Armed robbery of McDonald's store sends shockwaves through Strand
However, a swift and coordinated response by neighbourhood watch members and private security teams has led to a significant breakthrough in the case.
The robbery occurred near the Total Garage on the R44, prompting an immediate response from local safety networks.
KC Gericke, chairperson of the Strand Patrol Neighbourhood Watch, confirmed that the alarm was raised shortly after the robbery and that Sierra 47, a member of the local Sierra patrol group, responded without hesitation.
Multiple agencies rapidly converged at the scene, including Vetus Schola Group, AM Security Services, Fidelity ADT, AMBO, GB Sec, and the South African Police Service (SAPS).
Their collaboration played a critical role in tracking the suspects.
Sierra 47 promptly canvassed nearby businesses for surveillance footage, one of which captured the getaway vehicle fleeing down a side street.
Although the number plate was initially unclear, unique visual markers allowed investigators to positively identify the vehicle.
'Back at our control room, Sierra 1 began meticulously reviewing footage from our Navic LPR system – vehicle by vehicle,' Gericke explained.
Approximately 45 minutes later, the suspect vehicle was positively identified using Navic license plate recognition (LPR) footage.
The registration details were swiftly relayed to SAPS and the McDonald's armed response team, and a case number was promptly issued.
The vehicle has since been flagged on Navic, and an active search for the suspects is now underway.
'This town is no longer a playground for criminals. Our community is standing together, sharing information, and taking action. And this is exactly how we win,' Gericke added.
The community's response has been widely praised for its speed, organisation, and effectiveness, highlighting the vital role of collaborative policing efforts between residents, private security, and law enforcement.
The investigation is ongoing, and authorities urge anyone with information to come forward.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
32 minutes ago
- The South African
Here's HOW much fraudulent ghost tokens cost ESKOM annually
Eskom has probed the illicit creation, transfer and use of ghost tokens in South Africa, and the numbers are worryingly high. Leaders say the state-owned entity needs to get on top of these illegal ghost tokens being distributed countrywide. Essentially, they allow the user free electricity, and it is costing Eskom and South African taxpayers billions annually. Electricity expert, Chris Yelland, believes these counterfeit ghost tokens cost Eskom as much as R27 billion every year. Additionally, this is over and above a recent investigation into procurement fraud at Eskom at the start of 2025. Investigators found R180 million in kickbacks for contracts at certain power stations. The state-run power utility absorbs the cost of ghost tokens three-fold. Image: File For those who are unaware, Eskom ghost tokens are created through unauthorised access to Eskom's Online Vending System (OVS). The aforementioned requires direct collusion with corrupt Eskom insiders. It has been reported that Eskom insiders have compromised the OVS to create and sell fraudulent ghost tokens. They are able to gain unauthorised access to the system and generate legitimate tokens. These are then sold to both suspecting and unsuspecting customers, often at a wildly discounted rate. Worse still, the money goes directly to the fraudsters … A lack of revenue, producing electricity for free and then redirecting resources to combat the scourge has seen prices increase 450% in two decades. Image: File Furthermore, because these ghost tokens are not tied to any legitimate transaction, the revenue generated does not go back to Eskom. Essentially, this doubles the overall revenue loss for government and ensures that ghost tokens are not a victimless crime. Plus, the state-owned entities efforts to address the constant breaches diverts critical resources away from keeping the lights on. Yellend further explains, in low-income areas like Soweto, as much as 80% of the electricity delivered by Eskom is not paid for. Municipal arrears from this persistent non-payment now exceeds R100 billion. The power utility needs to make this shortfall up somehow, often with the only recourse being increased tariffs for paying customers. Between 2007 and 2025, the cost of electricity has risen 450%. Free electricity is available to qualifying households, but the uptake is dropping each year. Image: File Meanwhile, Stats SA has revealed some telling data on the decline of indigent households taking advantage of Free Basic Services at the same time. Between 2014 to 2024, the number of residents getting free electricity dropped from 25% to 14%. And yet, 80% of South African households – an estimated 5.4-million residents – are eligible for the service but choose not to receive it. Some households qualify for 100% subsidies, while others only qualify for less, depending on the criteria set. On average, free basic electricity and water includes 50 kWh of power and 6 000 litres of water per month. Contact your local municipality for more details in your area if you think you qualify. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Time to confront the crisis at the heart of the game
Royal AM's dramatic collapse — from PSL contenders to court battles and expulsion — has become a symbol of South African football's deeper structural crisis. Photo: Backpagepix Image: Backpageix South African football is in crisis. And not the kind that can be spun away with PR talk about 'transition phases' or 'teething problems.' This is structural decline: boardroom power plays, unpaid players, clubs being bought and sold with minimal vetting of new owners, and governing bodies that often look the other way. The Pretoria High Court's scathing judgment against Royal AM — a club already expelled from the PSL — should be a tipping point. The court ruled that the PSL had valid grounds to expel the club, even before it was placed under business rescue by SARS in November 2024. #LetsFixSAFootball Image: Independent Media Why? Because Royal AM reportedly misled the league on multiple occasions — including failing to disclose changes in shareholding, accumulating unpaid debts that resulted in Fifa-imposed player-transfer bans, and ultimately demonstrating a breakdown in operational stability. The past 2024/25 season may have exposed just how deep the problems run — even before a ball was kicked. From fixture irregularities to financial uncertainty at several clubs, early warning signs were there. Through it all, SAFA and the PSL remain publicly silent and institutionally divided, seemingly more focused on protecting their own domains than working together to address the crisis. The Betway Premiership — the PSL's flagship competition — has a new sponsor but what about a new direction? Where is the accountability? Where is the leadership? Where is the will to change? This is why we are launching the #LetsFixSAFootball campaign — not to stir controversy, but to demand clarity, transparency, and meaningful action. Most importantly, we hope to help influence real, lasting change. To club owners: Football is not just a side business. People invest their hopes, their histories, and their hearts into these teams. Respect that. To the PSL and SAFA: Step up. Clean house. Lead boldly — or make way for those who will. To the players: Keep speaking. You are the product, and your voice matters. To the fans: This is your game. Demand better. Hold the decision-makers accountable. South African football has the talent. It has the culture. It has the potential to be great. But if we don't confront the mismanagement, neglect and governance failures at its core, nothing will change. As such in the coming weeks, Independent Media will be interrogating the beautiful game from grassroots to state level, revealing the shortcomings, discussing the problems and arguing solutions. We want you to be involved in this discussion by visiting our platforms and adding to the debate by using #LetsFixSAFootball or sending your correspondence to [email protected]. Let's fix South African football. Now — before there's nothing left to fix.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Top 5 celebrity court cases give Mamkhize a run for her money
The glamorous lives of celebrities are often tarnished by what happens behind the scenes. From authors to kwaito stars, legal cases with dramatic twists have become all too common in the world of the rich and famous. Businesswoman and reality TV star Shauwn Mkhize's has been one case, with the South African Revenue Services (Sars) pressing charges for her failure to pay the taxman. Her prized fleet of 14 vehicles were individually sold in a Sars-sanctioned auction in Durban and Joburg last year, after she reportedly owed R40m in back taxes. See this list of five other celebrities who have made headlines for their court cases. BONANG MATHEBA According to a TimesLIVE report, in 2018, Sars opened a fraud case against South African television personality, actress and presenter Bonang Matheba for not paying personal tax from 2008-2017 and company tax from 2014-2017. During her case, she appeared at the Johannesburg Specialised Commercial Crimes Court after she paid an admission of guilt fine of R30,000. R22,000 was paid for personal taxes not filed and R8,000 for company taxes, listed under Bonang Matheba Entertainment (Pty) Ltd. JACKIE PHAMOTSE In 2023, Jackie Phamotse was found guilty in a high-profile defamation case brought against her by celebrity couple Basetsana Kumalo and her husband, businessman Romeo Kumalo. The legal saga originated from a controversial tweet posted by Phamotse in 2018, where she made allegations insinuating the existence of a compromising video involving the Kumalos and another male figure. Phamotse was sentenced to a two-year house arrest and was fined R30,000 for defamation. ARTHUR MAFOKATE According to The Citizen, the court agreed with the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) that musician Arthur Mafokate could not show how he purchased properties and cars without a National Lottery Commission grant he had requested for R9.3m. The grant was meant to provide unemployed youth in poor and rural areas with skills in the entertainment industry; instead, R7.5m was used to purchase a guest house, La Villa Rosa in Midrand. During the court proceedings, Mafokate argued that the funds were necessary to help deliver the required services. He appealed against a ruling to have the property released from a preservation order, but it was dismissed. JOHNNY DEPP AND AMBER HEARD Depp's ex-wife and actor Amber Heard accused him of domestic abuse, which she detailed in a 2018 Washington Post essay. Depp denied all allegations and instead claimed that it was Heard who was violent towards him. He filed a suit against her for defamation, for which she filed a countersuit alleging the same. Clips of the trial went viral on social media. Heard was found liable in all three matters of defamation raised and was ordered to pay her ex-husband $10m (R178,991,992) compensatory damages and $5m (R89,506,441) in punitive damages. The latter was reduced to $350,000 (R6,263,018) due to a limit imposed by a state law. Depp was found liable on one charge of defamation and ordered to pay Heard $2m (R35,783,058). Kendall Jenner had to cough up for falsely promoting the fictional Fyre Festival. Image: Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic KENDALL JENNER VS GREGORY MESSER No stranger to lawsuits, Kendall Jenner's most renowned legal troubles came from her and US Bankruptcy Court trustee Gregory Messer for the false promotion of Fyre Festival, a 2017 music event that famously never even happened. Jenner, who was among several celebrities to post about it, was paid $275,000 (R4,919,258) to endorse the event. Messer, who was trying to recover money on behalf of many creditors, argued that Jenner not only failed to disclose to her followers that she was paid for the advertising but also led them to believe the festival would be filled with famous models on an 'exotic private island with first-class culinary experiences and a luxury atmosphere'. She eventually agreed to pay $90,000 (R1,610,523) to settle.
