logo
Norfolk attorneys in turf war over authority to prosecute shoplifting cases

Norfolk attorneys in turf war over authority to prosecute shoplifting cases

Yahoo15-05-2025
A feud between Norfolk's city attorney and the city's top prosecutor over whose office should handle misdemeanor shoplifting cases has quickly escalated into a political turf war with both sides claiming chief authority.
The Norfolk City Council unanimously approved a code change Tuesday that will let the City Attorney's Office prosecute misdemeanor shoplifting cases after Mayor Kenny Alexander complained Commonwealth's Attorney Ramin Fatehi wasn't bringing charges.
Fatehi issued a swift rebuke the next day, saying he would revoke the city attorney's authority to prosecute any misdemeanors in Circuit Court and would implement additional oversight of charges pursued in District Court. He painted the move as power grab by city lawmakers that would disproportionately be used to target poor people.
But Norfolk City Attorney Bernard Pishko is now arguing Fatehi lacks the legal power to forbid his office from prosecuting misdemeanor shoplifting cases in Circuit Court.
'You lack the resources to attend to many of the issues our citizens face on a daily basis, and your prosecutors could not replicate the relationship we have with our code enforcement officers,' Pishko wrote in a letter sent Thursday.
Under Virginia law, commonwealth's attorneys — elected constitutional officers — must prosecute all felonies in their jurisdictions. But prosecutors have discretion on misdemeanor crimes, and Fatehi says the state does not provide funding for attorneys to handle misdemeanor case loads.
Virginia state code says city attorney's offices in the commonwealth can prosecute misdemeanor cases, so long as the city council wants them to and the elected commonwealth's attorney signs off on it.
The Code of Virginia section reads: 'City and town attorneys, if so authorized by their local governing bodies, and with the concurrence of the attorney for the commonwealth for the locality, may prosecute criminal cases charging either the violation of city or town ordinances, or the commission of misdemeanors within the city or town.'
Fatehi said under that law, his office has the authority to permit the city attorney's office to prosecute state and city misdemeanors. As of 5 p.m. Friday, he said he will revoke the city attorney's permission to prosecute any offenses punishable by jail or fine in Circuit Court. Further, he plans to scrutinize all cases the city attorney's office pursues in District Court, requiring them to provide monthly reports about all criminal cases they staff.
However, Pishko said in his letter city code directs the city attorney to prosecute all city code violations, and the Code of Virginia says municipal corporations shall have all powers granted to it by its charter. Thus, Pishko said Fatehi's referenced state code section was superseded by another state code section.
The matter could see the two attorneys duke it out in court. In his letter, Pishko asked Fatehi to rescind his decision and said doing so would eliminate the need for a seeking a declaratory judgement.
Fatehi said the two parties met in person Thursday but were unable to reach an agreement.
'I remain ready to have a serious discussion on how to avoid the criminalization of poverty, but until I see a meaningful change in the position of the City Attorney or his employer, my letter stands,' Fatehi said in an email.
Norfolk prosecutor revokes city attorney authority on shoplifting charges following council vote
Norfolk to vote on allowing city attorney to prosecute misdemeanor shoplifting
Norfolk commonwealth's attorney faces challenge from former federal prosecutor
Amanda Howie, administrator for the Virginia Association of Commonwealth's Attorneys, said she could not recall a top prosecutor in another Virginia locality ever attempting to forbid a city or county attorney from prosecuting cases. She did not know whether Fatehi's moves were legal.
The feud kicked off when Alexander announced a plan for the City Attorney's Office to begin prosecuting misdemeanor shoplifting cases at his annual State of the City event.
Fatehi said he lacked the state or city funding to staff the prosecution of misdemeanor shoplifting cases, and the city has ignored requests for more funding.
He also called the move politically motivated — Fatehi is facing a June 17 Democratic primary challenge by John Butler, a former federal prosecutor. Butler has been endorsed by Alexander and City Council members Jeremy McGee, Tommy Smigiel and Courtney Doyle.
Most prosecutor's offices in Hampton Roads take at least on some misdemeanor cases, such as DUIs, some domestic assaults and cases involving violence in schools.
For many other misdemeanors, police officers organize the case against the defendants, just as they do with traffic cases. Though the officers are considered witnesses rather than prosecutors, they must essentially prosecute their own cases without a lawyer.
It's a common practice when prosecutors are not available for whatever reason, said Rob Poggenklass, the executive director of Justice Forward Virginia, a state criminal justice reform group.
In Norfolk, for example, the Norfolk Police Department can — and does — still make arrests in misdemeanor shoplifting cases, but must handle the cases on its own.
When prosecutors in Hampton and Newport News backed away from handling misdemeanor marijuana possession cases in 2012, police began handling the cases on their own.
But because drug possession could be difficult to prosecute, police were having difficulties handling such cases. The Hampton City Council in 2014 created a position within the City Attorney's Office to take on the marijuana cases, the Daily Press reported at the time.
In 2016, the Newport News City Council granted their Commonwealth's Attorney two new positions in return for agreeing to prosecute the misdemeanor marijuana cases once again.
Several Norfolk residents who spoke at the council's Tuesday meeting expressed concern the move to pursue more misdemeanor shoplifting charges would harm the city's most vulnerable people.
Poggenklass said more prosecutions would only hurt marginalized Norfolk residents and would not deter the act of stealing. He said city officials should instead be investigating why residents are stealing and providing structural supports to eliminate the need for the crime.
Trevor Metcalfe, 757-222-5345, trevor.metcalfe@pilotonline.com
Peter Dujardin, 757-897-2062, pdujardin@dailypress.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pennsylvania lawmakers seek to withhold payments to the federal government
Pennsylvania lawmakers seek to withhold payments to the federal government

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Pennsylvania lawmakers seek to withhold payments to the federal government

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — Pennsylvania lawmakers want to push back against federal cuts made by the Trump administration by allowing the state to withhold payments to the federal government. Rep. Ryan Bizzarro (D-Erie) and Rep. Morgan Cephas (D-Philadelphia) introduced a co-sponsorship memo over the weekend for a proposed 'Protect Pennsylvanians Act.' It would allow the Commonwealth to temporarily stop payments to the federal government when federal funds are 'unlawfully withheld.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'We support efforts to cut the waste, fraud or abuse of taxpayer dollars anywhere,' the lawmakers said in the memo. 'What we've seen instead is the indiscriminate cutting of critical funding for services already agreed to by Congress.' The proposal rests on a novel legal theory in which states withhold federal payments if lawmakers determine the federal government is delinquent on the funding owed to their state. Lawmakers have introduced similar bills in at least four states — Connecticut, Maryland, New York and Wisconsin. However, none of the states have tested the theory. Under the proposed legislation, Pennsylvania would also be able to place liens on federal property until the funds are restored, and private citizens could take legal action if their rights are violated by the cuts. The approach comes as Pennsylvania lawmakers spar with the Trump administration over billions of dollars in funding. Last week, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro announced the Commonwealth would join 19 other states and Washington, D.C., in a lawsuit to stop the president from canceling federal funds allocated to states. Shapiro comes after Trump administration in lawsuit over federal funds The suit followed successful litigation to return $2 billion in funds that had been frozen by the Trump administration, the governor said. And earlier in June, Pennsylvania sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture, alleging the agency illegally cut off funding to it through a program designed to distribute more than $1 billion in aid to states to purchase food from farms for schools, child care centers, and food banks. 'We applaud Pennsylvania's vigorous defense of our Commonwealth in the courts,' the lawmakers said in the co-sponsorship memo. 'This legislation builds on efforts to protect Pennsylvanians from the unlawful abuses playing out weekly in Washington, D.C. If Congressional Republicans won't step up to defend our future, then it falls to us in the Pennsylvania legislature.' It's unclear if the proposed legislation would pass in the state's Republican-controlled Senate. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

‘I Voted' sticker contest underway in Loudoun County
‘I Voted' sticker contest underway in Loudoun County

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

‘I Voted' sticker contest underway in Loudoun County

LOUDOUN COUNTY, Va. () — As Virginia's 2025 general election inches closer, residents in Loudoun County have the opportunity to put their creativity to the test. The Loudoun County Office of Elections and Voter Registration is offering residents the chance to design an 'I Voted' sticker for the upcoming election, which will be given out to voters who cast their ballot at early voting sites, those who vote by mail and those who vote on Election Day. The basic sticker design is a circle, two inches in diameter, that just has to include the phrase 'I Voted' or a close variation of the phrase, with no more than four colors. Artists can submit as many designs as they want from July 1 through July 31. Where to watch Fourth of July fireworks across DC, Maryland and Virginia Eight finalists will be chosen, followed by an online vote, which will take place from Aug. 1 to Aug. 17, to pick the three winning designs. The three winners will be announced by Aug. 25, according to the county. For more information and to enter, click The general election will be elect the Commonwealth's new governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, members of Virginia's House of Delegates and to elect to local offices. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Karen Read attorney Alan Jackson blasts special prosecutor in new statement
Karen Read attorney Alan Jackson blasts special prosecutor in new statement

Yahoo

time24-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Karen Read attorney Alan Jackson blasts special prosecutor in new statement

Karen Read attorney Alan Jackson issued a lengthy statement on Tuesday, blasting special prosecutor Hank Brennan over his 'egregious breach of prosecutorial ethics' after Read's acquittal in the 2022 death of John O'Keefe. Jackson's critical comments come after Brennan on Monday said that a 'campaign of intimidation and abuse' by Read's camp led the jury in her second trial to find her not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter. She was convicted of drunk driving. Jackson also fired a shot at 'disgraced' Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey for 'having no interest' in seeking justice for O'Keefe. The jury handed down its verdict last Wednesday after deliberating over four days. Jackson first shared the statement with Boston 25's Ted Daniel. Jackson's full statement is as follows: 'The jury has spoken, but Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan, in an egregious breach of prosecutorial ethics, has tried to publicly shame and discredit that very jury. For him to attempt to supplant his personal views for that of the jury is a desperate attempt to save face in the wake of a unanimous rejection of the prosecution's case. The Rules of Professional Conduct are clear: A prosecutor should support the legitimacy of the justice system and promote public confidence in its operations. Openly attacking a jury's verdict because he disagrees with it undermines that centuries-old edict. Mr. Brennan claims that his investigation was 'thorough.' If that were true, the Commonwealth would have uncovered what we, the defense, uncovered: hidden exculpatory evidence; lies and perjury by the Commonwealth's own witnesses; cops covering for other cops; a biased and corrupt lead investigator with personal ties to witnesses; and inculpatory and suspicious conduct by myriad witnesses. The only job of an ethical prosecutor is to seek the truth in a just and fair manner. The Commonwealth fell wildly short of that responsibility. Theirs was not an effort to find justice for John O'Keefe. Rather, it was a personal vendetta against Karen Read by DA Michael Morrissey and his hand-picked prosecutors—and it cost the people of Norfolk County millions The fact is, Karen Read is factually innocent, and this case never should have gone to trial in the first place. This case is a stark reminder that there has been a complete breakdown in what is supposed to be our justice system. Those in power are more interested in protecting themselves than the citizens that they are sworn to protect. The Commonwealth's defamatory public comments ring hollow to the very constituents they are supposed to serve. It is now crystal clear that disgraced DA Michael Morrissey has no interest in actually seeking justice for John O'Keefe by identifying and prosecuting the real killer or killers. The Commonwealth would rather simply condemn the jury and its fair and lawful verdict. We are thankful for the jury's commitment to truth and that they found their way to a just verdict. But make no mistake—if DA Michael Morrissey had his way, the truth never would have come out in this case. It would have been lost somewhere in private and deleted conversations that would never have seen the light of day. Corruption like this doesn't happen in isolation. How many innocent people have been railroaded because of failures in our judicial system? We, as citizens, must demand more of our institutions." Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally spearheaded the prosecution's efforts in Read's first trial, which ended with a hung jury. Brennan, who replaced him in the retrial, said Monday that he is 'disappointed' in the verdict and the fact that he couldn't achieve justice for O'Keefe and his family. Brennan said that the evidence in the murder case led to 'only one person.' 'After an independent and thorough review of all the evidence, I concluded that the evidence led to one person, and only one person. Neither the closed federal investigation nor my independent review led me to identify any other possible suspect or person responsible for the death of John O'Keefe,' Brennan added. WATCH -- Jackson, Brennan deliver closing arguments: Brennan continued, 'We cannot condone witness abuse, causing participants to worry for their own safety or that of their families. It is my hope that with the verdict, the witnesses and their families will be left alone. The harassment of these innocent victims and family members is deplorable and should never happen again in a case in this Commonwealth.' Last week, Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey issued a four-word statement in response to Read's verdict: 'The jury has spoken.' Prosecutors said Read hit O'Keefe with her SUV, leaving him to die in a blizzard outside the home of fellow Boston officer Brian Albert, at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, following a night of drinking. Her lawyers successfully defended her, painting a sinister picture of police misconduct and theorizing that O'Keefe was, in fact, killed by colleagues, followed by a vast cover-up. Boston 25 News has reached out to Brennan and Morrissey for comment on Jackson's statement. RELATED: State police union defends investigation into John O'Keefe's death after Karen Read verdict Gov. Healey asked about verdict in Karen Read retrial, DA Morrissey's silence Juror says Karen Read was 'innocent,' calls investigation into John O'Keefe's death 'sloppy' 'Feel like I'm floating': Karen Read's parents speak out after murder acquittal Karen Read's murder retrial: Verdict recap with Ted Daniel, Peter Tragos Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store