
Thinking about a vasectomy? What you need to know before and after
As a urologist, I've performed countless vasectomies. They are my profession's bread and butter. When I'm not doing the procedure, I'm seeing men either alone or with their partners to discuss its safety, simplicity and effectiveness. Like many men, I've found myself contemplating whether it's time to get one, too.
Maybe it's the recent US Supreme Court decisions on reproduction prompting more men to actively consider their role in birth control. Or perhaps it's part of a larger cultural shift toward shared family-planning responsibility. Then again, as a urologist who sees a growing number of men seeking vasectomy consultations, I'm more attuned to how common this conversation has become.
An estimated 500,000 men in the US choose vasectomies as a form of contraception every year. And if you are like me and considering a vasectomy — or if you're just curious about this procedure as a form of birth control — here are the top things you should know.
A vasectomy is typically a minor office-based procedure that requires minimal preparation. You can eat the day of the procedure, wear your T-shirt and shorts, and try to be relaxed. (If you choose to have the vasectomy done in an operating room, more preparation may be needed.) Once you're in the doctor's office, it takes 10 to 20 minutes to perform.
After numbing the scrotal skin with a local anesthetic, the urologist makes a small opening in the skin, often so small that no stitches or scalpels are needed. From there, the doctor will find the vas deferens — the tube that carries sperm (made in the testicle) from a tightly coiled duct called the epididymis to the urethra prior to ejaculation. The vas deferens feels a bit like a piece of cooked spaghetti.
The tube is brought out through the small opening, cut, sealed or blocked, preventing sperm from mixing with semen. The procedure is done on both sides, on both vas deferens, in a similar fashion. The cut ends are placed back into the scrotum, and the openings may be sealed with skin glue. Then you can go home and rest.
Expect some soreness in the scrotum and surrounding areas. I advise patients to rest for one or two days, wear supportive underwear, and apply an ice pack to the scrotum for about 20 minutes every hour. For pain or discomfort, I suggest taking over-the-counter ibuprofen or acetaminophen if needed. Avoid heavy lifting or strenuous exercise for about one to two weeks, or however long your doctor recommends.
Post-vasectomy complications are rare but possible and include minor bruising, swelling and temporary discomfort around the area where the procedure was done. Though uncommon, infections can occur and are typically resolved quickly with antibiotics if caught early. Around 1% to 2% of men can experience chronic post-vasectomy pain, which usually improves over time but in rare cases may persist and require further treatment.
An important point to remember is that you won't be sterile immediately. It typically takes several weeks — and around 30 ejaculations — to clear out your remaining sperm. Your urologist will confirm your sterility with a semen analysis, which can be done at a lab or using new at-home testing kits. Until you're officially cleared, though, continue to use another form of contraception — it takes only one sperm to achieve pregnancy, so making sure you are sterile is vital.
I've heard all the myths about vasectomies, so I want to share the answers to some of the most common questions men ask me during our consultations.
Many men worry that after a vasectomy they will have lower testosterone levels, sex drive or sexual function. Not true. In fact, many couples report increased sexual activity and satisfaction after a vasectomy since they no longer have to worry about pregnancy. You will still have an ejaculate — almost the same volume and sensation — but now you'll be 'shooting blanks,' since your semen no longer contains sperm.
Despite what you've heard, March Madness isn't the only good time for a vasectomy. Many men choose to recover while binge-watching football or even their favorite show. The truth is, you can safely book the procedure whenever it fits your schedule.
Some men assume vasectomies are expensive or not covered by insurance, but most insurance plans fully or partially cover the procedure. Even if you're paying out-of-pocket, the cost is often less than $1,000, though prices can range from $500 to $3,000 depending on your location and whether you opt for anesthesia. It's worth shopping around, but always choose a qualified urologist who is board-certified and experienced in performing vasectomies — your safety is never worth compromising just to save a few dollars. But let's face it: Compared with the monthly cost of diapers alone (about $100 per month until your child is potty-trained), a vasectomy is a financial win.
Though it's less common, I'm seeing more men without children choosing to get a vasectomy. Why? Often it's a firm lifestyle decision, because of concerns over passing certain genetic conditions, or simply being absolutely sure that fatherhood is not in their future. During our consultation, we openly discuss the motivations for making this decision, and I review the pros and cons. One big con is the permanent nature of the procedure. Yes, vasectomy reversals exist — and I do them myself for patients — but I don't advise undergoing a vasectomy assuming it's temporary. Reversal procedures are expensive and not always successful. If you're not sure whether you want children, pause and seriously reconsider the decision. Ultimately, it remains your personal choice.
Men who need birth control can use condoms or avoid sex altogether. There is also research on male birth-control pills, injections and 'switches,' which could be a long time away from being offered to men.
For women, there are birth-control pills, intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, injections, patches, vaginal rings and tubal ligation.
Each of these methods has its own pros, cons and effectiveness rates, so a detailed discussion with your health care provider and partner can help you make the best choice.
Deciding on a vasectomy isn't easy. I should know, because I'm right there with you. My advice is don't rush it. Talk with your partner, ask your doctor all the questions you have during your consultation and think through what this means for your future. Whatever decision you make, though, make sure it feels right for you.
Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Flurry of trade deals offers relief for some Asian countries, while others wait
BANGKOK (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump has announced trade deals with Japan and a handful of other Asian countries that will relieve some pressure on companies and consumers from sharply higher tariffs on their exports to the United States. A deal with China is under negotiation, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying an Aug. 12 deadline might be postponed again to allow more time for talks. Steep tariffs on U.S. imports of steel and aluminum remain, however, and many other countries, including South Korea and Thailand, have yet to clinch agreements. Overall, economists say the tariffs inevitably will dent growth in Asia and the world. The deals reached so far, ahead of Trump's Aug. 1 deadline Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced a deal Wednesday that will impose 15% tariffs on U.S. imports from Japan, down from Trump's proposed 25% 'reciprocal' tariffs. It was a huge relief for automakers like Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda, whose shares jumped by double digits in Tokyo. Trump also announced trade deals with the Philippines and Indonesia. After meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., Trump said the import tax on products from his country would be subject to a 19% tariff, down just 1% from the earlier threat of a 20% tariff. Indonesia also will face a 19% tariff, down from the 32% rate Trump had recently said would apply, and it committed to eliminating nearly all of its trade barriers for imports of American goods. Earlier, Trump announced that Vietnam's exports would face a 20% tariff, with double that rate for goods transshipped from China, though there has been no formal announcement. Talks with China may be extended Negotiations with China are subject to an Aug. 12 deadline, but it's likely to be extended, Bessent told Fox Business on Tuesday. He said the two sides were due to hold another round of talks, this time in Sweden, early next week. Meanwhile, Trump said a trip to China may happen soon, hinting at efforts to stabilize U.S.-China trade relations. A preliminary agreement announced in June paved the way for China to lift some restrictions on its exports of rare earths, minerals critical for high technology and other manufacturing. In May, the U.S. agreed to drop Trump's 145% tariff rate on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days, while China agreed to lower its 125% rate on U.S. goods to 10%. The reprieve allowed companies more time to rush to try to beat the potentially higher tariffs, giving a boost to Chinese exports and alleviating some of the pressure on its manufacturing sector. But prolonged uncertainty over what Trump might do has left companies wary about committing to further investment in China. No deals yet for South Korea and other Asian countries Pressure is mounting on some countries in Asia and elsewhere as the Aug. 1 deadline for striking deals approaches. Trump sent letters, posted on Truth Social, outlining higher tariffs some countries will face if they fail to reach agreements. He said they'd face even higher tariffs if they retaliate by raising their own import duties. South Korea's is set at 25%. Imports from Myanmar and Laos would be taxed at 40%, Cambodia and Thailand at 36%, Serbia and Bangladesh at 35%, South Africa and Bosnia and Herzegovina at 30% and Kazakhstan, Malaysia and Tunisia at 25%. Nearly every country has faced a minimum 10% levy on goods entering the U.S. since April, on top of other sectoral levies. Economists expect tariffs to sap growth even with trade deals Even after Trump has pulled back from the harshest of his threatened tariffs, the onslaught of uncertainty and higher costs for both manufacturers and consumers has raised risks for the regional and global economy. Economists have been downgrading their estimates for growth in 2025 and beyond. The Asian Development Bank said Wednesday it had cut its growth estimate for economies in developing Asia and the Pacific to 4.7% in 2025 and 4.6% in 2026, down 0.2 percentage points and 0.1 percentage points. The outlook for the region could be further dimmed by an escalation of tariffs and trade friction, it said. 'Other risks include conflicts and geopolitical tensions that could disrupt global supply chains and raise energy prices,' as well as a deterioration in China's ailing property market. Economists at AMRO were less optimistic, expecting growth for Southeast Asia and other major economies in Asia at 3.8% in 2025 and 3.6% next year. While countries in the region have moved to protect their economies from Trump's trade shock, they face significant uncertainties, said AMRO's chief economist, Dong He. 'Uneven progress in tariff negotiations and the potential expansion of tariffs to additional products could further disrupt trade activities and weigh on growth for the region,' he said. Elaine Kurtenbach, The Associated Press
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
How the dropping dollar could scramble Trump's agenda
President Trump and his aides are closely watching the US dollar's drop over the first six months of this year as they track a change that could have wide-ranging effects, from how tariffs are felt to Federal Reserve policy to America's role in the world. The question, which notably remains a somewhat open one even among Trump's aides, is whether the net effects may include at least some positive short-term consequences for the president's agenda or whether the dollar needs to be strengthened at all costs. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick offered a limited case for a weaker dollar on CBS over the weekend when he responded to a question about rising consumer prices by saying that "the dollar declining sort of softens tariffs completely." The currency's moves so far this year — which have surprised some economists who expected Trump's tariffs to put pressure in the other direction — could indeed boost exports but could also complicate Trump's goals for the coming months, primarily by pushing prices up for US consumers of foreign goods. Trump himself remains very much in the strong dollar camp, as he reiterated just a few days ago, saying that he is "never going to let the dollar slide." The only way that could happen, he added, is "if you have a dummy" as president. The somewhat mixed messaging comes as the US dollar index — a measure of the US currency against various foreign currencies — has fallen significantly and is now down almost 10% since Inauguration Day. Declines in recent days have put the currency, as of Tuesday afternoon, near two-year lows. It's a change that, if it sticks, will have varied consequences for Trump's agenda — and not just on the trade front. RSM's Joe Brusuelas offered in a note this week that a weakening dollar tends to be followed by inflation pressure — "but it usually takes nine to 12 months" — which could work most directly against Trump's keen interest in lower interest rates. If the dollar holds or declines further, the economist wrote, "such a scenario will most likely lead the Federal Reserve to hold its policy rate steady through the end of the year at best" due to inflation uncertainty. 'People vote with their feet' The somewhat surprising dollar moves so far this year have also spurred some concerns that recent declines could be early signs of a loss of faith from global investors. As JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon put it recently, "people vote with their feet," and "if people decide that the U.S. dollar isn't the place to be ... that will become a problem." Eurasia Group's Ian Bremmer added in a recent analysis that the dollar's role as the world's global reserve currency is likely safe for now, but the US is entering a period where investment trends "could start a long term slide to become closer to parity in trust and utility with the Euro." Some analysts are pushing back, saying the evidence isn't there (at least yet) for a long-term slide. A recent analysis from Monty Gandhi at the SMBC Group called the flows away from the dollar "still more myth than reality" and found that "speculative positioning may reflect short-term bearishness on the dollar, actual capital flows continue to favor U.S. assets." Another note of skepticism about any long-term effects came from Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, who wrote in a note that his expectation is that if the trade uncertainty is resolved, "the US dollar is expected to appreciate again" after what he describes as a rebound in demand for US assets that began in May. (Disclosure: Yahoo Finance is owned by Apollo Global Management.) It's also a narrative that the White House pushes hard against, with Trump taking an aggressive stance against BRICs, an intergovernmental organization comprising 10 countries that had floated a long-shot idea of a common currency. "They wanted to try and take over the dollar," the president said. Trump promised a 10% tariff in response and gloated last week that the group's influence is "fading out fast," likening the possible loss of the dollar's status as a reserve currency to "losing a world war." "Ten-year Treasury yields rallying down since Inauguration Day, four consecutive expectation-beating inflation reports, and the trillions in historic investment commitments that have poured into the United States since Election Day are all indicative of the confidence that investors and markets continue to have in our economy and currency," added White House spokesperson Kush Desai in a statement. Read more: What is the 10-year Treasury note, and how does it affect your finances? A long-simmering Trump-world debate This summer's focus on the dollar is just the latest in a debate within Trump's orbit that stretches back even before the 2024 election around whether the dollar is overvalued. As the Atlantic Council recently put it: "What's the Trump administration's dollar strategy? It depends on who you ask." On one side historically are figures like Stephen Miran, the chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, who touted the idea of a "Mar-A-Lago accord" last year, before he joined the administration, that was largely built on a premise that the US dollar is "persistently overvalued" and that tariff inflation can be avoided if currency issues are also addressed simultaneously. His argument was that tackling the currency question alongside tariffs could rebound in America's favor on a variety of fronts — from the national debt to national security arrangements to providing a boost to US businesses. It was an argument that Lutnick appeared to resurface in part over the weekend. It's also a line of thinking that has faced clear resistance from other aides (and apparently from Trump himself) who shy away from any public suggestion that the Trump administration is interested in lessening the US dollar's strength. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — a former currency trader himself — has repeatedly downplayed the dropping dollar, saying that "it's natural for currencies to go up and down and what we've seen is not out of the ordinary." Bessent is often quick to note that the dollar also declined in 2017 — the beginning of Trump's first term — but then rose in the following years. He often casts the moves — as he did on CNBC earlier this month — as better understood as a strengthening of the euro instead of a weakening of the dollar. So far, at least, Trump's actions have focused on one side of Miran's thesis, the implementation of tariffs, but with much less focus on his corollary currency ideas beyond things like a mention of "currency practices" in his "Liberation Day" tariffs executive order. It has even led Miran to offer some distance from his own paper and, on possible currency actions, to suggest "could it be something that is entertained down the road? Sure." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
IRS offers $2.895 million settlement with Maple Lawn over COVID-19 funding
COLDWATER, MI — County owned Maple Lawn Medical Care Facility received written confirmation Tuesday, July 22 of a settlement offer of $2.895 million from the IRS of an appeal of COVID-19 grants owed from the Employee Retention Credit program. Director Jayne Sabaitis told her board July 16 if confirmed, she would accept the offer after appealing denial of the original $3.6 million request filed three years ago during the pandemic. The money will help Maple Lawn make up for its current $1.3 million operating deficit caused by reduction in Medicaid funding for the current federal fiscal year. Prior story Maple Lawn to appeal IRS denial of $3.6 million in COVID-19 relief funds Sabaitis told her board she would consult with accountants Plante-Moran. 'We'll be discussing how that's going to affect our cost report. We want to make sure that we keep our expenses so that our Medicaid rate stays the same to make sure the use of the funds would not hurt next year's Medicaid funding," she said. Sabaitis told the board there are some capital projects which were delayed. 'We're not going to take this money and blow it. We want to hold cash as much as we can' with questions about future funding, she said. Related story With a current $1.2 million loss, Maple Lawn faces concerns with federal Medicaid cuts Sabaitis said five other Michigan nursing homes hired Washington legal counsel to sue the IRS over ERC denial. Maple Lawn was a late applicant for ERC funding only learning near the end of the pandemic the non-profit nursing facilities were eligible. The program was created for eligible businesses and tax-exempt organizations that had employees and saw increased costs or losses affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. Subscribe Support local to the Coldwater Reporter Maple Lawn is licensed for 114 beds but fluctuates by staffing. The nursing care and rehabilitation regularly reports over 90% occupancy. Contact Don Reid: dReid@ This article originally appeared on Coldwater Daily Reporter: Maple Lawn to receive $2.895 million ERC program settlement from IRS Solve the daily Crossword