Man has drug driving conviction overturned after garda failed to say whether drug test was done
Jordan Lanigan (25) with an address at Darndale, Dublin 17, had pleaded not guilty to driving under the influence of drugs in the District Court.
Garda Fergal McSharry told the District Court Appeals Court that he was on patrol on Clonshaugh Road, Dublin 17 at 3.15pm on March 4, 2019, when he stopped a driver who he had observed with a mobile phone to his ear.
Garda McSharry said he smelled the scent of cannabis from the car and that he tested Mr Lanigan's oral sample on a Drager drug test machine, which he said returned a positive result.
Mr Lanigan was arrested under section 4(1) of the Road Traffic Act 2010 and taken to Coolock Garda Station.
Garda McSharry said that at the station, a doctor proceeded to take a blood test which the court heard later returned a positive result for cannabis.
Mr Lanigan was convicted in the District Court on March 14, 2024, for drug driving under section 4(1)a of the Road Traffic Act 2010. He was disqualified from driving for one year and given a €300 fine.
At the District Court Appeals Court, Judge Jonathan Dunphy said there was no specific evidence given by Garda McSharry that Mr Lanigan actually took the drug test, only that he handed him the test and Mr Lanigan handed it back.
He said that the Garda's evidence of: 'I handed it to him and he handed it back to me' was insufficient as there is no evidence that Mr Lanigan put the test in his mouth and did what was required of him to complete the test.
Judge Dunphy said it is an essential element of the whole procedure and he cannot infer that the test was done or not. He said that without direct evidence from the garda, the test may have been refused and handed back uncompleted.
Judge Dunphy decided to allow the appeal of the conviction from the District Court.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
'I'll mop the floor with you' – Woman convicted of repeatedly breaching protection order after threatening husband
She appeared before Judge Conor Fottrell at the District Court on Wednesday. The woman, aged in her 50s, pleaded guilty to three breaches of a protection order her husband had obtained against her in September 2024. Gardaí told the court that on one occasion in early October, at the family home, the woman shouted abusive language at her husband, calling him 'useless", "gay" and a 'f**kwit" - leaving him in fear. She also directed verbal abuse at their daughter, calling her 'an itinerant', 'fat' and a 'stupid slut' and shouted 'where are your sluts?', which also left the child in fear. Further breaches occurred in late September, when she shouted: 'I'll mop the floor with you,' and, in a separate incident, verbally abused her husband in a way that again caused fear. The court heard there was no physical violence and that the woman had voluntarily left the home as a condition of bail. She has no previous convictions. After reading victim impact statements from both the husband and the couple's daughter, Judge Fottrell said the breaches were 'very serious matters' and that the court was 'particularly concerned about the emotional impact on the child". "Not to preach to the defendant,' he said, 'but the effect this has had on the child is very concerning - and that's going to take time to repair.' He noted the victim - her husband, had spoken 'with a heavy heart', and described the accused as 'obviously someone with personal difficulties". Defence counsel, Andrew Forde BL, said the woman had been married to the victim for a long period and was previously the main earner in the household but developed alcohol issues after being made redundant. She is now nine months into recovery and fully engaged with treatment at the Rutland Centre. ADVERTISEMENT Judge Fottrell said he was 'not convinced a custodial sentence was appropriate", given the woman's guilty plea, work history and ongoing efforts to address her issues. "I believe she has made efforts to turn things around,' he said. 'But the statement from her child provided to the court today was very concerning. I hope you've learned your lesson in all of this.' He convicted her and imposed a €500 fine, with six months to pay. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme.
Sunday World
3 hours ago
- Sunday World
Man has drug driving conviction overturned after garda failed to say whether drug test was done
Jordan Lanigan (25) with an address at Darndale, Dublin 17, had pleaded not guilty to driving under the influence of drugs. A man has had his conviction for driving under the influence of cannabis overturned on appeal, after a judge found the prosecuting garda had failed to say whether he witnessed the roadside drug test actually being completed. Jordan Lanigan (25) with an address at Darndale, Dublin 17, had pleaded not guilty to driving under the influence of drugs in the District Court. Garda Fergal McSharry told the District Court Appeals Court that he was on patrol on Clonshaugh Road, Dublin 17 at 3.15pm on March 4, 2019, when he stopped a driver who he had observed with a mobile phone to his ear. A stock image of a roadside drug test. News in 90 Seconds - June 28th Garda McSharry said he smelled the scent of cannabis from the car and that he tested Mr Lanigan's oral sample on a Drager drug test machine, which he said returned a positive result. Mr Lanigan was arrested under section 4(1) of the Road Traffic Act 2010 and taken to Coolock Garda Station. Garda McSharry said that at the station, a doctor proceeded to take a blood test which the court heard later returned a positive result for cannabis. Mr Lanigan was convicted in the District Court on March 14, 2024, for drug driving under section 4(1)a of the Road Traffic Act 2010. He was disqualified from driving for one year and given a €300 fine. At the District Court Appeals Court, Judge Jonathan Dunphy said there was no specific evidence given by Garda McSharry that Mr Lanigan actually took the drug test, only that he handed him the test and Mr Lanigan handed it back. He said that the Garda's evidence of: 'I handed it to him and he handed it back to me' was insufficient as there is no evidence that Mr Lanigan put the test in his mouth and did what was required of him to complete the test. Judge Dunphy said it is an essential element of the whole procedure and he cannot infer that the test was done or not. He said that without direct evidence from the garda, the test may have been refused and handed back uncompleted. Judge Dunphy decided to allow the appeal of the conviction from the District Court. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme.
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
'Rogue' who sold fake Electric Picnic tickets to unsuspecting victim avoids jail
Sean Carroll (31) with an address at Tara Hill Crescent, Rathfarnham, Dublin 14, pleaded guilty in the District Court to theft contrary to section 4 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001. The court heard that on July 26, 2019, Carroll arranged through Facebook to meet a man on Henry Street in Dublin, where the injured party handed over €550 for tickets to the music festival Electric Picnic. These tickets turned out to be fake and the stolen money was never recovered. Carroll has 28 previous convictions, including those for theft and attempted robbery. Defence counsel for Carroll, Róisín Burnside BL, told the District Court Appeals Court that her client has undertaken treatment for drug addiction and is now free of drugs and alcohol. Judge Jonathan Dunphy noted that 'Henry Street seems to be full of people selling Longitude tickets'. He asked if the defendant understood how long the injured party would have had to save up for the tickets, only for the money to go to 'some rogue'. Judge Dunphy decided to increase the original sentence from six months to ten months, but fully suspended it for two years on the condition that Carroll keeps the peace and continues with his treatment. "If he comes back before me, I'll activate every second of that ten months," Judge Dunphy said.
