Taliban denies arresting Afghans after UK data leak
Thousands of Afghans who had worked with the UK were brought to Britain with their families in a secret programme after a 2022 data breach put their lives at risk, the British government revealed on Tuesday.
The scheme was revealed only after the UK High Court lifted a superinjunction order banning any reports of the events.
UK Defence Minister John Healey said the leak was not revealed because of the risk that the Taliban authorities would obtain the data set and the lives of Afghans would be put at risk.
"Nobody has been arrested for their past actions, nobody has been killed and nobody is being monitored for that," the Afghan government's deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat said.
"Reports of investigation and monitoring of a few people whose data has been leaked are false."
After the Taliban swept back to power in Kabul in 2021, their Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada announced an amnesty for Afghans who worked for Nato forces or the ousted foreign-backed government during the two-decade conflict.
"All their information and documents are present here in the Defence Ministry, Interior Ministry and Intelligence," Mr Fitrat added. "We don't need to use the leaked documents from Britain."
He said "rumours" were being spread to create fear among Afghans and their families. The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – by the previous government in April 2024.
Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including an estimated number of family members of the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, UK judges said in June 2024
The scheme is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with an estimated cost, once completed, of £850 million.
Millions more are expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation. About 4,500 people, made up of 900 Arap applicants and an estimated 3,600 family members, have been brought to the UK or are in transit through the Afghanistan Response Route.
They are among some 36,000 Afghans who have been accepted by Britain under various schemes since the August 2021 fall of Kabul.
Tens of thousands of Afghans fled Afghanistan in a chaotic weeks-long evacuation when the Taliban insurgency was successful, after the mass withdrawal of international troops and air support to the country.
Tens of thousands more have been resettled under European and US asylum schemes, which after four years have now declined to a virtual halt.
The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (Unama) said in 2023 there were credible reports of serious human rights violations by the Taliban authorities against hundreds of former government officials and ex-armed forces members.
From the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan on August 15, 2021 to June 30, 2023, Unama documented at least 800 instances of extrajudicial killing, arbitrary arrest and detention, torture and ill-treatment and enforced disappearance, it said in a report.
The Taliban's Foreign Ministry has denied the allegations and said all former employees had been pardoned.
The Taliban government has imposed a severe interpretation of Islamic law, under which women and girls are banned from most education and jobs.
Former Conservative UK ministers have sought to defend their record after Prime Minister Keir Starmer said members of the previous government had 'serious questions to answer' about the Afghan data leak that resulted in an unprecedented superinjunction.
Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick said he first learnt of the data breach, in which a defence official release details of almost 19,000 people seeking to flee Afghanistan, after a legal gagging order had been imposed.
Former veterans minister Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' regarding the former Conservative administration's actions in relation to Kabul but said it was 'absurd' to accuse him of failing grasp the scale of crisis.
'I know who is covering their tracks and who has the courage to be honest,' he said. 'I would caution those who might attempt to rewrite history.'
Former prime minister Liz Truss, who was foreign secretary at the time of the breach in February 2022, but a backbencher when the superinjunction was sought, said she was shocked by the 'cover-up'.
She said the revelations indicated a 'huge betrayal of public trust' and 'those responsible in both governments and the bureaucracy need to be held to account'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Business
13 hours ago
- Arabian Business
London Heathrow submits $65bn proposal to UK government for a third runway
London Heathrow Airport will be able to add 276,000 flights a year and increase the number of passengers from 84 million to 150 million annually after submitting a £49 billion ($65 billion) expansion proposal to the UK government. The plan includes the construction of the controversial third runway at a cost of £21 billion, a new terminal and re-routing the M25, the major highway that circles London. Heathrow expansion The proposal includes £12 billion to fund a new terminal and £15 billion for modernisation. The airport said the expansion would provide at least 30 new daily routes, more domestic connections and improved flight times. The runway would be privately funded. Terminal 2 would be extended as per the plan, while Terminal 3 – where Emirates flights operate from – and the old Terminal 1 would be demolished. Thomas Woldbye, chief executive, said: 'It has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow. We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity.' The expansion would require demolishing 752 homes in the surrounding area to make room for the third runway, as well as realigning and widening the M25 between the junctions at the airport. The project would also improve public transport links to the hub by expanding bus and rail capacity. In a statement, Heathrow said: 'A third runway and supporting infrastructure can be ready within a decade, and the full investment across all terminals would take place over the coming decades.' The Labour government backed the new runway in January in a bid to boost UK economic growth. The project has faced opposition from environmentalists and local residents over the years, as well as the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, and some of Labour's own MPs. Britain's Supreme Court ruled at the end of 2020 that Heathrow could build the third runway, overturning a legal decision to block construction on environmental grounds. Meanwhile, hotelier Surinder Arora's Arora Group, one of Heathrow's largest landowners, said it will submit a rival bid to build a shorter third runway of 2,800 meters, that would be constructed at lower costs and with less disruption to local residents and the environment.
The National
a day ago
- The National
UK tax authority warns of fake social media posts
Claims in a social media video that the British government is tracking taxpayers who travel overseas more than three times a year have been rejected as a fake by the UK 's tax authority, HM Revenue and Customs. The video has been circulated widely in the Middle East, causing alarm among British nationals overseas and UK residents. It claims that from August 4, a new branch of HMRC and the Home Office – called the Mobility Oversight Unit – will check whether a person's employment status and tax record match their lifestyle. This is part of an 'enhanced customs monitoring' programme to tackle benefit fraud and tax evasion, the video and other related social media posts claim. HMRC said the information contained in the video was false. 'This video is disinformation, designed to cause undue alarm and fear. Anyone wanting information on rules around taxation should go to or seek advice from a tax professional,' an HMRC spokesperson said. Many social media users commented under the video that the information was false, but that did not stop it being widely shared. Fact-checking charity Full Fact traced the video back to a TikTok account, where the post had been shared more than 66,000 times and liked by 57,200 accounts. The video claimed the information was first reported by The Guardian, but there was no evidence of this on the newspaper's website. Full Fact added that while there are existing restrictions on the length of travel for people claiming benefits, the system in described in the video does not exist. The Home Office was contacted for comment. British government departments are being targeted with misinformation. One widely shared post on social media says 'the UK government is hiring' for a 'Shariah law administrator'. A separate post claimed 'the role is for the Department of Work and Pensions' alongside a screenshot of a – now deleted – listing for Manchester Community Centre. The job description says the successful candidate will 'provide all admin and secretarial work for Manchester Shariah Council'. In fact, the advert was not for a government job and the administrator was being hired using money a mosque said it had raised through donations. The job was advertised on a portal run by the government, where private employers can post. It is not known whether any of the posts are part of a hostile state-backed cyber campaign. UK government bodies have repeatedly warned of threats from online and phishing operations by actors in Russia and Iran. Earlier this year the UK's National Cyber Security Centre exposed a cyber campaign by military unit 26165 of Russia's GRU intelligence directorate against western logistics providers and technology companies that had been running since 2022.
The National
a day ago
- The National
UK on edge as protests build outside all-male migrant hotels
The front of the Britannia Hotel in London these days has more police hovering around at the front entrance than guests coming and going. Metal gates block the entrance after it emerged the hotel has been earmarked to house asylum seekers, though none have as yet moved in. Extra security was put in place after protesters began gathering outside the hotel in Canary Wharf, east London, which in turn has attracted counter-demonstrations by anti-racism groups. More than 25,000 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel so far this year, with 898 arriving on Wednesday. This influx is causing a headache for a government that has promised to end the use of asylum hotels but is instead turning to more facilities. Protests first hit the headlines from a hotel in Epping, Essex, after an asylum seeker who had been staying there was charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity. Hadush Kebatu, 41, from Ethiopia, has denied the offences and is in custody. The focus of the Epping protesters has been the all-male make up of the asylum seekers living in the hotel. Males represent two thirds of those claiming asylum in the UK, according to official data. On Wednesday night former home secretary Suella Braverman backed a protest in the Hampshire town of Waterlooville, where a set of flats was reportedly being lined up for occupation by asylum seekers. Scenes of a mob setting fire to a hotel in Rotherham and attempting to break in to attack migrants is one of the enduring images of last summer's riots in Britain. One year on, the fear remains that demonstrators could light a nationwide tinderbox, sparking more violence. So far the protests at the Britannia Hotel have been peaceful and demonstrators The National spoke to said they wanted to make their voices heard about the prospect of male asylum seekers moving there. Lee Boys, 43, from nearby Stepney, said the decision to move asylum seekers during the summer holidays was provocative. 'It's worrying," he said. "I just want my kids to be safe and it's the summer holidays as well, so it's the worst possible time they could have done this. It's a bit antagonising.' Mr Boys, a construction worker, said he has been in touch with friends from Epping who have been protesting there and have formed a WhatsApp group to share information about migrants being moved from there to the Britannia. He contrasted the make-up of the migrants with Ukrainian asylum seekers, about 210,000 of whom have settled in the UK. 'When Ukraine happened, there were families coming but these are not families,' he said. 'And they're not just from one country. They're from different countries and we can't control it. 'We don't know who they are. We had terrorism a few years back but they're coming by boat, with no record of who they are.' He also hinted that the issue of migrants being accommodated in hotels has become a lightning rod for wider discontent over squeezed living standards in Britain. 'I've worked all my life. I've never had nothing from our government but they walk in and the first day they get a hotel room but I'm spending £1,500 [$1,985] a month for me and my family,' he said. Another protester, Heidi Stafford, 42, who is from the Canning Town area, also near the hotel, was outside with her two friends. She is an enthusiastic user of TikTok, which serves as a source of news and platform for posting videos for protesters. Ms Stafford told The National: 'Where I live is multicultural, which is not a problem. I've never been out to protest about legal migration but this is different. They want to put large numbers of men here and we're concerned about our kids.' As well as in Epping, at the weekend there were protests against asylum hotels in Norwich, Diss and Manchester, following those in Portsmouth, Leeds and Southampton last week. All have been met with counter-demonstrations, with both sides kept apart by a large police presence. Meanwhile, nervous communities are now looking for a way out, as the potential for serious violence rises. Epping Forest District Council unanimously voted in favour of the motion calling on the government "to immediately and permanently close" the hotel "for the purposes of asylum processing". The hotel in Diss, which has been the target of protesters, has insisted it accommodates families and said it has told the Home Office it will refuse to take single men. The Park Hotel even went as far as saying it would close down rather than accede any such demand. "There are currently vulnerable families and children staying at the hotel, many of whom are feeling frightened and uncertain about the recent events and their futures,' said the hotel. The numbers in hotels has been steadily increasing since 2020, and reached a peak of more than 50,000 in 2023, before falling to 32,345 by March this year. That figure had risen from 29,585 at the end of June 2024, just before Labour came into office. According to Fact Check, there were 71,339 asylum seekers living in other types of non-hotel accommodation at the end of March 2025, compared with 67,057 at the end of June 2024. The Home Office told Fact Check there were 210 asylum hotels currently in use and says it has reduced the figure by more than 70 during its first year in power. The government wants to end the use of hotels by 2029 and has been trying to move asylum seekers into cheaper accommodation. In a bid to achieve that, the Home Office has introduced a Failure to Travel policy aimed at compelling the hundreds of asylum seekers refusing to leave hotels to be transferred to other forms of accommodation every week. Those who refuse to move without a valid reason will now risk losing their housing and support, the Home Office said. Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said: "We are working to close hotels, restore order, and put fairness and value for money at the heart of our asylum system. "This government is making those necessary decisions to protect the taxpayer and uphold the integrity of our borders.'
