
The South Caucasus is slipping from Russia's grasp
On June 27, Russian special forces conducted a violent raid on ethnic Azerbaijanis in Yekaterinburg, an industrial city in Russia's Ural region. About 50 people were detained, several were reportedly injured, and two Azerbaijani brothers – Ziyaddin and Huseyn Safarov – died in custody under suspicious circumstances. Autopsies revealed blunt-force trauma and broken ribs, contradicting Russian claims that the men died of heart failure. Survivors reported beatings, electrocution, and degrading treatment. Far from being seen as a routine law enforcement action, the operation has been widely interpreted in Baku as a politically motivated act of intimidation – prompting sharp condemnation from Azerbaijani officials and a wave of anger from the public.
On July 1, Azerbaijan's ambassador to Russia, Rahman Mustafayev, delivered a formal protest to Moscow, denouncing what he described as the unlawful killing and mistreatment of Azerbaijani citizens, including dual nationals. This diplomatic fallout unfolded just as Baku launched its own high-profile crackdown on organised crime – one that notably included the arrest of several Russian nationals, some reportedly linked to Kremlin-funded media outlets and others accused of cyberfraud and drug trafficking. Among those detained were local staff of Sputnik Azerbaijan, the state-run Russian news agency. While the two episodes are officially unrelated, the timing suggests Azerbaijan is signalling a rejection of external coercion and asserting its sovereignty with new intensity.
These developments reflect a deeper geopolitical shift. Russia's traditional levers of influence in the post-Soviet space – military alliances such as the Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO), energy dependency, and soft power through Russian-language media – are weakening. Strained by the war in Ukraine and international sanctions, the Kremlin has increasingly turned to diaspora policing, symbolic shows of strength, and nationalist rhetoric to maintain control. The Yekaterinburg raid appears to fit this pattern: A demonstration of power aimed at a former Soviet republic now carving out a more independent path.
Azerbaijan's traditionally balanced foreign policy is now entering a more assertive phase. For years, Baku carefully navigated its relations with Russia, the West, and Turkiye. But the events of the past week have marked a clear shift: Azerbaijan is adopting a firmer stance against Kremlin pressure while deepening its strategic alignment with Ankara. This evolving alliance is not only strengthening bilateral ties but fostering broader regional integration through organisations such as the Organization of Turkic States (OTS).
The implications extend well beyond Azerbaijan. Moscow's deteriorating relationship with Baku may trigger a wider realignment across Central Asia. Kazakhstan has already taken steps to distance itself from Russian influence, while Armenia, under Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, has publicly questioned the reliability of Russian security guarantees. Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan are simultaneously strengthening ties with Turkiye and China. In this context, Azerbaijan's defiance signals not an isolated dispute, but a broader erosion of Moscow's soft power across the former Soviet sphere.
For the Kremlin, traditional diplomatic tools are proving increasingly ineffective. In Azerbaijan, public outrage over the deaths in Yekaterinburg is helping shape foreign policy in ways that go beyond formal statecraft. Moscow now faces the real prospect of Baku firmly embedding itself in the Turkish geopolitical orbit – supporting projects such as the Zangezur corridor, and reinforcing a trans-Caspian Turkic axis stretching from Anatolia to Central Asia. This vision stands in stark contrast to the Kremlin's fading Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) project, which now looks more like a symbolic construct than a meaningful alliance.
Meanwhile, the media landscape has become another battleground. Russian state outlets – particularly firebrand figures like Vladimir Solovyov – have adopted openly anti-Azerbaijani rhetoric, stoking ethnic and religious tensions. These attacks blur the line between journalism and state propaganda, further inflaming bilateral tensions and undermining traditional diplomatic protocols.
Yet, amid the escalating tensions, Azerbaijan faces a rare strategic opportunity. If managed wisely, Baku can leverage this moment to strengthen its leadership role within the Turkic world and reset its relationship with Russia on more equal terms. In the years ahead, Azerbaijan has the potential to emerge not just as a key energy hub, but as a central geopolitical actor in the South Caucasus and beyond.
The Yekaterinburg raid is not simply a matter of domestic policing. It is a symptom of the accelerating breakdown of Moscow's grip over its 'near abroad'. What happens next – whether Russia adapts to the changing dynamics or attempts to reassert control through more coercive means – will shape the next chapter of Eurasian geopolitics. One thing is already clear: The regional balance of power is shifting, and Azerbaijan stands squarely at the centre of that transformation.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Russia says it needs time to ‘analyse' Trump's Ukraine announcements
The Kremlin has said that US President Donald Trump's recent statements, including a threat to impose sanctions on Russia's trading partners, are serious and require time to assess. Amid growing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump on Monday announced new deliveries of weapons, including Patriot missile systems, to Ukraine and said that buyers of Russian exports could face severe tariffs if Moscow fails to agree to a peace deal within 50 days, signalling a major policy shift in Washington. 'The US president's statements are very serious. Some of them are addressed personally to President Putin,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Moscow on Tuesday. 'We certainly need time to analyse what was said in Washington. And if and when President Putin deems it necessary, he will definitely comment.' Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev mocked Trump's announcement, calling it a 'theatrical ultimatum' and saying that 'Russia didn't care'. Medvedev, who now serves as deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, has frequently issued strident remarks throughout the war. Russian Senator Konstantin Kosachev was similarly dismissive. Writing on Telegram, he said Trump's announcement would have no impact on public sentiment in Russia and claimed the United States was setting a trap for Europe — forcing NATO states to pay for weapons that would primarily benefit the US arms industry. 'Only the American military-industrial complex will profit from this,' Kosachev said. Europeans promise to support weapons shipments Several European countries pledged to support Trump's proposal to send more weapons to Ukraine. Denmark's Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said Copenhagen would 'do its part' to finance Patriot systems for Ukraine, though he gave no specifics. 'It seems the US is finally on the right side,' Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels. The Netherlands and Sweden also said they were exploring ways to support the initiative. Sweden's Defence Minister Pal Jonson welcomed Trump's pressure on Russia and confirmed Stockholm would contribute to the delivery of weapons, though details remained unclear. Lithuania's Foreign Minister Kestutis Budrys said the announcements showed that 'leadership is once again coming from the US.' Sanctions package stalls But in a sign that European unity remains fragile, the European Union's planned 18th sanctions package stalled on Tuesday after Slovakia requested a delay in the vote. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, who visited the Kremlin last year, said the move reflected domestic political concerns over gas supplies amid a looming ban on Russian imports from 2028. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas voiced frustration at the setback. 'I'm really sad the sanctions didn't get approved,' she said. 'But I hope they will be passed tomorrow.' Kallas added that the EU welcomes Trump's commitment to defending Ukraine but said Washington must also 'share the burden'. In a separate move, the European Council imposed asset freezes on five Russian judicial officials accused of persecuting opposition figure Alexei Gorinov, citing human rights violations.


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump threatens tariffs in 50 days: What harm will it do to Russia?
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to impose steep trading restrictions on Russia unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached within 50 days, as he announced an agreement with NATO allies to send more weapons to Kyiv. The announcements on Monday marked a shift in US foreign policy as Trump's endorsement of Ukraine comes just weeks after Washington announced it would pause weapons sales to Kyiv. But Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin and hopes that tariffs and sanctions, as well as new deals for Patriot air defence missiles, will help bring an end to Russia's more than three-year invasion of Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Telegram that he had spoken to Trump and 'thanked him for his readiness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace'. On Tuesday, Russia's top security official, Dmitry Medvedev, said the Kremlin did not care about the 'theatrical ultimatum' issued by Trump, adding that Putin will comment on the US proposals if he deems it necessary to do so. What did Trump say? Sitting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the White House, Trump told reporters he was disappointed in Putin and that billions of dollars of US weapons would go to Ukraine. In recent days, Russia has launched hundreds of drones to attack Ukrainian cities, angering Trump, who had accused Putin on July 8 of throwing a lot of 'b*******' at the US. Trump has said that his shift was motivated by frustration with the Russian president. 'My conversations with him [Putin] are always very pleasant… and then the missiles go off at night,' he followed up on Monday. 'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to NATO,' Trump said, adding that NATO would pay for them. For his part, Rutte said that Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway want to be part of the weapons deal. Trump also said that 'we're going to be doing very severe tariffs [on Russia] if we don't have a deal in 50 days'. Putin has yet to accept a proposal from Trump for an unconditional ceasefire, which was quickly endorsed by Kyiv. Trump also said US tariffs on Russian exports would be priced 'at about 100 percent' and then threatened 'secondary tariffs [otherwise known as secondary sanctions]'. Secondary sanctions, which would be far more punishing than US tariffs, would be levied on any country that trades with Moscow, targeting its commodities business in particular. What is Trump's tariff threat to Russia? Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Western countries – including the US, the United Kingdom, and European Union nations – have imposed 21,692 sanctions on Russia, most against individuals. Key sanctions on Moscow include import bans on Russian oil, a price cap on Russian fuel, and the freezing of Russian central bank assets held in European financial institutions. But the threat to impose so-called secondary sanctions, if carried out, would mark a notable shift. So far, Group of Seven (G7) member states have held back from taking steps that would restrict Russia from selling its fossil fuels elsewhere, to key buyers like China and India. Lawmakers from both US political parties are pushing for a bill – the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 – that would target other countries that buy Russian oil and gas. The bill would give Trump the authority to impose 500 percent tariffs on any country that helps Russia. US senators are reportedly waiting on Trump's OK to move the bill forward. Trump could also impose secondary tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which lets the president restrict trade in the event of a national emergency. Elsewhere, EU countries are close to reaching an agreement on a new package of sanctions against Russia, the bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Tuesday. 'We hope to reach a political agreement on the 18th sanctions package,' Kallas said before a meeting with foreign affairs ministers from the 27 EU countries in Brussels. How dependent is Russia's economy on fossil fuels? Fossil fuel sales still generate substantial revenue for the Kremlin. Seaborne oil revenues, for instance, dropped modestly in 2024 but stayed at near pre-war levels. This is due to Russia's 'shadow fleet' – ships with opaque ownership structures and no Western ties in terms of finance or insurance, allowing them to bypass Western sanctions. So, while G7 sanctions have reduced Moscow's margins and increased export costs, they haven't cut volumes to importing nations. From 2022 to 2025, China has purchased almost half of Russia's total crude oil exports (roughly 5 million barrels per day), with India following closely behind at nearly 40 percent. Both countries also import a large amount of Russian coal. Other importing nations include Brazil, Turkiye and Egypt. The EU, meanwhile, continues to consume large amounts of Russian natural gas, though Brussels has stated it wants to terminate all its contracts by 2027. As for the US itself, higher tariffs on Russian goods would have little impact – exports to the US totalled just $3bn in 2024, or 0.7 percent of Russia's total exports. While fossil fuels now contribute less to Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) than pre-invasion, Moscow's dependence on energy products remains high. Estimates vary, but fossil fuels still make up 55 percent of Russian export revenues and 16 percent of its GDP (roughly $280bn) That compares with 60 percent and 18 percent, respectively, before Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 – a small drop. How much could Trump's sanctions threat hurt Moscow? A sharp decline in Russian energy flows from secondary sanctions would almost certainly lead to higher global prices, particularly for natural gas. 'The impact would probably be greater on natural gas prices than oil,' said Kieran Tompkins, senior climate and commodities economist at Capital Economics, in a note. He pointed out that 'the oil market appears to have sufficient spare capacity to more or less offset a loss of Russian exports', owing to untapped OPEC supplies. However, he pointed out that 'knocking out half of Russia's crude and petroleum exports [on the back of Trump's threat] could reduce export revenues by $75bn or so.' In turn, Tompkins said that could induce a 'fiscal crisis' in Russia, leading to 'debt issuance ramping up, bond yields spiking and pressure for widespread fiscal tightening.' Looking ahead, Trump's 50-day proposal will give Moscow some time to come up with counterproposals and delay the implementation of sanctions. But Trump will be hoping that the threat of sanctions will influence Putin to put an end to hostilities.


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Russia-Ukraine war live: Kremlin needs time to ‘analyse' Trump's rhetoric
The Kremlin says it needs time to respond to Donald Trump's statement threatening tariffs unless a Ukraine peace deal is reached within 50 days, as top security official Dmitry Medvedev says Russia 'didn't care' about the 'theatrical ultimatum' issued by the US president. Trump has announced a deal to supply more weapons to Ukraine and threatened to impose steep tariffs on Russia unless the deal is reached.