not the real existential threat facing the BBC

As understatement goes, Tim Davie appeared to have mastered it as he presented the BBC's annual report. Questions poured in over whether he had ever considered his position as a succession of problems landed on his desk this year. In response, he acknowledged he and the BBC had faced a 'tough period'. The failure to cut a Glastonbury live stream, missed opportunities to correct the behaviour of former presenter Gregg Wallace and criticism over its handling of two Gaza documentaries have seen a huge amount of opprobrium heading the BBC's way in recent weeks. The incidents, often of the BBC's own making, have handed the corporation's perennial critics plenty of material. More surprising has been the role of Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary of a Labour government, who has repeatedly targeted Davie personally over the failings. Yet for all the issues Davie has been confronting, it was the lengthy document he was presenting that spelt out the real existential threat facing the BBC. The annual report heralded some notable BBC achievements – despite the criticisms, trust in the BBC's current affairs coverage actually went up last year. However, it also hinted at a shifting media landscape and confirmed the BBC is far from immune to the effects. An array of streamers and increased global competition has seen audiences fragment. Licence fee income – the life blood of the BBC – has declined significantly in value since 2010. Worryingly, more people feel they can do without it. At the start of 2019, about 26m households paid the fee. It now stands at 23.8m households. The decline has slowed slightly, but the direction of travel is clear. Meanwhile, partly as a result of the arrival of the streamers, making TV has become more expensive. In the toughest of environments, it seems remarkable that the BBC still reached 84% of UK adults on an average week last year – and iPlayer continues to be a success story. Nor should it be ignored that the BBC is only behind the all-conquering YouTube among the most used platforms for media by 16- to 34-year-olds in the UK. Yet the massive cultural change in the habits of young viewers is clear. Just 37% of 16- to 34-year-olds said they watched BBC TV or the iPlayer on average, per week – and only for an average of about two hours. Back in 2018-19, the figure stood at 58% of the group, who watched for 2 hours 39 minutes a week. It means Davie and his team are heading towards unavoidable financial choices – do they change the licence fee model, cut costs or find some other way of making money? In reality, they are looking at all three. Their quest for more cash is showing results. Helped by Bluey, a licensing cash cow – or dog, commercial revenue has reached a record high. Its decision to charge US users for unrestricted news content is part of the search for income. On cost cutting, you don't have to read between the lines to see it is on the way – the Guardian has revealed the BBC is looking at more outsourcing and collaboration with big tech to cut costs. And then there's the licence fee. People at the top of the corporation talk of being open minded, aware that more households are not paying it. But in reality, they've drawn numerous red lines ahead of talks with ministers. No to subscription models. No to advertising. And Davie opposes a hybrid model, where everyone would pay for basic BBC services but an additional fee for all its content. So what's left? Perhaps a more progressive system asking wealthier households to pay more – or attaching it to council tax. Both are fraught with political risk. Ultimately, both the BBC and the government may be tempted to duck a radical option on reforming the licence fee. But with the media world changing so fast, it may be the last time a fudge is possible.

Newcastle confirm stance on Alexander Isak amid Liverpool interest
Newcastle confirm stance on Alexander Isak amid Liverpool interest

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Newcastle confirm stance on Alexander Isak amid Liverpool interest

Liverpool are reportedly interested in signing Newcastle United striker Alexander Isak, with a suggested offer of £120 million. Newcastle are insistent that Isak is not for sale, valuing him at approximately £150 million and working to secure him on a new contract. Isak, who has three years remaining on his current deal, has been a pivotal player for Newcastle, contributing to their Champions League qualification and Carabao Cup victory. Liverpool are considering Isak as a potential option to bolster their attacking line-up, amid possible departures of other forwards. Separately, Liverpool have rejected a £59 million bid from Bayern Munich for winger Luis Diaz, maintaining their stance that he is not for sale despite his contract nearing its final two years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store