At least 13 may have killed themselves over UK's Post Office wrongful convictions scandal
At least 13 people were thought to have taken their own lives as a result of Britain's Post Office scandal, in which almost 1,000 postal employees were wrongly prosecuted or convicted of criminal wrongdoing because of a faulty computer system, a report said Tuesday.
Another 59 people contemplated suicide over the scandal, one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in UK history.
From around 1999 to 2015, hundreds of people who worked at Post Office branches were wrongly convicted of theft, fraud and false accounting based on evidence from a defective information technology system. Some went to prison or were forced into bankruptcy. Others lost their homes, suffered health problems or breakdowns in their relationships or became ostracized by their communities.
Retired judge Wyn Williams, who chairs a public inquiry into the scandal, said in a report published Tuesday that 13 people killed themselves as a consequence of a faulty Post Office accounting system 'showing an illusory shortfall in branch accounts," according to their families.
The problems at the Post Office, which is state-owned but operates as a private business, were known for years. But the full scale of the injustice didn't become widely known until last year, when a TV docudrama propelled the scandal to national headlines and galvanized support for victims.
The culprit was a piece of software called Horizon, made by the Japanese firm Fujitsu, which the Post Office introduced 25 years ago across branches to automate sales accounting. When the software showed false account shortfalls, the Post Office accused branch managers of dishonesty and obliged them to repay the money.
In all, the report said that about 1,000 people were prosecuted and convicted based on evidence from the incorrect data. The government has since introduced legislation to reverse the convictions and compensate the victims.
Williams said that some senior Post Office employees knew — or should have known — that the Horizon system was faulty. But 'the Post Office maintained the fiction that its data was always accurate,' he said.
Jo Hamilton, a former Post Office manager and a lead campaigner, said that the report 'shows the full scale of the horror that they unleashed on us."
In a statement, the Post Office's chairman pledged to ensure that all victims are compensated.
The 'Post Office did not listen to postmasters and, as an organization, we let them down. Postmasters and their families have suffered years of pain,' Nigel Railton said. 'It has taken them too long to clear their names and, in many cases, to receive redress.'
Tuesday's report was the first to be published from the inquiry, which was launched by the government and has the power to require evidence from all parties. It's expected to issue a further report at a later date that will address who was at fault for overseeing the scandal and potentially attribute blame.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg%3Fwidth%3D1260%26fit%3Dcover%26gravity%3Dfaces%26dpr%3D2%26quality%3Dmedium%26source%3Dnar-cms%26format%3Dauto%26height%3D630&w=3840&q=100)
Nikkei Asia
2 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Analysis: China lifts Japanese seafood ban amid political maneuvering
Katsuji Nakazawa is a Tokyo-based senior staff and editorial writer at Nikkei. He spent seven years in China as a correspondent and later as China bureau chief. He was the 2014 recipient of the Vaughn-Ueda International Journalist prize. China has partially lifted its unscientific ban on all Japanese seafood imports, which has been a source of tension between the Asian neighbors for the past two years or so.
6 hours ago
A Rare Recovery for Ishiba? June Poll Numbers Halt Slide for His Administration
In the monthly public opinion surveys run by eight of Japan's major media organizations, fully seven of them found growing support for the administration of Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru in June, compared to the previous month. Ishiba gained his highest approval rating in the NHK poll, at 39% of respondents—up 6 points from May—and his lowest, just 24%, in the Mainichi Shimbun poll, where it rose 2 points. The most marked growth came in the Kyōdō News poll, where it rose 9.6 points to 37.0%. This was a dramatic improvement for the prime minister, coming off of poll results in May that saw his support rating plunge in five of the eight polls, and five ratings hitting their lowest points ever since he launched his administration in October 2024. In June, only the Asahi Shimbun poll marked a drop in his approval rating, by 1 point to 32%. This by no means indicates that Ishiba is out of the woods, though. On the disapproval side, his highest negative rating came in the Mainichi survey, where it fell 1 point to 61%. His lowest disapproval rating was down 6 points month on month to 42% in the NHK poll. Just as in May, all eight surveys showed disapproving responses outstripping approval. Indeed, there can be dramatic shifts within the space of a few days, as shown by a special survey carried out by Kyōdō on June 21–22. Ishiba's support numbers fell 4.5 points from the firm's earlier June 14–15 survey, arriving at 32.5% at the end of the ordinary session of the Diet on June 22. Jiji: First Turnaround in Four Months Ishiba's support rating climbed for the first time in four months in the Jiji Press poll. The 6.1-point hike was the largest month-on-month climb since October last year, when the brand-new Ishiba administration saw a boost among survey respondents hoping for something new after his predecessor, Kishida Fumio, had suffered nearly a year of sub-20% approval ratings. Responses to survey questions in June 2025 point to consumer policy as one reason for this latest jump, with 63.8% of respondents noting that they favorably viewed Minister of Agriculture Koizumi Shinjirō's moves to tackle ballooning rice prices by releasing grain from Japan's emergency storehouses. Rice prices indeed fell for five straight weeks through late June, reaching Ishiba's targeted retail level of under ¥4,000 on average for a 5-kilogram bag of the staple food. Ishiba has seen less success on the international front. From June 15 to 18 he was in Canada for this year's G7 summit. While there he met with US President Donald Trump, but their talks produced no agreement on the American imposition of tariffs on Japanese imports, a key focus for the Japanese side. Domestically, too, Japan now looks to the July 20 House of Councillors election. The June 22 election for the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly, viewed as a bellwether for the upcoming national contest, went poorly for candidates from Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party, the ruling coalition leader at the national level, while opposition groups like the Democratic Party for the People and Sanseitō gained their first seats ever in the chamber. Ishiba's numbers in this month's polls may depend on whether his party can avoid similar setbacks on the national stage. (Translated from Japanese. Banner photo: Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, at center, in talks with other leaders at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, on June 17, 2025. Pool photo; © Jiji.)
The Diplomat
6 hours ago
- The Diplomat
The Trump Effect Heads to Tokyo
It is decidedly outside the Trump administration's interest to harm the LDP's electoral prospects if it wants a greater chance at achieving its goals for Japanese defense spending. But that's exactly what its doing. President Donald Trump speaks with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba after Session I of the G7 Summit, Monday, June 16, 2025, in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada. Canada's conservatives were gearing up to sweep the country's federal election in April. Then, Donald Trump began his second term in office. Just days later, he imposed a 25 percent blanket tariff on Ottawa while musing about making Canada the 51st state. Analysts watched in shock as the Liberal Party surged in polls as Canadian voters punished Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre for his association with Trump, dubbed the 'Trump Effect.' The Liberals dominated the April election. Poilievre lost his seat. And, ultimately, Trump lost out on a Trump-friendly right-of-center government in Ottawa. Echoing across the Pacific, Trump has backed Japan's ruling conservative Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) into a similar corner, through a combination of careless rhetoric and tariff policy. Just a few months into his second term, Trump has repeatedly questioned the United States' treaty obligation to defend Japan in the event of a foreign attack, at a time when threats from Japan's immediate neighbors — Russia, China, and North Korea — continue to grow. The Japanese public has not taken those comments lightly. A poll from Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun last week found that only 22 percent of respondents greatly trusted the U.S., a sharp drop from polling in 2024. On trade, Trump has placed Japan's already-unpopular Ishiba Shigeru cabinet into an impossible situation. Cars and rice have emerged as the main sticking points for U.S. negotiators after several rounds of trade talks. Trump and his allies have repeatedly promoted falsehoods about Japan's policies on both goods, including a nonexistent 700 percent rice tariff and an imaginary 'bowling ball test' for automobiles. Domestically, the economic and political consequences of acquiescence on the car and rice industries could be dire for Ishiba and the LDP. Vehicles are Japan's primary export — and the U.S. is its top customer. Changes to rice import policy could shake Japan's powerful agriculture lobby, a critical constituency of the ruling LDP. Japanese voters, unnerved by Trump's rhetoric and behavior, overwhelmingly support the Japanese government refusing to concede to U.S. demands. However, despite Japanese negotiators continuing to press for a favorable deal for Tokyo, a failure to do so may draw significant ire from Japanese voters who already have low faith in the Ishiba cabinet's minority government. Last week, Trump fired off a new round of threats against Tokyo over a span of several days, once again decrying Japan's car and rice trade policies and ultimately threatening to increase tariffs on the country if a deal wasn't reached by Trump's global July 9th trade deal deadline. This week, Trump sent a letter to Tokyo formalizing a tariff increase scheduled for August 1, just two weeks after Japan's upcoming elections. As in Canada, Trump is potentially sabotaging the success of a political party that has traditionally been an ally. The LDP's former and longtime leader, Abe Shinzo, notably enjoyed a close friendship with Trump during his first term. Additionally, Japan's LDP is leading the charge to increase the country's defense spending, one of Trump's primary goals for U.S. allies across the board, most recently pressing for a 5 percent benchmark among NATO countries. The Trump administration has been especially aggressive in pursuing a similar defense spending increase in Japan. So much so that the demands have repeatedly leaked into trade negotiations, to the public annoyance of Ishiba himself. In June, the Financial Times reported that the U.S. increased its demands for Japanese defense spending from an already unrealistic 3 percent to 3.5 percent, prompting Japan to cancel a scheduled 2+2 meeting. It is decidedly outside the Trump administration's interest to harm the LDP's electoral prospects if it wants a greater chance at achieving its goals for Japanese defense spending. Nor can Trump be taken seriously on standing against China if he chooses to sacrifice the U.S.-Japan security relationship over rice. The most productive off-ramp would be for U.S. trade negotiators to back down and promptly sign a good-faith, favorable trade deal for Tokyo, allowing the Ishiba cabinet to deliver a major win before Japanese voters go to the polls. The Japanese government can not electorally afford to acquiesce to a harmful deal, nor weather a tariff increase. Ultimately, only Trump can stop the Trump Effect.
