Moxies serves up a new $5 Espresso Martini
'Times are tough, so we want to give our guests something special, delicious, and reasonably priced,' said Joanne Forrester, President and Chief Operating Officer of Moxies.
Moxies' new Espresso Martini is bold and stylish. It's a blend of Ketel One vodka, Galliano, coffee liqueur, and 1.5 ounces of espresso. So it's the perfect pick-me-up for whenever you decide the time is right.
The new $5 Espresso Martini is making its debut at all locations (excluding Atlantic Canada). Bring a friend (or two!) and enjoy Moxies' reinvented Espresso Martini at a price worth celebrating. For more details on participating locations and opening hours, visit
www.moxies.com
. Follow Moxies on Instagram:
@moxies
to stay updated on the latest offerings and promotions.
About Moxies
With 58 locations across North America, Moxies is a Canadian premium casual concept owned by Northland Properties. It is known for progressive made-in-house culinary, an innovative beverage program, and enlightened hospitality in a stylish and relaxed environment.
Contact
Mary Hua,
mhua@northland.ca
Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/da1e1355-b79b-4f94-9ce9-6f9325396635
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/de055aa0-de3c-4c02-8416-e7a96a5ceeec
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
13 minutes ago
- Time Business News
What It's Really Like Being a Sugar Baby: My True Story
When most people hear the term 'sugar baby,' they imagine luxury handbags, expensive dinners, and private jets. While those things do exist in the sugar dating world, they're only a fraction of the full story. What's rarely discussed is the emotional complexity, the learning curve, and the real human experiences that come with it. This isn't a fantasy or an exaggeration—this is my true story. This is what it's really like to be a sugar baby, from the glamour and gifts to the boundaries, expectations, and personal growth. I was a 22-year-old university student drowning in student debt. I worked part-time, lived with two roommates, and barely made enough to cover my tuition, books, and basic living expenses. One day, while scrolling through TikTok, I came across a video talking about sugar dating and how some women were managing their financial lives with the help of successful older partners. At first, I rolled my eyes. It sounded too good to be true. But after some late-night Googling, forum reading, and watching firsthand stories, I became curious. Could this actually be a smart financial move? Was it safe? Was it ethical? I wasn't looking for love. I wasn't even looking for commitment. I just wanted stability, mentorship, and someone who respected my time and energy. So I signed up. I'll never forget the nerves before my first sugar date. I met him on a reputable site after a few weeks of messaging. He was 45, divorced, and ran a successful marketing firm. We agreed to meet at a well-known coffee shop in the city. He wasn't creepy or demanding. He didn't ask me to do anything uncomfortable. In fact, he was charming, funny, and refreshingly honest about what he wanted—companionship, intelligent conversation, and someone to enjoy weekend getaways with. There were no immediate promises of money or gifts. That came later, once we built trust. But after that coffee date, I realized something: this wasn't as taboo or weird as I had imagined. It was more like networking with someone who happened to also want companionship. From the very beginning, I made my boundaries clear. I didn't want anything physical unless there was real chemistry and consent. I didn't want to be available 24/7. And I wanted to maintain my independence—emotionally and financially. He respected that. In return, he was upfront about what he expected: honesty, emotional availability, and the ability to share experiences like dinner dates, travel, and sometimes just texting during stressful workdays. We agreed on a monthly allowance, which covered my rent and some tuition. But the most valuable thing he offered wasn't money—it was time. He mentored me in business, encouraged me to invest, and even helped me land my first internship. Yes, I've had some glamorous moments. Spa weekends. Designer shoes. Rooftop dinners. Business class flights. I won't pretend that those things weren't fun or appreciated. They made my Instagram feed look amazing. But they were just the surface. What people didn't see were the hours of emotional labor, the constant pressure to look and act perfect, and the occasional awkward conversation where we had to realign expectations. Being a sugar baby means being emotionally intelligent, adaptable, and clear about your needs. It's not just about taking. It's about giving too—your time, your attention, and your energy. I didn't tell many people at first. The stigma around sugar dating is real. Most of my friends assumed I was 'selling myself' or being exploited. Some judged me harshly, even though I was happier and more financially stable than ever. Over time, I stopped caring about what others thought. I knew I wasn't being used or manipulated. I was in control. I had clear boundaries and communicated openly. And more than anything, I was learning about human relationships, business, and confidence in a way that no college class could teach me. Of course, not every experience was good. I did encounter men who thought sugar dating meant ownership. Some messaged me expecting instant intimacy. One man ghosted me after two amazing dates. Another tried to guilt-trip me into spending more time with him than I was comfortable with. But I learned. I learned how to screen people better, how to say 'no' without apology, and how to walk away from arrangements that didn't serve me. That growth was invaluable. Being a sugar baby taught me how to negotiate, how to communicate honestly, and how to set healthy boundaries. It helped me finish school without debt. It allowed me to start a small business and become financially independent earlier than most of my peers. But more than that, it gave me clarity. I no longer date just for the sake of it. I no longer settle for less than I deserve. And I now understand that relationships—of any kind—should be mutually beneficial, built on respect, and aligned with your goals. It's easy to judge sugar dating from the outside, but only those who've truly lived it understand its depth. That's why I've shared a real sugar baby experience—mine. What surprised me most was the emotional connection I developed with one of my sugar daddies. He became a true friend. We laughed, we vented, we celebrated small wins together. He supported me when my father passed away, and I helped him through a tough business deal. People don't realize that real emotions can develop. And while our arrangement was transactional at first, it evolved into something meaningful. We cared about each other—just with clear roles and boundaries. Eventually, we ended our arrangement when I moved to another city. There were no hard feelings. Just gratitude. If you're thinking about sugar dating, here's my honest advice: Know your boundaries before you start. Write them down. Stick to them. Use reputable platforms with identity verification and user reviews. Never rush into an arrangement. Take your time to know the person. Don't be afraid to say no. You don't owe anyone anything. Treat it like a partnership. Be respectful, and expect respect in return. Sugar dating isn't for everyone. But if approached with confidence, honesty, and caution, it can be empowering—financially, emotionally, and even professionally. Looking back, I don't regret a single moment. I made mistakes, sure. I took risks. But I also found strength I didn't know I had. I gained experiences and insights that most people don't get until much later in life. I'm not here to glamorize or shame sugar dating. I'm simply here to share what it was really like—from my perspective. For me, it was never just about money. It was about control, freedom, and growth. So if you've ever wondered what it's really like being a sugar baby—well, now you've heard a real sugar baby experience from someone who lived it, learned from it, and walked away stronger. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Chicago Tribune
3 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
How a major Mexican tomato exporter is affected by Trump's 17% tariff
AJUCHITLAN, Mexico — The Trump administration's decision to impose a 17% duty on fresh tomatoes imported from Mexico has created a dilemma for the country providing more tomatoes to U.S. consumers than any other. The import tax that began July 14 is just the latest protectionist move by an administration that has threatened dozens of countries with tariffs, including its critical trading partner Mexico. It comes as the Mexican government tries to also negotiate its way out of a 30% general tariff scheduled to take effect Aug. 1. While the impacts of the tomato tariff are still in their infancy, a major grower and exporter in central Mexico shows how a tariff targeting a single product can destabilize the sector. Green tomato plants stretch upward row after row in sprawling high-tech greenhouses covering nearly six acres in the central state of Queretaro, among the top 10 tomato producing states in Mexico. Climate controlled and pest free, Veggie Prime's greenhouses in Ajuchitlan send some 100 tons of fresh tomatoes every week to Mastronardi Produce. The Canadian company is the leading distributor of fresh tomatoes in the U.S. with clients that include Costco and Walmart. Moisés Atri, Veggie Prime's export director, says they've been exporting tomatoes to the U.S. for 13 years and their substantial investment and the cost to produce their tomatoes won't allow them to make any immediate changes. They're also contractually obligated to sell everything they produce to Mastronardi until 2026. 'None of us (producers) can afford it,' Atri said. 'We have to approach our client to adjust the prices because we're nowhere near making that kind of profit.' In the tariff's first week, Veggie Prime ate the entire charge. In the second, its share of the new cost lowered when its client agreed to increase the price of their tomatoes by 10%. The 56-year-old Atri hopes that Mastronardi will eventually pass all of the tariff's cost onto its retail clients. Experts say the tariff could cause a 5% to 10% drop in tomato exports, which last year amounted to more than $3 billion for Mexico. The Mexican Association of Tomato Producers says the industry generates some 500,000 jobs. Juan Carlos Anaya, director general of the consulting firm Grupo Consultor de Mercados Agrícolas, said a drop in tomato exports, which last year amounted to more than 2 billion tons, could lead to the loss of some 200,000 jobs When the Trump administration announced the tariff, the Commerce Department justified it as a measure to protect U.S. producers from artificially cheap Mexican imports. California and Florida growers that produce about 11 million tons would stand to benefit most, though most of that production is for processed tomatoes. Experts believe the U.S. would find it difficult to replace Mexico's fresh tomato imports. Atri and other producers are waiting for a scheduled review of the measure in two months, when the U.S. heads into fall and fresh tomato production there begins to decline. In reaction to the tariff, the Mexican government has floated the idea of looking for other, more stable, international markets. Mexican Agriculture Secretary Julio Berdegué said Thursday that the government is looking at possibilities like Japan, but producers quickly cast doubt on that idea, noting the tomatoes would have to be sent by plane, raising the cost even more. Atri said the company is starting to experiment with peppers, to see if they would provide an option at scale. President Claudia Sheinbaum said recently her administration would survey tomato growers to figure out what support they need, especially small producers who are already feeling the effects of a drop of more than 10% in the price of tomatoes domestically over fears there will be a glut in Mexico.
Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
As Trump's trade deal deadline approaches, his tariffs face legal pushback in court
WASHINGTON - Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 27, 2025.
