Low aspirin dose 'reduces cancer risk in some patients', Newcastle University-led study says
The furniture maker, based in Newcastle, no longer has any family left alive in the UK."Quite a few members of my family have had cancer - like colorectal cancers, or endometrial," he explained."My grandfather had bladder cancer, my mum had a certain kind of cancer. When you start looking at the family tree - it becomes quite apparent what's going on. "We didn't actually know it was Lynch syndrome until 13 years ago, and that's when I learned about the aspirin trials."
To try and stop himself from developing cancer, Mr James was the first person to sign up to the latest trial nearly 10 years ago.The Cancer Prevention Project 3 study (CaPP3), supported by Cancer Research UK, involved patients taking a different daily dose of aspirin: 100mg, 300mg or 600mg. In the trial, a European-sized dose of 100 mg aspirin was used. The established dose is 75mg per day in the UK, and 81mg in the US.It was only at the end of the study that Mr James learned he had been put on a 300mg dose."The fact that I can now go down to a baby aspirin makes it feel less scary," he said. "I didn't have any major side effects - but it potentially reduces any."That the research has shown that taking an aspirin reduces your risk of getting a cancer if you have Lynch syndrome is massively reassuring for me - and my family."
Optimal dose
People with Lynch syndrome have inherited a faulty gene which can increase their chances of developing some cancers - including bowel and womb cancer.Prof Burn, who was involved in discovering Lynch syndrome and who led the international study, said he focused his research on those patients "because they get so many cancers". "We already have NICE guidance saying people with Lynch syndrome should be recommended to take aspirin. Now we should recommend a baby aspirin." An earlier study led by Prof Burn found a protective effect in those taking 600mg of aspirin every day for just over two years.He said the new results showed the lowest dose worked just as well as the larger doses."So what we can now say with statistical confidence is that the people taking a baby aspirin are as protected as the people taking two aspirins - but also much less likely to have side effects," he added.
In some people, aspirin can cause bleeding, so Prof Burn said he wanted health regulators to now recommend the lowest dose be given to Lynch syndrome patients."Roughly speaking, if someone with Lynch syndrome has about a 2% a year chance of getting mostly bowel cancers, we think if they take aspirin, that is halved - down to about 1% a year," he explained. Prof Burn said the next big challenge was to find those who were unaware they even have Lynch syndrome.He said "about 150,000 patients in the UK" have the condition, but a small number are only tested when they realise cancer runs in their family."It was only when they get cancer in their 40s and 50s, and remember their auntie had cancer, and their granddad."
NHS England said with only 5-10% of patients diagnosed, identifying more people with Lynch syndrome was a strategic priority. Once diagnosed, they can then be offered cancer screening and monitoring. Prof Burn said: "We can also put them on to a baby aspirin - and cut their risk." The findings of the study will be presented at the Cancer Prevention Research Conference, taking place in London from Wednesday, in partnership with the American Cancer Society.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Extension plan for Derby dental surgery approved
A dental surgery in Derby is set to be extended to treat more City Council has given the go-ahead for Blagreaves Dental Practice in Littleover to build a first-floor side comes at a time when low numbers of people are getting access to dental care in Derby and Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) has contacted the surgery for comment. A 2022 report showed that almost 23% of adults in Derby (figures dated 2022) had access to NHS dentistry, compared to 31% in Dental Practice is located at the junction of Blagreaves Lane and Oaklands Avenue, with staff parking at the front and a patients' car park at the were lodged to extend the premises earlier this year because the surgery is "at capacity" and needs more say an expansion will "enhance patient experience" and "future-proof the site's role as a vital community health resource".
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Grandparents are carers out of love – and necessity
I look after my grandchildren – at least a few hours for one day a week, often more ('There's an overwhelming bond of love': the grandparents whose kids rely on them to raise a family, 29 July). I love them deeply, and want to offer them whatever steadiness I can, while I can. But love alone isn't what holds this together. I also care for them because their parents, like so many others, are stretched to the edge. Childcare is unaffordable. Work is relentless. There's little left in reserve. Many grandparents step in not as a choice, but as the only available buffer in a fraying system. But that help comes at a cost. Caring for young children is tiring at any age; for older adults, after a full day or more, the next day is often a write-off too, which seems to be something almost no policy takes into account. This reflects the gradual withdrawal of social responsibility from care, and the assumption that families will absorb the shock. We're seeing the effects of this every day through exhaustion, silence and strain carried behind closed doors. As a systemic psychotherapist, I try to pay attention to patterns; what holds people together, and what pulls them apart. One pattern I see is that the work of care has become more vital, yet less visible. Grandparents, like many others, are holding families together behind the scenes. But we rarely speak about it, and policy almost never accounts for it. In this era of rapidly evolving climate disruption and growing social fragility, care is the connective tissue that keeps communities alive. If we fail to recognise and support it, we weaken the very systems we'll need to face what's Hugh PalmerPocklington, East Yorkshire I read your article with great interest as the grandparent of four children, but was sad that you did not take the opportunity to comment on the benefits and burdens for those of us who care full-time for our grandchildren. Over half of the estimated 140,000 children in kinship care are with grandparents full-time, and we are most definitely 'taking on a level of grandparenting that looks a lot more like parenting'. We do miss out on 'just being Granny' as we perform the parenting role with the grandchildren in our care. One of the losses I feel as we parent our 12-year‑old grandson towards adulthood is that he misses out on grandparents and we miss out on grandparenting. Unlike part-time grandparent carers, we don't have less anxiety as we deal with loss of work and income, lack of support, and difficult relationships with biological parents. And our chances of pursuing our own retirement plans are not limited – they're gone. We also struggle with the cost, the sense of obligation and the feeling of having no choice, but to a much greater extent. And we most certainly 'plug the gaps of a system not fit for purpose'. In our case, this is the children's social care system. The alternative forms of care for our grandchildren continue to have persistent deficits that lead to very poor life chances. There are so many benefits to us in terms of the loving relationships we have with our grandchildren, but the deficits are often serious and damaging to our mental health and, sometimes, the stability of our kinship and address supplied When I read about grandparents caring for and loving their grandchildren I feel such utter sadness and envy. Not because my children don't have grandparents but because their grandparents aren't interested in being around them. It's a certain kind of heartache, not to mention the practical side of living with the exhaustion of not having help and having a disabled child. I know they are busy, they have their lives to live, and I understand their desire to protect that. But I will never understand their indifference to their grandchildren and our situation. Everyone who has parents who are involved in their grandchildren's lives are the luckiest people – I hope they know and address supplied Surely grandparents being heavily involved in child raising is only new for the middle classes? Nans at the school gate was absolutely the norm when I was growing up in the 80s, and as a mother of 10, my mother's Mam always had a houseful of HoughtonNewport Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The harsh reality of ‘extreme morning sickness'
Abi Stephenson's article about hyperemesis gravidarum – 'extreme morning sickness' – carried me through memories, confirmation, horror and, at last, hope (Don't call it morning sickness: 'At times in my pregnancy I wondered if this was death coming for me', 31 July). When I hear of a new pregnancy, I ask after the mother, recalling my two pregnancies in the early 1990s. Both ended with successful delivery, and I can't imagine life without my two children. But I wonder whether my daughter will have inherited my predisposition to sickness throughout pregnancy, just as I did from my own mother. It is wonderful news to think there might be some safe medical option for her and many other women. I had many miserable days and nights with sick bowl to hand, eating one Rice Krispie every 30 minutes and always, always, throwing it back up. I theorised that a morsel of sugary goodness would get through, somehow. For my second pregnancy, under pressure to return to work after six weeks' sick leave, I spent a morning in the staff toilet before being allowed home again for another month. The nausea and vomiting started before a positive pregnancy test and ended within hours of giving birth. It took a lot of persuasion for me to embark on a second pregnancy and I've never regretted it, but memories soon fade. Since then I've had chemotherapy, which made me so sick that I required all the anti‑nausea drugs on offer. But being pregnant was worse, maybe because I hadn't anticipated fighting to stay alive as part of the deal. Thanks, Abi, for giving voice to an issue that affects many of us, and causes women to die while pregnant – yet is Wendy BryantChappel, Essex Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
