logo
US tariff tide likely to lift India's exports, reckons NITI Aayog

US tariff tide likely to lift India's exports, reckons NITI Aayog

In 2024, India's bilateral trade (merchandise) with the US stood at $123.8 billion, with a trade surplus of $37.7 billion for India
Dhruvaksh Saha Shreya Nandi New Delhi
Listen to This Article
India has a comparative edge over key competitors in a majority of products it exports to the US and stands to gain market share as the US raises tariffs on its major trade partners, NITI Aayog said on Monday.
In its quarterly trade report, it recommended that the government fast-track the India-US free trade agreement with time-bound goals to resolve non-tariff barriers and finalise digital trade rules on data flows and e-signatures to support services exports.
The Aayog's assessment is based on the assumption that India will face an additional 10 per cent tariff, while several other countries — including
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NITI Aayog proposes easing investment curbs on Chinese firms, suggests allowing 24% stake without nod: Report
NITI Aayog proposes easing investment curbs on Chinese firms, suggests allowing 24% stake without nod: Report

Mint

time23 minutes ago

  • Mint

NITI Aayog proposes easing investment curbs on Chinese firms, suggests allowing 24% stake without nod: Report

India's leading policy think tank, NITI Aayog, has suggested relaxing regulations that mandate additional scrutiny for investments by Chinese firms, asserting that these rules have caused delays for some significant deals, news agency Reuters reported, citing government sources. All investments by Chinese companies in India currently require necessary security approvals from both the Home Ministry and the Foreign Ministry. However, NITI Aayog has proposed that Chinese companies may acquire a stake of up to 24% in an Indian company without the need for approval, the news agency said, citing sources who did not wish to be named. The proposal is part of an initiative to increase foreign direct investment in India and is currently under review by the trade ministry's industries department, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as by Prime Minister Narendra Modi office, the report said. NITI Aayog has also suggested to revamp the board that decides on foreign direct investment proposals, it added. Livemint could not independently verify the report. Notably, the NITI Aayog plays an advisory role and not all proposals suggested by the body are implemented by the government. government. However, the proposal comes at a time when India and China are reportedly trying to improve bilateral relations following the border issues in 2020. The final decision over easing the trade rules will be taken by the political leaders, the report said, citing two sources. The current regulations were introduced following border conflicts in 2020. They apply to land-bordering countries, most impacting Chinese companies. Meanwhile, firms from other countries are generally free to invest in various sectors like manufacturing and pharmaceuticals, although certain sensitive areas such as defence, banking, and media remain restricted. Due to these rules, deals such as China's BYD plan to invest $1 billion in an electric car joint venture in 2023 have been shelved, the report stated. Although global foreign investment has slowed since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the restrictions on Chinese investment in India are seen as a key reason for a significant decline in the country's FDI. Net foreign direct investment in India dropped to a record low of just $353 million in the last financial year, compared to the $43.9 billion recorded in the year ending March 2021. Foreign Minister S Jaishankar made his first visit to China in five years this week. During his trip, he emphasised to his counterpart the importance of resolving border tensions and urged both nations to avoid restrictive trade measures, such as China's limits on rare earth magnet supplies.

Adani exits AWL agri business, sells 10.42% stake to Wilmar for ₹3,732 cr
Adani exits AWL agri business, sells 10.42% stake to Wilmar for ₹3,732 cr

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Adani exits AWL agri business, sells 10.42% stake to Wilmar for ₹3,732 cr

Adani Group on Friday exited AWL Agri Business (formerly known as Adani Wilmar) by selling its remaining 10.42 per cent stake in the company for Rs 3,732 crore through open market transactions, according to the BSE data. Adani Commodities LLP (ACL), a subsidiary of Adani Enterprises, offloaded a total of 13,54,82,400 equity shares in 11 tranches on Friday, amounting to a 10.42 per cent stake in AWL Agri Business, as per the block deal data on the BSE. The transaction was valued at around Rs 3,732.54 crore and executed at an average price of Rs 275.50 apiece. Meanwhile, Dubai-based Shajaeatan Investment FZCO purchased a little over 11.07 crore equity shares or 8.52 per cent in AWL Agri Business for Rs 3,049.99 crore. Quant Mutual Fund (MF), IDFC MF, Bandhan MF, Jupiter Fund Management, Morgan Stanley Asia Singapore, US-based Susquehanna International Group, Franklin Templeton, Vanguard, and Singapore-based Duro Capital were among the buyers of AWL Agri Business shares on the BSE. Shares of AWL Agri Business slipped 1.31 per cent to close at Rs 274.60 apiece on the BSE. On Thursday, billionaire Gautam Adani-promoted Adani Group said it has sold a 20 per cent stake in AWL Agri Business to Wilmar International Singapore for Rs 7,150 crore, as part of its decision to exit the FMCG business and focus on the infrastructure vertical. In January, ACL had already sold a 13.51 per cent stake in AWL through the offer for sale route, generating Rs 4,855 crore. AWL Agri Business sells edible oil and other food products under Fortune brand. In December last year, Adani Group had announced divestment of its entire 44 per cent stake in AWL to sharpen its focus on core infrastructure businesses. During the 2024-25 fiscal, AWL Agri Business Ltd had posted a net profit of Rs 1,225.81 crore on a total income of Rs 63,910.28 crore.

Hindustan Zinc CEO rejects Viceroy's brand fee allegations against Vedanta
Hindustan Zinc CEO rejects Viceroy's brand fee allegations against Vedanta

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Hindustan Zinc CEO rejects Viceroy's brand fee allegations against Vedanta

Viceroy argued that this arrangement not only undermines transparency but also places legal and financial risks on HZL New Delhi Hindustan Zinc Ltd (HZL) CEO Arun Misra on Friday dismissed allegations made by US-based short seller Viceroy, which claimed that Vedanta violated its brand fee agreement with the government. Misra stated that all decisions related to the brand fee were made following proper procedures and board approval. Viceroy, in a recent report, accused Vedanta of breaching its agreement with the government by collecting brand fees from HZL. Misra clarified that before any proposal reaches the board, it undergoes legal review and is shared in advance with the government of India and its nominee director. "We are very clear in our approach. We take matters to board after due consultation, legal vetting... we share (the proposals) with the government of India, nominee director before the board meeting. They have adequate time to go through (the proposals)," he told the news agency PTI. Misra added that it is the board's responsibility to approve or reject proposals and that the brand fee decision was made through this process. "We don't find any issue in that," he said. According to the latest shareholding data, the government holds a 27.92 per cent stake in HZL, while Vedanta owns 61.84 per cent. During the privatisation process, Vedanta acquired the stake in HZL from the government in 2002. Over the past few days, Viceroy has released a series of reports against Vedanta and its subsidiaries. One of the biggest claims involves HZL's ₹1,560 crore payment to Vedanta for 'brand and strategic services,' which Viceroy described as lacking commercial justification, despite oversight from government-nominated directors on the board. Viceroy's claims so far Viceroy argued that this arrangement not only undermines transparency but also places legal and financial risks on HZL. The report suggested the brand fee deal violated the original shareholder agreement signed during HZL's privatisation. Viceroy also claimed Vedanta failed to construct a smelter that was contractually required. According to its report, this could trigger a put/call option in the shareholder agreement, allowing the government to either force Vedanta to buy its 29.54 per cent stake in HZL at a 50 per cent premium, or require the government to buy Vedanta's 64.92 per cent stake at a 50 per cent discount posing a potential financial risk of up to $10.66 billion. In response, a Vedanta spokesperson said the shareholder agreement, signed between the government and Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures (now part of Vedanta), allowed the company to drop the Kapasan project within a year if it was not viable, based on an independent assessment. 'Following a thorough project evaluation, Hindustan Zinc opted for a more cost-effective brownfield expansion at Chanderiya, which was duly approved by the Board, including government-nominated directors. This was communicated to the Ministry of Mines in 2003 and again in 2005, and no concerns were raised. Since the acquisition, HZL's capacity has grown nearly 5-fold,' the spokesperson said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store