
NDP forges ahead with leadership race despite dissent
But Peter Julian, who headed up the 1993 renewal process the last time the NDP lost official party status, said taking time to do it right was the key to coming back stronger.
'There is no doubt that when we have the worst result in the century, that we need to properly reflect and be properly accountable on evaluating that campaign,' Julian said.
The former NDP MP and party stalwart told Canada's National Observer in an interview Wednesday that at such a critical juncture, the NDP should take six months to talk to party members across the country, take stock of what led to the disastrous 2025 election result and build a stronger foundation to move forward.
'This is where the evaluation is so important to know how these decisions were made and when they were made and why they were made,' he said.
He called the 2025 campaign strategy 'deeply flawed,' pointing to such examples as the final days of the campaign when volunteers in his riding were asked to campaign in other ridings despite the tight race. Many other decisions need to be examined, he said, including how national resources and the leadership tour were leveraged.
In particular, the party's decision to wait until late in the campaign to release an election platform made no sense, Julian said. A platform could have been used by candidates across the country to help the NDP differentiate itself from the Conservatives and Liberals — both of whom waited until the race's final weeks to release theirs — but instead, it was a 'stealth release' and flew under the radar, he added.
'We can't rush the leadership process. We need to make sure that we get the renewal right, the rebuilding right, that first important stage before we move to leadership,' @mrpeterjulian.bsky.social told @nationalobserver.com earlier this week.
On Tuesday, more than two months after the NDP's worst election result since 1993, the party announced a 'review and renewal' process to 'reflect' on the 2025 election campaign and 'help shape a path forward,' led by Emilie Taman, a former NDP candidate and labour and human rights lawyer.
However, today the national council — through a contentious process criticized by some members — approved rules that will launch the leadership contest in September, likely before the review and renewal process is complete. Julian did not immediately respond to a request for further comment on Thursday afternoon on this development.
A handful of other prominent New Democrats and grassroots members say a thorough post-mortem must come before the leadership race is launched.
'How can we decide on how to move forward, including with a leadership race, without all the information to assess the moment, where we are?' NDP MP Leah Gazan wrote in a leaked email June 23 criticizing the party for undemocratic decision-making and sidelining racialized and marginalized members.
At a confidential meeting on July 10, the NDP federal council decided on some, but not all, of the leadership contest rules, the Toronto Star reported late Thursday afternoon. The entrance fee is set at $100,000 — a cost many say is too high. A newly launched group called Reclaim Canada's NDP, as well as members of the NDP's Indigenous People's Commission, wanted an entrance fee no higher than $50,000 to ensure fresh faces can run, so the decision was "disappointing," said Keith de Silvia-Legault, a spokesperson for Reclaim Canada's NDP.
The race will last about six months, starting in September. The six-month duration was heralded as a win by Reclaim Canada's NDP, which bucked against earlier proposals by the party brass for a shorter race.
But some members are still concerned that the timing of the leadership race will sideline the review and renewal process.
"I, personally, do not foresee there being time between now and the election of a leader, where we will do a proper post-mortem and, personally, I'm afraid that that is an intentional move, because they don't want to do the post mortem, and they don't want to be held accountable," Des Bissonnette, co-chair of the Indigenous People's Commission, said in an interview with Canada's National Observer. Bissonnette would not specify or confirm what happened in the July 10 meeting.
Currently, the federal NDP is in debt, reduced to seven seats in the House of Commons and deprived of the resources that official parties of 12 or more MPs have.
Everyone has an opinion on where the party should go from here.
Nathan Cullen, former provincial and federal NDP MP (and 2012 leadership hopeful), recently penned an opinion piece in the Toronto Star arguing for a short leadership race, on the basis that the minority government could fall at any time.
According to Cullen, dragging the process out beyond 2025 will lower the NDPs profile at a time when the House of Commons needs strong opposition.
Others disagree. Peggy Nash, a former federal NDP president and MP, thinks the party 'should not rush into anything.'
Nash currently works in a non-partisan role removed from the NDP now, but said 'if there's a mood that somehow the central party was too controlling, it was too leader-focused, I think it might not be seen in a good light to have a short, quick election where it seems that there's only one candidate who's going to be the choice.'
In her view, it is wisest to hold a wide-ranging, open leadership race over a number of months where candidates can go out, sign up members, build support, raise money and engage in debate to rebuild the party.
'I have been in a leadership campaign, and I think those public debates are really, really healthy, and you can have debates from different perspectives and let the delegates choose,' Nash told Canada's National Observer in a phone interview.
A major challenge for the NDP is the need to raise money, which is why some members were willing to compromise with a $50,000 fee, federal council members told Canada's National Observer in June. In the last leadership race the cost was $30,000.
But leadership fees are not the only way to raise money.
In 1993, one of the byproducts of honest 'unvarnished' conversations and review process was that people saw this work being done and wanted to contribute, both financially and otherwise, to help rebuild the party, Julian explained.
'There is a fundamental reason why having that honest, accountable discussion is so important to rebuilding the NDP; there often are very clear benefits,' he said.
'When we went into the following election, we basically paid off our debt.'
Beyond the financial challenge, Julian said the 1993 renewal process allowed people to weigh in on everything and 'touched every aspect of the party.' All that work allowed them to make major changes to the party's democratic structure, its mission, values and produce 'very strong policy documents' on environmental, economic and social policy with widespread support of NDP members at convention.
'We can't rush the leadership process. We need to make sure that we get the renewal right, the rebuilding right, that first important stage before we move to leadership,' Julian said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
6 minutes ago
- National Post
From Alberta to Stephen Colbert: An imagined look at who Mark Carney will offer statehood to next
This week, Prime Minister Mark Carney promise to recognize a Palestinian state provided that its leaders can abandon violence and become a liberal democracy — and do so by the end of the summer. Article content Carney's conditions are basically impossible: Gaza remains in control of a literal terrorist organization that refuses to surrender, while the Palestinian areas of the West Bank are in the hands of a Palestinian Authority that has suspended elections since 2005. Article content Article content The other easy critique — and the one being made by the Conservatives — is that it rewards terrorism. For decades, Canada has explicitly rejected unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, including in a House of Commons vote held just last year. The only reason Carney is breaking with this precedent is because of a series of events that kicked off with the slaughter and mass-rape of hundreds of Israeli civilians on Oct. 7, 2023. Article content Article content At a time when Canada faces threats unlike any since the Second World War, complete national unity is an imperative. This may include the extension of self-determination to regions such as Alberta which pose barriers to this. However, this is predicated on Alberta's agreement to much-needed social and political reforms. If, in the next six weeks, the province can suspend its oil sector, transition its vehicle fleet to 50 per cent EVs and phase out its environmentally destructive beef sector in favour of more sustainable nutritive options such as quinoa or jicama we will recognize a State of Alberta at the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly. Article content Article content Afghanistan Article content Article content The worsening condition of Afghan women and girls leaves no room for delay in a co-ordinated international action to extend peace and security in the recently established Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. For this reason, Canada will recognize Afghanistan and its Taliban government and urge our European partners to do the same. That is, if the Taliban government can sign a memorandum of understanding to recognize the systemic equity-hostile dogma of its current policies and commit to hiring marginalized Afghans in at least 11.5 per cent of civil service positions. Article content Puerto Rico and Stephen Colbert Article content Bullies like Donald Trump only understand strength. This is why, in a bold show of diplomatic convening power, Canada will unilaterally recognize Puerto Rico as the 51st U.S. state, and immediately petition Washington to make space for Puerto Rican representatives in its Senate and House of Representatives. We will also be instructing our diplomats to indefinitely continue recognizing Stephen Colbert as host of The Late Show.


Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
The left needs to learn how to talk to young men — or it will keep losing them to the right
By Craig A. Johnson is the author of "How to Talk to Your Son About Fascism" (2025) and host of the podcast "Fifteen Minutes of Fascism." He teaches in the history department at the University of California, Berkeley. It takes only a few minutes of listening to right-wing politicians and podcasters to understand why their message appeals to so many young men in Canada, who increasingly feel that society has abandoned them in favour of women, racial and sexual minorities and the moneyed classes. Conservatives have sold them on the idea that they represent the true counterculture, rising up against the excesses and iniquities of the left-wing establishment that have kept them from finding a job or partner or affordable home. Meanwhile, there is a fundamental problem with the message progressives have for young men today, especially those who are cisgender, heterosexual, or white. The left has to convince young men, many of whom feel barely in control of their own lives, that they're members of a privileged class — and what's more, that the privileges they enjoy are unjust and should be dismantled. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details


CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
Members of environmental racism panel, N.S. government discuss meeting dates
Social Sharing Members of a provincial panel on environmental racism are discussing when they can schedule a meeting with Nova Scotia government cabinet ministers. The panel was commissioned via an NDP amendment to major environmental legislation the Progressive Conservative government passed in 2022. A report was delivered more than a year ago, but so far has not been shared with the public. Becky Druhan, the cabinet minister responsible for the Office of Equity and Anti-Racism, said in May that there were no plans to make the report and recommendations public, noting that was not part of the panel's mandate. At the time, Druhan would not say if she'd read the recommendations. Following pressure from opposition MLAs and Mi'kmaw chiefs, however, Druhan said last month that she'd asked department staff to arrange for a meeting with the panel. "Out of respect for the panel, we want to meet with members before sharing any further details publicly," she said in a statement at the time. On Tuesday, a government spokesperson said an invitation to meet had been extended to panel chair Augy Jones, who is also the executive director for African Nova Scotian Affairs for the province, and the hope was a meeting date could be set soon. "Given the busy summer season and the need to co-ordinate several schedules, it is likely the meeting will take place later this summer or early fall," Denise Corra said in an email. Tom Johnson, a member of the panel and the executive director of fisheries and wildlife for Eskasoni First Nation, confirmed in an email Tuesday that people are trying to line up schedules. Calls for the report's release Although Deputy Premier Barb Adams said earlier this year that the recommendations from the report are being used across government, some high-ranking civil servants and cabinet ministers have indicated in the last two months that they have either not seen the report or are only familiar with it at a high level. No one from the government has been willing to say whether reparations for communities affected by environmental racism is one of the panel's recommendations. Membertou First Nation Chief Terry Paul told CBC News last month that Mi'kmaw chiefs in the province have not seen the report, but they've talked about it and believe it should be made public. Louise Delisle feels the same way. Delisle lives in a historic Black community in the Town of Shelburne. She spoke to the panel during its consultation work and shared concerns about the effects a garbage dump situated for years beside her community had on the health of people living nearby. 'Where is it?' "I talked about the fact of the high rates of cancer and the fact that our water was polluted," she told CBC News. "We were not consulted when that dump was put in there. Nobody came into the community and asked anything because they felt they didn't need to do that. That's racism at its finest." Delisle said her expectation was recommendations from the panel would be shared with the communities consulted as part of the work. She's frustrated by the lack of answers. Communities are already dealing with the fallout from environmental racism, Delisle said, and to not share the report and its recommendations feels like another form of discrimination. "Where is it? Just make it public."