logo
Lawmakers finalize bipartisan deal on tipped wage and sick time hours ahead of deadline

Lawmakers finalize bipartisan deal on tipped wage and sick time hours ahead of deadline

Yahoo21-02-2025

Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) and Senate Majority Floor Leader Sam Singh (D-East Lansing) discuss their efforts on a bipartisan deal to curb incoming minimum wage and paid sick leave changes on Feb. 20, 2025. | Kyle Davidson
Facing a tight midnight deadline, the Michigan Legislature negotiated late into the night on Thursday, as members sought to finalize a deal on a pair of policies trimming back changes to the state's minimum wage and paid sick time policies set to take effect the following day.
At the beginning of the year, the Republican-led House and Democratic-led Senate each offered their own proposals for retaining the state's tipped wage and modifying new sick time requirements; they ultimately reached a deal with Senate Bill 8 and House Bill 4002, clearing several hurdles which could have prevented either policy from becoming law.
Although both bills were presented to Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer with the expectation of a signature, House Bill 4002, which dealt with earned sick time, was not presented to the governor until 1:30 a.m. Friday, after the midnight deadline. How that will impact the legislation is unclear.
Without action from the Legislature, the minimum wage would increase to $12.48 on Friday, gradually rising to $14.97 by 2028 and phasing out the tipped wage by 2030. Employers with fewer than 10 employees would be required to offer up to 40 hours of paid sick leave and 32 hours of unpaid leave accrued over the year, while businesses with 10 or more employees must offer 72 hours of paid sick leave a year.
The new rules came down through a mandate from the Michigan Supreme Court in July 2024. In its ruling, the Court determined that members of the Republican-led Legislature in 2018 acted unconstitutionally by taking up two ballot proposals — one to raise the minimum wage and eliminate the lower-than-minimum tipped wage rate and another setting new paid sick leave requirements for employers — and stripping out key components from each initiative through amendments.
Servers and business owners have railed against the court-ordered changes, with representatives of the restaurant and hospitality industry warning the new policies would shutter one in five restaurants and prompt layoffs for 40,000-60,000 restaurant jobs.
However, Democrats and Republicans were able to meet in the middle on Senate Bill 8, as members of the House voted to send the bill back to the Senate on Wednesday.
The proposal, put forth by State Sen. Kevin Hertel (D-St. Clair Shores), would raise the state minimum wage to $15 by 2027 and increase the tipped minimum wage from 38% to 50% by 2031 rather than phasing it out.
However the policy had to survive a nail-biter of a vote in order to take immediate effect.
Of the 37 members in the chamber, 25 votes were needed in order to grant the bill immediate effect. With only 20 Senators voting in favor of the bill when it moved out of the Senate last Thursday, its fate seemed uncertain, though 26 Senators ultimately voted in favor of granting the bill immediate effect.
Among those supporting immediate effect were Sens. Sarah Anthony (D-Lansing), Jon Bumstead (R-North Muskegon), John Cherry (D-Flint) and Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak) who previously voted against the effort, and Sens. Kevin Daley (R-Lum), Ed McBroom (R-Vulcan) and Rick Outman (R-Six Lakes) who were excused during last week's vote.
After granting Senate Bill 8 immediate effect, members of the Senate also needed to reach a deal on the House's proposed changes to the Earned Sick Time Act, House Bill 4002. The bills are tie-barred together meaning both policies must pass for either to take effect.
While the initial version of House Bill 4002 would have excluded businesses with fewer than 50 employees from the new sick leave requirements, the Senate's own sick leave proposal — Senate Bill 15 — would have allowed businesses with fewer than 25 employees to offer 40 hours of sick leave and 32 hours of unpaid leave, rather than 72 hours of paid sick leave.
The final version of House Bill 4002 — sponsored by Rep. Jay DeBoyer (R-Clay Twp.) — requires businesses to provide employees with 1 hour of paid earned sick time for every 30 hours worked. However, small businesses — defined as employers with 10 or fewer employees — would have the option to provide their employees with 40 hours of paid sick time at the beginning of the year instead, and would not be subject to the law until Oct. 1.
New businesses who have yet to hire an employee before House Bill 4002 takes effect would also be exempt from the new law for three years after hiring their first employee.
Employers with more than 10 employees are also allowed to provide their employees with 72 hours of paid earned sick time at the beginning of the year for immediate use.
Employers with part time employees can also provide those employees with their time off at the beginning of the year, provided they notify those employees how many hours they are expected to work in a year and offer time off equal to what they would accrue if they worked all of the hours expected of them. If they go over that requirement, they will accrue additional sick time.
Small businesses must allow their employees to carry over at least 40 hours of sick time from one year to the next, while businesses with more than 10 employees must allow them to carry over 72 hours.
While businesses can also allow their employees to carry over more sick time, if they offer a higher limit, employers who offer their workers paid time off at the beginning of the year are not required to allow them to carry their sick time over to the next year.
The bill also eliminates language allowing employees to bring a civil suit against their employer for violations of the law, and allows employers to take action against employees who use their sick time for a reason not approved by the law or for failing to give proper notice.
Employees can use paid sick time to address their physical or mental health needs or the needs of a family member, for meetings at a child's school or a place of care tied to a child's health, disability or the effects of domestic violence or sexual assault on the child if the child is a family member.
Survivors of domestic violence or sexual assault and family members caring for them can also used their sick time to obtain medical care, psychological care, victims services, legal services, to relocate due to domestic violence or to participate in any legal services.
It can also be used if the employees workplace is closed due to a public health emergency, to care for a child or family member whose school or workplace is closed due to a public health emergency, or if health authorities or a health provider has determined the employee or one of their family member's presence would risk exposing others to an infectious disease.
While opponents of the court-mandated sick leave changes argued it would allow employees to no-call no-show for three days without consequence, the final version of House Bill 4002 requires employees to provide notice as soon as practicable, unless employers provide their workers with a written policy on how to provide notice for unexpected sick time.
Just after 10:40 p.m., the Senate voted to return the amended House Bill 4002 to the House, with 26 votes in favor and 10 in opposition.
The bill received full support from Republicans, alongside Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids), Senate Majority Floor Leader Sam Singh (D-East Lansing), Hertel and Sens. Veronica Klinefelt (D-Eastepointe), Sean McCann (D-Kalamazoo), Jeremy Moss (D-Southfield), Dayna Polehanki (D-Livonia) and Paul Wojno (D-Warren).
After passing the Senate, the matter was taken up by the House where it was approved in an 89-21 vote.
Under House Bill 4002, Michigan will have one of the strongest sick leave policies in the nation, Brinks said, with Singh noting that no other state has a 72-hour paid sick leave requirement for businesses with more than 10 employees, with the closest policies coming in at 56 hours.
When asked if there were any concerns as to whether the governor would sign the bills before midnight, Singh said Whitmer's team was aware of the conversations happening over the past number of days, but that he would leave the final decisions to her.
While the deal brokered between the House and the Senate was better than the status quo, Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R-Porter Twp.) remained critical of the chamber's Democratic majority.
'Republicans have been calling on action since August, and it's unfortunate that, like college students waiting till the last minute to finish up their research paper, the Senate Democrats waited till the last minute to go ahead and pass some legislation that will help save tens of thousands of restaurant jobs here in the state,' Nesbitt said. 'Once again, our Republicans took the lead here in the House and in the Senate, as a majority of Republicans voted for a deal, whereas only a minority of the Democrats actually voted for it,' Nesbitt said.
Only eight Democrats voted for each of the bills in the deal of the 19 Democratic members serving.
However, while looking at the wins Republicans were able to secure in this package, it's not about Republicans and Democrats, Nesbitt said.
'It's about working families. It's about our small businesses. It's about trying to grow our economy. Unfortunately, this isn't perfect, but it's a lot better than what would have gotten enacted at 12:01 tomorrow morning,' said Nesbitt, who announced last month that he is seeking the GOP nomination for governor in 2026.
During a press conference earlier in the day on Thursday, Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Twp.) stressed the importance of finding a deal on minimum wage and sick leave policies.
'This is really critical to every worker in Michigan, and every small business in Michigan that we come to the center and make a deal here, because workers are about to lose their jobs, small businesses are about to close. You're going to see restaurant workers potentially losing their jobs and their pay getting cut and you're going to see many restaurants close,' Hall said.
'If we don't have a deal, it will be an absolute crisis for our state… Some of these employers, they don't even know what their workers are supposed to be paid tomorrow. You look at some of these smaller companies, they're not ready for these new changes in law to take effect tomorrow, and so you're gonna have total chaos,' He said.
After the vote, State Rep. Bill G. Schuette (R-Midland), who chaired the House Select Committee on Protecting Michigan Employees and Small Businesses that handled the House's tipped wage and paid sick leave proposals, said this deal was the first trial balloon of the state's divided government, with Republicans winning a 58-52 majority during the previous election.
DeBoyer said the deal was a testament to Hall's leadership and the strategy of the House Republican caucus. 'If you pay attention, this is how we're going to maintain in the next two years, things that matter to the citizens of the state of Michigan, So this is just one small step, and I think you're going to continue to see this behavior,' DeBoyer said.
While the minimum wage changes await action from the governor, they may also face another hurdle with a national group representing restaurant workers and service employees announcing its intent to offer a referendum on the bill.
In a statement, One Fair Wage criticized the Legislature's efforts to roll back the Supreme Court's minimum wage and the tipped wage changes.
'The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that these wage increases should be implemented, yet lawmakers are attempting to roll them back before they even take effect,' said Saru Jayaraman, the president of One Fair Wage. 'We're mobilizing to ensure voters — not politicians — have the ultimate say in whether these protections are upheld.'
Under the state's referendum process, citizens can challenge newly-passed laws by gathering signatures from voters. If One Fair Wage's volunteers gather 223,099 signatures, the law would be suspended and placed on the ballot, where voters will determine whether or not it takes effect.
Staff Reporter Anna Liz Nichols contributed to this report.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did Trump's big tax bill pass? Live updates as Senate enters fourth day of voting battle
Did Trump's big tax bill pass? Live updates as Senate enters fourth day of voting battle

USA Today

time18 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Did Trump's big tax bill pass? Live updates as Senate enters fourth day of voting battle

Debates on and off the Senate floor stretched through a third consecutive night as the House GOP gets ready to push for its own floor vote. President Donald Trump's tax, spending and policy bill remains stuck in limbo heading into a fourth day of Senate debate - including a couple of all-nighters - as Republicans scramble to find the votes and meet a self-imposed July 4 deadline to turn the controversial measure into law. Vice President JD Vance arrived at the U.S. Capitol shortly after sunrise on July 1, as senators approached nearly 24 hours of consecutive floor debate on a series of amendments to legislation that includes provisions on Medicaid reform, increased border security funding and limits to taxes on tips and overtime wages. The outcome in Congress is expected to be either a defining legislative win for Trump or a major setback early in his second term. Asked if Senate Republicans would reach a final vote on Tuesday, Vance told reporters, 'We're going to find out.' More: Medicaid cuts, no taxes on tips and overtime: What's in the Trump-backed Senate megabill? There are at least two Republican senators out of 53 who are expected to vote no on the legislation's final passage. With no Democrats expected to offer support, Majority Leader John Thune can only afford one more detractor. In that event of a 50-50 split, Vance will offer the tie-breaking vote. Despite working through the weekend, senators continued to hash out disputes on and off the floor of the Senate throughout the night June 30 and into the morning of July 1. Thune, R-South Dakota, has told reporters in the Capitol Republicans are "close" to nailing down a deal. If and when the Senate passes Trump's mega bill, it must then be reconciled in the House, where an original version passed by the smallest of margins in May. Votes in the House are tentatively planned for July 2, pending the outcome in the Senate. Trump threatens to unleash DOGE on Musk's companies President Trump said he might order the Department of Government Efficiency that Elon Musk previously led to review the government subsidies that go to Musk's companies as their rift resurfaced while the Senate took up Trump's tax and budget bill. Making the threat personal, Trump said the billionaire tech mogul would probably have to return to his native South Africa without the government's financial assistance. Trump's attack in a 12:34 a.m. ET July 1 post on Truth Social came after Musk, the world's richest man, resumed his criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill" in a flurry of X posts on Monday. It included a warning from Musk that he would boost primary challenges to defeat Republican lawmakers who vote for the legislation. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE," Trump said. "Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!" Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has pointed to the bill's projections to raise the national debt by $3.3 trillion over the next decade as the reason for his hostility. But Trump has claimed Musk only opposes the bill because the legislation would end a program under former President Joe Biden that offers consumer tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles. Musk's various companies have benefited from billions of dollars in U.S. government contracts over the past two decades, including SpaceX through its relationships with the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. In all, Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits, often at critical moments, a Washington Post analysis found. - Joey Garrison Senate nears a full day of debate, breaks their own record Senators have carried on debate over amendments to the sweeping legislation for almost 24 hours now. Throughout June 30 and into the morning of July 1, lawmakers have considered and voted on 45 amendments – a record number in what is known in Washington as a vote-a-rama. The previous record for this marathon-style series of votes was set in 2008 at 44 amendments. - Savannah Kuchar Has the 'big, beautiful bill' passed yet? Not yet. Despite working through the weekend, Senate Republicans continue wading through disputes and sticking points, including over proposed Medicaid reforms. At least two Republicans, Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, are expected to vote no. Majority Leader Thune met with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, earlier this morning, as she continues to be a key swing vote in the process. - Savannah Kuchar

Elon Musk escalates Trump feud, vows to back Rep. Thomas Massie
Elon Musk escalates Trump feud, vows to back Rep. Thomas Massie

New York Post

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Elon Musk escalates Trump feud, vows to back Rep. Thomas Massie

Elon Musk escalated his feud with President Trump, announcing that he would be backing one of the commander in chief's biggest foes in congress, Rep. Thomas Massie — the libertarian-leaning House lawmaker who Trump has vowed to see defeated in the midterm election. Musk signaled he would donate to the Kentucky Republican's 2026 reelection campaign on X when he responded 'Me' to a post asking who would be backing Massie's congressional bid. Trump, meanwhile, had pledged to support whichever candidate runs in the primary against Massie, who the president lambasted as a 'loser' and 'Third Rate Congressman' in an online tirade last week. 3 Elon Musk announced that he would be supporting Rep. Thomas Massie, a foe of President Trump. AFP via Getty Images 3 Rep. Massie is a libertarian-leaning House lawmaker who Trump has vowed to see defeated in the midterm election. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Massie, 54, has been vocally opposed to the One Big Beautiful Bill, which is Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill, and has slammed the US strikes on Iran as unconstitutional. The Kentucky Republican additionally teamed up with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on a bipartisan war powers resolution to stop the US from getting involved in the Israel-Iran conflict. The war of words between Trump and Musk erupted after the world's richest man renewed his sharp criticisms of the One Big Beautiful Bill, calling it 'utterly insane' and 'political suicide.' The Tesla boss had raged against the massive spending bill — on which Trump's major policy agenda hangs — on social media ahead of the Senate vote. Trump on Monday night responded with fury, threatening to unleash DOGE against Musk, the department's founder and former head, to investigate his companies' government subsidies. 3 Musk criticized the One Big Beautiful Bill, calling it 'utterly insane' and 'political suicide.' AFP via Getty Images He also warned his former ally that he may have 'to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.' 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump wrote.

Thought Markets Were Volatile Already? Watch Out.
Thought Markets Were Volatile Already? Watch Out.

New York Times

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Thought Markets Were Volatile Already? Watch Out.

Uncertainty ahead It has been a Jekyll-and-Hyde start to 2025. Analysts and investors are bracing for more drama in the second half. S&P 500 futures point to a weak opening on Tuesday, but the benchmark index is on a winning streak, having closed on Monday at another record. But the dollar has had its worst start to the year in more than a half-century as some investors sweat a possible return of the 'sell America' trade instigated by President Trump's trade war. Amid this split screen, Trump has stepped up his attacks on the Fed and its chair, Jay Powell. The threat to the central bank's independence could jolt global investors' nerves. A recap: Coming into the year, Wall Street hoped that Trump's business-friendly agenda of slashing taxes and regulations would propel stocks. But while the S&P 500 is up more than 5 percent this year, tariff uncertainty has rattled business executives, consumers and investors. And the fate of the Republican policy bill that is central to Trump's domestic agenda remains unclear as the legislation awaits a vote in Congress. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store