Iran authorities expand dog walking ban
The ban – which echoes a 2019 police directive that barred walking dogs in Tehran – was expanded to Ilam city in the west on Sunday, according to reports.
At least 17 other cities introduced similar bans in recent days, including Isfahan in the centre and Kerman in the south.
Owning and walking dogs has been a contentious topic since the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, though there is no law outrightly banning dog ownership.
Many religious scholars however consider petting dogs or coming into contact with their saliva as "najis" or ritually impure, while some officials view them as a symbol of Western cultural influence.
Local authorities have periodically introduced bans on walking dogs in public spaces or carrying them in vehicles as part of a wider campaign to discourage their ownership.
Enforcing the restrictions has been largely inconsistent, as many owners continue to walk their dogs in Tehran and elsewhere across Iran.
On Sunday, the reformist Etemad newspaper quoted an official from Ilam city as saying that "legal action will be taken against violators", without elaborating.
On Saturday, the state newspaper Iran said the latest measures are aimed at "maintaining public order, ensuring safety and protecting public health".
"Dog walking is a threat to public health, peace and comfort," said Abbas Najafi, prosecutor of the western city of Hamedan, as quoted by Iran newspaper.
In 2021, some 75 lawmakers condemned pet ownership as a "destructive social problem", saying it could "gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life".
In 2017, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that "keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guard dogs is considered reprehensible".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Eighty years after Hiroshima, is the world any safer from nuclear war?
AS THE 80th anniversary of the nuclear strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki rolls around next month, it is worth asking how safe is the world from another nuclear war. The aftermath of the US strike on Iran's putative nuclear weapons facilities in June seems to have engendered a belief that the world has somehow stepped back from the brink. Indeed, some even expect that Washington will now summon up its courage and decisively act against North Korea, never mind that Pyongyang has defence treaties with both China and Russia. The thinking seems to be that an Iran-like bombing raid would leave the world's nuclear arsenals in safe hands, however that notion of safety is construed. So perhaps this is a good moment to recount the times the world has come to the brink of all-out nuclear war – with all that it means for life on Earth. Everyone remembers the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. Moscow had placed nuclear missiles in Cuba. The Kennedy administration wanted the missiles withdrawn and ordered a naval blockade. As manoeuvres began, Soviet officers misinterpreted non-lethal depth charges from American surface ships as the onset of war. The Soviet submarine commander was about to fire a nuclear-tipped torpedo at an American aircraft carrier. But he needed the permission of a political officer, Captain Vasily Arkhipov, who judged the situation correctly and refused to give that permission. He thus saved both the US and the then Soviet Union from total devastation. On another occasion, a lieutenant colonel in the Soviet Air Defence Forces, Stanislav Petrov, was on duty on Sep 26, 1983, when the early-warning satellite system he was monitoring detected what appeared to be five approaching US nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles. He thought about it and reasoned that if the US really wanted all-out nuclear war, Washington would deploy more than just five missiles. He treated it as a false alarm, and the critical moment passed without incident. More pertinent to the North Korea situation was when President Richard Nixon ordered a nuclear strike against Pyongyang. In 1969, a few months into the first Nixon administration, North Korean leader Kim Il Sung's forces shot down an EC-121 spy plane over the Sea of Japan. Nixon had been drinking that evening and, as a book by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan notes, he was drunk when he heard the news. He ordered nuclear retaliation. Fortunately, his faithful sidekick Henry Kissinger was at hand and persuaded the military commanders to wait until Nixon sobered up before executing his order. Again, the moment passed without incident. The situation in North Korea now is vastly different from that in the Nixon era. The Kim dynasty has a nuclear arsenal of its own, with missiles that can strike the US mainland directly. Of course, Washington can flatten North Korea. But the US stands to lose Yokosuka, Okinawa, Guam and Honolulu, if not Anchorage, Seattle and Los Angeles. This prospect is likely to concentrate a few minds in the Trump administration. If anything, the recent US strikes against Iran have fundamentally changed how the Kims are likely to deal with Washington: nuclear weapons are not a bargaining chip to be traded away in return for some US assurance. And anyone who thinks Pyongyang's treaty allies, China and Russia, will both sit on their hands while the Trump administration drops bunker busters without consequence, is surely indulging in heroic assumptions.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
US targets Houthis with fresh sanctions action
FILE PHOTO: Houthi fighters take part in a parade for people who attended Houthi military training as part of a mobilization campaign, in Sanaa, Yemen December 18, 2024. REUTERS/Khaled Abdullah/File Photo WASHINGTON - The United States on Tuesday imposed sanctions on what it said was a Houthi-linked petroleum smuggling and sanctions evasion network across Yemen and the United Arab Emirates in fresh action targeting the Iran-backed militant group. The U.S. Treasury Department in a statement said the two individuals and five entities sanctioned on Tuesday were among the most significant importers of petroleum products and money launderers that benefit the Houthis. "The Houthis collaborate with opportunistic businessmen to reap enormous profits from the importation of petroleum products and to enable the group's access to the international financial system," said Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Michael Faulkender. "These networks of shady businesses underpin the Houthis' terrorist machine, and Treasury will use all tools at its disposal to disrupt these schemes." Among those targeted on Tuesday was Muhammad Al-Sunaydar, who the Treasury said manages a network of petroleum companies between Yemen and the United Arab Emirates and was one of the most prominent petroleum importers in Yemen. Three companies in his network were also designated, with the Treasury saying they coordinated the delivery of approximately $12 million dollars' worth of Iranian petroleum products with a U.S.-designated company to the Houthis. Since Israel's war in Gaza against the Palestinian militant group Hamas began in October 2023, the Iran-aligned Houthis have been attacking vessels in the Red Sea in what they say are acts of solidarity with the Palestinians. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Two found dead after fire in Toa Payoh flat Singapore Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 can claim $600 SG60 vouchers from July 22 Singapore Singaporeans continue to hold world's most powerful passport in latest ranking Singapore Singapore, Vietnam agree to step up defence ties, dialogue between leaders Asia Malaysia govt's reform pledge tested as DAP chief bows over unresolved 2009 death of political aide Singapore Woman evacuated from lift in Supreme Court building after falling glass triggers emergency halt Singapore Prosecution says judge who acquitted duo of bribing ex-LTA official had copied defence arguments Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving In January, Trump re-designated the Houthi movement as a foreign terrorist organization, aiming to impose harsher economic penalties in response to its attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea and against U.S. warships defending the critical maritime area. In May, the United States announced a surprise deal with the Houthis where it agreed to stop a bombing campaign against them in return for an end to shipping attacks, though the Houthis said the deal did not include sparing Israel. The Israeli military attacked Houthi targets in Yemen's Hodeidah port on Monday in its latest assault on the militants, who have been striking ships bound for Israel and launching missiles against it. REUTERS
AsiaOne
2 days ago
- AsiaOne
Iranian foreign minister says Iran cannot give up on nuclear enrichment, Asia News
WASHINGTON — Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Fox News that Tehran cannot give up on its uranium enrichment programme which was severely damaged during the Israel-Iran war last month. Why it's important Prior to the war, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman but could not agree on the extent to which Iran should be allowed to enrich uranium. Israel and Washington say Iran was close to enriching to levels that would allow it to quickly produce a nuclear weapon, while Tehran says its enrichment programme is for civilian purposes only. Key quotes "It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe. But obviously we cannot give up (on) enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride," the foreign minister told the Fox News show "Special Report with Bret Baier" on Monday (July 21). The foreign minister said the damage to the nuclear facilities in Iran after US and Israeli strikes was serious and was being evaluated further. Araghchi also said Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was in "good health" and that Tehran was open to talks with Washington but that those will not be direct "for the time being". Context US ally Israel attacked Iran on June 13 and the Middle Eastern rivals then engaged in an air war for 12 days in which Washington also bombed Iran's nuclear facilities. A ceasefire was reached in late June. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The UN nuclear watchdog says it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme in Iran. Tehran maintains its nuclear programme is solely meant for civilian purposes. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. [[nid:719087]]
