logo
Porn sites must check age of French users, says top court

Porn sites must check age of French users, says top court

Time of India2 days ago
Major pornographic websites Pornhub, YouPorn and RedTube need to verify the age of users in France, the country's top administrative court said Tuesday.
More than half of all boys in France access porn sites on average every month from age 12, French audiovisual watchdog Arcom said in June.
France is trying to prevent minors from accessing pornography, but has faced pushback from adult websites.
The government in March ordered porn sites based in the European Union, but not in France, to check the ages of their visitors based on a French law from 2024, to prevent underage users from accessing them.
Pornhub, YouPorn and RedTube, all owned by the same parent company, made themselves unavailable in France in early June in protest.
Hammy Limited, an adult film firm based on Cyprus and the operator of the Xhamster platform, took legal steps against the French decree.
The Paris administrative tribunal last month then suspended it, pending an investigation into whether it was compatible with EU legislation.
After the government appealed, the Council of State, the country's top administrative court, on Tuesday said it had annulled that suspension.
"YouPorn and Pornhub hit a wall. Judicial manoeuvrings in order to not protect children don't work," said France's junior minister for digital affairs Clara Chappaz on X.
In a bid to protect privacy, Arcom, the French watchdog, has recommended operators offer a third-party "double-blind" option that would prevent the platforms from seeing users' identifying information.
Aylo, which reports seven million visitors in France daily across its various platforms, has called instead for governments to require makers of operating systems such as Apple,
Microsoft
and Google to verify users' ages at the level of individual devices.
The EU Commission said on Monday that five EU countries, including France, would test an app aimed at preventing children from accessing harmful content online.
The commission unveiled the prototype of an age-verification app that Denmark, France, Greece, Italy and Spain will customise to launch national versions within several months.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Working more for less: France's austerity push sparks outrage
Working more for less: France's austerity push sparks outrage

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Working more for less: France's austerity push sparks outrage

(Representational Image: iStock) For decades, France has stood as Europe's most defiant advocate for work-life balance. It enshrined the 35-hour workweek, guaranteed extensive paid holidays, and made the 'right to disconnect' a legal entitlement. In the French imagination, leisure isn't a luxury—it's a birthright. But now, that ethos is under siege. Facing mounting fiscal pressure, the French government is floating a proposal that has struck a raw nerve: eliminate two public holidays in May to make up for budget deficits. The message, though couched in economic necessity, is crystal clear—work more, earn the same, expect less. And in a country where workers have historically fought to protect their time, that message is proving deeply unpopular. The proposal: Two holidays down, €4.2 billion up The suggestion came not from the Élysée Palace but from Prime Minister François Bayrou, who proposed scrapping the two May holidays as part of a broader austerity push to reduce public spending. By eliminating these holidays, France would potentially recoup €4.2 billion—a mere fraction of the €20 billion in targeted savings outlined by President Emmanuel Macron's administration. But for French workers, this is more than arithmetic. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo It's symbolic. The plan disrupts a longstanding cultural contract between labor and the state, one built not solely on productivity, but dignity and time. Cultural whiplash: A nation known for saying 'Non' From the outside, France may seem economically indulgent. With 25 statutory vacation days, multiple public holidays, and strict labor protections, its labor model prioritizes balance over burnout. But the French defense of downtime is deeply rooted. It's tied to historical movements, social values, and a rejection of the Anglo-American hustle culture. When Nicolas Sarkozy once said 'Work more to earn more,' it was met with resistance. Bayrou's implied version—'Work more, earn the same'—is being greeted with outright hostility. French unions have already raised red flags, framing the proposal as a 'stealth attack' on workers' rights. In the backdrop is a restive population still recovering from last year's pension reform protests. The economics: Is more work the real solution? Economists are divided. On paper, cutting holidays could improve gross output. But critics say this amounts to squeezing the same workforce harder without structural gains. France's true economic challenges lie elsewhere—low employment among older adults, high youth unemployment, and underutilization of immigrant labor. A recent report suggests that simply closing these employment gaps could add nearly 10% to France's GDP. In that light, clawing back holidays appears more like a political gesture than a sustainable fix. Public sentiment: Austerity fatigue is setting in Among everyday workers, frustration is mounting. Many see this not as reform, but erosion. The anger reflects a deeper issue, economic recovery is being pursued through worker concessions, rather than inclusive growth. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Go easy on history, keep it out of school curriculum
Go easy on history, keep it out of school curriculum

India Today

time5 hours ago

  • India Today

Go easy on history, keep it out of school curriculum

Year 2145 AD.A prime-time news debate is going on. The topic today is state-sanctioned correction of history e-books. On the panel is a ruling party spokesperson, a historian with a PhD from the Rajiv Gandhi University and three ChatGPT bots. The correction they are debating is about the first battle of Sindoor in 2025. The news studio is in the posh area of 'Greater than the previous Noida'.advertisementThe historian thunders: 'This is a complete fabrication. Let me point out the exact lies in the NCERT textbooks. I am quoting a primary source, a foreign publication, so that there is no bias. A French news portal - France 24 – writes that the Pakistanis had won the war on May 8 itself, showing complete air dominance. You don't believe it? Wait, let me quote another. A noted Chinese publication says India lost seven Rafales and the Pakistanis bombed 34 airbases, leading to a ceasefire.' The AI newsreader interjects: 'But we had satellite pictures to show the bombed airbases. Even The New York Times had published''Just some grainy pictures? We have recorded video footage of Pakistanis celebrating their victory. You can see fireworks. The army chief got promoted to the rank of a field marshal. There is so much corroborative evidence. Are you even listening to what you are saying?'As this is patently evident, any historical event or period will have different recorded versions of it, based on the agenda of the writer. Even in an era of satellite surveillance, Operation Sindoor had multiple versions of its chronology. Imagine 400 years ago, when there was no evidence recording mechanism, how easily one could distort such cases, we are destined to believe whatever written records survived from that era. In most cases they are hagiographies like Ain-i-Akbari or Baburnama, which were written by writers working on a retainer being paid by the kings. Even a highly communal Jizya tax is portrayed as protection money paid by the citizens to ensure security. A century later, we will whitewash hafta vasooli or Rangdari tax as kingdom or reign had varying degrees of atrocities and reforms. Every king had shades of grey. A history book should be aware of the same, and provide a balanced take for young students. It's easy to create binaries of heroes and villains which suit story books. History is far too serious a subject matter to be taught to young minds.A sixth standard student, a 12-year-old, tries to paint characters in black and white, purely out of convenience, and lack of reasoning abilities. And such tropes are then carried over by the film and television industry to create hagiographies of such rulers. We are all aware of dramas like The Sword of Tipu Sultan and Akbar, The Great. When an entire generation feeds on such stuff, grows up, and learns the darker things about such rulers, they revolt and naturally cry propaganda. They are unable to digest students study history to memorise facts and figures and regurgitate them on answer sheets during their exams to score marks. When was the first Battle of Panipat fought? becomes a quiz question, stripping it of all the complexities of a war - the ensuing politics and its impact on subsequent generations. Why was Babur invited to fight Ibrahim Lodi? And why did Babur eventually defeat the guys who invited him? No clue. History is essentially a domino effect, but we are so focused on individual slabs or dominoes that we never really zoom out to see the entire when we grow up, in our 30s and 40s, do we buy expensive hard-bound books at airports to read history from the lens of a mature grown-up man. Then, we will appreciate it. But by that time, we have already hard coded our biases, and hence we look for stuff that confirms our biases. It's too late. That's why, focus on geography, teach civics, but maybe, go easy on history, as it's far too complex to be taught to young people. Let them grow up and buy history books at airports.(Abhishek Asthana is the founder of a creative agency – GingerMonkey. He tweets as @GabbbarSingh)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch

France mulls intercepting UK-bound migrant boats at sea
France mulls intercepting UK-bound migrant boats at sea

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

France mulls intercepting UK-bound migrant boats at sea

AP image LILLE: France is considering stopping Britain-bound migrant boats in its shallow coastal waters, but the move raises both safety and legal issues. France has long been a launchpad for migrants hoping to cross the Channel and start a better life in Britain. Paying smugglers thousands of dollars, they often board overloaded rubber dinghies to make the dangerous and sometimes deadly journey across one of the world's busiest shipping routes. France and Britain have long vowed to crack down on people smugglers who organise the journey. But until now, French authorities have only intervened on land to prevent boats leaving. But once the vessels are at sea, French authorities have, under international maritime law, so far only intervened if someone's life was in danger. To avoid French authorities stopping them on land, smugglers have in recent years chosen to "taxi" migrants out to boats waiting in choppy waters just off-shore, rather than depart from the beach. But as more small boats land on English shores, and the UK government comes under mounting pressure from the far right to tackle irregular migration, London has pressed Paris to do more. The French interior ministry on Wednesday told AFP it wanted its rules to "evolve" so its law enforcement officers could "intervene in shallow waters and stop 'taxi boats' up to 300 metres from the coast". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo It said an inter-ministerial committee had tasked French sea authorities with drawing up an action plan "by the summer". The hope, the ministry added, was to have "shared orientations" in time for a French-British summit that President Emmanuel Macron is expected to attend in England from July 8 to 10. - Tear gas, knives - In February, London and Paris agreed to extend a deal under which the United Kingdom funds some of France's border security measures to stop migrants trying to reach British shores. Hardline Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau has already called for a new approach that would allow French forces to intercept boats in the water. Crossings have since only increased. Some 1,194 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel in small boats on June 1, a record for this year according to AFP counting from government data. "We know more needs to be done with the French to build upon the 10,000 crossing attempts that we have stopped this year, and are strengthening our cooperation to do this," a UK home office official said on Wednesday. Migrants, some travelling with children, have been making the most of the fair weather in recent days to make the sea crossing. On Monday morning, AFP saw dozens of migrants, some from Eritrea, sprint across a northern French beach at sunrise and French police fire teargas in their direction. Wading into the sea up to their waists or higher, some appearing to carry toddlers, they however managed to board a rubber boat. AFP has in the past also seen policemen -- who are deployed en masse along northern French beaches -- use knives to slash the inflatable dinghies on land to prevent departures. This is in part why smugglers now prefer the "taxi boat" system with pickups directly at sea, leading to perilous and often deadly passenger pickups. - 'Brutal and dangerous' - At least 17 people have died trying to cross the Channel to Britain by boat this year, after a record 78 lost their lives attempting crossing last year. It is not clear how many of them died during departure but an official French report in February noted that the stages of "boarding and/or return to the beach" were particularly perilous, with an increased risk of drowning or hypothermia. Migrant support organisation Utopia 56 said French authorities intervening at sea would only increase the "risk of the boat capsizing", and be "brutal and dangerous". Thibaut Fleury Graff, an international law professor at Pantheon-Assas University, said any intervention in shallow waters needs legal justification. Under international law, people have "the right to leave any country," he said. In territorial waters, a state can detain a ship only "if there is a legal basis" to do so such as "the commission of a criminal offence," he said. The alleged offence of "human trafficking could potentially apply, but it would need to be directed not at the migrants but at the smugglers," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store