Council overspend on social care highest in decade amid warning over NHS plan
The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (Adass) said the financial situation 'is as bad as it has been in recent history' with council overspend on adult social care budgets in the year to March hitting around £774 million.
This was up from £586 million in the previous year and is the highest level for at least a decade, Adass said.
Its survey – which had responses from 91% of directors of adult social services in England – also showed care leaders have reduced spending on prevention by 11% this year.
Just 5.6% of this year's total adult social care net budget is projected to be spent on prevention.
Adass said this lowest recorded spend is because overstretched budgets mean care leaders have had to prioritise immediate needs and people in crisis.
Earlier this month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting unveiled their 10-year NHS plan which they vowed would 'fundamentally rewire' the health service and put care on people's doorsteps.
The plan set out how the NHS will move from treatment to prevention and from hospital to more care shifted into neighbourhoods and people's homes.
But Adass president Jess McGregor said: 'Without more investment to keep people well and independent at home, we risk undermining the shift towards prevention and neighbourhood health that Wes Streeting, the NHS and this Government are rightly championing.'
The overall overspend is 'likely to result in councils further tightening the eligibility criteria for social care, so they can deliver their legal obligations, leaving very little left for preventative measures that would likely save the state money in the longer term and most importantly, improve outcomes for people', Adass said.
Ms McGregor said: 'The maths simply doesn't add up – more people are coming to councils for help and their care is complex and costly, which means we don't have funds left to provide the early support and prevention that would stop people's health from deteriorating and help them avoid spiralling into crisis, where they frequently end up in hospital.'
The spending review published last month stated there would be an increase of more than £4 billion of funding available for adult social care in 2028-29, compared with 2025-26.
But Adass said there remains 'uncertainty' about what that figure covers, including whether it takes in the 'much-needed but costly fair pay agreement for care workers', which is yet to be set out by the Government.
Ms McGregor repeated a call for social care to be prioritised, saying: 'It's vital that adult social care leaders who are well versed in delivering support at the community level are meaningfully involved in decisions about where and how resources for neighbourhood health and care are spent.
'After all, acute hospitals are not best placed to deliver social care at the neighbourhood level – but councils are.'
The Local Government Association (LGA) said the survey results show 'councils are caught in the impossible position' of choosing between meeting people's complex care needs and supporting other's wellbeing to prevent needs escalating.
The LGA added: 'Local government is best placed to lead this shift and deliver neighbourhood-level care, but it cannot do so with one hand tied behind its back by underfunding.'
Mr Streeting has previously said social care 'has to be part' of neighbourhood health, adding: 'In the context of this plan, social care features because it has a role to play on admission avoidance and speeding up delayed discharges.'
The Casey Commission, launched earlier this year, aims to set out a plan to implement a national care service, but social care leaders have previously raised concerns over the potential timeline of 2036 for some recommended reforms to be introduced.
The first phase is expected to report in 2026, although recommendations from the initial probe will be implemented in phases over the course of 10 years.
The second phase of the commission, setting out longer-term reforms, is due to report by 2028.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We inherited a social care system in crisis but in our first year of government we have taken immediate action to improve this.
'The spending review will allow for increased funding for social care by £4 billion, we have legislated for the first ever fair pay agreement for care workers, and Baroness Casey has begun her work on the independent commission into adult social care to build a National Care Service that is fair and affordable for all.
'We have also invested £172 million extra in the Disabled Facilities Grant to deliver around an extra 15,000 home adaptations and given unpaid carers a £2,000 uplift to their allowance.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Eight babies have been born in Britain using a new three-person IVF technique designed to prevent hereditary diseases
Eight babies have been born in the UK thanks to a groundbreaking three-person IVF technique to prevent devastating disease. Four boys and four girls, including one set of identical twins, have been delivered and are all doing well following treatment by a team in Newcastle, who pioneered the technique. One other woman is currently pregnant. The scientific method, known as mitochondrial donation treatment, is designed to prevent children from being born with devastating mitochondrial diseases that are passed down from their mothers. These illnesses can be fatal and often cause devastating damage to organs including the brain, muscle, liver, heart and kidney. Of the eight babies born, three are now aged under six months, two are aged six to 12 months, one is 12 to 18 months old, one is aged 18 to 24 months and one child is aged over two. All the babies are healthy and are meeting their milestones, according to the team from Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle University and Newcastle Fertility Centre. None of the eight babies shows signs of having mitochondrial DNA disease, which tends to affect around one in 5,000 births. The scientists said disease-causing mitochondrial DNA mutations, picked up in three of the children, are either undetectable or present at levels that are very unlikely to cause disease. The main lab method used by the team, known as pronuclear transfer (PNT), involves taking the egg from an affected mother, sperm from her partner and an egg from a donor who is free from disease. The mother of a baby girl born through mitochondrial donation said: 'As parents, all we ever wanted was to give our child a healthy start in life. 'Mitochondrial donation IVF made that possible. After years of uncertainty, this treatment gave us hope - and then it gave us our baby. 'We look at them now, full of life and possibility, and we're overwhelmed with gratitude. Science gave us a chance.' The mother of a baby boy added: 'We are now proud parents to a healthy baby, a true mitochondrial replacement success. This breakthrough has lifted the heavy cloud of fear that once loomed over us. 'Thanks to this incredible advancement and the support we received, our little family is complete. 'The emotional burden of mitochondrial disease has been lifted, and in its place is hope, joy, and deep gratitude.' Professor Sir Doug Turnbull, from Newcastle University and part of the team of researchers, said: 'Mitochondrial disease can have a devastating impact on families. 'Today's news offers fresh hope to many more women at risk of passing on this condition who now have the chance to have children growing up without this terrible disease.' In all the cases, the Newcastle team used the PNT technique after the egg was fertilised. For this, scientists transplanted the nuclear genome (which contains all the genes essential for a person's characteristics, such as hair colour and height) from the egg carrying the mitochondrial DNA mutation into an egg donated by an unaffected woman that had had its nuclear genome removed. Thanks to the procedure, the resulting baby inherits its parents' nuclear DNA, but the mitochondrial DNA is mainly inherited from the donated egg. Scientific progress in this area led Parliament to change the law in 2015 to permit mitochondrial donation treatment. Two years later, the Newcastle clinic became the first and only national centre licensed to perform it, with the first cases approved in 2018. Approval is given on a case-by-case basis by the UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). The new findings on the eight births, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, show that all the babies are developing normally. Aged 18 months, tests are carried out in areas such as gross motor skills, fine motor skills, cognitive and social development and language skills to check the babies are hitting milestones. The researchers will also check the children when they are aged five. Professor Bobby McFarland, director of the NHS Highly Specialised Service for Rare Mitochondrial Disorders at Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said he was confident the children would carry on developing normally. He added: 'If we're not picking up subtle signs of problems at five, then we're really very clear that is not going to be a problem.' He added: 'In my work...I see children in intensive care units up and down this country and that's not pleasant. 'It's very difficult for families to deal with these diseases, they are devastating... 'To see babies born at the end of this is just amazing really.' Mary Herbert, professor of reproductive biology at Newcastle University, added: 'PNT happens in the small hours of the morning - those long nights. And it has paid off. 'It's fair to say it's rewarding. In science though, periods of joy are fleeting and brief because you're always thinking what is the next challenge? How do we optimise it further?' She said the slight DNA mutations seen in three of the children are 'way, way below the threshold that would cause disease'. Peter Thompson, chief executive of the HFEA, said: 'Ten years ago, the UK was the first country in the world to licence mitochondrial donation treatment to avoid passing the condition to children. 'For the first time, families with severe inherited mitochondrial illness have the possibility of a healthy child. 'Although it's still early days, it is wonderful news that mitochondrial donation treatment has led to eight babies being born. 'Only people who are at a very high risk of passing a serious mitochondrial disease onto their children are eligible for this treatment in the UK, and every application for mitochondrial donation treatment is individually assessed in accordance with the law.' Dr Andy Greenfield, from the University of Oxford, said: 'It is a triumph of scientific innovation in the IVF clinic - a world-first that shows that the UK is an excellent environment in which to push boundaries in IVF; a tour de force by the embryologists who painstakingly developed and optimised the micromanipulation methods; an example of the value of clinical expertise, developed over decades of working with children and adults suffering from these devastating diseases, being used to support a new intervention and subsequent follow-up, potentially for many years.' Beth Thompson, executive director for policy and partnerships at Wellcome, said: 'This is a remarkable scientific achievement, which has been years in the making. 'The pioneering work behind mitochondrial donation is a powerful example of how discovery research can change lives.' Professor Dagan Wells, from the University of Oxford, said the study showed established methods for avoiding mitochondrial DNA diseases, such as preimplantation genetic testing, perform well and will be suitable for most women at risk of having an affected child. 'A minority of patients are unable to produce any embryos free of mitochondrial disease, and for those women the study provides hope that they may be able to have healthy children in the future,' he added.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Patients with penicillin allergy may benefit from further tests, study suggests
The majority of patients recorded as having a penicillin allergy may not be truly allergic to the antibiotic, a first-of-its-kind trial suggests. Those with the marker on their medical records could benefit from tests to confirm or rule out an allergy, according to researchers. Removing incorrect labels could help improve care for patients while tackling antibiotic resistance and saving money for the NHS, they said. For the Alabama trial, published in the Lancet Primary Care and led by the University of Leeds, researchers recruited 823 patients from 51 GP practices in England. Those taking part had no history of severe reactions to penicillin. Some patients were tested for a penicillin allergy, with either an oral dose of the antibiotic or a small injection under the skin. If there was no immediate reaction, patients were given a three-day course of penicillin to take at home, where they were monitored by the research team. Of the 365 people tested for an allergy, some 234 had an oral test, with 13 testing positive, while 131 had a skin test, three of which were positive. Elsewhere, 128 patients had an oral test after a skin test, with 14 testing positive for an allergy. Overall, the study found 30 patients tested positive for a penicillin allergy, while 335 – or 92% – tested negative. After three months, 276 patients had the allergy removed from their medical records. And after 12 months, allergies were removed from the records of 321 patients, or 88% of the group that was tested. Dr Jonathan Sandoe, lead author and associate clinical professor in microbiology at the University of Leeds School of Medicine and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, said: 'Antibiotics have been life-saving drugs since the late 1930s, but we are now in an era where microbes are evolving to resist the effects of current antibiotics. 'The global challenge of antibiotic resistance is causing people to die of common infections, so it is vital to find ways to improve how antibiotics are used. 'Assessing people with penicillin allergy labels is one way we can achieve this.' Patients who had the allergy check also had fewer antibiotics overall, the study suggests. As part of the study, researchers analysed the cost-effectiveness of allergy testing based on the NHS model. They said that although results may vary in different countries, the study observed 'tendency towards reducing consultations, days in hospital, and emergency admissions' which 'suggest that the penicillin allergy assessment pathway is cost-effective in the short run and increasingly likely to be so over longer follow-up periods'. Researchers now suggest that 'access to penicillin allergy assessment for patients should be widened'. Dr Sandoe added: 'This research shows that removing incorrect penicillin allergy labels has the potential to improve patient experiences, reduce health costs and tackle bacterial resistance. 'Now, we need to work together with policymakers and patients to help the NHS to address this issue.' Professor Sue Pavitt from the University of Leeds, who jointly led the study, said her mother Rosie Woollard had a penicillin allergy added to her medical records in the 1950s. She had been prescribed the antibiotic for mastitis – a common infection usually linked with breastfeeding – and developed a rash. Prof Pavitt said: 'My mum was vigilant and avoided taking penicillin from that day, but her allergy was never checked. 'It may have been a simple reaction to the other substances used in manufacturing the tablet or her rash was just a consequence of the infection. 'When my mum got older and had more underlying health problems, we noticed that when she had an infection, she often needed two or three courses of different antibiotics before the infection would clear. 'Each round of antibiotics took a toll on her wellbeing, appetite and ability to bounce back until the infection was under control.' Ms Woollard developed repeated urinary tract infections later in life and died at the age of 91. Her cause of death was recorded as an antimicrobial infection. Prof Pavitt said: 'Antibiotic allergy and resistant bugs are complex concepts to understand – she was our barometer to see if we were explaining things clearly. 'She was also instrumental in making the Alabama trial open to older people with multiple long-term conditions, a group that is often excluded from research but important to reach. 'This research is in part her legacy and shows the value of preserving antibiotics, so that we can keep fighting infections with these important medicines.' Christopher Butler, a professor of primary care in the Nuffield department of primary care health sciences at the University of Oxford, said: 'It's this kind of research question that has a huge impact on improving care for individuals, improving cost-effectiveness of what we do as clinicians, and helps us preserve the precious shared resource of of antibiotics to all of us and to future generations.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Supernanny's Jo Frost speaks out on 'life-threatening' health condition in candid video
Jo Frost, who shot to fame on the hit show Supernanny in the early 2000s, has opened up about a health condition she suffers with in a candid video Supernanny legend Jo Frost has bravely opened up about the "life-threatening" medical condition she battles in a heartfelt new video. The telly favourite shot to stardom in the early noughties with her hit show Supernanny, where she'd step into chaotic households to help struggling parents tackle their children's challenging behaviour. These days, Jo operates as a parenting guru, offering her expertise through online private sessions whilst sharing educational content across her social media platforms. In her most recent post, she courageously discussed her health struggles after receiving an anaphylaxis diagnosis, defiantly declaring she refuses to let the condition "define" her whilst expressing her determination to spread awareness. According to the NHS, anaphylaxis is described as a "life-threatening allergic reaction that happens very quickly" and can be sparked by food, medication or insect stings, reports the Express. When someone displays symptoms of anaphylactic shock, immediate medical intervention is crucial, as without treatment it can lead to cardiac or respiratory arrest. Opening her video, the 55 year old revealed: "I've survived more anaphylactic shocks than I'm prepared to go into detail about right now. I have anaphylaxis, a life-threatening medical condition to certain foods that will compromise my body so horrifically to the point of hospitalisation." She continued, addressing her followers: "Absolute millions of my community around the world, children and adults, live cautiously and anxiously navigating this journey with not nearly enough compassion, education, and empathy from those who do not." Jo expressed that she is "unapologetic" about her condition, comparing it to "shoving a loaded gun in her face". "I did not ask for it, and it does not define who I am and the impact that I make in the world daily. But it does impact how I live my life daily, like the precautions I take, the energy I have to use to discern with hypervigilance," she explained. Taking aim at those who disregard her condition in public settings, Jo also stressed the significance of checking food labels for safety. The television personality stated: "By the way, I speak on behalf of those who also have coeliac disease, too, because we are not all faddy eaters,' she asserted. Coeliac disease is an autoimmune disorder where ingestion of gluten leads to damage in the small intestine. "I'm not looking to be treated special; I'm looking to be treated with the same dignity and attentiveness as you just showed others." In closing, Jo urged her audience to "get curious" and "learn more" about her condition, while also asking them to refrain from leaving "passive aggressive comments" on her social media post. Jo's followers rallied around her on social media, with one expressing: "Thank you Jo. Been living with this my whole life and see how it has gotten so much worse for children now. Education is so important as well as looking at our food supply and what is in it. We need to look at the root cause and source as well." Another supporter chimed in: "Thank you for using your voice... many could benefit from empathy and understanding!! Wishing you healthy days, Jo!!"
