Headwater Exploration First Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
Key Financial Results
Revenue: CA$141.5m (up 26% from 1Q 2024).
Net income: CA$50.0m (up 33% from 1Q 2024).
Profit margin: 35% (up from 34% in 1Q 2024). The increase in margin was driven by higher revenue.
EPS: CA$0.21 (up from CA$0.16 in 1Q 2024).
Our free stock report includes 2 warning signs investors should be aware of before investing in Headwater Exploration. Read for free now.
TSX:HWX Earnings and Revenue History May 6th 2025
All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period
Headwater Exploration Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Falls Short
Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 1.2%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 4.5%.
Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 1.5% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 3.1% growth forecast for the Oil and Gas industry in Canada.
Performance of the Canadian Oil and Gas industry.
The company's shares are down 2.4% from a week ago.
Risk Analysis
Before you take the next step you should know about the 2 warning signs for Headwater Exploration (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) that we have uncovered.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P/TSX composite closes lower on Thursday, U.S. markets mixed
TORONTO — Losses in basic materials and consumer cyclicals helped drive Canada's main stock index to finish lower on Thursday, while U.S. markets were mixed. The S&P/TSX composite index was down 44.15 points at 27,372.26. In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 316.38 points at 44,693.91. The S&P 500 index was up 4.44 points at 6,363.35, while the Nasdaq composite was up 37.94 points at 21,057.96. The Canadian dollar traded for 73.37 cents US compared with 73.48 cents US on Wednesday. The September crude oil contract was up 78 cents US at US$66.03 per barrel. The August gold contract was down US$24.10 at US$3,373.50 an ounce. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD) The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Would a new $150,000 limit be enough to protect Canadians' deposits in case of a bank failure?
The federal government's recent proposal to increase the insurance coverage for bank deposits in Canada to $150,000 aims to protect depositors in case of a bank failure. But would the new amount be enough? Financial Post explains who is protected, why the amount is changing and how likely a bank failure might be in Canada. What is the government proposing? Ottawa released a consultation paper on Tuesday aiming to get feedback from 'interested Canadians and stakeholders' on a range of proposals to do with deposit insurance. Currently, the amount of money that Canadians can get back if a bank shuts down is limited to $100,000 per category of deposit, such as a chequing account, a joint deposit or a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP), per member firm. This is guaranteed by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. (CDIC), a Crown corporation established in 1967. All large Canadian banks and many other financial institutions such as federal credit unions are insured by the CDIC, though deposit categories such as mutual funds, stocks, bonds or cryptocurrencies are not included. The government is now considering increasing the insured limit to $150,000 and providing even higher coverage for businesses and other non-retail investors. Why does Ottawa want to change the limit? The paper, released by the Department of Finance, mentions a number of reasons behind the proposed increases. For one, the last time the limit was increased was in 2005 and Ottawa wants to adjust the amount for inflation. It also noted that Canadians' saving patterns and changing demographics have increased the number of deposits that exceed the $100,000 limit, with fewer fully protected depositors. Uninsured eligible deposits, or deposits that are in excess of $100,000, grew by 594 per cent from 2005 to 2024 in Canada, while insured deposits grew by 183 per cent over the same time, the paper said. The proportion of deposits that are insured as a percentage of total eligible deposits has declined from 58 per cent in 2005, to 36 per cent in 2024. Increasing the deposits could boost confidence and potentially lower the risk of bank runs, the paper noted. It referred to the 2023 crisis in the United States when three banks had to be shut down. While Canada's financial sector was not affected by the fall of the Silicon Valley Bank and the other lenders in the U.S. in 2023, it was a reminder that large banks could experience runs that could quickly lead to their end and highlighted the important role of the federal deposit insurance, the Department of Finance said in the paper. What are the details? The paper mentions five proposals. Aside from increasing the insurance limit to $150,000, it also wants to explore whether non-retail depositors such as corporations, municipalities, universities, schools or hospitals should receive a higher deposit insurance of about $500,000 per category. The current insurance framework does not differentiate between individual depositors and non-retail depositors, but the needs of the latter group are different, the paper stated. 'Many non-retail depositors hold deposit accounts specifically for operational purposes, to fund their ongoing operations (e.g. transactional accounts to cover payroll, pay suppliers, etc.),' the paper said. 'Any delay or cessation in access to the funds in these accounts could be highly disruptive.' Mark Zelmer, a former deputy superintendent at Canada's top banking regulatory agency, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, and currently a Fellow-In-Residence at the C.D. Howe Institute, said he is not a fan of introducing different coverages for different groups of people. It further complicates the system and makes it easier for people to 'game' it. 'Let's say somebody manages their personal savings through a Trust, as opposed to themselves. Is that trust suddenly going to be a non-retail deposit versus a retail deposit,' he said. The paper is also proposes an insurance limit of $1 million for 'temporary high balances,' for a brief period of time. The payments that fall in this category include large sums that depositors hold for a limited amount of time, such as an inheritance, an insurance payout, a divorce settlement, or the proceeds from the sale of a home. Canada's aging population may increase the circumstances leading to temporary high balances, it said. Ottawa has also proposed asking banks to provide its customers with 'tailored information explaining the amount of insured deposits that are held' in order to strengthen depositor confidence. 'Recent financial market turbulence in the United States highlighted the impact that social media can have during a financial crisis,' the paper said. 'The speed with which negative information (whether true or false) about a financial institution and deposit insurance can reach depositors is faster than ever before.' CDIC members are currently required to provide depositors with general information about the insurance framework and about the CDIC itself. But they are not required to inform them about the actual deposit insurance coverage applicable to the funds they hold at the institution, the paper said. The additional disclosure could 'support financial stability,' the paper said. Can increasing the deposit insurance prevent bank runs? While the paper suggests a higher insurance coverage could mean that depositors are less likely to withdraw funds in times of stress and reduce the risk of bank runs, Zelmer 'doesn't buy it,' he said. 'If somebody reads in the newspaper or on social media that there are some questions about the strength of their institution, they're going to run,' he said. 'You run first and ask questions later. We saw that with Silicon Valley Bank. They lost most of their deposit base within a day. The insured depositors ran too.' Cristian Bravo Roman, a professor at Western University who is also the Canada Research Chair in Banking and Insurance Analytics, said funds today are more fluid and easy to to take out of a bank. As such, increasing the deposit insurance may not prevent a bank run in a single institution, but what it can do is potentially prevent the fear from spreading to other banks, he said. If the banking system of a country is perceived safe as a result of the protections, this would avoid an 'overall run' in the system. 'If a small retailer bank is having issues, people won't run to one of the Big Six to get their money out thinking that the entire system is crumbling,' he said. Increasing the coverage could help boost competitiveness in the banking sector, which is overly reliant on a few lenders, Zelmer said. If it increased the public's confidence in smaller financial players, it may provide them with more options. The bigger players are already considered safe, he said. But the benefit would depend upon how much premium CDIC members would have to pay. The government would consider the fact that any increase in the scope and level of coverage could lead to additional premiums paid by CDIC members and affect the cost of financial services to consumers, the paper said. This could decrease competitiveness, Roman said, if smaller institutions had to pay higher premiums and either charge customers more or earn less profit. The proposal did not discuss how increasing coverage would affect the premiums banks are paying, he said. How likely is a bank failure in Canada? Canadian big banks follow guidelines that are stricter than their global peers when it comes to ensuring they have sufficient capital on hand, so a major bank failure is generally deemed an unlikely event. There has not been a deposit insurance payout in almost 30 years. However, questions were raised about the deposit insurance in Canada in 2023 after the collapse of a few U.S. banks and whether a limit of up to $100,000 was enough. Some analysts urged the need to increase it back then, saying that the U.S. limit of US$250,000 was much higher. Ottawa considers hiking bank deposit insurance limit to $150,000 Canadians are finally getting choice in their banking, but will it last? Amir Barnea, an associate professor of finance at HEC Montreal, for instance, said at the time that the number needed a 'serious update.' He said that the number in 2023 should be 42 per cent higher just to keep up with inflation. In 2023, the finance minister temporarily received the authority, upon the Governor in Council's approval, to increase the deposit insurance limit, but it wasn't used and the limit remained unchanged. • Email: bcousins@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pfizer (PFE) Faces Legal Challenges Over Depo-Provera's Increased Brain Tumor Risk
Pfizer is currently under significant scrutiny due to a study linking its product, Depo-Provera, to increased health risks, and an associated Multi-District Litigation could have influenced its recent share price performance. Despite reporting a 11% quarterly price movement, Pfizer's stock behavior aligns with broader market trends, which showed an 18% rise over the past year. Positive developments, such as successful trial results for XTANDI and HYMPAVZI™, contributed positively but were countered by legal challenges and safety concerns. These opposing factors underscore Pfizer's mixed quarter performance, balancing robust product news against adverse legal implications. We've spotted 3 possible red flags for Pfizer you should be aware of. The end of cancer? These 25 emerging AI stocks are developing tech that will allow early identification of life changing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's. The recent scrutiny surrounding Pfizer due to health risks linked with Depo-Provera and subsequent litigation is likely influencing the narrative of declining revenue and earnings projections. If legal challenges intensify, they could potentially exacerbate financial pressure, hindering near-term growth prospects. While Pfizer continues to face turbulent times, the company's share price experienced a 11% rise over the past three months amid a volatile 18 months, during which the total return was a 9.75% decline over the past year. The company also underperformed compared to the US Pharmaceuticals industry, which saw a decline of 7.2% over the same period. This signals potential investor hesitance stemming from ongoing legal matters and competitive pressures affecting core products like Vyndaqel and Paxlovid. In light of the factors detailed in the narrative, Pfizer's revenue and earnings forecasts are expected to encounter downward pressure. Analysts are projecting a potential revenue decline of 2.4% annually over the next three years. Such a decline, combined with the increased legal scrutiny, could affect Pfizer's earnings growth, projected at an annual 5.8% increase, which is slower than the broader US market's projected growth of 14.9%. Despite challenges, the share price's discount of approximately 15.3% to the current consensus price target of US$29.23 might suggest potential upside if revenue growth expectations and profitability improve. Investors need to consistently evaluate these variables as the legal situation unfolds, and market conditions evolve. The analysis detailed in our Pfizer valuation report hints at an deflated share price compared to its estimated value. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include PFE. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@
