logo
US to leave UN cultural body, citing 'national interest'

US to leave UN cultural body, citing 'national interest'

France 24a day ago
"Continued involvement in UNESCO is not in the national interest of the United States," State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said.
UNESCO called the US departure -- which it said will take effect in December 2026 -- regrettable, but unsurprising, and said its financial impact would be limited.
President Donald Trump had already ordered withdrawal from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation once before, in 2017 during his first term. President Joe Biden then reestablished US membership.
"I deeply regret President Donald Trump's decision to once again withdraw the United States of America from UNESCO," Director-General Audrey Azoulay said, adding the move contradicted fundamental principles of multilateralism.
"However regrettable, this announcement was expected, and UNESCO has prepared for it".
In recent years, Azoulay said, UNESCO had "undertaken major structural reforms and diversified our funding sources", including with private and voluntary governmental contributions.
The US share of UNESCO's total budget currently stands at eight percent, she said. This compares to an estimate of nearly 20 percent a decade ago, according to a UNESCO source who asked not to be named.
No staff redundancies were planned, Azoulay said.
Bruce described UNESCO as working "to advance divisive social and cultural causes" and being overly focused on UN sustainability goals, which she described as a "globalist, ideological agenda."
'Same as seven years ago'
Bruce also highlighted what she said was the body's anti-Israeli position in admitting Palestine as a state.
"UNESCO's decision to admit the 'State of Palestine' as a member state is highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organisation," Bruce said.
The administration has also objected to UNESCO's recognition of heritage sites in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem as Palestinian.
Azoulay said the reasons put forward by the US "are the same as seven years ago" although, she said, "the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism".
Washington's claims "contradict the reality of UNESCO's efforts", she added, "especially in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism".
The source at UNESCO described the US move as "purely political, without any real factual base".
The organisation had already been "forced" to do without US money for several years after the 2017 departure, the source told AFP. UNESCO adapted but new sources of funding would still need to be found, the source said.
'Always welcome'
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said he welcomed the US decision. "This is a necessary step, designed to promote justice and Israel's right for fair treatment in the UN system," he said on X.
French President Emmanuel Macron meanwhile said, also on X, that UNESCO had his "unwavering support" that would not weaken after the US departure.
The UN organisation describes its mission as promoting education, scientific cooperation and cultural understanding.
It oversees a list of heritage sites aimed at preserving unique environmental and architectural gems, ranging from Australia's Great Barrier Reef and the Serengeti in Tanzania to the Athens Acropolis and Pyramids of Egypt.
The UNESCO source said that the US will continue to be represented on the world heritage committee even after leaving the organisation formally, just as it had in 2017.
Trump was not the first to pull the United States out of UNESCO.
President Ronald Reagan ended US membership in the 1980s, saying the agency was corrupt and pro-Soviet. The United States reentered under the presidency of George W. Bush.
The American return under Biden was a major success for Azoulay, who became UNESCO chief in 2017, also because it included a pledge to pay back the US's contribution arrears to the tune of $619 million.
On Tuesday, Azoulay said the US could always return to the fold in the future.
"The United States of America is and always will be welcome," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to release AI action plan that leans into Silicon Valley's ideas
Trump to release AI action plan that leans into Silicon Valley's ideas

Euronews

time5 hours ago

  • Euronews

Trump to release AI action plan that leans into Silicon Valley's ideas

US President Donald Trump is expected to release an artificial intelligence (AI) action plan Wednesday that has been six months in the making. Trump launched a review process shortly after his inauguration in January that gave his tech advisors six months to come up with new AI policies after axing former president Joe Biden's AI guardrails. A senior official told the Associated Press that the Act will include some familiar tech lobby pitches, like accelerating the sale of AI technology abroad and making it easier to build the data centres that fuel AI growth. It might also include some ways to combat the "liberal bias" the Trump administration sees in OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. David Sacks, a former PayPal executive and now Trump's top AI adviser, has been criticising 'woke AI' for more than a year, after Google rolled out an image generator that, when prompted to show one of the country's founding fathers, showed Black, Asian, and Native American men. The tech industry has pushed for easier permitting rules to get their computing facilities connected to power, but the AI building boom has also contributed to spiking demand for fossil fuel production that will contribute to global warming.

Kremlin expects 'difficult' talks with Ukraine in Istanbul
Kremlin expects 'difficult' talks with Ukraine in Istanbul

France 24

time6 hours ago

  • France 24

Kremlin expects 'difficult' talks with Ukraine in Istanbul

Delegations from the two countries have left for Istanbul and are expected to begin talks in the evening. The two sides previously met in Istanbul in May and June, but managed to agree only on exchanges of prisoners and soldiers' bodies. US President Donald Trump last week gave Russia "50 days" to end the war or face sanctions, but the Kremlin has not indicated it is willing to compromise on its demands. "No one expects an easy road," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters when asked about his expectations for the talks. "It will be very difficult," he added. Ukraine said it hoped the two sides would discuss the release of prisoners and lay the ground for a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Moscow has said that "a lot of work" is needed before even discussions can take place about possible talks between Putin and Zelensky, who last met in 2019. Radically different positions The two sides have radically different positions for ending the conflict. Russia has called on Ukraine to effectively retreat from the four Ukrainian regions Moscow claims to have annexed in September 2022, a demand Kyiv has called unacceptable. Ukraine has ruled out any negotiations on territory until after a ceasefire and says it will never recognise Russia's claims over occupied territory -- including Crimea, which Moscow annexed in 2014. Russia's full-scale invasion, launched in February 2022, has ravaged swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine, killing tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians. Ukraine said former defence minister Rustem Umerov, who currently serves as security council secretary, would head its delegation. The Kremlin said it would send political scientist Vladimir Medinsky to lead its negotiating team. Medinsky, who led the Russian delegation in the two previous rounds of negotiation, is not seen as a powerful decision maker and has been described by Ukraine as a puppet. At the last talks on May 16 and June 2, the two sides agreed to large-scale prisoner exchanges. They also exchanged their draft terms for ending the conflict, which the Kremlin said were "diametrically opposed". Wednesday's talks come as the White House ramps up pressure on Russia to agree a compromise. Trump announced last week he was giving Russia until September to strike a peace deal with Ukraine or face bruising sanctions. The US leader has been trying to broker an end to the war since his inauguration in January, but has failed to extract any concessions from the Kremlin, despite repeated phone calls with Putin. Russia has meanwhile intensified its bombardment of Ukrainian towns and cities, while advancing across several different areas of the front line. Between late Tuesday and early Wednesday, Russia fired 71 drones at four different regions of Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian air force. The Russian defence ministry said Wednesday it had captured the village of Varachyne in Ukraine's northern Sumy region.

Germany seeks US guarantee before sending Patriots to Ukraine
Germany seeks US guarantee before sending Patriots to Ukraine

France 24

time7 hours ago

  • France 24

Germany seeks US guarantee before sending Patriots to Ukraine

In comments to Der Spiegel news magazine, Pistorius said European NATO members needed "watertight" guarantees that any American-made Patriot air-defence systems sent to Ukraine would be replaced within about six to eight months. US President Donald Trump last week announced a deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte for European alliance members to buy US weaponry -- particularly Patriot systems -- for Kyiv to help it in its war against Russia. The move marked a pivot for Trump as his patience has worn thin with Russia's President Vladimir Putin for frustrating efforts to halt the war in Ukraine. Germany has offered to finance two of the Patriot systems, while several other NATO allies have expressed willingness to pay for three more. But concern has grown as Washington wants European allies to first send Patriot systems from their own stocks to Ukraine and then wait for replacements from the United States. Pistorius told Der Spiegel it was important that "the countries transferring systems can continue to meet their NATO requirements and that no security gaps arise for NATO". Countries including Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands had declared their willingness to finance Patriot systems, but Pistorius said that "no decision has been made as to which country could supply Patriot systems to Ukraine". Speaking later at a Berlin news conference, he said talks were ongoing on the question of "which countries in Europe and beyond currently have Patriots, and in what quantities are they willing to hand them over?" He added: "There is money for these Patriots. Now we just need the Patriots." Germany formerly had 12 Patriot systems but has sent three to Ukraine and two to Poland. Another Patriot battery is dedicated to training, leaving Germany with six active units.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store