Climate change to weaken Middle East wind energy: study
The study, published Friday in the journal Climatic Change, predicted that coastal surface winds may strengthen by up to 0.7 meters per second by 2070, potentially easing extreme heat.
However, winds at 150 meters above ground -- critical for turbines to generate energy -- could slow by up to 1.0 meter per second due to changes in the regional weather system, reducing energy output by up to 7 gigajoules over six hours and impacting renewable energy plans and investments, the study showed.
One gigajoule is equivalent to 277.8 kilowatt hours (kWh).
Highlighting varying wind energy capacity in different regions in the Middle East, the study stressed the need to analyze wind patterns at multiple altitudes to avoid flawed energy forecasts.
The study urged policymakers to include future wind changes in their energy strategies, particularly by prioritizing resilient projects in high-potential regions like the Red Sea coast.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Anxious parents face tough choices on AI
The path is all the more difficult for parents given the lack of scientific research on AI's effects on users. — Pixabay NEW YORK: When it comes to AI, many parents navigate between fear of the unknown and fear of their children missing out. "It's really hard to predict anything over five years," said Adam Tal, an Israeli marketing executive and father of two boys aged seven and nine, when describing the post-generative AI world. Tal is "very worried" about the future this technology holds for his children – whether it's deepfakes, "the inability to distinguish between reality and AI," or "the thousands of possible new threats that I wasn't trained to detect." Mike Brooks, a psychologist from Austin, Texas, who specializes in parenting and technology, worries that parents are keeping their heads in the sand, refusing to grapple with AI. "They're already overwhelmed with parenting demands," he observed – from online pornography and TikTok to video games and "just trying to get them out of their rooms and into the real world." For Marc Watkins, a professor at the University of Mississippi who focuses on AI in teaching, "we've already gone too far" to shield children from AI past a certain age. Yet some parents are still trying to remain gatekeepers to the technology. "In my circle of friends and family, I'm the only one exploring AI with my child," remarked Melissa Franklin, mother of a 7-year-old boy and law student in Kentucky. "I don't understand the technology behind AI," she said, "but I know it's inevitable, and I'd rather give my son a head start than leave him overwhelmed." 'Benefits and risks' The path is all the more difficult for parents given the lack of scientific research on AI's effects on users. Several parents cite a study published in June by MIT, showing that brain activity and memory were more stimulated in individuals not using generative AI than in those who had access to it. "I'm afraid it will become a shortcut," explained a father of three who preferred to remain anonymous. "After this MIT study, I want them to use it only to deepen their knowledge." This caution shapes many parents' approaches. Tal prefers to wait before letting his sons use AI tools. Melissa Franklin only allows her son to use AI with her supervision to find information "we can't find in a book, through Google, or on YouTube." For her, children must be encouraged to "think for themselves," with or without AI. But one father – a computer engineer with a 15-year-old – doesn't believe kids will learn AI skills from their parents anyway. "That would be like claiming that kids learn how to use TikTok from their parents," he said. It's usually "the other way around." Watkins, himself a father, says he is "very concerned" about the new forms that generative AI is taking, but considers it necessary to read about the subject and "have in-depth conversations about it with our children." "They're going to use artificial intelligence," he said, "so I want them to know the potential benefits and risks." The CEO of AI chip giant Nvidia, Jensen Huang, often speaks of AI as "the greatest equalization force that we have ever known," democratizing learning and knowledge. But Watkins fears a different reality: "Parents will view this as a technology that will be used if you can afford it, to get your kid ahead of everyone else." The computer scientist father readily acknowledged this disparity, saying "My son has an advantage because he has two parents with PhDs in computer science, but that's 90% due to the fact that we are more affluent than average" – not their AI knowledge. "That does have some pretty big implications," Watkins said. – AFP
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
Human brain focuses in quick flickers, not in steady stream: study
JERUSALEM, July 21 (Xinhua) -- Israeli researchers have discovered that the human brain does not pay attention in one smooth stream, but in quick bursts, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem said in a statement on Monday. Although it might seem like the human eyes and brain take in the world in a steady, continuous way, a new study published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences shows otherwise. It was found that attention works more like a strobe light, flickering on and off at a regular rhythm. As people scroll through their phones or switch between tasks, the brain is already doing something similar, the researchers explained. Rather than processing everything at once, it takes rapid mental snapshots, more like a slideshow than a movie. This process, named "attentional sampling," helps the brain handle the constant flood of information. The study found that the brain focuses on visual input around eight times per second. When attention is split between two things, it alternates between them at about four times per second. Attention is always shifting, even when feeling deeply focused. This flickering focus helps the brain manage competing visual inputs by quickly switching between them, often without being aware of it. The idea builds on a long-standing theory called "biased competition," which suggests that different parts of the visual system compete to process information. What drives this rhythm is still unknown, with some scientists believing higher-level brain regions may control the pattern, while others point to local brain circuits. The researchers said this mechanism may apply not just to vision, but to all the senses, and could have wide-reaching implications for interface design, education, and neurological treatments.
Barnama
6 days ago
- Barnama
BRICS Media, Think Tank Forum Releases Initiative On AI Cooperation, Development
RIO DE JANEIRO, July 18 (Bernama-Xinhua) -- The BRICS Media and Think Tank Forum released an initiative on AI cooperation and development on Wednesday, calling for joint efforts to explore AI-empowered journalism and think tank research, Xinhua News Agency reported. The initiative formed a key consensus on building synergies to reshape global communication, deepening collaboration to forge new models of industrial cooperation, and leveraging intelligent production to create a new ecosystem of knowledge sharing. The participants agreed that the AI revolution is reshaping the global information landscape, creating new opportunities for digital transformation in the Global South, while exacerbating systemic risks such as technological monopolies and data hegemony.
