No 10 says abortion law change must be ‘safe and workable'
The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral.
But Downing Street said that now MPs had made that decision, the Government had a responsibility to ensure that if it makes it to the statute book it is in an effective form.
The Bill still has further stages to go through in Parliament and changes could be made to the measures in the House of Lords.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe.
'But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.'
The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.'
Gower MP Ms Antoniazzi said the change will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy.
She pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions.
Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law.
Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment.
They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell.
Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative frontbench voted against it, but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour.
Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability.
It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant.
Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.
Kate Ellis, joint head of litigation at the Centre for Women's Justice, said: 'It is high time that these outdated, Victorian laws were removed from the statute books.
'This proposed change in the law will only impact a relatively small number of women each year who find themselves – in already desperate circumstances – threatened with imprisonment for a criminal offence they probably didn't know existed.'
The changes do not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands there.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
a minute ago
- Scotsman
Why rising food price inflation is a real problem for Labour and SNP
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... For much of 2021, food was actually getting cheaper. However, in the second half of the year, prices slowly began to rise and, by January 2022, food inflation had hit 4.4 per cent. The following month, Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, creating a humanitarian tragedy and a global energy crisis that affected the cost of almost everything we buy. Inflation soared. The consumer price index (CPI) peaked at 11.1 per cent in October 2022, but food price inflation rose even higher, hitting a staggering 19.2 per cent in March 2023. It was this, combined with sky-rocketing energy prices, that made the cost-of-living crisis so devastating. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad By July last year, when Labour swept to power with a landslide majority, food inflation had fallen to just 1.5 per cent, below the overall rate of 2.2 per cent. While prices remained higher than in the past, they were no longer rising at an untenable rate. Food price inflation is an issue that affects the vast majority of people (Picture: Matthew Horwood) | Getty Images 'Significant challenges to household budgets' However, the cost of food and non-alcoholic beverages rose by 4.5 per cent in the year to June, above the CPI rate of 3.6 per cent. Now the British Retail Consortium (BRC) is warning, based on a survey of its members, that food price inflation will hit 6 per cent by the end of the year, posing 'significant challenges to household budgets, particularly in the run-up to Christmas'. Eighty-five per cent of chief financial officers told the BRC that the UK Budget, which raised employers' National Insurance contributions and the national living wage, had forced them to increase prices and 65 per cent predicted there would be more hikes to come. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad David Lonsdale, director of the Scottish Retail Consortium, said the changes had added £190 million a year to Scottish retailers' outgoings and 'this was compounded by the decision in the Scottish Budget to lump an extra £7.6m annually onto retailers' business rates bills'.
New Statesman
2 minutes ago
- New Statesman
We must fight the deepfake future
Photo by Jonathan Brady/Alamy Penny Mordaunt broadsworded her way into Britain's collective imagination when she became the unexpected breakout star of King Charles III's May 2023 coronation. We had lost one stoic queen; here was another. Mordaunt bore the Sword of State, the heaviest in the royal collection, for 50 minutes. The world watching, Mordaunt kept her face composed, the image of ceremonial gravitas, strength, tradition and honour. But imagine that face smeared across violent pornography. Speaking to BBC Newsnight recently, the former Conservative MP and cabinet minister revealed that she had been a victim of deepfake pornography while serving in parliament. Her face, along with those of other female MPs including Priti Patel and Angela Rayner, had been digitally placed onto explicit videos. 'It was deliberately humiliating and violent,' she said. Deepfakes are the latest grotesque frontier in the battle for digital dignity, where artificial intelligence is weaponised to humiliate, disempower, and violate women's bodies. And the harm inflicted is not virtual – it can be as real as any other form of sexual violence. Headlines in 2013 may have asserted otherwise: 'No harm in simulated rape videos (as long as they are well made), say ministers' ran in the Telegraph. Though this predates the inception of deepfakes by a few years, it is grim that, even today, some still think this basic principle of female autonomy is up for debate. Digital violence is violence, as Mordaunt understands. 'The people behind this,' she said, 'don't realise the consequences in the real world when they do something like that.' Since the first deepfake was created in 2017, AI-generated, sexually explicit videos have proliferated across the internet. A study assessed that half a million deepfakes were shared in 2023; this year's total is expected to be eight million. Of all deepfakes, 98 per cent are sexually explicit, and 99 per cent of those are of females. This technology is both misogynistic and, as it stands, unregulated. Worse, it is now so sophisticated that viewers no longer realise they are consuming fakes. We stand on the precipice, looking at potentially an entire generation of young males whose sexual understanding of consent is being warped by digital hallucinations. Keir Starmer's government has shown some willingness to take on issues related to deepfakes. Amendments to the Online Safety Act, which require pornography websites to implement age-verification measures, came into force on 25 July. The aim is to prevent children from accessing explicit material, and thereby protect them. But we might note the unnecessary protractions before the legislation was introduced. (While it is illegal to distribute deepfakes, it is legal to create one. Rishi Sunak pledged to legislate against the production of deepfakes in April 2024 though said legislation never materialised; Keir Starmer pledged the same in January 2025, yet production remains legal.) We may also note that a lot of porn lives outside of traditional porn sites, instead circulating on the murky backwaters of Telegram groups, Reddit threads, and 4chan. Whatever the measures, we need more of them. AI-driven deepfake porn is a disturbing new theatre of abuse advancing, like all AI developments, at an alarming pace. But technology is made by humans. The scaffolding of our digital lives is designed, curated, and upheld by other people. The sword Mordaunt held at King Charles' coronation was historic and symbolic. Today, her sword is rhetorical: a call to action against the degradation of female autonomy, identity, and safety in a world that increasingly treats women's faces and bodies as public property. Mordaunt has exposed a frightening fault line in British society. Children are given unfettered access to pornography. Women are transformed into digitally altered chimeras without consent and without recourse. Allowing this to continue is not just a regulatory failure but a cultural one. Technological change is relentless; violence against women is perennial. The internet is hard to contain and full of malicious actors. But we must summon the will to protect basic privacies and dignities. However heavy, we should pick up and carry that sword. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Schools need more sex education, not less] Related
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nearly half of Jersey's carbon goals behind schedule
Nearly half of Jersey's goals to become carbon neutral are behind schedule, according to a new report from the island's Carbon Neutral Roadmap (CNR) was published in 2022 and set out 32 policy areas designed to help the island prepare for net zero, with phase 1 due to be completed by the end of six months to go, 13 of Jersey's CNR goals are behind schedule or at risk, with one further target cancelled Minister Deputy Steve Luce said things were moving "in the right direction" but "the pace of this change must accelerate if we are going to meet our goals within the agreed timeframe". 'Stark reminder' Luce said the report served as "a stark and important reminder that there is still a long way to go in tackling the climate emergency".He said "subsidies and incentives alone" would not be sufficient to keep the island on track to reach net zero emissions by 2050."Decisive action such as restricting the importation of fossil fuel vehicles and heating systems" was needed, he added. The CNR goals measure progress on initiatives in areas such as transport, heating and roadmap does not measure Jersey's progress on reducing carbon emissions is aiming to cut emissions by 68% compared to 1990 levels by 2030 and to net zero by emissions had only fallen 48% by 2023 - putting the 2030 target at risk, the report delayed areas included home-heating incentives, carbon offsetting and updating by-laws.
