GE2025: Trust in Potong Pasir has to be earned, says PAP's Alex Yeo
GE2025: Trust in Potong Pasir has to be earned, says PAP's Alex Yeo
Follow our live coverage here.
SINGAPORE - Trust cannot be inherited or demanded in Potong Pasir, it has to be earned, said PAP's Alex Yeo in a rally at St. Andrew's Junior College on May 1.
Mr Yeo is one of three candidates battling for the single seat in the constituency on May 3. The others are Singapore People's Party's (SPP) Mr Williiamson Lee and People's Alliance for Reform's (PAR) Mr Lim Tean.
In his sole rally this election, Mr Yeo noted that no one can fill the shoes of leaders like PAP's former MP Sitoh Yih Pin and ex-opposition MP Chiam See Tong. Mr Chiam held the seat for 27 years before losing in 2011 to Mr Sitoh, who went on to serve two more terms.
'His (Mr Sitoh) shoes, like that of Mr Chiam See Tong and others before them carry the journeys that they have walked, the relationships built and trust earned with Potong Pasir residents are theirs and theirs alone,' Mr Yeo, 46, said.
'Political party aside, Potong Pasir residents want (their) representative to build that relationship and trust with (them). I know that I have a lot of work to do to earn your trust and to get to know you and you, me.'
Over the past nine days of campaigning, Mr Yeo said that he and his team have managed to visit about 82 per cent of the households in Potong Pasir.
Following this, at the rally he laid out 'a top 10 list of improvements for Bidadari and Woodleigh'.
These include more directional signs in the estate, more sports recreation options, and better pest control. His top priority, he added, is to 'do something about the boring playgrounds' for children.
He added that he intends to hold dialogue sessions with different areas to understand the 'unique needs and aspirations' of the residents.
Seniors are also on the agenda, as Mr Yeo said he will take care of older residents by offering them affordable preventive healthcare services at their doorsteps, which was a programme he implemented in Paya Lebar, where he was formerly its branch chairman.
If elected into Parliament, Mr Yeo said he will listen and engage with residents who want to share their concerns and views.
'I will not shy away from dealing with difficult and sometimes hard discussions, in a constructive, safe space. I will always try to find workable solutions to your concerns,' he added.
In a rally on April 26, PAR secretary-general Mr Lim had pledged to push for free education, school meals and healthcare for Singaporean children if elected. He said this could improve the country's total fertility rate by encouraging Singaporeans to have more children, which would make Singapore less reliant on foreigners.
Mr Yeo said on May 1: 'If the response to your residents' concerns about the rising cost of living is to simply highlight the problem and then demand free education, free school meals and free healthcare, then I think, it not only oversimplifies the problem and is also not going to result in any real solutions.'
Long-time volunteer Mr Chua Kian Meng, 67, also took to the stage at the rally. He had supported Mr Sitoh in every campaign since 2006 and he is now lending his support to Mr Yeo.
Vouching for Mr Yeo's character, Mr Chua told the crowd at St. Andrew's Junior College that he has known the former since 2014, when Mr Yeo started volunteering in Potong Pasir.
'(Mr Yeo) is not someone parachuted in, he is no rookie,' said Mr Chua. 'He is a good man with a heart in the right place… He has good intentions and a genuine desire to want to do work for others.'
While sharing that politics was never in his plans, Mr Yeo said decided to step up after his experience volunteering in the single member constituency.
He added: 'I cannot promise that I can solve all your problems. I am certainly not so arrogant to think that I have all the answers.
'But if you give me and my team the chance, the opportunity to serve you, we will spare no effort to listen to you, engage you, work with you to find solutions and speak up for you.'
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
21 hours ago
- AsiaOne
South Korea says it has no written pact on US trade deal, Asia News
SEOUL - There is no written agreement yet on a trade deal between South Korea and the United States announced by President Donald Trump this week, the Asian nation's trade minister said on Friday (Aug 1). The US tariff on South Korean imports will be 15 per cent, Trump said after meeting its ministers on Wednesday, down from a threatened 25 per cent, but the US gave scarce details, apart from social media posts by him and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Speaking to reporters as he arrived home from a visit to Washington, Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo said the two sides had an oral negotiation because of time constraints. "What we felt during this negotiation is that the US trade environment is fundamentally changing. This is completely different from the first Trump term," Yeo said of the deal easing tension with a top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally. "I think we are entering a new normal era. So, although we have overcome this crisis, we cannot be relieved, because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again." The White House, which issued factsheets on trade deals with Japan and the European Union a day after striking them, has not yet released a separate one on the pact with South Korea. Trump said South Korea would invest $350 (S$450 billion) billion in the United States in projects "owned and controlled by the United States" and selected by him. Lutnick said 90 per cent of profits from the investments would go to the American people, while White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said they would go to the US government to help repay debt. More discussions were necessary on the investment fund's profit structure, said Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan, who returned with Yeo. [[nid:720806]] Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, also one of the negotiation team, said detailed plans for the $350-billion investment would need be established. Wednesday's deal did not tackle most non-tariff barriers discussed during working-level talks, as well as security and foreign exchange aspects.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
South Korea says it has no written pact on US trade deal
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox KIA Motors' vehicles are parked to be exported, at a port in Pyeongtaek, South Korea, July 31, 2025. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji SEOUL - There is no written agreement yet on a trade deal between South Korea and the United States announced by President Donald Trump this week, the Asian nation's trade minister said on Friday. The U.S. tariff on South Korean imports will be 15%, Trump said after meeting its ministers on Wednesday, down from a threatened 25%, but the U.S. gave scarce details, apart from social media posts by him and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Speaking to reporters as he arrived home from a visit to Washington, Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo said the two sides had an oral negotiation because of time constraints. "What we felt during this negotiation is that the U.S. trade environment is fundamentally changing. This is completely different from the first Trump term," Yeo said of the deal easing tension with a top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally. "I think we are entering a new normal era. So, although we have overcome this crisis, we cannot be relieved, because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again." The White House, which issued factsheets on trade deals with Japan and the European Union a day after striking them, has not yet released a separate one on the pact with South Korea. Trump said South Korea would invest $350 billion in the United States in projects "owned and controlled by the United States" and selected by him. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Tech Reporting suspected advanced cyber attacks will provide a defence framework: Shanmugam Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: Road will progressively open to motorists from Aug 2 noon World Trump modifies reciprocal tariffs ahead of deadline; rate on Singapore remains at 10% Business Singapore's US tariff rate stays at 10%, but the Republic is not out of the woods yet Singapore 5 women face capital charges after they were allegedly found with nearly 27kg of cocaine in S'pore Business Sumo Salad had valid insurance coverage for work injury claims: MOM Asia Australia to force Google to conduct age checks in world-first rules for search engines Singapore PM Wong to deliver National Day message on Aug 8 Lutnick said 90% of profits from the investments would go to the American people, while White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said they would go to the U.S. government to help repay debt. More discussions were necessary on the investment fund's profit structure, said Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan, who returned with Yeo. Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, also one of the negotiation team, said detailed plans for the $350-billion investment would need be established. Wednesday's deal did not tackle most non-tariff barriers discussed during working-level talks, as well as security and foreign exchange aspects. REUTERS
CNA
3 days ago
- CNA
Ex-Malaysian minister Khairy Jamaluddin calls PAP 'juvenile' for response to WP chief Pritam Singh's podcast appearance
SINGAPORE: Former Malaysian health minister Khairy Jamaluddin called Singapore's ruling People's Action Party (PAP) "immature" and "juvenile" for its response to Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh's appearance on his podcast earlier this year, and said that the party "needs to grow up". He also said in an episode of popular Malaysian political podcast Keluar Sekejap, released on YouTube on Jul 29, that he and co-host Shahril Hamdan, previously UMNO's information chief, have both been interviewed by Singaporean media on Malaysia's internal politics too. Workers' Party leader Singh had spoken to the duo in a video released on Jun 24. It was his most in-depth interview since the General Election, in which the PAP retained power with 65.57 per cent of the vote. During the interview, which lasted more than one-and-a-half hours, Mr Singh addressed a wide range of topics, including the WP's electoral strategy, and the intersection of race, religion and politics. It drew a response from the PAP, which questioned Mr Singh's intent on going on the Malaysian podcast, and that "politics should stop at the water's edge". In the latest episode, Mr Khairy and Mr Shahril were discussing whether to include Singapore among the stops for their overseas live shows. While it is a popular option based on their "engagement data", the "not-so-pleasant experience recently" surrounding Mr Singh's appearance on their show has turned them off. "When Pritam Singh appeared on KS (Keluar Sekejap), at first, there wasn't much of an issue. But I think, about a week after that, there was an article written, if I'm not mistaken, on PAP's own portal. This PAP portal belongs to Singapore's ruling party. It stated, and I suppose, accused Pritam Singh's appearance of being akin to interference in Singapore's internal politics," said Mr Khairy. "Its main target was Pritam Singh. Why did Pritam Singh go on a Malaysian podcast to talk about Singapore? And after that, it said this was like an interference in Singapore's internal politics and that politics should stop at 'the Water's Edge'. Meaning, don't you talk about our politics." Mr Khairy said he thought it was "such an immature take". APPEARANCE ON SINGAPORE MEDIA He noted that he and Mr Shahril have been interviewed by Singapore news outlets CNA and The Straits Times on Malaysia's internal politics, including when he was invited two weeks back to be a commentator virtually for a study conducted on UMNO by the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies think-tank, where he was a visiting fellow. "So I don't understand, when they want to talk about other people's politics, it's fine … But when it happens to you, when Pritam comes here to talk about the Singaporean election, suddenly it's, 'Oh, foreign interference'," said Mr Khairy. "I think I have a lot of friends there, but PAP needs to grow up." His co-host, Mr Shahril, said that he has also spoken about Malaysian politics in Singapore on academic platforms, and noted that having an extensive analysis of its neighbouring countries is one of Singapore's strengths. "Perhaps in a moment that was less self-aware, maybe a part of the establishment, a small part perhaps, felt they could use that argument to voice their dissatisfaction that an opposition party leader could perform and shine so well on our podcast," he said of Mr Singh's appearance. "I think that was just hopefully one small moment. When I asked friends in Singapore, including those who are strong supporters of the establishment, most of them didn't see it the way that article did. To be fair, I don't think that's the majority view. It's just a particular kind of view." Mr Khairy noted that "it's the view of the ruling party", and said that until the "PAP stops being juvenile on this issue", the duo would not come to Singapore as part of their overseas tour for their podcast live shows. Mr Shahril added that the duo typically banter and crack jokes on their podcast when discussing heavy topics, and that in Singapore, "if there are restrictions, or the perception of them, it won't be natural". CNA has reached out to the PAP for comment. POLITICS STOP AT THE WATER'S EDGE The PAP had said on Jul 3 that Mr Singh's decision to speak about Singapore's politics on a Malaysian podcast "raises serious questions" as to why he chose to address the topic "on foreign soil to a foreign audience". "Strikingly, he chose not a local media outlet, but a podcast hosted by Malaysians and recorded in Malaysia to share his views on our domestic political landscape," the party said in a statement. The PAP also challenged Mr Singh's claim that his party does not "score political points based on race or religion". The party added that while Singapore and Malaysia share close ties, they have long refrained from commenting on each other's politics and from using each other's media to influence public opinion, especially after the racial unrest of the 1960s. "As a sovereign nation, we must be clear: Politics should stop at the water's edge," it said. "Singapore's affairs are for Singaporeans to decide, based on what is best for our national interests." In response, the WP said that Mr Singh's podcast appearance "had no detrimental impact whatsoever on Singapore's national interests", adding that public reception in Singapore to the podcast has been positive. "It exemplified how a non-government Singaporean politician can speak fairly and frankly about Singapore and the Singapore government, without denouncing either. This particular point continues to be well-received by many Singaporeans," it said. PAP leaders routinely give interviews and share their views on domestic matters to foreign media outlets, it noted. In response to the WP's statement, the PAP said that while ministers do engage with foreign media, they discuss a wide range of topics, "be it on international and regional affairs or domestic matters", compared to Mr Singh's interview, which "focused almost entirely on Singapore's internal politics". Mr Singh has also declined invitations from Singaporean podcasters, it added. Noting that the WP has continued to brush aside serious concerns about its engagement with Noor Deros, a self-styled religious teacher in Malaysia known for "views that are at odds with Singapore's commitment to multiracialism and religious harmony", as well as public endorsements made by Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS) politicians in support of its candidates, the PAP said that "many important questions raised remain unanswered".
