Labour dismisses claims it is being 'greedy' by contesting by-election
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Labour is brushing off accusations it is being greedy by standing in the Tāmaki Makaurau by-election, saying if it were to win it would not diminish the presence of Māori in Parliament.
Peeni Henare, who held the seat between 2014 and 2023, has been confirmed as Labour's candidate in the 6 September by-election, which is being held due to the death of Takutai Tarsh Kemp.
Te Pāti Māori has selected Oriini Kaipara to contest the seat, which Kemp won off Henare in 2023.
Prominent figures in the party have since criticised Labour's decision to run.
Speaking to regional Māori news service
Pūkāea
, party co-leader Rawiri Waititi said win or lose, Henare would remain in Parliament, and if he did win the seat a Māori voice would be "lost" in the House.
Party president John Tamihere told the
New Zealand Herald
Henare could risk leadership aspirations by contesting the by-election.
"How many times are you going to run and lose?" he asked.
Meanwhile, Waititi's wife Kiri Tamihere-Waititi, who is also Tamihere's daughter and a party media liaison, said Labour was being "greedy" by standing in the by-election.
"Them standing a current MP in the by-election is a greedy move to take away from Māori. Why? Because Peeni already holds a seat in Parliament," she posted.
"The only reason they are running in Tāmaki is to take a seat away from Māori. Labour are not there to increase a Māori voice, they want to take one away."
She went on to say a vote for Henare was a "wasted" vote.
If Henare were to win the by-election, Labour would bring Georgie Dansey in off the party list.
Dansey is of Ngāti Tūwharetoa descent.
Her tūpuna Roger Dansey was a captain in the Māori Pioneer Battalion during World War I, and was also a Māori All Black.
Addressing Te Pāti Māori's criticisms, Henare pointed out the next person on Labour's list is a wāhine Māori, and dismissed the accusations Labour was being greedy.
"Any suggestion that I'm curbing a Māori voice in Parliament is absolute folly. Those kinds of reckons don't help what should be a good contest between two good candidates, and that's what we're hoping to do."
He said he got more than 10,000 votes in 2023, and owed it to Tāmaki Makaurau voters to give them a choice.
"Every green seat in the House of Parliament is a contested seat. Anybody who thinks a seat is going to be given to somebody is absolute folly."
Vision NZ leader Hannah Tamaki - who also contested the seat in 2023 - will stand again, while National, the Green Party, ACT and New Zealand First will not field a candidate.
The prime minister has called the by-election as a "pillow fight" between Labour and Te Pāti Māori.
Labour's Māori caucus co-chair Willie Jackson said Labour did not want to be "really contesting and having a bad relationship with Te Pāti Māori", and the by-election was more a fight against the government.
He said if Te Pāti Māori wanted a fight, he was up for it, but Labour would be running a respectful campaign.
He said when Ikaroa-Rāwhiti MP Parekura Horomia died in 2013, Te Pāti Māori contested that by-election.
"When they start talking tikanga, let's just remember what happened when our rangatira died, they lined up. I get it that they want us to stand aside, but it's not going to happen."
Henare would not say whether he would try again in 2026 if he did not win the by-election.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Thousands of Afghans win UK asylum after huge data breach
By Jo Biddle, AFP Photo: AFP Thousands of Afghans who worked with the UK and their families were brought to Britain in a secret programme after a 2022 data breach put their lives at risk, the British government revealed on Tuesday (UK time). Defence Minister John Healey unveiled the scheme to Parliament after the UK High Court on Tuesday lifted a super-gag order banning any reports of the events. In February 2022, a spreadsheet containing the names and details of almost 19,000 Afghans who had asked to be relocated to Britain was accidentally leaked by a UK official just six months after Taliban fighters seized Kabul, Healey said. "This was a serious departmental error," Healey said, adding: "Lives may have been at stake." The previous Conservative government put in place a secret programme in April 2024 to help those "judged to be at the highest risk of reprisals by the Taliban", he said. Some 900 Afghans and 3600 family members have now been brought to Britain or are in transit under the programme known as the Afghan Response Route, at a cost of around £400 million (NZ$900m), Healey said. Applications from 600 more people have also been accepted, bringing the estimated total cost of the scheme to £850m (NZ$1.9b). They are among some 36,000 Afghans who have been accepted by Britain under different schemes since the August 2021 fall of Kabul. As Labour's opposition defence spokesman, Healey was briefed on the scheme in December 2023 but the Conservative government asked a court to impose a "super-injunction" banning any mention of it in Parliament or by the press. When Labour came to power in July 2024, the scheme was in full swing but Healey said he had been "deeply uncomfortable to be constrained from reporting" to Parliament. "Ministers decided not to tell Parliamentarians at an earlier stage about the data incident, as the widespread publicity would increase the risk of the Taliban obtaining the dataset," he explained. A video grab from footage broadcast by the UK Parliament's Parliamentary Recording Unit (PRU) Britain's Defence Secretary John Healey making a statement to MPs in the House of Commons in London on 15 July, 2025. Photo: Supplied / AFP Healey set up a review of the scheme when he became defence minister in the new Labour government. This concluded there was "very little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution". The Afghan Response Route has now been closed, the minister said, apologising for the data breach which "should never have happened". He estimated the total cost of relocating people from Afghanistan to Britain at between £5.5b to £6b (NZ$12.3b to NZ$13.5b). Conservative Party defence spokesman James Cartlidge also apologised for the leak which happened under the previous Tory government. But he defended the decision to keep it secret, saying the aim had been to avoid "an error by an official of the British state leading to torture or even murder of persons in the dataset at the hands of what remains a brutal Taliban regime". Healey said all those brought to the UK from Afghanistan had been accounted for in the country's immigration figures. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to cut the number of migrants arriving in Britain. In 2023, the UK defence ministry was fined £350,000 (NZ787,000) by a data watchdog for disclosing personal information of 265 Afghans seeking to flee Taliban fighters in the chaotic fall of Kabul two years earlier. Britain's Afghanistan evacuation plan was widely criticised, with the government accused by MPs of "systemic failures of leadership, planning and preparation". Hundreds of Afghans eligible for relocation were left behind , many with their lives potentially at risk after details of staff and job applicants were left at the abandoned British embassy in Kabul. - AFP
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Coalition rift opens over UN letter as Seymour defends rogue response
The Act leader's unilateral reply to the UN has exposed fresh cracks in the coalition – and created a clean-up job for Winston Peters, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Letter row underscores coalition strain David Seymour's fiery response to a United Nations letter has turned into a full-blown coalition controversy, exposing divisions over both diplomatic conduct and the ideological direction of government. In June, UN special rapporteur Albert K Barume wrote to the government expressing concern that Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill failed to uphold Treaty principles and risked breaching Māori rights. Without consulting his coalition partners, Seymour fired back, sending his own letter to Barume telling him his remarks were 'presumptive, condescending, and wholly misplaced' and branding the UN intervention 'an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty'. As RNZ's Craig McCulloch reports, prime minister Christopher Luxon yesterday described Barume's letter as 'total bunkum' but agreed Seymour had overstepped and should not have responded directly. What the UN said – and what Seymour wrote back In his letter, Barume said he was concerned about reports of 'a persistent erosion of the rights of the Māori Indigenous Peoples… through regressive legislations' that may breach New Zealand's international obligations. Seymour's response was uncompromising. 'As an Indigenous New Zealander myself,' he wrote, 'I am deeply aggrieved by your audacity in presuming to speak on my behalf and that of my fellow Māori.' He dismissed concerns about Māori exclusion from consultation as 'misleading and offensive', and accused Barume of misunderstanding both the bill and New Zealand's legislative process. While Seymour has since agreed to withdraw the letter to allow foreign minister Winston Peters to respond officially, he has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing, insisting that 'we all agree the UN's criticisms are crazy' and that the official response would be essentially the same as his own. When asked if that was the case, Peters sounded aghast, reports The Post's Kelly Dennett (paywalled). 'That's not true,' Peters told reporters. 'Why would he say that?' The government's position would be made clear only after consulting all affected ministries, Peters said. 'We don't do megaphone diplomacy in this business,' he added acidly. 'Don't you understand diplomacy? You don't speak to other countries via the media.' Māori opposition to the bill runs deep Behind the diplomatic drama lies the more substantive issue: widespread Māori opposition to the Regulatory Standards Bill itself. Writing in Te Ao Māori News, former MP Louisa Wall says Seymour's claim that the bill doesn't weaken Treaty protections is 'demonstrably false'. In fact, she says, 'the Bill is silent on Te Tiriti. It elevates a monocultural legal standard based on private property and individual liberty while excluding Māori values like tikanga, mana motuhake, and kaitiakitanga. This is not neutral. It is erasure.' Wall also defends Barume's intervention, arguing that he was fulfilling his mandate to monitor Indigenous rights worldwide and that his concerns echoed those already raised by Māori leaders and legal scholars. 'Dr Barume is not imposing an external ideology,' she writes. 'His letter reflects what Māori across the motu already know: our rights are being undermined.' Coalition fault lines widen over Seymour's bill The clash over the UN letter comes at a tense time for Act's relationship with NZ First, which has made no secret of its discomfort with parts of the bill. Seymour has 'made it clear behind the scenes' that the regulatory standards legislation is 'as bottom line as it gets', writes Thomas Coughlan in a fascinating piece for the Herald (paywalled). Translation: '[Seymour] is willing to walk away from the coalition over it, bringing down the Government and triggering an election' if he doesn't get what he wants. While that's an unlikely scenario – especially since the coalition agreement commits the government to passing some version of the legislation – Seymour's passion for the bill speaks volumes about the junior coalition partners' divergent ideologies, writes Coughlan. 'Act is willing to risk short-term unpopularity, even losing an election, for long-term foundational change; NZ First is not.'
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Scandal, division and rumours - Gore District Council's tumultuous term
It's been a tumultuous three years at the Gore District Council with a heated election in 2022 ending in a close call and New Zealand's youngest ever mayor; a fallout between the new mayor and long-serving chief executive; scandal; division; and murmurs of central government intervention. But two-and-a-half years on, how is the council and the community faring now? And what does October's election hold? Timothy Brown reports. "The first year was a shambles. It was an absolute shambles - a train wreck." Former Gore mayor Tracy Hicks doesn't mince his words in assessing the reign of his successor. Hicks, a six-term incumbent, lost the mayoralty to then-23-year-old Ben Bell by only eight votes in October 2022. About 100 voting papers were left blank and more than 4300 eligible voters did not even bother. The tight contest followed an election campaign described by one veteran councillor as the ugliest he had witnessed . There were nasty rumours about salacious photos and Bell's sexuality, with mud slung at the opposing candidate by both camps. Following his election, Bell and then-chief executive Stephen Parry shared a fractious relationship which left the men unable to communicate without an intermediary . Gore Mayor Ben Bell. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon An aborted vote of no confidence in Bell followed , as did petitions calling on Parry to resign , failed mediation , and ultimately Parry's resignation and a new chief executive being appointed . RNZ has attempted to speak to the key players of the past three years and everyday Gore residents. Numerous attempts have been made to interview Bell about his first-term - even travelling to Gore to meet with him. However, on the morning of the agreed interview, Bell pulled out at short notice; was unable or unwilling to re-schedule; and has not responded to subsequent efforts to make contact. Parry told RNZ he has no interest in being interviewed on the situation either, saying: "I am enjoying a private life". But Hicks and deputy mayor Keith Hovell have been happy to talk. Hicks gives the current council a low four-out-of-ten for its performance under Bell. "You've got to give credit to a number of the individuals around the council table who have done sterling work and never been appreciated for it - in my view anyway - but there are a number that I wouldn't give much credit," he says. Without stating it explicitly, it seems Bell is not one of those whom he credits. "I'm not sure - what's he achieved?" Hicks says. "I've been thinking about that today - what has he achieved? I struggled to find anything concrete to point to and I guess I'm not surprised at that, because he came completely fresh to the scene and, like it or not, local government is quite a different beast and it's not a beast that moves quickly. "So I do feel sorry for him and the fact that you can't make the changes you want quickly, but he promised changes and he promised a number of things along the way that - if I'm wrong, I'm wrong - but I don't see those changes happening." Former Gore mayor Tracy Hicks was a six-term incumbent. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Hicks says if he had won a seventh term, the council would have been more functional and could have avoided reputational damage. Under Bell's watch, rates have risen an average of 11 percent in 2023, 21 percent last year and 8.8 percent this year. It is well in excess of the 5.9 percent, 8.2 percent and 5 percent for the three years prior, however, it is hardly Bell's fault alone and he even opposed the extent of this year's hike. But Hicks says despite escalating rates hikes, the council is still spending far more than it brings in. "Just looking at what the costs of the council have been over the last three years, they're extraordinary," he says. "That really worries me because ... it's something like a 59 percent increase in costs, not in rates, but in costs. In my time I don't know of that ever happening here or anywhere. I think that is a really telling statistic on how the council is functioning." But deputy mayor Keith Hovell, who is stepping aside from local politics after October's elections, does not shy away from the rates rises. "We did what needed to be done to secure the financial stability of the council moving forward. And I would hope that the electorate recognises that," he tells RNZ. Hovell was thrust into the role of deputy mayor after a majority of councillors called for Bell's first choice, Stewart MacDonnell, to step down . The retiring councillor defends the efforts of the council this term. "There have been issues at a governance level and we've worked those through, but there are also some underlying issues that feed into that. As councillors, we believe that we were acting in the best interest of the community with what we've done over the last three years and particularly during that first six months," he says. "We were seen as the bad guys, but we believe we were acting in the best interests of the situation that we faced at the time." Hovell has a "clear conscience" after his time around the council table and he says he looks back on his achievements positively. "I think when you look at what we have managed to achieve over the whole three years, and setting aside the slow start that we had, the advances that we've made in the last two years in particular, I think are serving the community extremely well," he says. Deputy mayor Keith Hovell is stepping aside from local politics after October's elections. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Hovell has often been at the frontline of ructions this term. He was instrumental in the call for Bell to step down as mayor, as well as the aborted no-confidence vote and in blocking the petitions calling for Parry's resignation. "I guess I'd sum it up that I retired and retirement's about doing the things you want to do and I am - but not necessarily the way I want to do them all the time," Hovell says. "We went through our initial period and have found a way forward. So we're working together professionally doing what we need to be doing." So what does he make of Bell's leadership? "Ben does bring a particular skillset, particularly what we're working through at present with the three waters. So from his technical background, he's not only able to provide the leadership that's necessary from a mayor, but also some technical input," Hovell says. But after previously leading a mutiny against the young mayor, does Bell now have his support? "The mayor has my confidence to do the job that we all need to do to see us through over the next four or five months." There is a sense among those in Gore, regardless of where they sit in the district's political spectrum, that time has been lost this term. Bell stood at the 2022 elections as part of the Team Hokonui alliance of candidates. In addition to Bell winning the mayoralty, Team Hokonui council candidates Robert McKenzie and Joe Stringer were elected on a promise of change. McKenzie tells RNZ there has been no discussion of resurrecting the group, though he intends to stand for a second term. "I'm definitely standing and I fully support our young mayor Ben Bell," McKenzie says. "I'm definitely standing because there's work to be done. We wasted the first 18 months on political bullshit." A Gore District Council meeting. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Bell also seems to have the backing of his community. Ratepayers and residents who spoke to RNZ outlined a litany of grievances with the council and the work it is doing, but are supportive of Bell and believe he is trying to do the right thing by ratepayers. While in no way a scientific measure of sentiment, those who spoke to RNZ rated Bell's performance between six and eight out of ten, with all unanimously saying fresh blood is good for the council and they are likely or certain to give Bell a vote for a second term - even those who admitted to not voting for him at the last election. Bell has publicly committed to seeking a second term and others are already putting their hand up to run. It is possible a familiar face will be among them. "A month ago I would have said no, and I haven't made a decision, but I have been quite surprised at the number of people that have approached me," Tracy Hicks says. "I'm fearful of where this community's heading, particularly on the fiscal front and I'm very mindful of what has been gained over the years - over almost a century and a half - developing this as a stunning community ... I think there's a lot to make sure that we don't lose." Hicks says his future is in Gore, but he is not convinced that is true for Bell. "I guess I'd been there a long time - 18 years - you can see why people wanted a change, I don't blame them for that," Hicks says. "But I'm not sure change has delivered anything better. In fact, I think ... it put us back. "In saying that I hold no grudges against Ben. He's a young guy who was out to make his name and make a profile for himself, and he's done that. So good on him for that. Is his long-time future representing Gore district or the Gore community or the eastern Southland community? I'm not sure about that." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
