
National Security Conference in Canada calls for stronger action to counter radical forces
A national security conference in Ontario addressed the rising threats of extremism and foreign interference in Canada. Discussions centered on historical events like the Air India bombing, the impact on Indo-Canadian and Jewish communities, and the need for a unified national response. Speakers urged for stronger policies, intelligence sharing, and media responsibility to protect Canadian values and security.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Canada India Foundation (CIF), in collaboration with The Alliance to Fight Secessionism and International KhalistTerrorism (TAFSIK), convened a powerful one-day National Security Conference on Sunday under the theme "United Against Extremism".Held at the Paramount EventSpace in Woodbridge, Ontario, the conference brought together prominent voices from across Canada to deliberate on the growing threats posed by extremist ideologies, foreign interference, and their impact on Canada's domestic security.The conference addressed a harsh and sobering reality: Canada's multicultural democracy is increasingly being manipulated by radical elements that import divisive agendas from overseas. The event featured discussions around historical failures like the 1985 Air India Flight 182 bombing , the rise of foreign-funded extremist groups, and the urgent need for a coordinated national response to counter radicalization, misinformation, and transnational crime."The idea behind this conference is not to single out any individual or community," said Ritesh Malik, founder of Canada India Foundation and chief organiser of the event. "This conference is for Canada to preserve Canada. We came to this country for its peace and values, and we now see extremism threatening those very foundations. Our communities face daily threats. It's time policymakers, security agencies, and elected officials listen and take action."One of the major focal points of the conference was the 1985 Air India bombing--Canada's deadliest act of terrorism that claimed 329 lives, most of them Canadian citizens. Sanjay Lazar, an aviation expert and author who lost his entire family in the tragedy, made an emotional plea."This year marks the 40th anniversary of that bombing," Lazar said. "It wasn't just an attack on a flight; it was a direct assault on Canadian values. We're still waiting for a memorial learning centre and want this story to be integrated into the Canadian education system. We owe that to the victims and future generations."The conference's "Human Cost of Terrorism" session explored how affected communities, particularly Indo-Canadians and Jewish Canadians, continue to suffer the consequences of extremism through hate crimes, threats, and targeted violence."There was a recent attack on a Jewish school--spraying bullets at children. The perpetrators are still at large," one speaker noted. "Is this failure of intelligence or dangerous apathy?"The event also examined modern-day threats ranging from Islamist networks and Khalistani separatists to far-left radicals and foreign intelligence-linked agents operating in Canada under the guise of human rights activism.Danial Bordman, a Canadian journalist, did not mince words: "We are dealing with Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, ISI-backed Canadians, Khalistanis, and radical far-left elements. It's alarming that these forces continue to operate openly while policy remains paralysed. But I also see the best people here today--and I hope this conference yields action."Wyatt Claypool, another Canadian journalist, echoed the need for a principled foreign policy and stronger national resolve. "Canada has become the country that often backstabs its allies. Whether it's India or Israel, we take the wrong side. We talk like second-year foreign policy students obsessed with de-escalation. We forget that sometimes there is a right and a wrong."He continued, "The Liberals haven't taken this threat seriously. Under Stephen Harper, at least we had a direction. Now, it's chaos."Ujjal Dosanjh, former federal Health Minister and one of the most respected Indo-Canadian political voices, said, "Today's meeting is probably the first in a long time to publicly address extremism in the Indo-Canadian community. Politicians have ignored this issue for far too long. What we see now is an intermingling of extremism, drug smuggling, and immigration fraud--creating serious problems for our society."Community participant Guneet Singh praised the inclusive nature of the event. "This is a Canadian issue, not an Indian issue. Illegal immigration, extremism--these are problems affecting all of us. It's good that platforms like CIF and TAFSIK are stepping up and bringing together people from across social, political, and digital spaces."Panelists also discussed the reluctance of mainstream media and public institutions to address these challenges openly. "Extremists are posting threats online and waving AK-47s, and the RCMP remains silent," a speaker noted. "Hate is disguised as freedom of expression, and security agencies walk on eggshells."One section of the conference focused on Bill 63, legislation which panelists argue curtails freedom of expression for moderate voices, while shielding radical ones from criticism. "Laws like this suppress open dialogue, which is essential to challenge extremism," a speaker noted.The conference's objective was not just to diagnose the problems but to push for solutions. Speakers advocated for better intelligence sharing, law enforcement empowerment, and reforms in immigration to weed out exploitation by radical elements. They also called on the media to abandon fear-based self-censorship and speak honestly about growing threats."We must protect the vast majority--the peaceful, gentle citizens of Canada," a panelist urged. "The Canadian Charter of Rights was never meant to shield violence or extremism. It must protect the innocent, not the dangerous."The conference concluded with a commitment to compiling a comprehensive report based on its findings, which will be submitted to Canadian lawmakers and security agencies."The time for silence is over," said Ritesh Malik in closing remarks. "Canada deserves to be what it was, what it should be, and what we want it to be for our children."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
26 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump Administration Threatens New Harvard Cuts Over Jewish Right
Washington: The Trump administration on Monday accused Harvard of violating the civil rights of its Jewish and Israeli students and threatened to cut off all federal funding if the university does not take urgent action. Harvard has been at the forefront of Donald Trump's campaign against top US universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity." Trump and his allies claim that Harvard and other prestigious universities are unaccountable bastions of liberal, anti-conservative bias and anti-Semitism. In a letter sent to the president of Harvard, a federal task force accused it of failing to protect the students during campus protests against Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Following an investigation, the task force concluded that "Harvard has been in some cases deliberately indifferent, and in others has been a willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff," according to the letter. The letter went on to say that the majority of Jewish students at Harvard felt they suffer discrimination on campus, while a quarter felt physically unsafe. "Jewish and Israeli students were assaulted and spit on; they hid their kippahs for fear of being harassed and concealed their Jewish identity from classmates for fear of ostracization," the letter said. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Harvard was in violation of civil rights legislation and "if you break federal law, you should not be receiving federal tax dollars." The school said it strongly disagreed with the government's findings as it "has taken substantive, proactive steps to address the root causes of antisemitism in its community." The Trump administration has also sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed US embassies around the world to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university. Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing that they were illegal and unconstitutional and the courts have put those moves on hold for now. International students accounted for 27 percent of total enrollment at Harvard in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump admin accuses Harvard of civil rights violations against Jewish students, threatens to cut all federal funding
The Trump administration on Monday accused Harvard of violating the civil rights of its Jewish and Israeli students and threatened to cut off all federal funding if the university does not take urgent action read more People walk between buildings on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge. File image/AP The Trump administration on Monday accused Harvard of violating the civil rights of its Jewish and Israeli students and threatened to cut off all federal funding if the university does not take urgent action. Harvard has been at the forefront of Donald Trump's campaign against top US universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Trump and his allies claim that Harvard and other prestigious universities are unaccountable bastions of liberal, anti-conservative bias and anti-Semitism. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a letter sent to the president of Harvard, a federal task force accused it of failing to protect the students during campus protests against Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Following an investigation, the task force concluded that 'Harvard has been in some cases deliberately indifferent, and in others has been a willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff,' according to the letter. The letter went on to say that the majority of Jewish students at Harvard felt they suffer discrimination on campus, while a quarter felt physically unsafe. 'Jewish and Israeli students were assaulted and spit on; they hid their kippahs for fear of being harassed and concealed their Jewish identity from classmates for fear of ostracization,' the letter said. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Harvard was in violation of civil rights legislation and 'if you break federal law, you should not be receiving federal tax dollars.' The school said it strongly disagreed with the government's findings as it 'has taken substantive, proactive steps to address the root causes of antisemitism in its community.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Trump administration has also sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed US embassies around the world to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university. Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing that they were illegal and unconstitutional and the courts have put those moves on hold for now. International students accounted for 27 percent of total enrollment at Harvard in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income.


India.com
42 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Can We Buy BrahMos?': Pakistani General Gets A Stinging Clapback From Missile Maker
New Delhi: At an international arms expo in Dubai, a high-ranking Pakistan Army officer walked up to one of India's missile scientists. 'Would India ever sell the BrahMos missile to Pakistan?' he asked. Dr. Apathukatha Sivathanu Pillai, the man behind the indigenous missile, did not blink. Equal parts wit and warning, his response cut straight through: 'For Pakistan, it would be free of cost.' The hall went quiet. The message was clear. This was not just a casual exchange. It unfolded against the backdrop of heightened tensions between the two countries. India had recently launched Operation Sindoor in response to the deadly April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. The operation hit terror camps deep inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Following Pakistan's retaliatory strikes with missiles and drones, New Delhi responded back and successfully targeted Rawalpindi, Chakwal and Rahim Yar Khan. Skardu, Bholari and Jacobabad airbases took major hits. Even radar installations in Sialkot and Pasrur did not escape the precision strikes. At the heart of India's modern strike capability is BrahMos – a missile born of an Indo-Russian partnership but matured with Indian innovation. It carries weight. In reputation. In capability. And in message. The missile is no ordinary weapon. A two-stage system. The first stage fires a solid propellant booster, pushing the missile to supersonic speeds. Then it separates. The second stage, powered by a liquid-fueled ramjet, takes over and propels it to speeds nearing Mach 3. Designed with stealth features and advanced guidance, BrahMos travels with speed, silence and deadly accuracy. Named after the Brahmaputra and Moskva rivers, this missile is more than just a technological achievement. It is a statement. Today, India continues to work on making the BrahMos more indigenous. From private firms to state labs, the focus remains on tightening control, improving systems and pushing the limits. All while keeping the deterrent razor-sharp. So when Pakistan asked if it could buy one, the reply was not only sharp but calculated as well. Some things are never for sale, especially when the buyer is the target.