Low aspirin dose 'reduces cancer risk in some patients', Newcastle University-led study says
The furniture maker, based in Newcastle, no longer has any family left alive in the UK."Quite a few members of my family have had cancer - like colorectal cancers, or endometrial," he explained."My grandfather had bladder cancer, my mum had a certain kind of cancer. When you start looking at the family tree - it becomes quite apparent what's going on. "We didn't actually know it was Lynch syndrome until 13 years ago, and that's when I learned about the aspirin trials."
To try and stop himself from developing cancer, Mr James was the first person to sign up to the latest trial nearly 10 years ago.The Cancer Prevention Project 3 study (CaPP3), supported by Cancer Research UK, involved patients taking a different daily dose of aspirin: 100mg, 300mg or 600mg. In the trial, a European-sized dose of 100 mg aspirin was used. The established dose is 75mg per day in the UK, and 81mg in the US.It was only at the end of the study that Mr James learned he had been put on a 300mg dose."The fact that I can now go down to a baby aspirin makes it feel less scary," he said. "I didn't have any major side effects - but it potentially reduces any."That the research has shown that taking an aspirin reduces your risk of getting a cancer if you have Lynch syndrome is massively reassuring for me - and my family."
Optimal dose
People with Lynch syndrome have inherited a faulty gene which can increase their chances of developing some cancers - including bowel and womb cancer.Prof Burn, who was involved in discovering Lynch syndrome and who led the international study, said he focused his research on those patients "because they get so many cancers". "We already have NICE guidance saying people with Lynch syndrome should be recommended to take aspirin. Now we should recommend a baby aspirin." An earlier study led by Prof Burn found a protective effect in those taking 600mg of aspirin every day for just over two years.He said the new results showed the lowest dose worked just as well as the larger doses."So what we can now say with statistical confidence is that the people taking a baby aspirin are as protected as the people taking two aspirins - but also much less likely to have side effects," he added.
In some people, aspirin can cause bleeding, so Prof Burn said he wanted health regulators to now recommend the lowest dose be given to Lynch syndrome patients."Roughly speaking, if someone with Lynch syndrome has about a 2% a year chance of getting mostly bowel cancers, we think if they take aspirin, that is halved - down to about 1% a year," he explained. Prof Burn said the next big challenge was to find those who were unaware they even have Lynch syndrome.He said "about 150,000 patients in the UK" have the condition, but a small number are only tested when they realise cancer runs in their family."It was only when they get cancer in their 40s and 50s, and remember their auntie had cancer, and their granddad."
NHS England said with only 5-10% of patients diagnosed, identifying more people with Lynch syndrome was a strategic priority. Once diagnosed, they can then be offered cancer screening and monitoring. Prof Burn said: "We can also put them on to a baby aspirin - and cut their risk." The findings of the study will be presented at the Cancer Prevention Research Conference, taking place in London from Wednesday, in partnership with the American Cancer Society.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Senior nurse warned of ‘nightmare' baby-killing bacteria in Lucy Letby unit
A senior nurse at Lucy Letby 's hospital warned she was facing her 'worst nightmare' after deadly bacteria was found on several taps in the 'over-capacity' baby unit, leaked emails show. Eirian Powell, the manager of the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital, argued the department was 'taking too many risks' and 'compromising patient safety'. The email was sent to senior managers in December 2015, the middle of the period in which there was a spike of baby deaths at the unit, for which Letby was convicted of murder. Former Estates Management staff at the hospital also told The Telegraph that nappy pads were placed in the ceiling of the unit to prevent sewage leaking through. The Telegraph has previously reported that the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa had colonised taps in the nurseries of the neonatal unit, including intensive care. But the extent of the outbreak has only now come to light through the leaked emails. Ms Powell wrote the email after discovering that a second sink in her unit had tested positive. Copying in Tony Chambers, the trust's chief executive, she wrote: 'We are currently over-capacity and this is my worst nightmare. 'I feel that we are taking too many risks and compromising patient safety. I want filters put on all taps until we have the ALL clear.' A risk register seen by The Telegraph shows that filters had to be kept on the taps for months indicating that the hospital struggled to eliminate the bug. The problem was labelled as 'high risk' on the register, which also warned there was a 'high risk' from ongoing doctor shortages in the unit. Records show that the taps in the baby unit were fitted with bacterial filters in an attempt to deal with the issue. But a former member of the Estates Management team told The Telegraph there were regular call-outs to the unit when the filters became detached from the taps, increasing the risk of infection. He said he was concerned about the safety of the vulnerable babies in the unit, believing the ward should have been shut down until the bacteria risk had been eliminated. Speaking anonymously, he said: 'I could not understand why the most vulnerable patients in the hospital were being cared for in that unit which was not fit for purpose. I thought it was dangerous. Everyone in Estates did.' He also described how there were regular call outs to deal with foul water from the pipes which carried macerator waste and sewage above the unit. When there were blockages the waste would seep out of the pipes and through the ceiling tiles in the unit. The team was forced to put multiple absorbent nappy pads in the ceiling area to stop any waste from dripping down The former worker also said the sinks were often blocked, adding that the release of the blockage 'could be explosive with big splashes of foul water and the cleaners would not be on hand immediately'. 'I'd unblock a sink using a plunger with babies still in the room. All of the lads would raise issues. It was an ongoing battle of firefighting with leaks and blockages,' he said. Mark McDonald, Letby's barrister, said: 'This is yet another indication as to why this unit was not fit for purpose. 'It has now become clear that there is a strong argument that Lucy was a scapegoat for a dysfunctional, under-resourced and understaffed neonatal department.' The jury was never told about the bacterial outbreak or the full extent of the sewage problems on the unit, while the new email and full risk register were never disclosed to Letby's defence team. At Letby's trial, the prosecution claimed that testing had ruled out infections in the babies, but during the Thirlwall Inquiry – which is looking into how the killing might have been stopped – Dr Susie Holt said it was 'difficult to eliminate them'. Consultant Dr Murthy Saladi also told the inquiry that before the finger had been pointed at Letby, he was concerned that the baby deaths and collapses were due to an outbreak of the pseudomonas in the unit. Dr Rachel Lambie, a former paediatric registrar at the Countess of Chester, also told the inquiry that she was initially concerned that two indictment babies had been geographically close to each other in the unit and may have picked up the same infection. She said she had 'personally raised' the issue of an environmental toxin and that pseudomonas was 'being considered'. Pseudomonas is known to be lethal to vulnerable babies. In 2012, a premature baby died and 12 others needed treatment at Southmead Hospital in Bristol after an outbreak of a water-borne bacterium. Three premature babies also died after contracting the bug at the Royal Jubilee Maternity Hospital in Belfast in January 2012. In that case, sink taps were found to be the source of infection. A baby had died from the same infection six weeks earlier in Derry. Letby is serving 15 whole life terms for the murder of seven infants and the attempted murder of seven more, but since her conviction dozens of medical and statistical experts have voiced concerns about the evidence. The safety of Letby's convictions is currently under consideration by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which investigates potential miscarriages of justice in England. A spokesman at the Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust said: 'Due to the Thirlwall Inquiry and the ongoing police investigations, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.' A new documentary, Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?, is being aired on ITV1 and ITVX on Sunday at 10.20pm. The show's producers said: 'After two trials, nurse Lucy Letby was found guilty of killing seven newborn babies and attempting to kill seven others in one of the most shocking murder cases in British history. 'Described as a cold-blooded, calculating killer, Letby was said to have used her trusted role to cause catastrophic harm to the most vulnerable newborn babies 'So why are a growing number of expert voices now questioning the evidence used to convict her? This programme explores the views of a team of international scientists who say the prosecution case simply doesn't stand up to scrutiny.'
The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Budget UK supermarket recalls popular chicken product over dangerous health risk as shoppers warned ‘do NOT eat'
A MAJOR supermarket has urgently recalled a product over a possible health risk. Customers have been warned not to eat the popular item as it could be lethal. Lidl has pulled out Tempura 4 Chicken Steaks off the shelves as it has undeclared allergens. The item contains milk but does not emphasise it in bold in the ingredients list. It poses a dangerous health risk to anyone with an allergy or intolerance to milk. Customers should look out for boxes with best before dates of 11/12/2026, 16/12/2026, 22/12/2026, 30/12/2026. The Food Standards Agency issued a warning to shoppers today saying "do not eat it." A point-of-sale notice has also been issued to customers explaining why the product is being recalled and instructing them what to do if they have bought it. Shoppers are advised to return the product to the point of sale where they will receive a full refund with or without a receipt. It comes just days after the viral Dubai-style chocolate bar was recalled for having an undeclared ingredient. Shops selling the product were warned to immediately stop sales and undertake product withdrawals. The internet sensation contained peanuts which was not declared on the packaging. Thousands of contaminated tablets are urgently recalled in UK as Brits fall ill with 'antibiotic resistant Salmonella' It posed a health risk to anyone with a peanut allergy or peanut intolerance. Businesses had been supplied the chocolate by a company called Black Sea Trading Ltd, who had "so far been uncontactable." Shoppers were urged not to buy the product and not to eat the chocolate if they had already bought it. Anyone who had purchased the chocolate was encouraged to dispose of it at home. The Food Standards Agency encouraged customers to contact their local Trading Standards and report where they had purchased the chocolate. Your product recall rights Chief consumer reporter James Flanders reveals all you need to know. Product recalls are an important means of protecting consumers from dangerous goods. As a general rule, if a recall involves a branded product, the manufacturer would usually have lead responsibility for the recall action. But it's often left up to supermarkets to notify customers when products could put them at risk. If you are concerned about the safety of a product you own, always check the manufacturer's website to see if a safety notice has been issued. When it comes to appliances, rather than just food items, the onus is usually on you - the customer - to register the appliance with the manufacturer as if you don't there is no way of contacting you to tell you about a fault. If you become aware that an item you own has been recalled or has any safety noticed issued against it, make sure you follow the instructions given to you by the manufacturer. They should usually provide you with more information and a contact number on its safety notice. In some cases, the manufacturer might ask you to return the item for a full refund or arrange for the faulty product to be collected. You should not be charged for any recall work - such as a repair, replacement or collection of the recalled item
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
The everyday hairstyle making Brits go bald & the easy trick to solve it, according to a hairdresser
A HAIR expert has revealed that brushing wet hair may cause more permanent damage to hair follicles than many people realise - and can lead to you going bald. Dr Roshan Vara, from Treatment Rooms London, said this common post-shower habit weakens hair structure at a molecular level, potentially leading to increased breakage and thinning over time. 3 They shared: "Wet hair has a lot of physical differences to hair when it's dry and that can affect its ability to handle stress from brushing. 'Water affects the hair shaft, and as a result, it experiences stretches in the cuticle because of swelling and that leads to breakage due to the strain.' Hair researchers have found that wet hair can stretch more than dry hair before breaking, but this apparent elasticity is misleading. Dr Roshan explained: "Wet hair causes stretching which damages the protein structure, leading to weaker hair over time.' So how do you combat this? SAFE SOLUTION Wide-tooth combs should be used instead of brushes, for wet hair, according to the hair transplant expert. Dr Roshan continued: "If you haven't brushed your hair before you wet it, don't use a standard brush, use a wide-tooth comb and start from the ends and work your way up. 'Never start brushing from the roots when hair is wet - you must avoid doing this to prevent damage.' According to Dr Roshan, styling techniques that combine wetness and heat exacerbate the damage. They added: "Using a hairdryer on soaking wet hair is particularly damaging, even if many may do that without even thinking. My hair's so thin you can see my scalp but miracle £8 buy fixes it in seconds 'The speed of which water is removed from the hair shaft can cause essentially a rupturing effect which pushes out the cuticle and leads to hair falling out as it isn't as strong as it needs to be." The protection of the hair cuticle continues its decline as a result of aggressive brushing on wet hair. Fine hair and chemically treated hair – whether coloured, permed or relaxed – are especially susceptible to wet brushing damage because their protein structure is already altered. TINA Farey, Editorial director at Rush Hair, shares her advice… HOW TO RESTORE DAMAGED HAIR Whilst you can't fully reserve the effects of damaged hair, you can stop the problem from growing. Depending on the condition of your hair, I'd recommend getting a trim every six to eight weeks - this will prevent any split ends from travelling further up the hair shaft, which weakens the hair's overall structure and leads to more breakage. Even just an inch of the ends will completely transform the appearance of your hair – trust me. When it comes to products to help restore damaged hair, Goldwell's Rich Repair Treatment Mask is a firm favourite – strengthening damaged locks to be healthy and shiny once again. HOW TO PREVENT DAMAGE My number one tip is to always use a heat protectant – even if you're only blow-drying your hair. Consistent heat styling without one will leave your hair open to heat damage. I'd also recommend refraining from over-washing your hair as this can strip the hair of its natural oils – nobody wants a dry and irritated scalp! And finally, swap your sleek, slick back for a hair down day! They may be in fashion at the moment, but over time all that tension on your strands from being pulled will wreak havoc on your hair follicles – this could lead to thinning and bald spots in areas where the hair is constantly pulled.
