logo
Three committees complain of ‘inadequate consultation' over welfare reforms

Three committees complain of ‘inadequate consultation' over welfare reforms

Rhyl Journal25-06-2025
A letter to Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall also said there had been a 'lack of robust data' to allow parliamentarians in the three areas to 'effectively scrutinise' the potential impact of the changes.
The letter, sent by the Scottish Parliament's Social Justice and Social Security Committee together with the Equality and Social Justice Committee of the Welsh Senedd and the Northern Ireland Assembly's Committee for Communities, comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing a rebellion from Labour MPs against the proposed changes.
We, alongside @nia_communities & @seneddequality, have jointly written to @leicesterliz, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, to share our concerns about a lack of meaningful engagement on proposed changes to the UK benefits system.
Read the letter: https://t.co/IKT4qGa4cy pic.twitter.com/EtDHwTU5Hw
— Social Justice and Social Security Committee (@SP_SJSS) June 25, 2025
A Commons vote on the plans to squeeze sickness and incapacity benefits is due to go ahead on Tuesday, despite 120 Labour MPs having publicly backed a move to block the legislation.
Meanwhile, the Work and Pensions Secretary was told there are 'significant concerns' about the Government's changes.
The letter from the three committees told how the 'economic backdrop' for many of those claiming disability benefits is 'already extremely challenging'.
And the committees added that the payments people receive 'are not symptomatic of a 'broken' system, but make a significant contribution to their health and wellbeing'.
They told Ms Kendall they were 'agreed that inadequate consultation and engagement by the UK Government with stakeholders and the devolved institutions has contributed to this sense of concern'.
Representatives from the committees added: 'In addition, the lack of robust data and jurisdiction-specific impact assessments presents significant challenges for our three committees to effectively scrutinise potential impacts.'
Here they insisted they have been 'constrained by the lack of quality information'.
They added: 'Our committees fully support the stated ambition that 'no-one should be consigned to a life on benefits just because they have a health condition or a disability, especially when they're able to and want to work with the right support in place'.
'However, in order to contribute meaningfully to the reform process, committees and citizens must be fully informed and offered every opportunity for meaningful engagement.'
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I shouldn't have gone to PMQs, says Reeves
I shouldn't have gone to PMQs, says Reeves

Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

I shouldn't have gone to PMQs, says Reeves

Rachel Reeves has admitted she regrets attending prime minister's questions after she was seen in tears on the Government front bench. The Chancellor said she had been dealing with a 'personal issue' when her bottom lip shook and tears ran down her face during a moment of distress in Parliament on Wednesday. Ms Reeves was speaking after she made a surprise appearance alongside Sir Keir Starmer to unveil the Government's 10-year plan for the NHS. In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said she regretted going into PMQs after a 'tough day at the office', but hoped people 'could relate' to her distress. She said: 'In retrospect, I probably wished I hadn't gone in... But you know, it is what it is.' The Leeds West and Pudsey MP said she never thought about resigning despite backbench anger over the way she had handled the economy, adding: 'I didn't work that hard to then quit.' A backbench rebellion saw the government forced to drop key welfare cuts, which has left the Chancellor with a £5 billion black hole to fill. She has insisted she is 'totally' up for the job of Chancellor and asserted that she and the Prime Minister remain united. Ms Reeves said: 'People can see that Keir and me are a team.' Sir Keir stood by his Chancellor in the aftermath, telling BBC Radio 4 Today's Nick Robinson: 'She is going to be Chancellor into the next election and for many years afterwards.' He was quick to deny any political link to her tears, insisting it was a personal matter, saying: 'I'm not going to go into the personal matter of a colleague.' Labour insiders have claimed that the Chancellor has made herself 'unsackable' after the public tears. A government source said that Sir Keir 'seems to have tied himself to her' after her tears, which triggered a £3 billion market sell-off and crash in the pound's value. 'I thought at the beginning of Wednesday she would go, then thought it was confirmed when I saw her crying at PMQs but then she didn't,' said the source. Another source said Ms Reeves had enjoyed an 'outpouring of sympathy' over an incident that was still 'inescapably linked to the political facts' of the welfare rebellion. A third added that being pictured distraught on television had 'shored up her position'. In a turbulent week for the government, Ms Reeves refused to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget, saying: 'I'm not going to, because it would be irresponsible to do that. 'We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement. 'So we'll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.'

EXCLUSIVE Special forces chiefs unite to demand an end to Labour's legal witch hunts against veterans
EXCLUSIVE Special forces chiefs unite to demand an end to Labour's legal witch hunts against veterans

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Special forces chiefs unite to demand an end to Labour's legal witch hunts against veterans

Special Forces leaders have united in an unprecedented move to stop legal witch hunts against veterans. The heads of the UK's three most elite military units have said 'enough is enough' after Labour seeks to leave troops exposed. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act was introduced by then veterans minister Johnny Mercer in 2023 and established an independent commission, away from criminal and legal proceedings, to promote reconciliation. Sir Keir Starmer 's government has promised to dismantle the Legacy Act, in fact including a pledge to amend it in their election manifesto last year. The Mail's Stop the SAS Betrayal campaign has demanded a U-turn to stop former soldiers being hounded in their old age. The Government's failure to fight their corner has led to a joint move by veterans from the Special Air Service (SAS), the Special Boat Service (SBS) and the Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR) associations. They have written to Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS), Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, demanding action now to stop the 'lawfare'. At the centre of the campaign are 12 SAS soldiers who could face murder charges after a coroner ruled their shooting of four IRA terrorists in 1992 was unlawful. The men were cleared after an extensive investigation into events at Clonoe, County Tyrone. But campaigners have claimed their relatives' human rights were ignored. That night the terrorists had been equipped with a Russian-made heavy machine gun and three assault rifles. Remarkably, this February coroner Mr Justice Humphreys ruled the SAS's use of force excessive. The Mail understands this is the first time in the history of the SAS, SBS and SRR they have challenged the head of the UK's Armed Forces together. Their letter reads: 'This unified communication makes clear our collective position. A line must be drawn under the legacy matters arising from the conflict and that the time has come to bring closure to events that may never reach a just or conclusive end. 'We believe it is time to bring certainty, closure and fairness to this issue, not only for those who served but also for their families. Our joint letter reflects the deep concern held across the military community and urges decisive leadership to resolve this matter once and for all.' The Mail understands the current Director of Special Forces, who is responsible for SAS, SBS and SRR operations around the world, has also penned a furious letter on the same issue. Last night these unprecedented moves received emphatic support from former Commanding Officers (COs) of the SAS, leading defence voices and shadow ministers. Speaking exclusively to this newspaper, former SAS CO Lieutenant Colonel Richard Williams criticised the Ministry of Defence's position. He said: 'The whole country should reflect on the contents of this important letter by the combined Special Forces Associations and the total lack of official response extremely seriously. 'It outlines clearly a critical crisis of trust in the military and political chain of command by those special forces engaged today in the most dangerous and sensitive of national security operations. I remain utterly dumbfounded by the lack of overt support shown by the current or past leadership of the MoD for these brave and skilled British soldiers. 'The consistent, sweaty-palmed silence by those appointed to lead and resource our forces cannot be justified in any way and smacks of moral cowardice.' Since the Mail's campaign began last month, tens of thousands of signatures have been added to a petition backing veterans. Last night more than 165,000 people had signed the UK Government and Parliament petition. A further surge is expected in the build up to a major parliamentary debate on the issue on July 14. The political side of the campaign is being led by David Davis MP, former SAS reservist, and Tory defence spokesman Mark Francois. Last night, Mr Francois said: 'I welcome this well-informed intervention by these highly experienced personnel. 'Both the outgoing CDS, Admiral Sir Tony and his successor, Air Chief Marshal Richard Knighton, have acknowledged the recruitment challenges facing the Armed Forces. But who would sign up to serve a government that plainly doesn't have the back of troops?' Labour's manifesto included a pledge to repeal the act after a Belfast court last February ruled the amnesties were unlawful. The Act was found to breach the European Convention on Human Rights which places an investigative duty on the state where its agents may have caused death or injury. The government intends to use a Remedial Act to remove key provisions within the Legacy Act. Mr Mercer, who is backing the Mail's campaign, has described military veterans who left the forces to become Labour MPs as 'useful idiots'. Former Army commander Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon said: 'Special Forces are the brightest jewel in the military crown who must be protected and supported. To lose any of their mercurial capabilities would make us less safe at home and abroad.' The Ministry of Defence said: 'We consider that the findings and verdict [of the Clonoe incident] do not properly reflect the context of the incident nor the challenging circumstances in which members of the Armed Forces served in Northern Ireland. 'We inherited a mess of a Legacy Act that was not supported by a number of Veterans groups and would have also meant immunity from prosecution for those who committed the most appalling terrorist crimes – such as those who took part in the IRA's bombing campaign.' 'Soldiers don't want to be deployed after our bogus murder charges' An SAS soldier cleared of murder after shooting a jihadist in Syria has accused top brass of throwing soldiers 'under the bus'. The Mail revealed he was one of five SAS troopers who went through a three-year legal hell. The soldiers were accused of unlawfully killing two terrorists in Syria via excessive force despite the enemy fighters vowing to use suicide vests to blow up 'infidels'. The jihadists were eventually shot dead by an SAS assault team in a raid in hostile territory in July 2022. They were only cleared of wrongdoing last month. In a remarkable interview on a US podcast 'Jay Cal' - as he called himself - said SAS operations are being compromised by red tape. He also accused General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, former Special Forces director of triggering the investigation despite knowing there was no wrongdoing. Jay told the Shawn Ryan Show: 'These guys like Sir Gwyn sit in their ivory towers in Westminster making these decisions which are destroying people's lives. SAS soldiers are saying they don't want to deploy on operations because what happened to us will happen to them. It is a disgrace. They are spineless, they have no moral courage. This has got to stop.' Jay, or Soldier C as he was known in the military police investigation, suggested Sir Gwyn wanted to 'look transparent' to boost his career. He described how Sir Gwyn's decision to launch the probe came after he was accused of ignoring war crimes. He added: 'We were thrown under the bus despite there being no wrongdoing.'Jay said his colleagues who also faced murder charges suffered emotional trauma. Despite their ordeal, the 'Syria Five' have not received any apology. They claim the Ministry of Defence failed to support them through the legal process. Their case provoked fury within the regiment, with troops demanding their officers provide more support.

ALEX BRUMMER: Chancellor's emotional rollercoaster set to continue
ALEX BRUMMER: Chancellor's emotional rollercoaster set to continue

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

ALEX BRUMMER: Chancellor's emotional rollercoaster set to continue

When in difficulty, politicians grasp at straws. The weird scenes in the Commons on Wednesday of a lachrymose Chancellor and a seemingly oblivious Prime Minister as the markets tanked frame Labour's first year in office. Labour apparatchiks claim the surge in gilt yields – as Keir Starmer left Rachel Reeves blowing in the wind – as evidence that financial markets believe in the Chancellor's ironclad grip on the public finances. Bond buying by BlackRock, Schroders and Fidelity as gilt yields soared is cited as confidence that the budget rules will hold. Fascinating that L&G, among the biggest UK asset managers, says a 'lack of clarity' in the Government's fiscal stance has unsettled markets. The unusual juxtaposition of Reeves in tears on Wednesday and cackling in the company of Starmer a day later doesn't suggest stability. The markets don't really believe it. The yield on the 30-year-long bond has jumped 0.64 of a percentage point to 5.33 per cent in the 12-months since Labour won. The ten-year yield is 0.36 per cent higher at 4.56 per cent. Some of this can be attributed to Trump mayhem. UK rates shadowing the US are only part of the story. Oxford Economics suggests that the U-turns on welfare and winter fuel, together with likely revisions to Office for Budget Responsibility growth assumptions, have opened a £20billion to £30billion funding chasm to be closed in the autumn. A black hole of that size cannot be surmounted by small shifts in secondary taxes such as a bank levy or punishing wealth. Similar charges already have caused enough damage with private equity princelings among those fleeing to Milan. The Chancellor's only choice may be to raid one of the bigger pots of government income, flying in the face of manifesto promises. Freezing tax thresholds for a further two years is a possibility, even though it already has propelled millions of working people into higher bands. A surcharge on corporation tax is an option. That would be a fresh blow to business confidence. It is going to be a long, hot summer for Reeves on a personal roller-coaster. Beautiful day July 4 for this writer will always be associated with the delightful celebration in our Washington DC neighbourhood. The children's bikes would be decorated with red, white and blue ribbons and balloons, and join a procession down to the local Palisades Park. US Independence Day this year is marked by Donald Trump's 'big beautiful' tax and spending bill. It reinstates Trump's first term tax cuts for the better off and lifts spending on defence and border security. It also slashes benefits for the less well and elderly with cuts in Medicare and Medicaid. The estimated outcome is a $3.4 trillion hit to the nation debt over the next decade. That underestimates the supply side impact of lower personal and corporate tax on enterprise, entrepreneurship and output. Bank robbery A letter from a reader in Abingdon bemoans NatWest's decision to close its listed bank building in the town. Meanwhile, Santander is making no secret of its intention to shutter unspecified TSB outlets if it reclaims the bank from Sabadell. That's no way to win hearts and minds.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store