logo
From Sidelines To The Core: Now Is The Time For Business To Reframe Its Approach To Well-Being

From Sidelines To The Core: Now Is The Time For Business To Reframe Its Approach To Well-Being

Forbes18-06-2025
In recent years, the importance of employee well-being has steadily climbed the corporate agenda – with a growing number of organizations offering dedicated programs and support resources to help address mental health at work.
Prompted by the growing expectations of younger generations in the workplace, and accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, this increased focus is welcome.
However, data increasingly points to a need for organizations to redefine their strategies for supporting well-being in the workplace - to move beyond an approach where support sits on the 'sidelines' to one that firmly embeds well-being into the core of the work experience. This means addressing the root causes of stress and anxiety at work to prevent them, rather than just treating them.
Deloitte Global's annual Gen Z and Millennial Survey, now in its 14th year, explores the views and experiences of over 23,000+ Gen Z and millennial respondents across 44 countries. And this year's findings make evident the wide range of factors impacting people's well-being, many of which are related to work and can be directly influenced by leadership behaviors.
Work/life balance features prominently as an enabler, or as a limiting factor, to well-being – and to happiness. Indeed, over half of respondents who say they are happy also say they are satisfied with their work/life balance, but in those who report being unhappy, satisfaction with work/life balance drops to three in 10. Achieving work/life balance isn't just seen by these generations as a 'nice to have' – it is now a fundamental expectation. To this end, maintaining a good work/life balance features in the top career goals for both generations, along with financial independence and job stability. Yet many have not consistently achieved work/life balance – with around a quarter of Gen Zs (28%) and millennials (26%) having changed industries or career paths for better work/life balance.
While the importance of achieving a work/life balance is clear – it is equally clear that there is a mismatch between expectations and reality when it comes to a leader's role in helping to achieve it. Around four in 10 look to their leaders to enable work/life balance, yet just under a quarter say this happens in reality.
Workplace culture and recognition also play a key role. The data shows that both are closely linked to employee well-being. Indeed, for those who report good mental well-being, feeling valued at work, satisfaction with the recognition they receive, and satisfaction with career growth opportunities are common workplace experiences. For example, six in 10 Gen Zs and seven in 10 millennials who feel satisfied with the recognition they receive for their work report good mental well-being. Yet the picture is less positive for a third of respondents who say that their job contributes significantly to their stress levels, with long working hours and a lack of recognition being most cited (by nearly half). And for around four in 10 of these respondents, workplace stress is driven by toxic workplace cultures and unfair decision-making processes.
Here we again see the importance of the role of line managers and leaders – along with a mismatch in expectations and experience. More than four in 10 respondents believe managers have a responsibility to foster a positive and inclusive work culture, but only one-fifth believe that they do this – with a lack of recognition, unfair decision-making practices and toxic work environments cited as top workplace stress drivers.
Financial reward for work is important to these generations, but so is doing meaningful work, and both impact well-being. Sixty-two percent of Gen Zs and 68% of millennials who are satisfied with their pay and benefits report good mental well-being, while only 39% Gen Zs and 44% millennials who are dissatisfied with these elements report the same. When it comes to meaningful work, nine in 10 respondents overall say having purpose to their work is important to their well-being.
When these generations don't experience meaning or purpose in their work it negatively impacts stress and anxiety levels as well as retention – indeed, four in 10 say that not getting a sense of meaning or purpose from work contributes to their feelings of anxiety and stress. And nearly half (44% of Gen Zs and 45% of millennials) have left a role they felt lacked purpose.
This data paints a clear picture: well-being is impacted by workplace experiences – it cannot be regarded as a stand-alone issue on the sidelines that is solely addressed by providing mental health resources. It is about fundamentals at the core – work/life balance, culture, recognition, financial reward and meaningful work – and it is about leaders who understand and enable this.
Some may read this article and be comfortable that they have embedded well-being in all they do. But for those who read it and think there is more to do, here are some questions to think about:
By asking these questions and being open to reframing how they consider their approach to workplace well-being, employers can start to meaningfully meet the expectations of younger generations and reap the full benefits of a thriving, productive and loyal workforce.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Layoffs climb to highest level since 2020: Research
Layoffs climb to highest level since 2020: Research

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Layoffs climb to highest level since 2020: Research

Layoffs across the United States have climbed to the highest level since 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic slowed down economies around the world, according to a new report that was published on Wednesday. The report, which was released by the executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said companies have announced 744,308 job cuts so far this year, the highest tally since 2020, when 1,585,047 positions were slashed. Excluding the 2020 figures, the number of job cuts in 2025 is the highest since the first half of 2009, when 896,675 reductions occurred. The U.S.-based companies announced 47,999 job cuts in June, nearly 50 percent lower than the 93,816 reductions in May. 'The bulk of companies cited economic conditions last month. We saw some DOGE activity and have tracked over 2,000 jobs directly attributed to tariffs this year, but for the most part it was a quiet June,' the Challenger, Gray & Christmas' senior vice president and labor expert Andrew Challenger said in a statement. Challenger, Gray & Christmas laid out several reasons why layoffs have increased this year. The leading reason is the impact of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was cited in 286,679 planned layoffs in 2025. Economic and market conditions was the second most-cited reason for reductions, linked to 154,126 cuts this year. The shutdown of stores, plants and units has resulted in 107,142 layoffs. Restructuring efforts have also caused 64,487 job cuts. Bankruptcies led to another 35,641 cuts. Retail has seen the most cuts in the private sector in 2025, with 79,865 reductions, an increase of 255 percent compared to the first half of 2024, when 22,467 job cuts took place. 'Retailers are one of the hardest hit business sectors by tariffs, inflation, and uncertainty. If consumer spending continues to fall, it could mean more job losses in this industry,' Challenger said in a statement.

Slam dunk? Fundstrat's Tom Lee considers two new themes for his Granny Shots ETF
Slam dunk? Fundstrat's Tom Lee considers two new themes for his Granny Shots ETF

CNBC

time33 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Slam dunk? Fundstrat's Tom Lee considers two new themes for his Granny Shots ETF

Long-time market bull Tom Lee is considering two new themes for his Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF. On CNBC's "ETF Edge" this week, he revealed sovereign security could soon make the cut. "It's now evident to me that the mechanisms are in motion for companies to really fix their supply chains within a sovereign border, and that's a change," the firm's chief investment officer said. "That's not going to just be one or two years." He's also looking at Gen Z. Lee compares the generation to millennials, who he called "the engine" of the market when Fundstrat first began researching themes seven years ago. "That means we need to be focusing on Gen Z and then Gen Alpha, so we might have to evolve our demographic theme to kind of orient towards the younger cohorts," he said. "It may not be for a couple years, but I'm kind of sharing our thought process." Lee's Granny Shots ETF was inspired by NBA legend Rick Barry's awkward free throw style. 'If you buy the best stocks in each theme, then you're hanging your hat on a single idea. So we said, 'Let's be like Rick Barry. Let's do a correct physics basketball throw, underhanded,'" said Lee. "It doesn't look great, but it makes 90% of the shots." According to Lee, the ETF's strategy starts with seven themes Fundstrat predicts will define the market over the next 10 years — from millennials to energy security. To be considered a granny shot, a stock must fit at least two of the themes. "We're not buying junky stocks. We want to make sure that they generate earnings and high ROIC [return on invested capital]," Lee said. "We rebalance every quarter." So far, the Granny Shots ETF, which was launched on Nov. 7, is scoring investors. In May, Fundstrat reported the ETF crossed the $1 billion in assets under management milestone. As of last week, Lee said the fund grew to $1.3 billion. Since its launch, the ETF is up 13% as of Thursday's close. The fund is beating the S&P 500 so far this year. It's up almost 15% since Jan. 1 while the index is up about 7%. As of July 3, Fundstrat reports its top three holdings are Robinhood, Oracle and AMD. Independent ETF expert Dave Nadig said he's observed recently that ETFs with active management styles are gaining traction. "Tom's very much a part of it," Nadig said in the same interview. "I think having an active management overlay, both on the stock selection and the thematic part, can make a lot of sense for investors. It's certainly easier for investors to understand."

Trump's 'big beautiful' budget bill includes a new tax break worth up to $2,000—around 90% of filers could take advantage
Trump's 'big beautiful' budget bill includes a new tax break worth up to $2,000—around 90% of filers could take advantage

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Trump's 'big beautiful' budget bill includes a new tax break worth up to $2,000—around 90% of filers could take advantage

House Republicans on Thursday voted to pass President Donald Trump's massive budget bill, making good on a promise to deliver the legislation to the president's desk by July 4. The bill promises continuity for taxpayers by permanently extending the cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as well as a raft of new cuts, including breaks for tipped and overtime income. The new law also includes a throwback: an above-the-line deduction on charitable contributions. The bill allows taxpayers who don't itemize to deduct up to $1,000 for single filers and $2,000 for married couples filing jointly. "This could provide some tax savings for folks," says Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation. "That could be something unexpected if you're not currently deducting charitable giving." Most people don't currently deduct charitable contributions — and it's not because they're not generous or don't want a tax break. Other than under the Covid-19 relief bill, taxpayers generally have had to itemize deductions in order to get a break for charitable giving. For most people, that doesn't make sense. Some 9 in 10 taxpayers take the standard deduction, which in 2025 is $15,000 for single filers and $30,000 for joint filers. You'd typically only itemize if the sum of your deductions would save you more money than just taking the standard deduction. In short, the new law allows anyone who donates to charity to get a tax break — not just the mega-philanthropists among us. Because these deductions reduce your taxable income, they're the most beneficial for people in the highest tax brackets. A $1,000 deduction from income is effectively worth $100 to someone in the 10% tax bracket. The same deduction is worth $350 to someone in the 35% bracket. You'll still have to follow the IRS' rules on charitable giving to get the break. Donations must be made to qualifying charitable organizations — donations to political campaigns, crowdfunding efforts and, in the case of the proposed tax break, donor-advised funds won't be eligible. Before you make a donation you plan on deducting, check the IRS' search tool to make sure the organization is tax-exempt. And be sure to get a receipt for your donation; the IRS generally requires written acknowledgement of any donation in excess of $250.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store