Poll: Supermarkets to get voting bins in bid to raise Chch local body elections turnout
Additional in-person voting bins will be available at supermarkets for the October local body elections in an effort to boost turnout and improve accessibility.
More than 70 bins will be in public locations, such as supermarkets and libraries, after the drop-off points were considered a success during the 2022 election.
Turnout for local body elections is relatively low with 43.3% voting in the Christchurch 2022 election, compared to 78.2% nationally for the 2023 general election.
Voting bins were only available at 23 city council facilities last election, notably all libraries and most services centres.
'Building on past success, we will expand the use of highly visible orange vote bins,' said a city council spokesperson.
'Locations are currently being confirmed. Details of these will be promoted, provided to electors with the voting documents and available on the city council website.'
Mayor Phil Mauger supports the voting bins being in a range of locations.
'Anything that can help make voting easier in a way that works for people and helps lift participation is a positive thing,' he said.
It comes as support increases for in-person voting, instead of postal, for local body elections nationwide.
A report by Local Government New Zealand in March advocated for a transition to in-person voting in time for the 2028 election.
Postal voting was labelled as 'outdated' and inaccessible for younger voters not used to the postal system.
It would require a law change by Parliament as the Local Government Act determines the local body elections voting system.
Mauger said he is open to in-person voting and other options for Christchurch.
'Provided it can be done securely and fairly, I'm open to a mix of approaches that suits the needs of people – whether that's in-person voting, postal voting, or online options for the future.'
Wellington had a similar turnout to Christchurch in 2022 with 43.2% while Auckland and Hamilton were significantly lower at 35.5% and 29.4% respectively.
Dunedin had a higher turnout with 48.2%.
Voter turnout by city council ward in 2022:
Banks Peninsula – 60.3%
Cashmere – 53.4%
Fendalton – 49.2%
Halswell – 48.4%
Harewood – 47.3%
Heathcote – 47.1%
Coastal – 46.3%
Waimairi – 44.6%
Burwood – 44.4%
Papanui – 44.2%
Innes – 38.4%
Spreydon – 38.2%
Hornby – 36.9%
Linwood – 34.4%
Central – 31.1%
Riccarton – 29.6%
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
David Seymour pushes Regulatory Standards Bill despite Waitangi Tribunal, public opposition
Acting Prime Minister David Seymour arriving for a post-Cabinet press conference. The controversial Regulatory Standards Bill is racing through Parliament despite public opposition. KEY FACTS Despite overwhelming expert advice, tens of thousands of public submissions, and a damning Waitangi Tribunal report, Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour is barrelling ahead with the Regulations Standards Bill as public submissions closed last week. Rather than engage on the merits of the legislation, Seymour came out
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
50 Years On: Petition Calls For Review Of NZ's Outdated Drug Laws
Campaign: Modernise Our Drugs Act A new petition is calling on Parliament to launch an independent regulatory review of New Zealand's outdated Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 (MoDA) and its associated framework, including the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013. Launched under the banner Modernise Our Drugs Act, the campaign is non-partisan and focused on sound governance — not ideology. The petition specifically calls for the review to be led by the Ministry for Regulation, to ensure an evidence-based, impartial assessment of whether these laws are effective, efficient, fair, and fit for purpose in 2025 and beyond. 'This is about public interest and modern regulation. These laws haven't had a full review in 50 years — it's time to assess whether they're working, not from a moral or political standpoint, but through the lens of good governance.' Why Now? Outdated framework: MoDA was passed in 1975 and reflects an era long past. Fragmented laws: Ad hoc amendments have created inconsistency and confusion. Equity concerns: Māori, Pasifika, and young people are disproportionately impacted. Inefficiency: Current laws impose high costs on police, courts, and health services with limited results. Global leadership: New Zealand has previously led the world on needle exchange, medicinal cannabis, and drug checking — it's time to lead again. What This Petition Is Not Calling For This campaign does not advocate for: The legalisation or decriminalisation of any specific substance Specific changes to health or justice policies Any predetermined reform outcome Instead, it simply calls for a regulatory review — a neutral, expert-led process to evaluate whether our current laws are achieving their intended goals and aligned with modern evidence. The petition is live on OurActionStation and open for public signatures: About the Campaign Modernise Our Drugs Act is a grassroots, cross-partisan initiative seeking an evidence-informed, modern approach to drug law in Aotearoa. The campaign is focused on clarity, fairness, and regulatory fitness — not on promoting any specific policy outcome.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
The Bill and the trees
Something which often surprises those whose only glimpse of Parliament is a few seconds on the TV news of MPs shouting at each other, is that most politicians — just like most people — actually get along fairly well. In my experience, very few MPs are malevolent figures: they genuinely are in the job to make New Zealand a better place (as they see things) and it is not at all unusual to see friendships made across the aisle. Parliament is a workplace, albeit a very unusual one, and like most workers MPs just want to get on with their colleagues and get the job done. Hence the genuine expressions of shock and grief in the House on Thursday when the news of the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp was announced. She is the second MP to have died during this term: both she and the Green MP Fa'anānā Efeso Collins were young, first-term MPs with their abundant potential unfulfilled. The unexpected adjournment was a reminder that while politics is proposition and opposition, those advancing their ideas are real people with genuine human concerns. Before Parliament came to a shuddering halt the House did get through the first reading of the snappily entitled Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme — Forestry Conversion) Amendment Bill, one of those rare pieces of legislation where Labour and National — mostly — see eye to eye. In 2002 the then Labour government passed the well-intentioned Climate Change Response Act 2002 which — among many initiatives — allowed farmers who swapped their entire property over from tending cows and sheep to tending trees, to register for the emissions trading scheme. Farmers, like most businesspeople, are practical. Once it eventuated that there was more money in lumber than livestock, pines started proliferating and productive farmland stopped generating food. New Zealand First Taieri list MP Mark Patterson offered the Bill his full-throated endorsement. Advancing this law change is part of the National-NZ First coalition agreement and is an issue close to Mr Patterson's heart: he has seen many properties in the vicinity of his Lawrence farm given over to trees. "This is the most consequential Bill to come before this House in this term of Parliament for our rural communities," he said. "Whole-of-farm conversions of some of our most productive land, if left unchecked, are in the process of shuttering large swathes of rural New Zealand. Action is both necessary and overdue." Beef and sheep farms were doing decent business at the moment, but the current price for carbon credits meant trees were far more profitable. What's more, on current trends trees were about to become competitive with dairy farming — the backbone of New Zealand's economy. "I know: I planted some myself; I've taken advantage of this scheme," he confessed. "Why would I not? It would be looking a gift horse in the mouth." Mr Patterson said he came not to damn forestry — a $6 billion export sector in its own right — but to encourage the right trees being planted in the right place. "It does create opportunities to integrate forestry in with sheep and beef farming primarily, in a mosaic-type approach, and it can help cash-flow farm succession. It's not all down side, by any means, for our rural communities." Dunedin Labour MP Rachel Brooking said while Labour thought it was slightly ambitious to hope this Bill could solve the woes of rural communities, we could all (well, apart from the Greens and Te Pāti Māori, who voted no) agree there was a problem. "We think that some more fixing will be needed in addition to this Bill," she said. "We heard the Hon Mark Patterson speak before about a piece of farmland that he owns where he planted some trees because that is what the economics were telling him to do. "He didn't have to do it, but it made good financial sense, and people will follow the incentives." Ms Brooking noted the issue was not trees per se, but how to disincentivise carbon forests on good food-producing farmland. "These are pine trees that are planted to stay put. They might be harvested once, but then they're going to stay in the ground. "It's different from plantation forestry whereby foresters are out there planting the trees and then planning to cut them down." While broadly backing the stated intent of the Bill, Ms Brooking took issue — as the opposition has with other pieces of legislation — with the short time the environment select committee will have to consider the legislation. "The report back is only August 20, which is not much time, but it is better than all stages under urgency, which, of course, this government likes to do." Not quite peace in our time, but it was a start.
