
Chronic Water Shortages Plague Pakistan's Capital
Degraded infrastructure and mismanagement cause the country's capital, Islamabad, and the adjacent city of Rawalpindi, whose surface water comes from watersheds entirely within Pakistan, to face persistent and worsening water shortages. Monsoon rains have arrived in the capital, but they will not solve the pervasive problems in Islamabad and Rawalpindi's water system. Pakistan's leadership will need to take steps far beyond its current plan to keep the capital and its surrounding agricultural and industrial areas supplied with water.
Islamabad and Rawalpindi are a telling exemplar of the issues facing Pakistan as it attempts to mitigate climate change's impact on the country's water supply.
Even before India's recent withdrawal from the Indus Waters Treaty, water was easy to politicize in Pakistan. After all, Pakistan is dependent on the Indus River, which originates in India, for 80 percent of its agriculture. Agriculture provides 25 percent of Pakistan's GDP and employs 65 percent of its labor force. Pakistan's National Security Committee has warned India that any disruption of Indus water flows would be considered 'an act of war,' sustaining a similar diplomatic position for almost a decade.
Blaming India has made it easy for Pakistan to avoid the difficult work of providing water security to its population. Pakistan faces a 32 percent shortfall in water supply and nearly 80 percent of the country is forced to drink contaminated water.
The twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad feel Pakistan's policy shortfalls acutely. About 40 percent of the Pakistani population depends on surface water, including from rivers, while about 60 percent rely on underground water reserves. Both systems are failing. The lack of oversight on water metering in both cities has limited investment and allowed illegal taps to flourish. There are few regulations to limit the installation and use of wells, leading to massive overuse. Groundwater depth has fallen from 22.8 to 56 meters in Islamabad and from 37.8 to 59 meters in Rawalpindi. The lack of regulation has also left both the surface and ground water polluted with toxic substances and bacteria as chemicals, trash, and sewage are openly dumped across the watershed. The pervasive presence of contaminants and pollutants contributes to waterborne illnesses and rising cancer rates in the twin cities.
In addition to limited oversight, the twin cities' infrastructure is simply not up to the task. Much of the water in the region is supplied by three reservoirs created by the Khanpur, Rawal, and Simly dams. Even when full, which is a rare occurrence, the three lack the capacity to supply both cities with sufficient water. The dams are augmented by 480 tube wells to supply the network with groundwater. Rawalpindi has a water deficiency of 18.5 million gallons per day in the summer, while Islamabad has a deficiency of 52 million gallons per day. These dams are supported by 53 water plants, of which only 13 are supplying clean water that is safe to drink. Local authorities laid the water pipe network between 30 to 100 years ago and the system has deteriorated in most places. Poor rainwater drainage and sewage runoff have further damaged the network.
National and local authorities have attempted to address surface water storage issues. However, limited funds and poor project oversight have dimmed hopes of meaningful relief in the near term.
In 2020, Pakistan approved a plan to construct a 60-kilometer pipeline from the Tarbela Dam to Islamabad in an attempt to provide additional fresh water to the capital. However, the plan lacked sufficient funds to progress and was canceled early this year. The Asian Development Bank is funding a more viable plan to supply an additional 25 million gallons per day to Rawalpindi through the construction of the Chahan Dam. While some portions of the project are underway, two major segments of the dam are mired in a long-term legal dispute. The Dadocha Dam, another key upgrade, also faced legal issues but appears to be progressing and may provide some relief to Rawalpindi in the coming year.
None of these plans involve improving the connections between the reservoirs and the population. The poor state of the network will continue to undercut the quality of the water in the twin cities.
Regardless of the status of the new construction, climate change will continue to pose a massive threat to residents of Islamabad and Rawalpindi. All of Pakistan's dams have seen drastically lower levels as last winter was one of the driest in Pakistan's history, with parts of the country seeing 67 percent less rainfall than usual. In May, authorities suspended water supplies from the Khanpur Dam to surrounding farms in an attempt to save capacity. Despite this, water levels in the dam are falling as much as 0.03 meters daily at the dam as it approaches the dead storage line, when water cannot be pulled from the dam to supply the network. Even the Tarbela and Mangla dams, which boast the largest reservoirs in the country, reached their dead storage levels and were unable to provide hydropower and irrigation. Given recent rain patterns, plans to connect Islamabad to the large dam at Tarbela would not provide meaningful relief. The Chahan and Dadocha dams will also likely succumb to the climate change-driven drought that is currently plaguing Pakistan.
In addition to climate change, the continuing urbanization of Pakistan will only put more pressure on Rawalpindi and Islamabad's teetering water network. The Asian Development Bank estimates that 40 percent of the country will live in urban areas by 2030. As the twin cities continue to accept an influx of citizens from Pakistan's rural areas, the water system will not be able to cope. Those who can afford it will resort to water tanker services or bottled water. However, due to Pakistan's poor regulatory scheme many providers have charged exorbitant prices or provided unsafe bottled water.
The water crisis in Islamabad and Rawalpindi seems destined to exacerbate challenges to civil order. Rawalpindi saw limited protests about water shortages on July 2 as well as in late May and early June. Things may not always be so calm in the capital as water shortages have caused unrest in other parts of the country. A May protest over canals on the Indus River turned violent in Sindh Province, resulting in injuries to two policemen and the destruction of a district official's house. Without progress in controlling groundwater use, improving the quality of the water provided to the population, and expanding surface water storage capacity, additional protests and political turmoil are likely in the capital. Climate change and urbanization will only worsen the problem. Water issues will challenge authorities in Pakistan's capital for years to come.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Nikkei Asia
5 days ago
- Nikkei Asia
U.S. designates Pakistani group's offshoot as 'terrorist' over Kashmir attack
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government designated The Resistance Front, considered an offshoot of the Pakistani extremist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, as a "foreign terrorist organization" over the April 22 Islamist militant attack in India-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday. The Resistance Front, also known as Kashmir Resistance, initially took responsibility for the attack in Pahalgam before denying it days later. Lashkar-e-Taiba, listed as a "foreign terrorist organization" by the United States, is an Islamist group accused of plotting attacks in India and in the West, including the three-day deadly assault on Mumbai in November 2008. TRF's designation by Washington as a "foreign terrorist organization" and "specially designated global terrorist" enforced President Donald Trump's "call for justice for the Pahalgam attack," Rubio said in a statement. Rubio called TRF, which emerged in 2019, a "front and proxy" for Lashkar-e-Taiba. It is considered an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal, a Delhi-based think tank. India said it appreciated the move, with Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar calling it a "strong affirmation of India-US counter terrorism co-operation," in a post on X. The April attack sparked heavy fighting between nuclear-armed Asian neighbors India and Pakistan in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. New Delhi blamed the attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not directly blame Islamabad. Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based South Asia analyst and writer for Foreign Policy magazine, said in designating TRF, "Washington is flagging its concern about the terrorist attack that provoked the recent India-Pakistan conflict, and siding with New Delhi's view that the group is linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba." He added: "This can be a shot in the arm for a U.S.-India relationship looking to rebound after a few tough months." On May 7, Indian jets bombed sites across the border that New Delhi described as "terrorist infrastructure," setting off an exchange of attacks between the two countries by fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery that killed dozens until a ceasefire on May 10. The ceasefire was first announced by Trump on social media after Washington held talks with both sides, but India has differed with Trump's claims that it resulted from his intervention and his threats to sever trade talks. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their problems directly and with no outside involvement. India is an increasingly important U.S. partner in Washington's effort to counter China's rising influence in Asia, while Pakistan is a U.S. ally. Both Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in full while ruling only parts of the Himalayan territory, over which they have also fought wars.

Nikkei Asia
6 days ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump set to visit Pakistan in September, reports say
Two Pakistani TV news channels report that U.S. President Donald Trump would visit Islamabad in September and India afterward. © Reuters ISLAMABAD (Reuters) -- U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to visit Pakistan in September, two local television news channels reported on Thursday, citing sources familiar with the matter. If confirmed, the visit would be the first by a U.S. president since nearly two decades ago, when President George W. Bush visited Pakistan in 2006. Pakistan's foreign office spokesperson said he was not aware of Trump's expected visit. The two TV news channels said that Trump would also visit India after arriving in Islamabad in September. U.S.-Pakistan relations saw a major boost when Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House last month in an unprecedented meeting. A U.S. embassy spokesperson in Islamabad told Reuters, "We have nothing to announce," and said that the White House could not provide confirmation on the president's schedule. Pakistan's information ministry didn't respond to a Reuters request for a comment. India is due to host the summit of the so-called Quad countries this year but dates for the meeting have not been announced yet. The Quad grouping includes the U.S., India, Australia and Japan and is focused on countering China's rise in the Indo-Pacific region.


The Diplomat
7 days ago
- The Diplomat
How Corruption Hollows Out Pakistan's Benazir Income Support Program
Pakistan's largest social support initiative is a vital lifeline for the poor – but is plagued by 'total corruption' at all levels of disbursement. In June 2008, Pakistan launched the Benazir Income Support Program (BISP), the country's largest single social support initiative. It was established as an autonomous institution in 2010, facilitating its expansion. The program's name is a tribute to Pakistan's late Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. According to a World Bank report, Pakistan's social safety net programs prior to the BISP had been ineffective due to their limited coverage and lack of objective targeting. In response to rising inflation, the government of Pakistan introduced the BISP, an unconditional cash transfer (UCT) program. Since its inception, the BISP has become the country's flagship social safety net, providing support to the poorest families. As of December 2024, the BISP supports around 9.6 million families, positively impacting approximately 58 million people, which is nearly one-fourth of Pakistan's population. The selection criteria for the program is primarily based on economic need, without regard to religious, racial, geographical, or political backgrounds. To qualify for support through the BISP, a family's monthly income must be less than 50,000 Pakistani rupees (approximately $175). Eligible beneficiaries receive 13,500 rupees quarterly through a biometric verification system (BVS) at designated retail outlets or payment centers. In some cases, beneficiaries have the option to receive funds directly into their bank accounts. In the past, various methods such as smart debit cards, mobile phone banking, and money orders via Pakistan Post were used to transfer the funds. Despite its mission to provide an income safety net to the millions of poor families in Pakistan, the program is faced with rampant corruption. In 2020, the issue of the disbursement of BISP funds to ineligible beneficiaries came to light. In January 2023, the office of the Auditor General of Pakistan (AGP) informed the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of country's National Assembly that 19 billion rupees of the BISP funds were illegally distributed among 143,000 government officials – including 2,500 ranked at Basic Pay Scale-17 or higher, meaning at the assistant director and under secretary level or above. Using the names of their spouses and relatives, these officials were tapping into funds meant to help Pakistan's poor. The government ordered the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to investigate the issue. The situation does not appear to have improved. According to the Audit Report for the fiscal year 2023-2024, there were financial irregularities amounting to 141 billion rupees in the BISP during this period. The report indicates that more than 3 million beneficiaries lacked a registered family Computerized National Identity Card, yet 116.95 billion rupees in funds were transferred without proper verification into their names. Officials have warned that these funds may have been transferred to businesspersons, government employees, and other ineligible beneficiaries. There is another level of corruption that directly impacts eligible beneficiaries. A reliable source, who spoke to The Diplomat on the condition of anonymity, stated that bank employees responsible for distributing fingerprint devices to retailers, as well as the retailers themselves, are keeping some of the BISP funds for themselves. This results in beneficiaries receiving less than they are entitled to. According to the source, 'Five fingers are not equal. Some retailers deduct only 500 to 1,000 rupees from each beneficiary, while others engage in more deceitful practices. These dishonest retailers take beneficiaries' biometric information and claim that their funds are not available. They then hold onto the money until the beneficiaries return, at which point they may deduct up to 4,000-5000 rupees from the actual amount of 13,500 rupees owed.' Furthermore, the source claimed that 'the funds collected by the retailers are then distributed among various officials, including those from law enforcement and public administration services. Additionally, the relevant monitoring official from the BISP at the district level also demands a share of the money. Typically, these BISP officials request between 40,000 to 50,000 rupees per retailer. However, in the last quarter, the demand increased to 100,000 rupees per retailer.' The source also claimed that 'journalists, as well as social and political workers, also take their share from retailers to keep them silent.' Additionally, 'Bank officials collect amounts from retailers that are not part of any official fees.' This source estimated that the total amount of misappropriated funds in just one district of Sindh Province amounted to 'approximately 30 to 40 million rupees.' The total amount of corruption can vary from district to district based on the number of beneficiaries registered. With multiple actors skimming off funds at all levels of the disbursement process, 'the BISP is unfortunately facing total corruption,' the source lamented. The corruption is effectively mandatory. The source stated, 'Retailers are threatened with the possibility of having their devices blocked and confiscated or facing criminal charges' if they don't partake in these illegal practices. As a result, corruption is pervasive throughout a program that is intended to alleviate the financial burden on low-income families. While the source cited above has direct knowledge only of Sindh, the situation is reportedly the same in Pakistan's other provinces: Punjab, Balochistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. A source from Balochistan said that 'payment centers charge a minimum of 500 rupees for withdrawals. Additionally, there are agents who charge between 300 and 500 rupees to assist individuals in withdrawing their funds. There have also been reports of fake and duplicate payments occurring in the province. Furthermore, it has been highlighted that some government officials are illegally benefiting from the BISP.' Perhaps this is not surprising, given that Pakistan ranks 135th out of 180 countries in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) for 2024. But the corruption eating away at social support payments is particularly alarming in a country where over 44 percent of the population lives in poverty. The Benazir Income Support Program, which was intended to help alleviate poverty, is instead riddled with corruption. It appears that the program serves not only to support those in need but also to foster corrupt practices among government officials. Despite various measures introduced to reduce corruption within the program, such as different payment methods, those in power consistently find ways to profit illicitly.