Trump alleges illegal campaign payments to Beyoncé and Oprah
Trump alleged on his Truth Social platform that the Harris campaign paid Beyoncé $11 million (R200.2 million), Oprah $3 million (R54.6 million), and Sharpton $600,000 (R10.92 million).
However, no verified documentation currently supports these claims.
The US Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings directly contradict the figures Trump cited, showing significantly lower and legally justifiable amounts for campaign-related services.
According to FEC records, Beyoncé's company, Parkwood Entertainment, received $165,000 (R3.01 million) for a fundraising concert.
The payment covered event production and not a personal endorsement.
Oprah Winfrey's Harpo Productions produced a nationally televised town hall featuring Kamala Harris and received $1 million (R18.25 million) for the event.
Campaign filings and New York Post reporting confirmed this figure. Meanwhile, the Harris campaign donated $500 000 (R9.12 million) to the National Action Network, founded by Reverend Al Sharpton.
The Harris campaign publicly disclosed the donation but did not specify its exact purpose in official filings. No evidence links the payment to any endorsement. FactCheck.org and PolitiFact state that such payments are legal if they reflect fair market value and are properly reported.
Legal experts also confirm that no verified evidence supports Donald Trump's claim that these celebrities were paid to endorse Harris.
Tina Knowles publicly stated that Beyoncé did not receive payment to support Kamala Harris. She stated on Instagram that her daughter covered all personal costs.
Oprah Winfrey also responded to the allegations. She confirmed she received no personal payment from the campaign. Instead, Harpo Productions handled event staffing and production under a formal contract.
Meanwhile, Reverend Al Sharpton's team addressed the controversy. They denied that he took payment for endorsement.
They also explained that campaign funds supported community outreach and event logistics. Legal experts also confirmed the transactions were lawful. The payments were disclosed and reflected fair market value.
Legal analysts have raised doubts about Donald Trump's recent calls for criminal charges against Democrats and celebrities who supported Kamala Harris.
US campaign finance law permits payments to individuals or entities if campaigns properly disclose them, ensure they reflect fair market value for legitimate services, and avoid using them for personal benefit unrelated to campaign activity.
However, legality may still depend on the payment's intent and context, as determined by the Federal Election Commission or the Department of Justice.
According to FEC filings and public records, the Harris campaign paid Beyoncé's Parkwood Entertainment and Oprah's Harpo Productions for event production, not endorsements.
However, no verified legal expert has confirmed that Trump's accusations meet the threshold for criminal prosecution.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Everything you need to know about the US-SA tariffs
The Trump administration has set a non-negotiable deadline of 1 August for imposing new tariffs on the countries with which the US trades. Here's where South Africa stands. What's the background to the 1 August deadline? US President Donald Trump is obsessed with tariffs, which is a very weird 18th-century mercantilist preoccupation: tariffs used to fund governments before taxes were invented. There is evidence to suggest that Trump has been yapping about tariffs for more than four decades: at some point in the 1980s he decided that tariffs were the silver bullet to unlock unheard-of US prosperity, and no one has been able to persuade him against it, even though virtually all economists say he is wrong. He also sees tariffs as a way of resetting US trade terms with other countries — he feels that the US has been taken advantage of — and is using them as leverage to achieve various political goals. None of this is fair, justified, or reasonable, but, unfortunately, we all live in Trump's world now. In April, Trump announced tariffs for different countries based on a nonsensical formula which, it was later determined, had almost certainly been generated by ChatGPT. Since then, in a kind of demented game that Trump would have relished, countries have been scrambling to negotiate deals for themselves before an entirely arbitrary deadline of 1 August, on which the tariffs with trading partners will be set. Could South Africa get an extension on the 1 August deadline? Given the absurdity of the situation whereby every single one of the US's major trading partners is attempting to get an audience with a limited number of US trade negotiators, an extension to the deadline might seem — there's that word again — reasonable. But… 'THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE – IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED,' Trump trumpeted on Truth Social on Wednesday, 30 July. Somewhat confusingly, however, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox News on Sunday that further negotiations and deals were still possible after the incredibly inflexible deadline. What will South Africa get hit with? Probably 30% tariffs on its US exports. There are certain elements of South African social media who are hell-bent on claiming that this is some kind of unique punishment for the sins of President Cyril Ramaphosa, but the truth is that South Africa's likely tariff rate looks quite average. Canada looks set to get hit with 35%; Mexico, 30%; Thailand, 36%; Laos and Myanmar, 40%; Bangladesh, 35%; and Brazil — more about this in a second — 50%. But the fact that South Africa is not unusual in being hit with these tariffs doesn't mean they are inconsequential. In the Eastern Cape in particular, terrible job losses are being predicted as a result of the hit on the automotive sector; see Estelle Ellis's piece here. What do we know about the progress of negotiations so far? Very little, because both the South African and US negotiating teams are under a non-disclosure agreement, so don't believe everything you see floating around on social media. We know, thanks to comments made by Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen, that the first proposed trade deal between South Africa and the US was rejected on 20 May for not being 'ambitious' enough, and so the South African team sweetened the initial deal. This was confirmed by the Dirco director-general, Zane Dangor, on Tuesday. Dangor also said that 'extraneous issues' were clouding the matter, and that certain 'demands' were being made by the US team on 'domestic policy' — with BEE a central concern. On Wednesday, Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau said the South African team was being encouraged to 'resubmit' a last-minute 'enhanced' proposal — with extra pork in it. Literally. What exactly is the US demanding from South Africa in terms of domestic policy? Again, we don't know, because all these talks have been happening behind closed doors between trade negotiators, with no formal, public statement of demands: that's not how tradecraft works. The Afrikaner delegation that visited Washington in June and met with 'representatives from the Office of the Vice President, the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council' claimed that US officials had presented them with four non-negotiable conditions to communicate to the South African government to achieve a reset of relations with the US. These just happened to be four issues very close to the heart of the Afrikaner political lobby, coincidentally enough. They were: the prioritisation of farm attacks; the condemnation by the ANC of the song 'Kill the Boer'; no land expropriation without compensation; and the exemption of US businesses from BEE requirements. It's hard to know how much of this might be wish-fulfilment from the Afrikaner delegation, since they were not there operating with any official South African mandate. What do we know about the criteria Trump's team are using to arrive at the tariffs? It seems like a heady mix of political vendettas, Trump's personal hyper-fixations and perhaps some economic considerations. But you would be demented to assume that the Trump administration is operating in good faith, and that some perfect (white, male) South African negotiator could have unlocked the perfect deal by uttering some magic words. For the best possible illustration of how the Trump administration is approaching this, see Brazil, which is likely to get hit with 50% tariffs, in large part because Trump's ally Jair Bolsonaro is facing criminal charges for trying to incite a coup. Trump used the trade negotiations to try to meddle in a sovereign country's justice system, demanding that the charges be dropped. This is, by the way, almost certainly illegal — but we are far past that point now. This is what South Africa is up against. Would it have helped to have a South African ambassador in place, or at least a trade envoy who could get a US visa? It surely wouldn't have hurt. But let's look at the example of India: India has been locked in trade talks with the US since March, while its external affairs minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, has been 'camped in the US for months', to quote one commenter. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been practically spooning Trump, diplomatically speaking. And India still looks likely to get hit with 25% tariffs, proving that there is no guaranteed value to sucking up to Trump. As the days to the deadline have ticked down, South Africa has packed off Dirco Minister Ronald Lamola, one of the ANC's coolest heads, to Washington. In addition, Tau said on 702 on Wednesday that the South African government had 'pulled out all the stops' to try to engage on the trade matters: sending delegations from ministers, business, civil society and even Cosatu. 'From all angles, we have continued to engage with the US,' he said. What's in the deal we're offering the US? South Africa would buy 75–100 petajoules of liquefied natural gas from the US over 10 years; the US would simplify its poultry export rules so South Africa could buy more US chicken products; and South African companies would pledge about $3.3-billion (R59-billion) in US projects, especially in mining, metals recycling and related 'critical minerals', plus pharmaceuticals and farm machinery. In exchange for measures like these, South Africa is hoping that certain key industries — like shipbuilding and farming produce that can't be grown locally at the same time (counter-seasonal agriculture) — would be kept free of tariffs, as well as small-scale exporters. What if South Africa refused to supply minerals to the US in retaliation? This is something Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe has hinted at several times as a potential retaliatory measure, and one of the only forms of leverage South Africa has: the US is dependent on South African platinum group metals, such as chrome, gold and manganese, for its car industry. Withholding those exports from the US is a nice little revenge fantasy. But News24's Lisa Steyn has a good explainer on why this move isn't feasible: partly because it would hit South African mining companies the hardest, and partly because these metals are sold to multinational companies rather than to countries. What happens next? We brace for impact. And remember to thank Uncle Donald once his tariffs stunt the world's economic growth, as is already happening. DM
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Trump says tariffs are making US 'great and rich' again
US President Donald Trump Image: Peter Zay / AFP US President Donald Trump said Thursday that the sweeping tariffs he has imposed on nations around the world were making the country "great & rich again" as governments raced to strike deals with Washington less than 24 hours before an August 1 deadline. "Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again," he wrote on his Truth Social platform. "ONE YEAR AGO, AMERICA WAS A DEAD COUNTRY, NOW IT IS THE "HOTTEST" COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD," he added. A day earlier, the US President imposed new tariffs to punish or favor several major trading partners -- the latest round of sweeping measures that have roiled markets around the world. South Korea squeezed in at the last moment, securing agreement on a 15 percent tariff for exports to the United States -- significantly below the 25 percent that Trump had earlier threatened to introduce. But Trump also announced crippling 50 percent tariffs on Brazil and a 25 percent levy on Indian exports, while warning Canada it would face trade repercussions for planning to recognize a Palestinian state. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The 15 percent rate on Seoul -- Washington's key security ally -- was equivalent to levies determined from US trade deals with Japan and the European Union. He added that South Korea had committed to investing $350 billion in the United States, as well as the purchase of "$100 billion worth" of liquefied natural gas (LNG) or other energy sources. Seoul's presidential office said tariffs on automobiles -- one of Seoul's key exports -- would also stay at 15 percent. Trump hit Brazil with high tariffs as well as sanctions against the judge overseeing a trial of his far-right ally Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of attempting a coup in Latin America's biggest economy. But he delayed its implementation from Friday to August 6, and crucially exempted many products from the prohibitive levy, including orange juice, civil aircraft, iron ore and some energy products. Canada trade threat He had threatened to wield US economic might to punish Brazil -- and its Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, in particular -- for what he has termed a "witch hunt" against former president Bolsonaro. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said he would defend "the sovereignty of the Brazilian people in the face of measures announced by the president of the United States." Among Trump's latest announcements were a 25 percent duty on Indian goods to begin Friday -- slightly lower than previously threatened -- after talks between Washington and New Delhi failed to bring about a trade pact. India would face an unspecified "penalty" over purchases of Russian weapons and energy as well, Trump said. "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World," he added. Canada's trade relations with the United States also came under threat after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. "Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine," the US president wrote on his Truth Social platform. "That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them." 'Big day for America' He also signed an order Wednesday to impose previously threatened 50 percent tariffs on certain copper products and end a tariff exemption for low-value shipments from abroad. It left out products like copper ores, concentrates and cathodes, bringing some relief to industry. As Trump's deal deadline neared, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox News that Washington had struck trade deals with Cambodia and Thailand, but provided no details of the accords. The US tariff hikes due Friday were initially announced in April as part of a package in which Trump slapped a minimum 10 percent levy on goods from almost all trading partners -- citing unfair trade practices. This rate was set to rise to varying levels for dozens of economies such as the European Union, Japan and others, but Washington twice postponed their implementation as financial markets gyrated. The US leader insisted Wednesday that the August 1 deadline "will not be extended" any further. So far, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, the EU and South Korea have reached initial deals with Washington to secure less punishing conditions. While the United States and China earlier slapped escalating tariffs on each other's products, both sides are working to further a truce maintaining duties at lower levels. Although Trump has promised a surge in government revenues from his duties, economists warn that higher tariffs can fuel an uptick in inflation and weigh on economic growth. AFP
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Trump escalates trade war with Canada following Palestine stance
Trump is set to impose a 35% tariff on all Canadian goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement if the two countries do not reach an agreement by the deadline. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them,' Trump said on Truth Social. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney previously said tariff negotiations with Washington had been constructive, but the talks may not conclude by the deadline. Talks between the two countries were at an intense phase, he added, but a deal that would remove all U.S. tariffs was unlikely. Canada is the second-largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of U.S. exports. It bought $349.4 billion of U.S. goods last year and exported $412.7 billion to the U.S., according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Canada is also the top supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States, and faces tariffs on both metals as well as on vehicle exports. Last month, Carney's government scrapped a planned digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms after Trump abruptly called off trade talks saying the tax was a 'blatant attack.' Carney followed France and Britain as he said on Wednesday that his country was planning to recognize the State of Palestine at a meeting of the United Nations in September. In announcing the decision, Carney spoke of the reality on the ground, including starvation in Gaza. 'Canada condemns the fact that the Israeli government has allowed a catastrophe to unfold in Gaza,' he said. Israel and the United States, Israel's closest ally, both rejected Carney's comments.
