Anti-immigrant activist Philip Dwyer appeals conviction for trespass at Clare Ipas centre
'Citizen Journalist' Mr Dwyer is appealing the conviction and €500 fine for the trespass offence on May 18th, 2023 at Magowna House imposed at Ennis District Court in March.
Advertisement
At Ennis Circuit Court today, State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey said that the appeal will require a full hearing and would take two hours.
Counsel for Mr Dwyer said that it would take significantly less than two hours and Judge Francis Comerford fixed July 7th for hearing at Ennis Circuit Court.
Imposing the penalty at the district court, Judge Alec Gabbett said that words used by Mr Dwyer to others on the grounds at Magowna House were 'unkind' and "quite unseemly" on the date.
Judge Gabbett said that Mr Dwyer had told a Ukrainian man at the Magowna House site "'you are Ukrainian - you are in my country' or words to that effect and 'you can't tell me what to do in my country' isn't particularly pleasant to watch'.
Advertisement
Mr Dwyer (56) of Tallaght Cross West, Tallaght, Dublin 24 had denied the trespass charge and presented video footage of his interactions at Magowna House as part of his case and Judge Gabbett said that the footage was instead helpful to the State's prosecution against Mr Dwyer.
The court was told at the time, there were protests at Magowna House where 29 International Protection applicants were being accommodated and there were blockades on local roads which were attracting media attention.
Evidence
In evidence heard previously at the district court, Manager of Magowna House, Ahlam Salman told the court that Mr Dwyer was on the property on May 18th recording 'making me and my staff feel afraid and unsafe'.
Judge Gabbett said that Mr Dwyer's footage corroborated the State's evidence of Ms Salman's fear on the day.
Advertisement
Judge Gabbett said that Magowna House was no longer operating as a hotel and was private property.
In the footage shown in court, Mr Dwyer could be heard saying 'These are all foreign people telling me what I can't do in my own country'.
Mr Dwyer can be seen addressing a Ukrainian man wearing a fluorescent jacket asking 'Do you think Irish people are stupid? Do you think we are all idiots? I wouldn't blame you to be honest with you.'
He asks later: 'What is your problem? You are not in Ukraine, this is my country…What are you hiding? I am just asking questions on behalf of the people of Ireland…. The people in this country are very concerned about this.'
Advertisement
Footage
After seeing some men believed to be IP applicants staying at the centre, Mr Dwyer asks: 'Why are these people covering their faces….This is Ireland. This is my country."
Ireland
Amateur boxer and comedian avoids jail for drug de...
Read More
He says later: 'The people of Ireland you can see what is happening in their country - stopping Irish men going they lawful business to do journalism.'
The footage later shows Mr Dwyer saying: 'Philip Dwyer is my name. I am a Citizen Journalist. You are in Ireland now.'
Prior to Judge Gabbett imposing sentence, counsel for Mr Dwyer, Ann Doyle BL said her client does not accept the verdict of the court and had instructions not to give a very detailed plea in mitigation.
Ms Doyle said: "Mr Dwyer is someone who I believe is a person of integrity. He is a citizen journalist and he had no intention of creating a breach of the peace or invoking fear in anyone."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump assassination attempt suspect can represent himself in Florida trial, judge rules
A man accused of attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump at his Florida golf course last year will be allowed to represent himself at trial, a court has Routh, 59, is charged with trying to assassinate then-candidate Trump by aiming a rifle through a fence at his West Palm Beach golf course. US District Judge Aileen Cannon approved his request to represent himself at trial, but ordered court-appointed attorneys to remain on standby. "I strongly urge you not to make this decision," Judge Cannon told Routh, warning that his lawyers would represent him "far better". Routh says his attorneys were not answering his questions and that they were "a million miles apart". "[I]t was ridiculous from the outset to consider a random stranger that knows nothing of who I am to speak for me," he wrote in a letter to the judge asking to represent himself. Routh's public defenders had requested to be taken off the case because they said he had refused to meet them on several occasions. The trial is scheduled for 8 September. He has pleaded not guilty to charges of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer and several firearm convicted, he faces a maximum sentence of life in prison on the assassination has been held in a Florida jail since last September, when he was arrested on a main highway after fleeing Trump's golf course. He had been spotted with his rifle barrel poking through a fence at the oceanfront golf course before a Secret Service agent saw him and fired in his direction. Police say Routh hid for nearly 12 hours in the bushes waiting for Trump, who was playing records suggest Routh had been plotting his attack on the then-presidential candidate for has a long criminal record, including a felony gun conviction for owning a fully automatic machine gun, and was barred from owning firearms as a alleged plot was the second attempt on Trump's life as he ran for office. A gunman in Butler, Pennsylvania, shot Trump in the ear during a rally in July. Routh was active in recruiting volunteers to fight in Ukraine's war against Russia, and had a range of eclectic political views, although he was registered as a Democrat and made anti-Trump posts an earlier letter this year, the 59-year-old had asked to be used in a prisoner swap with another country like Russia so he could have a "swift and useful" death.
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How James O'Brien became the most polarising voice on the radio
The perpetually exasperated LBC talk radio host James O'Brien seems to provoke irritation and inspire admiration in equal measure. During the weekday show he has hosted since 2004, he's become famed as much for his sneering derision for callers on subjects from Brexit to Donald Trump as he has for eloquently dissecting the news of the day. But this week, the 53-year-old's polarising approach slipped into something more sinister when he repeated the anti-Semitic testimony of a man who made ludicrous claims about his Jewish wife 's 'anti-Arab' indoctrination. Speaking to his audience of hundreds of thousands, the former Newsnight host read out a message that said: 'My wife was brought up Jewish and at Shabbat school, in a leafy Hertfordshire town, she was taught that one Jewish life is worth thousands of Arab lives and that Arabs are cockroaches to be crushed. Whilst young children are taught such hatred and dehumanisation – undoubtedly on both sides – then they will always be able to justify death and cruelty.' 'Unacceptable and highly offensive' O'Brien's apparent readiness to accept the veracity of the inflammatory account led to calls for his suspension from LBC. For critics, it marked the most extreme example yet of his perceived arrogance. Indeed, O'Brien prefaced what he read out on Tuesday with the words: 'I'm fascinated by objectivity', as if – rather than being a highly questionable set of claims – this was a provably factual account that his audience desperately needed to be made aware of. Others, however, were quick to take issue with his behaviour. Critics included the Board of Deputies of British Jews, who called O'Brien's decision 'unacceptable and highly offensive'. The backlash has led him to issue an apology, and footage of the incident has now been removed from LBC's social media platforms. 'As with all the texts and messages that I read out on the programme, I did so in good faith,' said O'Brien. 'But the message has understandably upset a lot of people, and I regret taking those unsubstantiated claims at face value and am genuinely sorry for that.' Of course, being a talk show host necessitates heated debate and disagreement. But this appeared to be O'Brien indulging shock jock tactics, airing the type of conspiracy that he would typically rail against. Political ambiguity For all his divisiveness, O'Brien's own politics are somewhat undefined. He has described himself as liberal (not Lib Dem) and he is far from being a Left-wing firebrand or Corbynista (last week he said he couldn't defend Diane Abbott after she recanted her comments about Jews not being subject to racism equivalent to people of colour – describing Abbott's remarks as 'objectively stupid'). His adoptive father was a journalist who once worked for The Telegraph, and O'Brien's own career spanned stints at The Daily Mail, The Express, The Spectator and BBC's Newsnight. His technique on LBC is to position himself as someone who wants to uncover the truth or say the unsayable – to challenge the mainstream media, whether that be Conservative-leaning newspapers or the BBC. It is his job to provoke reactions from his listeners, but it's as much his manner as his content that divides opinion. Brexit's loudest critic O'Brien is best known as a standard bearer for Remainers over Brexit, and one of the most persistent and polarising voices on the fall-out from Britain's decision to leave the EU. The prominence of Brexit, especially from 2019 onwards, coincided with his and LBC's ability to exploit social media. O'Brien's confrontational soliloquies or exchanges with callers regularly go viral, expanding his reach beyond his weekly audience of 1.5 million. This statement from his show from May this year is typical: 'I've enjoyed nothing more over the last few years than explaining to you the reality that has been either completely ignored or misunderstood by almost every other corner of the UK media, including many beloved colleagues on this station, some of whom asked you to stop talking about Brexit, which is a demonstration of ignorance visible from space.' His style – sometimes characterised as patronising – has been parodied most effectively by the impressionist Tony Lapidus, who manages to convey both O'Brien's over-familiarity and ability to verbally outmanoeuvre callers. 'At 10 o'clock he eases himself into his very own Star Chamber, wig in place, and casts a practised eye over the miscreants he has lined up for his daily exercise,' wrote Michael Henderson in The Critic magazine in 2022. 'Nobody is quite as clever as he, nor as public-spirited. His rebukes are coated with sarcasm and exasperation but as he falls short of top-notch intelligence, and has a limited vocabulary, his barbs rarely wound as he would like.' O'Brien has long been cited as a spokesman for 'Centrist Dads'. His interventions are often anti-Trump and anti-Reform, as well as continuing to attack Brexit. He castigates anyone who strays from centrist orthodoxies as ignorant or ill-intentioned. In August last year, he called the riots following the Southport murders 'The Farage Riots' in reference to the Reform leader. (His labelling of the unrest attracted numerous complaints. Ofcom did not uphold them.) Farage said in response: 'At no point in the past 30 years have I ever encouraged violence or the use of undemocratic means… and yet we have LBC presenters like James O'Brien calling them 'The Farage Riots''. O'Brien wrote a virtual Centrist Dad manifesto in the form of his book trilogy How To Be Right, How Not To Be Wrong and How They Broke Britain, the titles of which only further irritated his detractors. He said of How They Broke Britain: 'I hope this book becomes some sort of Rosetta Stone, or at least a compass to navigate the oceans of bullshit.' This is not O'Brien's first self-induced crisis O'Brien is often seen in the studio rubbing his head with frustration, as if the combined obligations of listening to the views of the public and having to set them straight is about to break him at any moment. It is, however, a very effective media persona. His mid-morning show, broadcast after that of Right-leaning Nick Ferrari's At Breakfast, is the most popular on LBC. Asked about O'Brien's approach, Matt Deegan, a radio industry expert and host of The Media Club podcast, says: 'It's always been fun to put down callers and let them fall into traps. There is a good apocryphal quote from the New York radio legend Howard Stern, which is something like 'People who hate me listen longer than the people who like me'. Sometimes people tune in to be offended.' Before this week, O'Brien has mostly managed to tread the line between leaning into disagreement and becoming embroiled in scandal. But this isn't the first time that he has found himself in a self-induced crisis. From 2014, O'Brien was a vocal supporter of the later convicted paedophile and fraudster Carl Beech, who made unfounded claims of sexual abuse against numerous politicians and public figures, including the former Conservative MP Harvey Proctor and former Home Secretary Leon Brittan. Especially damning was the prominent support his show gave to Mark Watts, editor of the now defunct Exaro news organisation, who was at the time leading the campaign supporting the accusations made by Beech, many of which did huge personal damage to the falsely accused and their families. In 2015, O'Brien commented: 'Words like 'cover-up' spring to mind. Words like 'conspiracy' spring to mind.' In a series of exchanges with Watts at the time, he cast doubt over the commitment of the 'mainstream media' and Britain's political establishment to address Beech's alleged revelations. Four years later, in September 2019, Beech was jailed for 18 years on 12 counts of perverting the course of justice, one of fraud, and for several child sexual offences. There is no suggestion O'Brien knew of Beech's crimes while he was defending him – far from it – but Beech's eventual conviction still cast a shadow over someone whose career is based on being 'right'. O'Brien would later say on X: 'Hate the Carl Beech story. We gave his allegations against dead politicians a lot of coverage on the show & it turns out he was bulls---ing everyone. But from Rotherham to Westminster to the BBC, telling abuse survivors that they'll be believed still seems the right thing to do. 'There will always be accusations of bias over a long period of time if you do a show every day on subjects people feel very passionate about,' says Deegan. 'Hosting a three-hour live show means you have to keep things interesting and express a lot of opinions.' Selective firepower Certainly, O'Brien doesn't seem short of opinions or a willingness to air them. But while he is adept at taking down callers whose arguments he sees as flimsy or foolish, he seems less interested in the knotty business of offering coherent alternatives. In stark contrast to the Brexit debate, he has been far less strident on trans issues, for example, saying in 2023: 'If someone believes that they were born in the wrong body, I don't want to call them a liar. And if somebody believes that their personal security is threatened by that person using the same amenities that they use, I don't want to call them a liar either.' It is his apparent self-righteousness, whether he chooses to come down firmly on one side or not, that perhaps alienates his opponents above all. 'There are lots of opportunities for us to dedicate ourselves to evidence and fact, while the age seems to be dedicated to promoting idiots and falsehood and disinformation,' O'Brien said in May this year.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump reviewing displays at museum that houses the Liberty Bell for violating his anti-DEI orders
The Trump administration has ordered a review of several items at Philadelphia 's Independence National Historical Park — the museum where the Liberty Bell is kept — because they fall outside of Donald Trump 's anti-DEI rules, according to a new report. The move is apparently part of a broader move to fight"corrosive ideology" at national parks, says the New York Times. Independence Park is home not only to the Liberty Bell, but to Independence Hall, where both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution were signed. Back in March, Trump issued an order demanding the censoring of any information at federal parks, public monuments, or statues added since 2020 that "perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history." Federal employees had until last week to flag any displays or materials that failed Trump's ideological purity test, according to the Times. The "corrosive ideology" found at Independence Park reportedly includes a panel at the Liberty Bell describing its 1800s travel and which addresses the 'systemic and violent racism and sexism that existed at the time.' An outdoor exhibit at the President's House — where George Washington and John Adams lived and conducted business while in Philadelphia — notes nine of Washington's slaves and includes descriptions of the brutality that slaves faced. Under Trump's guidance, that must also be censored. Independence Park also has displays noting the contentious relationship between the U.S. and Native American tribes. They have been flagged by federal staff. The Trump administration also allowed the public a period of time to offer feedback on Independence Park and the wokeness or lack of wokeness in its exhibits. The U.S. Interior Department received fewer than 20 comments, according to Axios. The deadline for federal workers to remove all the "inappropriate" content from federally managed land and monuments is September 17, according to the Times. Trump may be especially eager to get the Philadelphia sites censored to his liking, considering the nation's upcoming 250th anniversary will be celebrated in the city of brotherly love. The celebrations are expected to draw many out-of-state visitors, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.
