logo
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt says AI is not a bubble, but a whole new industrial structure

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt says AI is not a bubble, but a whole new industrial structure

India Today6 days ago
Eric Schmidt, former CEO and chairman of Google, knows a thing or two about bubbles. After all, he was leading Google when the company was navigating the chaotic aftermath of the dot-com bubble burst in the early 2000s. At that time the internet was seen as a revolutionary technology, which quickly saw billions of dollars of investment. However, everything fell apart with a few years as investors did not get the expected profits. Now, many analysts are predicting that the hype around AI may meet a similar fate. But Schmidt does not believe history is repeating itself.advertisementSpeaking at the RAISE Summit in Paris, Schmidt dismissed growing concerns that the AI boom is headed for a comparable crash. 'I think it's unlikely, based on my experience, that this is a bubble,' Schmidt said. 'It's much more likely that you're seeing a whole new industrial structure' (via Business Insider).Schmidt's comments come at a time when AI is the hot topic and investors are once again all in, eager to stake their money on this new revolutionary technology. Since the debut of ChatGPT in late 2022, major tech firms have funnelled billions into AI development, talent acquisition, and infrastructure. Companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta are at the forefront, racing to secure top AI talent and build the infrastructure necessary to reach superintelligence first. According to reports, the global AI market, estimated at $189 billion in 2023, is projected to swell to a staggering $4.8 trillion by 2033.
While there is plenty of curiosity and hope, many are questioning whether AI is being overhyped, and whether it might face the same fate as the dot-com era, potentially triggering a market crash. At that time, the internet was seen as a revolutionary technology, prompting investors to pour money into internet companies in anticipation of massive future profits. However, by 2000–2001, with few profits in sight, the bubble burst and it wiped out trillions in value.Apollo Global Management's chief economist, Torsten Slok, recently warned that the current AI surge may represent an even larger bubble than the dot-com era. 'The top 10 companies in the S&P 500 today are more overvalued than they were in the 1990s,' Slok wrote in a note published on Wednesday.In contrast, Schmidt points to the hardware demands of AI as a sign of its long-term viability. 'You have these massive data centres, and Nvidia is quite happy to sell them all the chips,' he said in Paris. 'I've never seen a situation where hardware capacity was not taken up by software.'No overcapacity, limited by electricitySchmidt acknowledges that many are concerned about 'overbuilding' and the risk of 'overcapacity in two or three years.' However, he sees this more as a normal cycle of ups and downs, rather than evidence of an impending collapse. 'That's a classic bubble, right?' Schmidt quipped, referring to those who believe their own firms will survive while others fail. 'If you believe that those are going to be the defining aspects of humanity, then it's under-hyped and we need even more,' he added.advertisementMeanwhile, Schmidt has also addressed the challenges of AI and what he believes could be the biggest obstacle to building superintelligence. In a recent episode of the Moonshots podcast with Peter Diamandis and Dave Blundin, Schmidt identified electricity — not chips or money — as the true limiting factor for AI's progress. 'AI's natural limit is electricity, not chips,' he said, warning that the US may need an additional 92 gigawatts of power to support future AI infrastructure.In a LinkedIn post, he wrote: 'It is reasonable to predict that we are going to have specialised AI savants in every field within five years. Now imagine their capabilities and how they will change society and our day-to-day lives.'- Ends
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta appoints ChatGPT co-creator as Superintelligence Lab chief
Meta appoints ChatGPT co-creator as Superintelligence Lab chief

Deccan Herald

timean hour ago

  • Deccan Herald

Meta appoints ChatGPT co-creator as Superintelligence Lab chief

Meta Platforms has appointed Shengjia Zhao, co-creator of ChatGPT, as chief scientist of its Superintelligence Lab, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Friday, as the company accelerates its push into advanced AI. "In this role, Shengjia will set the research agenda and scientific direction for our new lab working directly with me and Alex," Zuckerberg wrote in a Threads post, referring to Meta's Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang, who Zuckerberg hired from startup Scale AI when Meta took a big stake in it. Zhao, a former research scientist at OpenAI, co-created ChatGPT, GPT-4 and several of OpenAI's mini models, including 4.1 and o3. He is among several researchers who have moved from OpenAI to Meta in recent weeks, part of a broader talent arms race as Zuckerberg aggressively hires from rivals to close the gap in advanced AI. Meta has been offering some of Silicon Valley's most lucrative pay packages and striking startup deals to attract top researchers, a strategy that follows the underwhelming performance of its Llama 4 model. Meta launched the Superintelligence Lab recently to consolidate work on its Llama models and long-term artificial general intelligence ambitions. Zhao is a co-founder of the lab, according to the Threads post, which operates separately from FAIR, Meta's established AI research division led by deep learning pioneer Yann LeCun. Zuckerberg has said Meta aims to build 'full general intelligence' and release its work as open source — a strategy that has drawn both praise and concern within the AI community.

No Rafale or F-35! Army Demands Rs 1.12 Lakh Cr Defence System, Gets Only Rs 36,000 Cr
No Rafale or F-35! Army Demands Rs 1.12 Lakh Cr Defence System, Gets Only Rs 36,000 Cr

India.com

time2 hours ago

  • India.com

No Rafale or F-35! Army Demands Rs 1.12 Lakh Cr Defence System, Gets Only Rs 36,000 Cr

New Delhi: After Operation Sindoor, India's defense upgrades are speeding ahead like a bullet train. With over Rs 3 lakh crore being pumped into military modernisation, the government is on a mission to acquire or indigenously develop fighter jets, submarines and advanced missile systems. One by one, big-ticket purchases are being cleared, and the pace is relentless. Earlier this month, the Ministry of Defence approved military procurements worth over Rs 1 lakh crore in one go. Among them, Rs 44,000 crore has been set aside for 12 Mine Counter Measure Vessels and Rs 36,000 crore has been sanctioned for six regiments of the Quick Reaction Surface-to-Air Missile system, better known as QRSAM. These six QRSAM regiments will be split evenly between the Indian Air Force and the Army. But here is the twist. This is only a fraction of what the armed forces actually asked for. The Army had demanded 11 regiments. What they got was only three. The Air Force's separate demand? Also unmet. If both services were to receive the full complement, 11 regiments each, the total cost would have soared to Rs 1.12 lakh crore. But the government stopped short. Enter the 'Baby S-400' Apart from being a missile defense system, QRSAM is being nicknamed the 'Baby S-400'. India already has three operational regiments of Russia's S-400 system and expects two more by next year. But defense planners know that S-400s and indigenous Akash systems alone cannot transform the country into a secure fortress. The threat matrix has changed. China is watching, and so is Pakistan. And they are not standing still. Operation Sindoor proved India's air defense muscle. But it also exposed gaps, ones that Pakistan tried to exploit through waves of drone incursions, many supplied by Turkey and China. Hundreds were launched. All were neutralised. But the lesson stuck – air defense needs to be multi-layered, relentless and everywhere. That is where the QRSAM fits in. Designed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), it is built to intercept fighters, drones and helicopters within a 30 km radius. Not as long-range as the S-400's 400 km or Akash's 100-200 km reach, but perfect for quick and short-range airspace protection in dense threat environments. More importantly, it's Indian-made, fast, precise and combat-ready. Not Enough for a Fortress At Rs 6,000 crore per regiment, scaling up to the Army's full demand alone would cost Rs 66,000 crore. Add the Air Force's likely mirror request and you are staring at a Rs 1.12 lakh crore bill. Expensive? Yes. But what is the price of making the skies over India completely off-limits to 5th-gen fighter jets, drones, cruise missiles or worse? With full deployment, India's air defense would shift from deterrence to denial. Nothing would be able to breach the perimeter. During Operation Sindoor, India's air defenses held. But in military planning, holding is never enough. The military is not asking for luxury, it is asking for survivability. Against future drone swarms, supersonic fighters or long-range missile salvos, six regiments are just a start. If the government greenlights the remaining 16 regiments, the Army and the Air Force both, it would send a message that India is preparing. And once QRSAM rings the nation's skies, even the birds will need clearance to fly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store