7 critical estate planning mistakes to avoid if you're in a new relationship, according to a financial planner
According to the National Institute on Ageing and RBC Royal Trust, more than 25 per cent of Canadians over the age of 55 lack a will — despite having the most to lose. For those entering new relationships, many also assume their previous estate planning will protect their new partner, but this assumption can be catastrophically wrong.
To help seniors navigate these challenges, Yahoo Canada consulted Janet Gray, an advice-only financial planner with Money Coaches Canada, who revealed the biggest mistakes people make when love finds them again.
Past relationship trauma often prevents the honest financial discussions that estate planning requires. Many seniors don't want to appear overly-concerned with finances — and don't want to focus on money talk with potential partners.
"Not everybody wants to jump in and say, 'Hey, I make this much. How much do you make?'" Gray explained.
She warned that "cautious communication" is important. You can share too much too early, but you also can't build a future without honest discussions.
Gray suggested starting with conversations about financial values and goals before diving into specific numbers. This approach can allow couples to gauge compatibility on money matters without the pressure of sharing exact income figures or net worth.
Many seniors assume they have ample time to organize their documents, but health crises can emerge suddenly and leave them unable to make important decisions.
"One of the biggest mistakes is waiting too long," Gray said. "You kind of procrastinate, procrastinate, procrastinate, and now you've gotten sick. You no longer have the legal capacity to make your will."
Gray strongly advised starting to update official documents before entering a new relationship. She often sees clients with outdated beneficiary designations on RRSPs, life insurance or pension plans that still name their former spouse.
These designations override what's written in your will, so updating them is important.
Blended family estate planning involves complex tax, legal and family issues. Balancing children from previous relationships with a new spouse's needs can overwhelm even the most financially savvy individuals.
"One of the biggest mistakes is waiting too long. You kind of procrastinate, procrastinate, procrastinate, and now you've gotten sick. You no longer have the legal capacity to make your will."Janet Gray, financial planner
"Everyone needs professional help," Gray stated firmly. "This is not something people should try to do on their own."
She recommended consulting an experienced estate lawyer who specializes in blended family planning, rather than relying on well-meaning neighbours or general accountants. For particularly complex situations, you may also need a specialized tax advisor or certified financial planner.
Gray said many people don't know what they want their estate planning to accomplish when entering a new relationship. Without clear objectives, it's impossible to create effective legal documents that serve everyone's needs. "You can't create a plan if you don't know what you're trying to achieve," Gray noted.
Before meeting with professionals, couples should tackle some difficult questions together: Do you want to leave money to your children? How will you provide for your new partner? What happens if one of you needs long-term care?
Before any estate planning discussions, understanding your complete financial picture is essential. Gray said many people focus on obvious assets while missing significant holdings that could change everything.
"Financial awareness means understanding your complete financial picture," she explained. "Do you have a pension? Where are your RRSPs? What does your money look like?"
Gray recommended creating a comprehensive list of all assets and debts, including investments, life insurance, employee benefits and potential inheritance. That way, nothing will slip through the cracks when planning.
Assumptions about family loyalty can lead to devastating consequences. Some seniors assume their new partner will look after their kids, or that stepchildren will respect handshake agreements about inheritance. "We all think, 'If something happens to me, I know they'll look after my kids,'" Gray said.
But this assumption is "too arbitrary." She noted she's seen cases where families "implode" because estate planning was left to chance. Gray strongly recommended prenups or domestic agreements for blended families to establish clear expectations.
Perhaps the most dangerous mistake is failing to understand what happens if you take no action. The legal system has default rules that vary dramatically depending on your relationship status. "There's different defaults for marriage versus common law," Gray warned.
Protect your assets and get it in writing.Janet Gray
She cited cases where common law partners of 30 years received nothing after their partner's death because the house went to the deceased's children. Property doesn't automatically transfer to common-law partners, which makes it even more integral to ensure your estate planning is set up in the exact way you want it to be.
Estate planning for new relationships isn't just about protecting assets — it's about protecting the people you love. While having difficult conversations about money and estate planning isn't romantic, it's essential to preventing family conflicts and ensuring your wishes are honoured. "Protect your assets and get it in writing," Gray advised.
Work with professionals to create clear, legally binding documents that reflect your goals and protect everyone involved. Don't leave your family's future to chance or assumptions about loyalty. "Day one of living together could be your last day," Gray reminded.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Those who invested in Stingray Group (TSE:RAY.A) five years ago are up 136%
Generally speaking the aim of active stock picking is to find companies that provide returns that are superior to the market average. And while active stock picking involves risks (and requires diversification) it can also provide excess returns. For example, long term Stingray Group Inc. (TSE:RAY.A) shareholders have enjoyed a 88% share price rise over the last half decade, well in excess of the market return of around 72% (not including dividends). However, more recent returns haven't been as impressive as that, with the stock returning just 47% in the last year, including dividends. Now it's worth having a look at the company's fundamentals too, because that will help us determine if the long term shareholder return has matched the performance of the underlying business. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During the five years of share price growth, Stingray Group moved from a loss to profitability. That's generally thought to be a genuine positive, so investors may expect to see an increasing share price. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). We know that Stingray Group has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? If you're interested, you could check this free report showing consensus revenue forecasts. It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Stingray Group, it has a TSR of 136% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! It's nice to see that Stingray Group shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 47% over the last year. And that does include the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 19% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Stingray Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Even so, be aware that Stingray Group is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about... If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Canadian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Individual investors who hold 42% of Benz Mining Corp. (CVE:BZ) gained 51%, institutions profited as well
Benz Mining's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders Institutional ownership in Benz Mining is 25% Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of Benz Mining Corp. (CVE:BZ) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 42% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's CA$48m market cap gain, institutions too had a 25% share in those profits. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Benz Mining. See our latest analysis for Benz Mining Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Benz Mining. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Benz Mining's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Benz Mining is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Spartan Resources Limited with 13% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Benz Mining Corp.. In their own names, insiders own CA$14m worth of stock in the CA$142m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 42% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. We can see that Private Companies own 10%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. We can see that public companies hold 13% of the Benz Mining shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Benz Mining has 3 warning signs (and 2 which make us uncomfortable) we think you should know about. Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $359.72 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Petrus Resources (TSE:PRQ) Has Announced A Dividend Of CA$0.01
Petrus Resources Ltd.'s (TSE:PRQ) investors are due to receive a payment of CA$0.01 per share on 31st of July. The dividend yield will be 8.6% based on this payment which is still above the industry average. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. While it is great to have a strong dividend yield, we should also consider whether the payment is sustainable. Prior to this announcement, the company was paying out 1,499% of what it was earning and 93% of cash flows. While the cash payout ratio isn't necessarily a cause for concern, the company is probably focusing more on returning cash to shareholders than growing the business. EPS is set to grow by 46.2% over the next year if recent trends continue. However, if the dividend continues along recent trends, it could start putting pressure on the balance sheet with the payout ratio reaching 1,059% over the next year. View our latest analysis for Petrus Resources The dividend has been pretty stable looking back, but the company hasn't been paying one for very long. This makes it tough to judge how it would fare through a full economic cycle. The payments haven't really changed that much since 2 years ago. It's good to see at least some dividend growth. Yet with a relatively short dividend paying history, we wouldn't want to depend on this dividend too heavily. Investors who have held shares in the company for the past few years will be happy with the dividend income they have received. Petrus Resources has seen EPS rising for the last five years, at 46% per annum. EPS has been growing well, but Petrus Resources has been paying out a massive proportion of its earnings, which can make the dividend tough to maintain. Overall, we don't think this company makes a great dividend stock, even though the dividend wasn't cut this year. In general, the distributions are a little bit higher than we would like, but we can't ignore the fact the quickly growing earnings gives this stock great potential in the future. Overall, we don't think this company has the makings of a good income stock. Companies possessing a stable dividend policy will likely enjoy greater investor interest than those suffering from a more inconsistent approach. Meanwhile, despite the importance of dividend payments, they are not the only factors our readers should know when assessing a company. Just as an example, we've come across 2 warning signs for Petrus Resources you should be aware of, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable. If you are a dividend investor, you might also want to look at our curated list of high yield dividend stocks. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $359.72 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.