
Key diet change can help you lose DOUBLE the weight – and it's not about counting calories
Research by University College London found that slimmers fared better if they ate unprocessed meals compared to shop-bought food.
1
They lost more weight even if the foods were matched for calories, fat and sugar.
For example, participants eating porridge and home-made spaghetti bolognese slimmed faster than those who ate shop-bought oat bars and lasagna ready meals.
People on the balanced but processed diet lost 1.05 per cent of their body weight in two months.
Meanwhile those eating similar but non-processed versions of the foods lost 2.06 per cent in the same time – twice as much.
The difference was equal to eating 170 fewer calories per day, and could lead to even more weight loss over a longer period.
The results suggest the way foods are processed makes them less healthy, even when they look like normal meals.
Brits rely heavily on ultra-processed foods (UPFs) as they make up around two thirds of our daily diet.
They include most packaged foods that come ready-made, such as crisps, chocolate, biscuits, ready meals and breakfast cereals and bars.
Minimally processed foods are those that have to be made but can be bought plain, such as pasta, rice and milk.
Unprocessed foods include fresh fruit, vegetables, meat, fish, eggs and unflavoured nuts.
Popular low cost snack that can help you lose weight and improve your heart health
Senior study author Professor Rachel Batterham said: 'The best advice to people would be to moderate overall energy intake and limit intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat, while prioritising high-fibre foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses and nuts.
'Choosing less processed options such as whole foods and cooking from scratch, rather than ultra-processed, packaged foods or ready meals, is likely to offer additional benefits.'
Writing in the journal Nature Medicine, the researchers said people eating less processed food also experienced fewer cravings.
How ultra processed is YOUR kitchen?
Ultra processed foods (UPFs) were defined by Brazilian researchers who made the NOVA classification system. It breaks foods into groups depending on how processed they are. The most natural foods are in group 1, while the most processed are in group 4.
The groups do not entirely indicate how healthy a food is. However, it does indicate how processed it is - and studies have linked UPFs to a number of diseases.
How does your kitchen compare to the following groups?
Unprocessed or minimally processed foods (group 1)
vegetables and fruits (fresh or frozen)
dried fruits with no added sugar, honey, or oil
grains and legumes (chickpeas, lentils)
meat, poultry, fish, seafood, eggs
milk without added sugar
plain yogurt with no added sugar
nuts and seeds
spices and herbs
tea, coffee, water
Processed culinary ingredients (group 2)
iodized salt
salted butter
sugar and molasses from cane or beet
honey extracted from combs
syrup from maple trees
vegetable oils crushed from olives or seeds
butter and lard from milk and pork
starches extracted from corn and other plants
vegetable oils with added anti-oxidants
vinegar with added preservatives
Processed foods (group 3)
canned vegetables, fruits, and legumes
fruits in syrup
salted or sugared nuts and seeds
salted cured or smoked meats
canned fish
artisanal breads and cheese
Ultra-processed foods (group 4)
pop and fruit drinks
sweetened yogurt
sweet or savoury packaged snacks (e.g., cookies)
candies and cake mixes
mass-produced packaged breads and buns
margarines and spreads
breakfast cereals
cereal and energy bars
energy drinks
instant soups, sauces, and noodles
poultry and fish nuggets, hot dogs
many ready-to-heat products: pre-prepared pies, pasta, and pizza dishes
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Child is rushed to hospital 'after falling from height' in Dagenham
A five-year old boy has been rushed to hospital after 'falling from a height' in Dagenham this afternoon. Paramedics rushed to the scene near Dagenham Headway Tube station in east London at 2.31pm. The child is understood to have fallen from a height and was taken to a major trauma centre following the incident.


The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
Boy, 5, rushed to hospital after plunging from a height as air ambulance responds & cops close street
A FIVE-year-old boy has fallen from a height and been rushed to a major trauma centre. Paramedics raced to the scene, nearby Dagenham Headway Tube station, in east London, at around 2.30pm today. Church Elm Lane was cordoned off from Tasty kebab shop to Church Elm Lane Health Centre. Emergency services, including an air ambulance, arrived to transport the youngster to a major trauma centre. It is understood the boy's injuries are not life threatening. The Met Police confirmed there have been no arrests. A spokesperson for the force said: "Police were called at 14:32hrs on Monday, 4 August to reports of a child who had fallen from height in Church Elm Lane, Dagenham Officers, the London Ambulance Service and the London Air Ambulance attended. "A five-year-old boy was taken to hospital for treatment. His injuries are not life threatening. There have been no arrests." A London Ambulance Service spokesperson added: "We were called at 2.31pm today to reports of a person fallen from height on Church Elm Lane, Dagenham. "We sent resources to the scene, including an ambulance crew, an incident response officer and a paramedic in a fast response car. "We also dispatched London's Air Ambulance. "Our first paramedic arrived in less than five minutes. We treated a child at the scene and took them to a major trauma centre by road." 1


The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?
If there was a five-minute nuclear warning, I'd run straight to my local shop and buy a pack of cigarettes. Even now, after all these years. I stopped more than a decade ago – note that I say 'stopped' rather than 'gave up' because the latter implies a sacrifice, and I have been brainwashed (OK, hypnotised) not to use the term. But you are never really a non-smoker. You are just a smoker who is currently not smoking. In your soul, you are forever one of the people who leave the table after eating to go and have a conversation outside, even if you physically stay put these days. So, as someone who found it difficult to quit, it's baffling to hear that although two stop-smoking medications have been available in the UK since 2024, only 0.2% of those attempting to give up have used them, according to an analysis of NHS data on smoking in England. Cytisine (which also goes by cytisinicline) is a plant-based product that has been used in eastern Europe since the 70s and may appeal to those who prefer a natural option over a synthetic drug. It mimics the effects of nicotine, and tricks your brain into thinking you've had a cigarette. Varenicline – withdrawn in 2021 over concerns about impurities, but now reformulated and rereleased – can apparently reduce the urge to smoke, make you enjoy it less when you do and ease withdrawal symptoms. I tried everything when it came to my struggle with Silk Cut. Patches, gum, lozenges – I carried on smoking while I wore, chewed and sucked them all. I read the world-famous success story The Easy Way to Stop Smoking by Allen Carr (no, not that one). I attended the NHS in-person sessions, three times, to no effect. I was a triple failure, and oddly proud of it for a reason I still don't quite understand. I had neurolinguistic programming, where the man shook my hand as he greeted me, asking, 'And how long was it that you smoked for?' 'Oh, I still smoke now. I just had one outside,' I volunteered cheerfully. He tutted and told me that for some clients, talking about smoking in the past tense like that was all it took. I scoffed at those weaklings as I walked to my train afterwards – in a cloud of smoke, obviously. The closest I came to victory back then was a hypnotist recommended by a friend, with the caveat that he sounded so much like Cliff Richard it was hard to take him seriously. She didn't mention that he worked out of an extremely insalubrious portable cabin at the back of a building site. As I knocked on the tin-can door (while simultaneously putting out yet another last ever cigarette), I reasoned that if he murdered me, I would technically have given up smoking, therefore this would have been a success. Reader, he did not murder me. In gentle, dulcet tones, he told me I felt sleepy, while I felt embarrassed for him because I definitely wasn't hypnotised. When he 'brought me round' he asked me how long I thought I'd 'been under'. I'd been thinking about what to have for dinner the whole time, so stifled a giggle as I told him: about 10 minutes. He replied that it had been two hours. The next morning, it occurred to me that I hadn't even thought about smoking, let alone done it. Thrilled, I sent another friend, who had the same experience. However, a year later, almost to the day, we both started smoking again. I went back for a do-over but it didn't work. In the end, I probably spent about as much on trying to stop smoking as I had on cigarettes, and the thing that finally worked was free: boring old willpower. It was agony. Personally, I would have bitten the doctor's hand off if they could have given me a treatment that worked. And while of course no treatment is 100% effective, as I found out, stopping smoking is hard and gruelling. The more options people have, and the more visible and accessible these options are, the better. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.