Clashes continue in Sweida as ceasefire struggles to hold
Government forces were redeployed on Saturday to Sweida to halt the renewed fighting that had erupted late Thursday.
Shortly after the announcement, Syria's interior ministry said the fighting had stopped and that Sweida had been cleared of Bedouin tribal fighters. However, several clashes were reported to have taken place in the predominantly Druze region of Sweida.
Clashes began last Sunday between Druze militias and local Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribes in Syria's southern Sweida province. Government forces intervened, nominally to restore order, but ended up taking the Bedouins' side against the Druze.
On Thursday, government forces largely withdrew from the southern province of Sweida, a day after Israel launched several strikes on Damascus, citing a need to protect the Druze community.
However, shortly after, state media reported that Druze militants had launched retaliatory attacks on the Bedouin communities.
In his second televised address since the fighting started, al-Sharaa blamed the conflict's escalation between 'lawless groups on one side and Bedouin communities on the other, leading to an unprecedented deterioration of the situation."
He had urged all parties to "fully commit" to the ceasefire.
"Everyone must understand that this moment requires unity and full cooperation in order to overcome the hardships we all face and to protect our country and land from foreign interference and internal strife," he said on Saturday.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights report at least 940 people have been killed since clashes erupted on Sunday. Meanwhile, the UN estimated that roughly 80,000 people have been displaced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
Islamists sent here to 'islamise' Europe, says female imam in Germany
German authorities filed criminal charges against dozens of participants following weekend protests in Berlin and Düsseldorf, where demonstrators celebrated violence against Syria's Druze minority and clashed with Kurdish counter-protesters. Hundreds gathered Saturday outside Berlin's city hall, waving Syrian flags and chanting slogans, including "Today we liberate Suwayda. And we will bend the Druze," according to observers. Protesters also directed hostile chants against Christians, Alawites and Israelis while displaying support for Syria's new Islamist leadership under Ahmed al-Sharaa, formerly known by his nom de guerre Mohammed al-Jolani. The demonstrations coincided with ongoing violence in Syria's Druze-majority Suwayda region, where human rights organisations report hundreds were killed in attacks by Bedouin militias and government-aligned forces. Entire villages have been burned and civilians, including women and children, assaulted and summarily executed. Similar protests in Düsseldorf drew approximately 300 participants who displayed large posters honouring al-Sharaa. Videos showed demonstrators dancing while glorifying attacks on Druze communities, with footage later posted to TikTok featuring scissors symbols representing the cutting of Druze men's facial hair. Violence erupted at Düsseldorf's central train station when Syrian protesters clashed with Kurdish demonstrators. Participants threw bottles and stones, injuring five police officers before authorities separated the groups. Police filed roughly 20 criminal charges, including breach of peace, assault and property damage. 'Sent to Europe to cause unrest' Seyran Ateş, founder and imam of the Ibn Rushd Goethe Mosque, issued a stern warning about the "protesters" who openly show their radicalism on the streets. "They were sent to Europe to cause unrest here, to recruit people for their ideology and to work on the big idea of Islamising Europe," Ateş told Euronews. "A liberal society like Germany cannot and will not close itself off to radical views as long as they do not threaten the constitution." "If right-wing extremist Germans are allowed to demonstrate, then Islamists can demonstrate too. Yet more tolerance is often shown towards Islamists so as not to be seen as Islamophobic," she explained. Ateş's liberal mosque had to close temporarily in 2024 due to threats of extremist attacks. She was the target of an attack by a member of the Turkish right-wing extremist group Grey Wolves in 1984. Ateş has been under police protection for almost 18 years - yet she continues to campaign for gender equality and LGBTQ+ rights. "Syrian Islamists who celebrate massacres of minorities and attack Druze and Kurds on our streets have just as little place in Germany as foreign antisemites," anthropologist focusing on Islam Susanne Schröter told Euronews. "Those who belong to the Islamist opposition to al-Assad should be returned to their home country as quickly as possible", she explained. "They no longer pose a threat there (but) when they come here, they pose a threat to internal security," warned Schröter. Mehmet Tanriverdi of the Kurdish Community of Germany (KGD) noted many demonstrators originally fled Syria's al-Assad regime a decade ago but now support the Islamist forces persecuting minorities including Kurds, Alawites and Druze. He called on the German government to "absolutely correct" its current Syria policy. "In addition to the criminals, Germany must also deport all others who are Islamist-minded, promote the dictatorship and are against the constitution." CDU politician Christopher Förster questioned why supporters of Syria's new regime remain in Germany, arguing they should be encouraged to leave voluntarily or face deportation since Syria is now "obviously a safe country" for Islamists. "Nobody should be given a German passport for taking part in such a demonstration," Förster said. "I seriously wonder why these people are still here at all."
LeMonde
12 hours ago
- LeMonde
ICJ opinion says states are legally obligated to tackle climate change
The world's highest court declared, on Wednesday, July 23, that states have a legal obligation to tackle climate change and that failing to do so was a "wrongful act" that could open the door to reparations. The decision by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), a UN court in the Hague that adjudicates disputes between nations, was closely watched by legal experts, who said the judges' opinion could mark a turning point for environmental justice and climate litigation around the world. ICJ advisory opinions are not binding but carry considerable moral and legal weight, and Wednesday's decision was seen as the most consequential in a recent string of landmark climate rulings. In handing down the decision, ICJ president Yuji Iwasawa said climate change was an "urgent and existential threat" and states breaching their obligations to address the crisis were committing "an internationally wrongful act." "The legal consequences resulting from the commission of an internationally wrongful act may include (...) full reparations to injured states in the form of restitution, compensation and satisfaction," the court said. This would be on a case-by-case basis where a "sufficient direct and certain causal nexus" had been shown "between the wrongful act and the injury," it added. It also said that the climate "must be protected for present and future generations" and the adverse effects of a warming planet "may significantly impair the enjoyment of certain human rights, including the right to life." Courts as key battlegrounds for climate action The United Nations had tasked the 15 judges at the ICJ to answer two fundamental questions. First: what must states do under international law to protect the environment from greenhouse gas emissions "for present and future generations"? Second: what are the consequences for states whose emissions have caused environmental harm, especially to vulnerable low-lying island states? The Paris Agreement, struck through the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), has rallied a global response to the crisis, but not at the speed necessary to protect the world from dangerous overheating. As a result, courts have become key battlegrounds for climate action as frustration has grown over sluggish progress toward curbing planet-warming pollution from fossil fuels. Ahead of the ICJ's decision, experts said the advisory opinion could have ripple effects across national courts, legal processes, and public debate. More than 100 nations and groups gave submissions at a mammoth hearing in December in the Great Hall of Justice in the Hague. Many hailed from distant Pacific Island nations, and delivered impassioned appeals in the sober arena dressed in colourful traditional attire. Experts said it would take time to go over the full advisory opinion, which is the biggest case ever handled by the ICJ. To reach its decision, ICJ judges pored over tens of thousands of pages of submissions from countries and organisations around the world. Wealthy states vs. smaller ones The debate pitted major wealthy economies against the smaller, less developed states, which are most at the mercy of a warming planet. Big polluters, including the United States and India, argued that legal provisions under the UNFCCC were sufficient, and that a re-examination of state responsibility in relation to climate action was not necessary. New Yet the smaller states refuted this, saying the UN framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects and that the ICJ's opinion should be broader. These states also urged the ICJ to impose reparations on historic polluters, a highly sensitive issue in global climate negotiations. They also demanded a commitment and timeline to phasing out fossil fuels, monetary compensation when appropriate, and an acknowledgement of past wrongs. 'No more delay' Outside the court in the Hague, about a hundred demonstrators waved flags and posters bearing slogans like "No more delay, climate justice today." The journey to the world's highest court was six years in the making, spearheaded by students from the climate-imperilled Pacific region, and championed by the tiny island nation of Vanuatu. Ahead of the ruling, Vanuatu's climate change minister, Ralph Regenvanu, said the advisory opinion could be a "game-changer." "It's a landmark milestone for climate action," said Regenvanu on the steps outside the court in the Hague. "It's a very important course correction in this critically important time." "We've been going through this for 30 years (...) It'll shift the narrative, which is what we need to have," he added, speaking to Agence France-Presse (AFP).
Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
Syria asks Turkey for defence support after sectarian clashes
Syria's interim government has requested Turkey's support to strengthen its defence capabilities, Turkish officials said on Wednesday, following sectarian violence over the past two weeks that increased tensions in Syria and drew an Israeli intervention. The defence ministry officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity according to procedures, said that Syria has also sought assistance to combat "terrorist organisations," including the so-called Islamic State (IS) group. Turkey, which has long expressed readiness to assist Syria, was working towards providing training, advisory services and technical support to help strengthen Syria's defence capacity, the officials added. Syrian officials could not be immediately reached for comment. Tensions escalated in southern Syria last week, with violent clashes erupting between Bedouin Arab tribes and Druze militias in Suwayda province. The conflict triggered Israeli air strikes on convoys of government forces in Suwayda and on the Ministry of Defence headquarters in central Damascus, which Israel justified as efforts to protect Druze communities. The US envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, announced a US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Syria on 19 July, which allowed the Syrian government forces to go into Suwayda and break up the fighting between the Druze and Bedouins. An earlier ceasefire between Druze factions and government forces broke down. After a second ceasefire, government forces withdrew from Suwayda, but fighting flared again between Druze and Bedouin groups. Ankara strongly supports Syria's interim government led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa and has been seeking a defence agreement with Damascus that could reportedly include establishing Turkish military bases on Syrian territory. In an interview earlier this week with the AP news agency, Barrack said the US has "no position" on the prospect of a defence pact between Syria and Turkey. "It's not in the US' business or interest to tell any of the surrounding nations with each other what to do," he said. Ankara also backs an agreement reached between the interim Syrian administration and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to integrate into Syria's national army. Implementation of the deal has stalled, with a major sticking point being whether the SDF would remain as a cohesive unit in the new army or be dissolved completely. On Tuesday, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan warned Kurdish and other groups in Syria against exploiting the tensions to pursue autonomy, stating that any attempt to divide Syria would be viewed as a direct threat to Turkey's national security and could prompt an intervention. Turkey considers the SDF a terrorist organisation because of its association with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which waged a decades-long insurgency in Turkey. The Turkish officials said Turkey expects the SDF to follow through on its commitments under the agreement, adding that Turkey would be "following" the situation. The situation in Syria has increased tensions between Turkey and Israel. In April, Israel struck five cities in Syria, including more than a dozen strikes near a strategic air base in the city of Hama, where Turkey reportedly has interests in having a military presence. Israel accused Turkey of trying to build a "protectorate" in Syria.
