US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
Trump, who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at between 10 and 41 per cent, come August 7, his new hard deadline for the duties.
In a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates.
"A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said.
"These tariff rates are pretty much set."
Undoubtedly, some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he added.
But "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates."
The US had announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of trade partners, which will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline.
Among the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 per cent tariffs on exports to the United States -- albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice.
Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a "witch hunt."
Greer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes.
"The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy," Greer told CBS. "It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues."
Trump was "elected to assess the foreign affairs situation... and take appropriate action," he added.
Meanwhile, White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in."
Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" if Trump could change tariff rates, should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: "I would rule it out, because these are the final deals."
Legal challenges have been filed against some of Trump's tariffs, arguing he overstepped his authority.
An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared sceptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 minutes ago
- Business Times
Opec+ leaves traders with cliffhanger as stormy chapter ends
[NEW YORK] The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies (Opec+) closed a two-year chapter in its oil strategy on Sunday (Aug 3) with the last in a series of bumper oil production increases. But it left crude traders with a cliffhanger. Saudi Arabia and its partners have stunned oil markets and capped futures prices in recent months by pushing more barrels into a fragile global market, offering relief to consumers and a fillip for US President Donald Trump. The 547,000 barrel-a-day output increase they approved on Sunday completes the reversal, one year ahead of schedule, of a giant supply cutback made in 2023. The Opec+ have fast-tracked the revival in a bid to reclaim market share. Yet they also have unfinished business: another layer of supplies, also halted two years ago, amounting to 1.7 million barrels a day, which is currently due to remain offline until late 2026. And on Sunday, delegates were offering less, rather than more, clarity regarding its fate. Depending on oil market conditions, the coalition could press on with restarting this tranche, officials said. Or, as some delegates suggested last month, the producers could take a pause. Alternatively, if markets slump, they might even completely reverse the recent surge. A follow-up meeting was set for Sep 7 to review the situation. 'The messaging coming from today's voluntary producer meeting is that all options remain on the table, including bringing those barrels back, pausing increases for now, or even reversing the recent policy action,' said Helima Croft, head of commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Based on the outlook for the months ahead, Opec+ may actually need to consider cutting production. While oil demand has held up this year, a projected slowdown in China and swelling supplies across the Americas leave world markets on track for a hefty surplus of two million barrels per day in the fourth quarter, according to the International Energy Agency in Paris. Weak US economic data on Friday underscored the risks to consumption from Trump's tariffs. Forecasters such as Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase see crude futures, already down 6.7 per cent this year to near US$70 a barrel in London, sliding further towards US$60 later in the year. That's considerably lower than the levels the Saudis and other Opec+ members need to cover government spending. Goldman expects that the coalition will most likely pause and hold output levels steady for some time as it takes stock of supply and demand balances. Five crude traders surveyed by Bloomberg last week also predicted a hiatus. On the other hand, if Riyadh is genuinely committed to pursuing market share, as sources familiar with its thinking believe, it should ignore those forecasts and press on with restarting the 1.7 million-barrel tranche regardless. 'We can expect the group to adopt a wait-and-see approach for at least the first several months,' said Greg Brew, senior analyst at Eurasia Group. 'But if there is a contraction in US supply, and if demand growth and the general macro environment remains favourable, I think further unwinding of cuts should be expected.' The outlook is only clouded further by the geopolitical backdrop, as Trump intensifies diplomatic pressure on Opec+ co-leader Russia over its war against Ukraine. The US president has threatened to impose secondary tariffs on Moscow's oil customers unless a ceasefire in the conflict is quickly agreed. On Thursday, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak made a rare visit to Riyadh for talks with Saudi Arabian Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, a meeting that officials said symbolised the solidarity between the two oil giants. As Opec+ weighs pressure from Trump to lower prices on one side, and a desire to preserve alliance cohesion on the other, whatever it ultimately decides will involve a delicate balancing act. 'Will it move to unwind the remaining 1.7 million barrels-a-day to defend market share, especially if fresh US sanctions hit Russian oil, without putting unity at risk?' said Jorge Leon, an analyst at Rystad Energy A/S who previously worked at the Opec secretariat. 'The group is still threading a fine needle.' BLOOMBERG
CNA
36 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Will Trump's latest ultimatum be another demand for Putin to ignore?
BIRMINGHAM, United Kingdom: Against a backdrop of threats Donald Trump made but never followed through and demands ignored by Vladimir Putin without consequences, the United States president issued the latest ultimatum to his Russian counterpart: Make progress toward a ceasefire within 50 days or prepare for tariffs. It was already a major shift in Mr Trump's approach to the war in Ukraine, before he dramatically cut his deadline. His ultimatum will now expire on Friday (Aug 8), instead of Sep 2. This is not the first time that Mr Trump has tried his economic brand of diplomacy on Mr Putin, though he constantly oscillated between pressure on Ukraine and on Russia. On Jan 22, just two days after his return to the White House for a second term, he demanded on Truth Social that Russia 'STOP this ridiculous war' or face trade sanctions. By May, Mr Trump suspected he was being strung along and gave Mr Putin two weeks to respond to his calls for a ceasefire. Vague as this appeared at the time, it was the first time that Mr Trump imposed a concrete timeline. The Russian president did not blink. On the contrary, Russia intensified both its air and ground campaigns against Ukraine. The Russian reaction to the original 50-day ultimatum indicated no particular concern in the Kremlin. Widespread criticism that this simply gave Russia another seven weeks to pound Ukraine was swiftly borne out, including the capture of Chasiv Yar, a town in eastern Ukraine that Russia had besieged for more than a year. On Aug 1, Mr Putin signalled that there would be no change to his stance, as Mr Trump's shortened deadline loomed. WILL 'SECONDARY TARIFFS' UP THE PRESSURE? If it were only the threat of sanctions by Washington, Moscow might be right to shrug off the ultimatum as another unenforceable threat and unlikely to have a major impact on Russia's remarkably resilient war economy. But the stakes are now more complex and go beyond another customary Russian warning of impending nuclear armageddon. This is despite Mr Trump ordering two nuclear submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions' following a very public social media fight with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, now the deputy chairman of Russia's national security council. Mr Trump has threatened to impose what he called 100 per cent 'secondary tariffs' – which is not a technical term but has come to mean tariffs on US imports from countries which trade with Russia. India and China are the two largest remaining buyers of Russian oil. India's Aug 1 tariff rate has been announced at 25 per cent, with an unspecified 'penalty' for its trade ties with Russia and would affect billions of dollars of exports to the United States. New Delhi and Beijing may not immediately stop trading with Moscow, but they may exert pressure on Mr Putin to at least show progress on a ceasefire. Russia's dependence on China, in particular, and in turn China's high trade volumes with the US are a key vulnerability for Mr Putin that Mr Trump finally appears willing to exploit. MORE MILITARY SUPPORT Moreover, Mr Putin's obstinance has now provoked Mr Trump's ire, making him look the weaker party who can be repeatedly ignored. The threat of sanctions is now only one of the Russian president's worries. More significantly, beyond ultimatums issued and ignored, Mr Trump has also re-committed the United States to militarily supporting the Ukrainian war effort. Making more 'top of the line' weapons available to European NATO allies will deliver much needed air defences and offensive weapons to Kyiv. More European investment in its own defence-industrial base and in cooperation and joint ventures with Ukrainian partners will further strengthen Kyiv's military capabilities. None of this will be a game-changer overnight but it will prevent Ukrainian defences and morale from being further eroded by Russia's slow-grinding advances. 'PRESIDENT OF CEASEFIRES' After months of mixed signals, it now appears that Mr Trump may have decisively pivoted towards Ukraine. This is possibly due to a mix of frustration with Mr Putin and much improved relations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, from whom Mr Trump secured a deal on critical minerals. Given the American president's notorious unpredictability, how long this will last is everybody's guess. If Mr Trump finally follows through on his threats to impose steep costs on Russia, at the very least, he will have massively increased Ukraine's long-term chances of survival as a sovereign country. Count on Mr Putin to continue his defiance: He still thinks he can win the war and – with high if almost certainly over-stated approval ratings – faces little domestic pressure to stop. But a ceasefire is now more likely before the end of the year, albeit not before Washington's latest ultimatum expires. Mr Trump, who has tried to fashion himself as a 'president of peace', is still a long way off earning this title. But, with some peacemaking successes elsewhere already in the bag, he may be a step closer to becoming the 'president of ceasefires'.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Trump, Carney to speak soon over tariffs, Canadian official says
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will likely talk "over the next number of days" after the US imposed a 35 per cent tariff on goods not covered by the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, a Canadian official said on Sunday (Aug 3). Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister in charge of US-Canada trade, told CBS News' "Face the Nation" that he believes there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down tariffs. "We're encouraged by the conversations with Secretary Lutnick and Ambassador Greer, but we're not yet where we need to go to get the deal that's in the best interest of the two economies," LeBlanc said, referring to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The trade minister said he expected Carney and Trump to speak "over the next number of days." "We think there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down some of these tariffs provide greater certainty to investment," LeBlanc said. Washington linked Friday's tariff announcement in part to what it said was Canada's failure to stop fentanyl smuggling. It was the latest blow in a months-long tariff war, which Trump initiated shortly after returning to power this year.
