
I spent decade looking into twisted mind of Moors Murderer Ian Brady…reason he kept victim's body hidden made me sick
Even fellow serial killer the Yorkshire Ripper was horrified at the way he tortured and murdered children before callously dumping their bodies - crimes so twisted that bosses at Broadmoor refused to accept him as a patient.
16
16
Most people would recoil at the idea of delving into the dark recesses of the Moors Murderer 's mind - but that's exactly what Britain's top amateur criminologist Alfie James did, for a decade.
He swapped scores of letters with Brady as he tried to work out the motivation for his unspeakable crimes, just as he has done with a string of other murderers on both sides of the Atlantic.
And he gained a unique insight into what made one of Britain's most notorious ever serial killers tick.
Speaking exclusively to The Sun as part of our Meeting a Monster series, Alfie said: 'He was very self-centred and had this over-inflated sense of his own superiority.
'He thought he was more intelligent than everyone, and he never took responsibility for anything.
'He was always trying to shift the blame onto others and could never accept that what he had done was wrong.'
Brady and his lover Myra Hindley sexually assaulted, tortured and murdered five children in Manchester in the 1960s in a series of crimes which shocked Britain.
At their trial in 1966 a horrific tape recording they had made of one of their victims screaming and begging for mercy was played.
The couple's relationship had been crucial to the crimes, and Brady was convinced they would remain close even after they were convicted and jailed for life.
But Alfie revealed how Brady became furious at what he saw as Hindley's lack of 'loyalty' over her attempts to secure parole and also when she struck up a relationship with a female prison warder.
Moors Murders viewers rage 'my blood is boiling' as CGI brings evil Ian Brady and Myra Hindley 'back from the dead'
16
Bizarrely, he claimed he could have freed her from prison after just 15 years and was so angry with her he refused to use her name in letters he sent Alfie, instead referring to her as 'M'.
In one letter he said of her: 'Now, of course, I couldn't care less. All sense of obligation departed when she began lying against me to secure parole. Had she remained loyal, I could have had her out in 15 years.'
Alfie said: 'He never explained how he was going to secure her freedom, and in reality he never would have been able to, of course.
'But that was typical of him. He thought he was so intelligent that he could secure her release. It was another one of his superior boasts.
'He did like to reminisce about his earlier life with her, though. He used to talk about going on motorbike trips with her, riding over Shap in Cumbria on the Great North Road, heading from Manchester to Glasgow where he was from.
'He said, 'We would sit on a wall and have a couple of drinks, something to eat. I would discard a bottle and it would smash on the ground. That bottle will still be there now and will be for hundreds of years as a reminder that we once walked here.'
'It was like ghost talk, about things linked to him that would be around long after he was gone.
'He would describe how they would get to Glasgow as morning was breaking with the streets all quiet. He liked that.
'And whenever he was travelling around he liked visiting churches, not for any religious experience, he liked the smell of them.
'As he was telling me these things I couldn't help but think about the things he had done and thought, 'You of all people should not be in a church.'
'Meeting Hindley was obviously crucial to their crimes but he even passed off any sort of responsibility for that, blaming it on 'circumstances' that led him to have to get a job at the chemical distribution company where she later got taken on as a typist.
'If circumstances had not led him to get that job he would never have met her and the murders would not have happened, he said.
'As if he didn't have any free will. I would think - you say you are so clever, then why couldn't you stop it happening?'
'Sick in the head'
16
Alfie and Brady swapped around 150 letters over the years they were writing to each other, part of an incredible library of true crime material that factory worker Alfie, 49, has built up.
It includes a trove of letters and other material acquired over nearly 20 years from Peter Sutcliffe, which he turned into the definitive biography of the killer, I'm The Yorkshire Ripper, written with Sun reporter Robin Perrie.
It was during those conversations that Sutcliffe disclosed to Alife just how much he despised Brady.
Sutcliffe said: 'Ian Brady seems to actually enjoy people's suffering, but then that's the trademark of a psychopath.
'He had an air of… like he thought he was… like a snob, like very important.
'He's just a psychopath, an idiot, full of himself and he's shallow, very shallow and stupid, he's not intelligent really in the real sense of the word. Thinks he's the bee's knees. He's sick in the head.'
Sutcliffe wasn't the only one who thought Brady was beyond help.
Dr Pat McGrath, one of the medical experts who gave evidence at the Yorkshire Ripper's trial, was the medical superintendent at Broadmoor when the authorities considered transferring Brady there after he was diagnosed as a psychopath in 1985.
But Dr McGrath refused to accept him, saying he was one of only two people he had met who he thought were evil, not sick, and therefore could not be treated.
Instead he was sent to top security Ashworth Hospital on Merseyside, which is where he was when he and Alfie started corresponding.
Those held at places such as Ashworth and Broadmoor are treated as patients, not prisoners, and have more freedom than criminals held in jails.
Alfie saw that first-hand thanks to the content of the letters Brady sent him.
He said: 'He poured out all of his hatred for the system on these pages of the letters he sent me. He said of the staff, 'I don't speak to any of the maggots'.
'I was amazed at the things he said about the staff. The letters were checked as they all had a little slip of paper confirming that the postal monitor had read them.
'But they never crossed anything out. They let all his hatred spill out from beyond the hospital walls, which I was surprised at.
'There were things crossed out in some of Sutcliffe's letters, so the post monitors seemed stricter in Broadmoor than Ashworth.'
Missing remains
16
16
16
Alfie repeatedly quizzed Brady over the enduring mystery at the heart of the Moors Murders case – the location of Keith Bennett's body.
Brady and Hindley killed the 12-year-old in 1964 and buried his body on Saddleworth Moor, but despite repeated searches the police have never found him.
The pair were even taken back to the moor on a number of occasions but were unable to pinpoint the spot.
Brady later told Alfie he would never help the police to look again – for fear that others would take the credit.
Alife said: 'I asked him again and again. He said, 'It's history. I'll never repeat my offer to help.'
'He blamed the police for messing up the searches when he did go to the moor. So the fact that Keith's family couldn't have a proper funeral wasn't his fault, it was 'the police's fault'.
Brady blamed the police for messing up the searches when he did go to the moor. So the fact that Keith's family couldn't have a proper funeral wasn't his fault, it was 'the police's fault'
Alfie James
'It was another example of him refusing to accept responsibility.
'A few years later I asked him again, and this time he said he would be willing to help.
'But then he changed his mind, saying they messed it up and would be squabbling about who's going to get the publicity over it, who would get the glory if Keith was found.'
In one letter Brady wrote: 'Politicians, police and this penal warehouse spent their only effort on squabbling for the most PR for themselves. I won't repeat the offer.'
Dodged questions
In the early years of their relationship, Alfie keenly anticipated receiving one of Brady's letters, looking forward to fresh insights into his motivation for the crimes.
Alfie said: 'He was a good letter writer. He was intelligent, his punctuation was always spot on and he had a good memory for detail.
'His letters would be front and back, sometimes four pages, with really small writing, so there was a lot of detail. But he often dodged questions.
'Serial killers sometimes start out by hurting animals, and I had read about him throwing a cat off a roof, so I asked him about it.
'But instead of saying whether he had or had not done it, and if he had why, he ranted about the Royal Family killing animals by going shooting. Again, avoiding responsibility for his own actions.'
The letters were also becoming hate-filled rants.
He branded support for missing Madeleine McCann as "hypocritical hype" and accused people of 'whining' about the 7/7 attacks which killed 52 people in London in 2005.
He also branded the UK as 'the a***hole of Europe."
The letters became so bitter – and so boring – that Alife eventually called time on their relationship a few years before Brady died in Ashworth in 2017, aged 79.
He said: 'The letters were getting more and more repetitive and were all about the hardship he claimed he was suffering because Ashworth wouldn't let him starve himself to death.
'There was not a single word of remorse for his victims or their families.
'It was all me, me, me - which I guess speaks volumes about how the mind of a serial killer works.'
'I'm The Yorkshire Ripper' by Robin Perrie and Alfie James is published by Mirror Books and is available in paperback and as an ebook. Buy it on Amazon now.
16
16

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Police arrest dozens of protesters for supporting banned Palestine Action including vicar after activists' vows to go 'floppy' - a week after priest, 83, was among 29 seized
Police have today arrested more than 70 protesters for supporting newly banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action. A vicar was among at least 42 people detained by Scotland Yard officers as activists gathered for a second week in a row beside a statue of Gandhi in London 's Parliament Square, holding placards reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Another 16 arrests were made in Manchester and 13 people were also held in Cardiff at other related demonstrations on Saturday. A briefing document circulated to activists ahead of the action told protesters to 'go floppy' when they are arrested as it 'adds to the visual drama', reported The Telegraph. Five officers were today seen carrying one tattooed protester by her arms and legs, with one supporting her head. Some demonstrators could be seen lying on top of each other on the floor as police searched their bags and took their ID cards and handmade signs. Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square. Other standing protesters were also led away from the statues and placed into the vans. The last of the protesters was lifted from the Nelson Mandela statue shortly after 2.30pm. Those held were of mixed ages, from their 20s to 70s and many said they had jobs and had been arrested before. Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square. Other standing protesters were also led away from the statues and placed into the vans. The offences mainly related to Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000, an officer said. One protester, an architect called Steve, 59, said: 'I'm terrified. But some things in this world are bigger than fear of arrest. I will do whatever it takes to highlight this problem. 'They (the police) can do whatever they want. I don't care.' This Saturday is the second weekend Palestine Action supporters have protested and been arrested. A small group of protesters sat at the steps of the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Parliament Square for the demonstration, organised by campaign group Defend Our Juries, shortly after 1pm and received a brief applause. The individuals then wrote the message 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' with black markers on pieces of cardboard and silently held the signs aloft, surrounded by Metropolitan Police officers, who formed a cordon, and members of the media. A number of demonstrators were carried away by police by their legs and arms after refusing to walk. A social care worker, who gave her name as Kate, 42, was taken away by police as demonstrators shouted 'free free Palestine around her'. Several people were arrested at Parliament Square in London for supporting newly banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action Around ten people in Parliament Square were held by a group of Met Officers next to a statue of Gandhi after they held placards which said: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action' Officers could be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square Others yelled 'from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free' - a controversial chant which some say is a call for Israel not to exist. Kate was holding a sign which said: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' She said: 'It's shocking. I'm terrified. But the greater risk is genocide. That's more important. I don't have a phone. I've never been arrested before. 'I can't work because I've been trouble before connected to these activities. 'I was in social care. I had a good job. Nobody will employ me now. They'll think I'm a terrorist after this as well.' An elderly man - believed to be in his 70s - looked visibly unwell as he was taken into the back of a police van. A woman in her 40s was also taken away. Scotland Yard said its stance remains that officers will act where criminal offences, including support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed. A spokesperson for the Met police said: 'We are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action. Officers are in the process of making arrests.' This is the second round of protests in London in support of Palestinian Action and the group have said they will continue to take to Parliament Square every week. Last Saturday police arrested almost 30 people on suspicion of terrorism offences after protesters gathered in Parliament Square also holding signs supporting Palestine Action, just hours after a ban on the came into effect. One of those arrested was an 83-year-old priest and the Met said: 'The law doesn't have an age limit'. Around two dozen people, including a priest, professor and an emergency care worker who is just back from Gaza, sat in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square on Saturday expressing support for the group, which is now a proscribed terrorist organisation. They held signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Shortly after their arrival, police officers could be seen engaging with the protesters and the Met said it had began making arrests. Several people were seen being carried away by officers. A spokesperson for the force said: 'Officers are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. 'The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence. Arrests are being made.' They later added: 'A total of 29 arrests were made during this afternoon's protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. They remain in custody.' It comes after the Home Office today last week the ban on Palestine Action, with the group failing to block its proscription as a terrorist organisation in a late-night legal bid. Lawyers representing co-founder Huda Ammori, whose father is Palestinian, asked for the decision to be delayed at least until July 21. The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. This includes chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos. Palestine Action argues it is a protest group that has never incited or encouraged violence, but does support civil disobedience. Activists protest against the continuing war in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians since October 7 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed by a Hamas incursion into the country. One of those protesting last week is former government lawyer Tim Crosland. He said: 'There are already 18 Palestine Actionists held in UK prisons without a trial, following lobbying by the Israeli government and Elbit Systems, the leading supplier of the machinery of genocide. 'If we cannot speak freely about the genocide of Palestinians, if we cannot condemn those who enable it and praise those who resist it, then the right to freedom of expression has no meaning, and democracy in this country is dead.' In a post shared on X, Defend Our Juries said the protesters had been arrested 'for holding cardboard signs' and that further arrests had been made at the Manchester demonstration. Scotland Yard said its stance remains that officers will act where criminal offences, including support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed. The force added that this includes 'chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos'. The terror group designation means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move to ban the organisation came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.


Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
TikTok troublemaker 'Mizzy', 20, insists he's turning his life around after the birth of his second child
TikTok troublemaker ' Mizzy ' has declared that he is turning his life around and looking to the future following the recent birth of his second child. The 20-year-old Londoner sparked outrage for his vile 'pranks' shared online which included walking into strangers' houses, stealing an elderly woman's dog, ripping up library books and asking random passers-by, 'Do you want to die?'. In 2023, he was sentenced to 18 weeks in prison for breaking a court order that blocked him from filming people without their consent, with a judge informing him that his social media stunts were 'not funny'. But now the notorious TikTok terror, whose real name is Bacari-Bronze O'Garro, has revealed his hopes to make a better future for both himself and his two children - the youngest of whom was born a month ago, with the elder now aged two. Sharing that he is now focused on 'growth, responsibility and having a purpose', O'Garro insisted he had 'learned' from his 'past mistakes'. Speaking to The Star, the content creator said: 'The main thing I'm motivated by is my family, especially my newborn and my first child, because I'm focused on building a better future for myself and them. 'If I was going the way I was going, I probably would have ended up in jail for how long. Having these two young ones, I'm going to prove to myself and others I can do things the right way.' Adding that his extreme pranks were due to his once 'impulsive' nature, O'Garro said that he previously believed he would get online fame from going viral, but had failed to consider the consequences. The 20-year-old Londoner sparked outrage for his vile 'pranks' shared online which included walking into strangers' houses, stealing an elderly woman's dog and ripping up library books He did, however, insist that he has no regrets, stating that to harbor regret 'means I'm regretting my past, my life story'. Last April, the father-of-two announced that he had returned to college to 'change my life around'. He did not, however, issue an apology to any of the individuals he tormented and ominously declared that he would be 'returning to social media'. Taking to social media platform X to share the news, O'Garro wrote: 'The day I came out of jail I told myself I am never going back and that imma do whatever it takes to change my life around so I can do better for my child and the people around me. [sic] 'So I went back to college, started looking for loads of jobs and signed up to a CSCS course.' He added: 'Now I'm trying to progress further in different aspects of my life and change any negative perceptions on me and of course I won't be able to change everyone's mind due to how I've portrayed myself in the past on social media, but I hopefully resonate with the people who understand. 'Yes, I will be returning to socials and posting videos eventually but only in a way that will prevent me from being in risk of harm and anyone else. 'So make sure your following up because the return of Mizzy could be sooner than you think*' In May 2023, O'Garro was ordered by Thames Magistrates' Court 'not to upload directly or indirectly, any original video content on social media, without prior documented consent of the people in that content' In May 2023, O'Garro was ordered by Thames Magistrates' Court 'not to upload directly or indirectly, any original video content on social media, without prior documented consent of the people in that content'. The content creator shared a photo of him leaving HMP Thameside on X. Then, just a month later, MailOnline revealed how the troublemaker, of Hackney, east London, had been taken to Thames Magistrates' Court on suspicion of a tag breach. A spokesman for the Met Police confirmed that the case was withdrawn by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), and that Mizzy was released with no further action. Releasing a video that showed the moment he was arrested by police officers captioned: 'The Matrix sent their agents', Mizzy appeared to refute allegations that he was not home when police tried to install his tag. An officer claimed that on June 12, just after midnight, police visited the residence and Mizzy did not appear to be in. The teen claims he was asleep. The video was posted just one day after he shared footage of himself sneaking through an open flat door while its residents sit on the balcony. Mizzy was then seen opening two bedroom doors and laughing until the homeowners notice, running towards him. He is then chased out the flat by a barking Alsatian. Mizzy previously shared footage of himself sneaking through an open flat door while its residents sit on the balcony. He was then seen opening two bedroom doors and laughing until the homeowners notice, running towards him In November 2023, a court ruled that he 'deliberately and intentionally' flouted the order requiring documented consent just hours after it had been imposed. During a trial at Stratford Magistrates Court, it was heard how O'Garro began sharing videos of people without their consent at Westfield Stratford, a location he had been banned from under the court order, 'within hours' of the criminal behaviour order being passed. Other videos shared on O'Garro's Snapchat account, which were also in breach, showed him grabbing hold of a schoolboy by his uniform and another showed him fighting a man with dwarfism, which O'Garro claimed were hoax videos made with their prior agreement. O'Garro's claim that one of his friends, who had access to his login details, posted the Twitter videos without his consent, was dismissed by Judge Matthew Bone as 'inconceivable'. Judge Bone also highlighted the fact that on May 24, the same day the criminal behaviour order was imposed, O'Garro had appeared on Piers Morgan's TalkTV show Uncensored and slated the UK's criminal justice system. Later that evening, in the video posted from Westfield Stratford, O'Garro said to the camera: 'I'm banned from this place, I can't go in here. The UK law is a joke.' District Judge Bone found him guilty 'on two occasions of an intentional and a deliberate challenge to this order' - for the video filmed at Westfield, and for footage in which he 'roughed up' a schoolboy and a man with dwarfism and posted the video to Snapchat on July 7, 2023. O'Garro was found not guilty of breaching the order for two videos – one, posted to X, of him cycling around a Sainsburys, and another which showed him doing the same through a Jobcentre. O'Garro was found not guilty of breaching the order for two videos – one, posted to X, of him cycling around a Sainsburys (pictured), and another which showed him doing the same through a Jobcentre The youngster was sentenced to 18 weeks at a young offenders' institution due to the age at which he committed the offence. As he sentenced him, Judge Bone said O'Garro's actions had been motivated by a desire to 'receive money and designer clothes from sponsors'. He continued: 'Your further offending was motivated by your desire to be famous. Your actions caused innocent members of the public significant harm and distress. 'You claimed on national television the law was weak. Put bluntly, your pranks are not funny.' He added: 'I concede that there may be some prospect of rehabilitation in the community, and I accept the mitigation. 'But it must be clearly understood by all that for such an immediate breach of the criminal behaviour order, detention is what is appropriate. 'The defendant caused ordinary members of the public harassment, alarm, and distress – and then profited from that. I want to ensure this does not happen again.' District Judge Bone also strengthened O'Garro's already existing criminal behaviour order, banning him from posting videos on social media for the next two years. He said: 'Following application by the prosecutor, I am satisfied that the criminal behaviour order you were subjected to should be strengthened. 'Your allure to fame is clear, meaning you need further help so as to not reoffend. 'Therefore, for two years starting from today, you must not publish or share or attempt to publish or share any video footage; you must not act with anyone else to publish or share or attempt to publish or share any video footage; and you must not contribute to any social media account other than your own. 'You must not trespass on any private property, or enter the E20 postcode area of London, unless travelling on public transport for pre-arranged child arrangements.' In mitigation remarks, Barrister Paul Lennon, defending O'Garro, urged the court to consider his young age and his personal circumstances, insisting that he was 'actively trying to better himself'. He added: 'Mr O'Garro was 18 at the time of the offending. 'He is currently studying at Haringey Sixth Form College. At the end of the course, which I am told he is performing extremely well on, he will have the opportunity to move on to higher education. 'He is predicted to achieve a distinction. He is very academic, very hands-on, and his timekeeping is good. 'He has recently gained employment as a waiter at a restaurant in Islington. 'In terms of his family relationships, his relationship with his mother is both good and bad. He has not had any contact with his father since he was two years old. 'He has two sisters, who he has good relationships with. One sister is in court today. 'His relationship with the mother of his child is difficult, but he still attempts to have as much time with his child as he can. 'The clear factor in mitigation here is his age, his immaturity. But he is in college, he is employed, he is actively trying to better himself.' But District Judge Bone refused to hand O'Garro only a community sentence, although he did say he had taken mitigation into account – in particular his age, the fact that 'he did not have the best start in life', and the 'helpful character statement provided by Haringey College for the pre-sentencing report.' Speaking outside court, Yasmin Lalani – Detective Chief Inspector at the Central East Command for the Met Police, said: 'I think it is appropriate sentence when you have disregard for the law. 'I hope that he gets some help in the Youth Offenders Institution. Hopefully he will get some help that will prevent him from reoffending. 'I think this is a loud and clear message that nobody is above the law and that you have got to be held accountable.'


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Met police drops probe into man accused of wearing 'Hamas' parachute at pro-Palestine protest
Police have dropped an investigation into a pro-Palestine protester accused of wearing a parachute in support of Hamas, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. Furious campaigners have branded Scotland Yard's decision not to charge the suspect in line with terror laws as 'remarkable'. The Metropolitan Police had warned 'anyone displaying symbols, wording or otherwise indicating their support for a proscribed organisation risks arrest' ahead of a central London protest on October 5 last year commemorating one year since the start of the conflict following the 2023 October 7 massacre. Yet the Met closed its investigation into the unnamed man accused of wearing the parachute – interpreted as support for terrorists who used paragliders to enter Israel from Gaza in the attack – despite the force even publicising his arrest on social media. It said on its X account the suspect was 'wearing what appeared to be a parachute' and shared a clip showing him being taken away by officers in Whitehall during the protest. The force said he was 'arrested on suspicion of wearing or displaying an article indicating support for a proscribed organisation', but the case was quietly dropped earlier this summer due to 'evidential difficulties'. A Campaign Against Antisemitism spokesman told the Mail: 'This kind of imagery glorifies a proscribed terrorist organisation and its lethal antisemitism. 'The reported decision to drop the investigation is remarkable and the public is entitled to an explanation.' A Met spokesman said: 'The findings from our investigation did not meet the evidential threshold for any charges to be brought against the individual.' On Saturday police arrested more than 70 protesters for supporting newly banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action. A vicar was among at least 42 people detained by Scotland Yard officers as activists gathered for a second week in a row beside a statue of Gandhi in London's Parliament Square, holding placards reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Another 16 arrests were made in Manchester and 13 people were also held in Cardiff at other related demonstrations the same day.