BREAKING NEWS War erupts in the Liberal party after elder erupts about women becoming 'assertive'
Former federal president Alan Stockdale, 80, reportedly claimed women had become 'so assertive' the party might need to consider support for men.
'The women in this party are so assertive now that we may needs some special rules for men to get them preselected,' he told a meeting of the NSW Liberal Womens' Council, the Daily Telegraph reported on Thursday.
Mr Stockdale, who was treasurer under ex-Victorian premier Jeff Kennett, made the remarks at the womens' executive gathering on Tuesday and later told the Telegraph he had made 'a lighthearted but poorly chosen remark'.
But that didnt stop senior Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie and former Labor premier for Queensland Anna Palaszczuk from joining forces to condemn his remarks.
'Honestly, Alan, read the room,' Senator McKenzie told Nine's Today show on Thursday.
'It was a shocking comment - I think it's time for Alan to head back to the Melbourne Club, have a stiff whisky and chat with the old boys about what went wrong.'
Ms Palaszczuk said she couldn't believe it.
'You've finally got one step forward for the Liberal Party with Sussan Ley being elected (federal leader), and it's three steps backwards with these comments,' she told Today.
'These are not appropriate in this day and age, and honestly, the Liberal Party needs a good hard look at themselves, especially the men.'
Senator McKenzie said she was on a 'unity ticket' with Ms Palaszczuk over Mr Stockdale's remarks.
During the federal election campaign, the Liberal party announced a policy requiring public servants to stop working from home.
It was blamed for alienating women voters, many of whom use working from home to balance their jobs with child care and other duties, ahead of Labor romping home to government.
Deputy opposition leader Ted O'Brien also questioned Mr Stockdale's comments, appealing to strong women to join the Liberals.
'To any of the assertive women out there, the Liberal Party is your party,' he told ABC's News Breakfast on Thursday.
'We need more women engaging with our party, running for our party.
'I'm proud to have Sussan Ley as our leader.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The biggest voices need to admit Australia is a low-taxing nation before joining the economic reform conversation
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has reinvigorated the economic policy debate with all the talk now about his economic reform roundtable. Unfortunately, the biggest voices invariably are those who desire to help themselves. The other problem is the debate remains bounded in purposeful obfuscation. That is why it is very pleasing to read Acoss's new report 'Taxing income less and consumption more: The case against', which factchecks some myths about Australia's tax system. Acoss provides three points that need to be the basis of any discussion of tax. If you can't admit Australia is a low-taxing nation, then you should not get entry into any roundtable discussion on the topic. As Acoss notes, Australia is the ninth lowest taxing nation across all the advanced economies in the world. We raise less tax than every nation in the G7 except for the US. We raise less tax than South Korea, Canada, Japan, or the UK. In 2022 (the latest OECD-wide figures) the average level of tax across the OECD was 34% of GDP, while in Australia it was just 29.4% of GDP. If the graph does not display click here That's the equivalent of an extra $128bn. And sure, you might say, 'that's how it is, we can't change that'. But we change things all the time in our tax system. Paul Keating introduced capital gains tax, John Howard introduced a 50% capital gains tax discount and the GST. We used to have inheritance taxes, and then Joh Bjelke-Petersen got rid of them in 1977: If the graph does not display click here We also change our spending – we haven't always had Medicare or the NDIS. Nothing needs to only be the way it is or was. In 1970, total government tax revenue was 20.5% of GDP; within 15 years it was 27.5% of GDP – that's a bigger shift than to go from where we are now to the OECD average. Nothing is fixed. If the graph does not display click here The myth that we are a big income-taxing nation refuses to die. Independent MP Allegra Spender, for example, likes to say in her social media videos and tax 'green paper' that 'we need to lower the tax burden on working people through lowering income taxes' because we need to rebalance 'tax revenue from income taxes on labour towards other sources of tax' to ensure 'sustainability'. Except, as Acoss details, we are the seventh lowest taxer of personal income in the OECD, and the 11th lowest when you include corporate income: If the graph does not display click here As the Acoss report notes, Australia's 'share of personal income and social security taxes is 40%, below the OECD average of 50%': If the graph does not display click here Australia is less dependent on personal income taxes than every country in the G7 and yet apparently, we need to reduce our dependency even more. Even compared to our own history we're not all that dependent on private income tax: If the graph does not display click here Often talk about needing to reduce our dependency on income tax is followed by a call to increase the GST. Conservative economists like to argue a GST is the most efficient tax. Caring more about tax efficiency rather than equity is rather revealing, but even still, as Acoss notes, the GST is not actually much more efficient than income tax. They note that previous Treasury research found increasing the GST to 15% and reducing income tax to compensate 'would deliver negligible GDP gains'. The difference in efficiency of income tax and GST is so small that it would barely register in the overall economy. So, the only reason you would do it is if it was fairer. But, as Acoss finds, it is decidedly not so. Around the bottom 60% of households would be worse off from an increase in the GST to 15% combined with a 5% income tax cut. If the graph does not display click here The government could instead increase low-income benefits, but as Acoss argues, these are notoriously temporary. They note, for example, that the GST support package included '$3 per week per child family payments … together with an increase of up to $7 per week per family for sole parent families'. That was great until 'seven years later, income support for sole parents with school age children was cut by $25 per week'. So where does this leave us? The problem is not dependency on income taxes, but that we have overly generous income tax breaks for those who do not need them other than for reasons that have little economic basis. As Acoss argues, 'tax concessions for superannuation are excessively generous for people who don't need support to save for retirement' and similarly 'capital gains tax and negative gearing concessions encourage speculation in land, undermine housing affordability and divert investment from more productive purposes'. We don't need to increase the GST, but we could broaden it to include things like private health insurance and private school fees which would actually be progressive. Some in the private school sector are already getting antsy about this (as they should). And here's the thing – we don't need to only fund things with more GST – we could tax wealth and better tax gas companies and all the proceeds could go into the GST bucket that the states get. There are a lot of ways to improve the tax system, but if you can't admit the three points above, you really should admit you don't belong in the conversation. Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The many controversies of Mark Latham — podcast
Mark Latham came close to becoming an Australian prime minister, but it's very different headlines being made now. After a career of controversy, the New South Wales upper house MP is being taken to a NSW local court by an ex-partner seeking an apprehended violence order. Separately, there have also been claims of inappropriate behaviour directed towards other female MPs. Latham will contest the allegations in the AVO matter in court and has otherwise denied any wrongdoing. Chief political correspondent Tom McIlroy speaks to Reged Ahmad about how this latest controversy has ricocheted to the upper echelons of federal Labor and sparked a debate about his portrait, which still hangs in Parliament House
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Four Corners 'meltdown' two hours before going to air. Plus, blind gossip hints at media Lothario's dark side... and which TV star has meth on his mind? INSIDE MAIL
By and JO SCRIMSHIRE and NICHOLAS COMINO and PETER VAN ONSELEN, POLITICAL EDITOR FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA Published: | Sore corners In case you missed it, Four Corners poured a steaming bucket of s*** on Melbourne neurosurgeon Greg Malham this week, digging Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article.
