US court decisions allow for Abrego Garcia's release, bar his deportation
The decision was part of a one-two punch on Wednesday, as two courts weighed in on the Maryland father's fate.
Abrego Garcia was catapulted into the national spotlight in March after the administration of President Donald Trump wrongfully deported him to his native El Salvador, despite a court order protecting him from removal.
His case became emblematic of the early days of Trump's mass deportation drive, with critics accusing the president of taking a slapdash approach that violated the due process of the law.
In recent weeks, Abrego Garcia has been held in a Tennessee prison, as the Trump administration pursues criminal charges against him.
But in one of Wednesday's twin rulings, US District Judge Waverly Crenshaw in Nashville upheld the finding that Abrego Garcia could be released from jail, rejecting Trump administration claims that he might be a danger or a flight risk.
Crenshaw also expressed doubt about the Trump administration's claims that Abrego Garcia is a member of the gang MS-13, citing a lack of evidence.
His decision allows Abrego Garcia to potentially be released from detention as he awaits a January trial on human smuggling charges. Still, his release has been once again delayed for a period of 30 days, at the request of Abrego Garcia's lawyers, who fear he could be deported.
Simultaneously on Wednesday, a second court hearing was unfolding in Maryland under US District Judge Paula Xinis.
She has been hearing arguments about Abrego Garcia's wrongful deportation to El Salvador, as part of a lawsuit filed by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura.
Given that Trump officials have signalled they plan to deport Abrego Garcia if he is released, Xinis issued a ruling requiring that immigration officials to give him notice of three business days if they initiate removal proceedings.
The Trump administration, Xinis wrote, has 'done little to assure the court that, absent intervention, Abrego Garcia's due process rights will be protected'.
Xinis also ordered the government to restore the legal status that Abrego Garcia had previously been under, which allowed him to live and work in Maryland.
Abrego Garcia was deported to El Salvador in March, in violation of an immigration judge's 2019 order barring him from being sent back to his home country.
His lawyers have maintained that Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador as a teenager to avoid gang threats.
The government acknowledged that Abrego Garcia's removal to El Salvador had been the result of an 'administrative error'.
Judge Xinis — and later the US Supreme Court — ultimately ruled that the Trump administration had a responsibility to 'facilitate' his return to the US.
But the Trump administration doubled down, arguing that Abrego Garcia's removal was lawful and painting him as a member of MS-13.
Trump even posted a picture of himself to social media holding a photo of Abrego Garcia's knuckles, with the letters and numbers for 'MS-13' digitally superimposed on each finger, next to real tattoos of a smiley face and marijuana leaf.
'He's got MS-13 tattooed onto his knuckles,' Trump wrote, falsely, on April 18.
Judge Xinis had threatened to find the Trump administration in contempt of court for failing to adequately facilitate Abrego Garcia's release, or provide meaningful updates. Officials had argued that they had little power to bring him back, given that he was held in El Salvador.
But in early June, the Trump administration abruptly announced Abrego Garcia's return to the US. At the same time, the Justice Department revealed it had obtained an indictment to criminally charge Abrego Garcia.
At the centre of the government's case is a video from a November 2022 traffic stop, showing Abrego Garcia driving a Chevrolet Suburban SUV with three rows of seats. A police officer heard in the footage speculates that the nine passengers could be involved in human smuggling, but no charges were brought at that time.
His lawyers have dismissed the government's case as 'preposterous'.
Still, before Xinis's ruling, the lawyers had requested Abrego Garcia remain in custody as he awaits trial, for fear that he might be immediately deported if released.
While Abrego Garcia cannot be sent to El Salvador again, the Trump administration has maintained he can be legally deported to a third country, even one where he has no personal ties.
Last month, the US Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could, at least in the short term, continue to deport individuals to such third-party countries while legal challenges proceed against the practice.
Some of those third-party countries have included South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, both of which have faced accusations of human rights abuses in their prisons.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security took to the social media platform X on Wednesday to criticise Xinis's latest ruling.
'The fact this unhinged judge is trying to tell ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] they can't arrest an MS-13 gang member, indicted by a grand jury for human trafficking, and subject to immigration arrest under federal law is LAWLESS AND INSANE,' spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin wrote, reiterating unproven claims.
Abrego Garcia's lawyers, however, applauded Wednesday's court decisions.
'These rulings are a powerful rebuke of the government's lawless conduct and a critical safeguard for Kilmar's due process rights,' lawyer Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump calls on Fed board to take control from Powell over interest rates
Washington, DC – United States President Donald Trump has called on the Federal Reserve board to wrest control of the central bank from Chairman Jerome Powell and lower interest rates. In a series of social media posts on Friday, Trump — who has called for lowering interest rates for months — escalated his attacks on Powell, suggesting that the central bank chief should be stripped of his powers. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell, a stubborn MORON, must substantially lower interest rates, NOW,' Trump wrote. 'IF HE CONTINUES TO REFUSE, THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!' Earlier this week, Powell announced that interest rates would remain steady at 4.25 to 4.5 percent. The central bank's rates indirectly set the rates for private lending across the country. When the Federal Reserve, known as the Fed, sees the need to accelerate economic activity, it cuts interest rates to lower the cost of borrowing and pump money into the economy. Conversely, when prices rise too rapidly, the Fed raises interest rates to bring the cost of living under control. The central bank operates independently of political officials. During the COVID-19 pandemic, interest rates plummeted to prevent a prolonged recession during the lockdown. But as supply-chain disruption and an abundance of money in the economy sparked an inflation crisis in 2022, the Fed hiked interest rates to levels not seen since the 2008 Great Recession. An advocate for greater investments in the US economy, Trump has been arguing that inflation is now at sustainable levels, so there is no need for interest rates to remain high. Over the past year, the central bank slashed interest rates by about 1 percent, but Trump has been demanding more aggressive cuts. On Wednesday, Powell cited a risk of inflation linked to Trump's trade policies as the reason behind his decision not to drop interest rates. 'Higher tariffs have begun to show through more clearly to prices of some goods, but their overall effects on economic activity and inflation remain to be seen,' he told reporters. Earlier this month, a government report showed that consumer prices rose by 0.3 percent from May to June, compared with 0.1 percent the previous month, as Trump's tariffs started to set in. Powell did not rule out that the uptick in prices could be 'short-lived', but he also warned that it may become persistent, arguing for a cautious approach while monitoring inflation. 'For the time being, we're well positioned to learn more about the likely course of the economy and the evolving balance of risks before adjusting our policy stance,' he said. 'We see our current policy stance as appropriate to guard against inflation risks.' The decision proved controversial, with the Fed board seeing rare dissent from two members, both Trump appointees, who publicly argued for more rate cuts. On Friday, Trump warned Powell that the dissent 'WILL ONLY GET STRONGER'. 'Too Little, Too Late,' the US president wrote. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell is a disaster. DROP THE RATE! The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!'
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Switzerland says ‘disappointed' by Trump tariffs, will try to negotiate
Switzerland says it will try to negotiate its way out of stiff United States tariffs, hours after US President Donald Trump's administration shocked the European country by announcing plans to impose a 39-percent tariff rate on Swiss goods. The Swiss government said on Friday that it was 'disappointed' and would decide how to proceed after Trump unveiled the 39-percent rate, more than double the 15 percent being applied for most European Union imports into the US. The new tariffs, which are set to go into effect on August 7, would prove painful for several key Swiss industries, including manufacturing and watchmaking. The Swiss government said in a statement on social media that it remains in contact with US authorities and 'still hopes to find a negotiated solution'. 'The Federal Council notes with great regret the intention of the US to unilaterally burden Swiss imports with considerable import duties despite the progress made in bilateral talks and Switzerland's very constructive position,' it added. The Trump administration unveiled a range of new tariffs on many US trading partners on Thursday, saying the move aimed to address a 'continued lack of reciprocity in our bilateral trade relationships'. Nearly 70 countries now face import duties that were due to come into force on Friday. But most will now begin on August 7, giving countries a few days to try to reach an agreement with Washington to stave off or reduce their respective tariff rate. 'Everyone had been focused on August 1 … and now there is a new deadline,' Al Jazeera's Kimberly Halkett reported from the White House on Friday morning. 'The reason is so that there can be a little bit more time and breathing space to get some more deals done. There were a few that were very close but didn't quite make the deadline, and so the White House [said] this will allow … for these final agreements to be worked out.' Trump negotiated trade frameworks over the past few weeks with the EU, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines — allowing the US president to claim victories as other nations sought to limit his threat of charging even higher tariff rates. He said on Thursday there were agreements with other countries, but he declined to name them. Asked on Friday if countries were happy with the rates set by Trump, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said, 'A lot of them are.' The new tariffs also include a 35-percent duty on many goods from Canada, 50 percent for Brazil, and 20 percent for Taiwan. Taiwan said its rate was 'temporary' and it expected to reach a lower figure. The Trump administration said it decided to impose 39-percent tariffs on Switzerland because of what it called the European country's refusal to make 'meaningful concessions' by dropping trade barriers. 'Switzerland, being one of the wealthiest, highest-income countries on Earth, cannot expect the United States to tolerate a one-sided trade relationship,' a White House official said on Friday. Swissmem, a group representing the mechanical and electrical engineering industries, said it was 'really stunned' by the US move. 'It's a massive shock for the export industry and for the whole country,' said Deputy Director Jean-Philippe Kohl. 'The tariffs are not based on any rational basis and are totally arbitrary … This tariff will hit Swiss industry very hard, especially as our competitors in the European Union, Britain and Japan have much lower tariffs.' Stock market tumbles But Trump's new tariffs have created yet more uncertainty, with many details unclear. Global stock markets stumbled on Friday, with Europe's STOXX 600 down 1.8 percent on the day and 2.5 percent on the week, on track for its biggest weekly drop since Trump announced his first major wave of tariffs on April 2. Wall Street also opened sharply lower on Friday. Reporting from the New York Stock Exchange, Al Jazeera's Kristen Saloomey explained that US markets were 'definitely down' following the tariffs announcement, but the drop was not as bad as what was seen after the first round of tariffs in April. 'When the first round of tariffs were enacted, the market did drop substantially, but then clawed back a lot of the losses about a month later as deals were worked out. A lot of economists are saying that this time around, the market has priced in tariffs,' Saloomey said. Still, she said, 'the concern is still that the underlying fundamentals of the economy are under strain and the full weight of the tariffs' has yet to be seen.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Top EU court strikes a blow against Italy's Albania migrant camps scheme
The European Union's top court has backed Italian judges who questioned a list of 'safe countries' drawn up by Rome, as it prepares to deport migrants to detention centres in Albania. The hard-right government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni denounced the European Court of Justice's (ECJ) ruling and said it 'weakens policies to combat mass illegal immigration'. Meloni's plan to outsource migrant processing to a non-EU country and speed up repatriations of failed asylum seekers has been followed closely by others in the bloc. The costly scheme has been frozen for months by legal challenges. Italian magistrates have cited the European court's decision that EU states cannot designate an entire country as 'safe' when certain regions are not. On Friday, in a long-awaited judgement, the Luxembourg-based ECJ said Italy is free to decide which countries are 'safe', but warned that such a designation should meet strict legal standards and allow applicants and courts to access and challenge the supporting evidence. In its statement, the ECJ said a Rome court had turned to EU judges, citing the impossibility of accessing such information and thus preventing it from 'challenging and reviewing the lawfulness of such a presumption of safety'. The ECJ also said a country might not be classified 'safe' if it does not offer adequate protection to its entire population, agreeing with Italian judges that had raised this issue last year. Meloni and her Albanian counterpart, Edi Rama, had signed a migration deal in November 2023, and last year, Rome opened two centres in Albania, where it planned to process up to 36,000 asylum seekers per year. The detention facilities have, however, been empty for months, due to the judicial obstacles. Last week, a report found that their construction cost was seven times more than that of an equivalent centre in Italy. Government's approach 'dismantled'? The European court made its judgement considering a case of two Bangladeshi nationals who were rescued at sea by Italian authorities and taken to Albania, where their asylum claims were rejected based on Italy's classification of Bangladesh as a 'safe' country. Dario Belluccio, a lawyer who represented one of the Bangladeshi asylum seekers at the ECJ on Friday, said the Albanian migrant camps scheme had been killed off. 'It will not be possible to continue with what the Italian government had envisioned before this decision … Technically, it seems to me that the government's approach has been completely dismantled,' he told the Reuters news agency. Meloni's office complained that the EU judgement allows national judges to dictate policy on migration, 'further reduc(ing) the already limited' capacity of parliament and government to take decisions on the matter. 'This is a development that should concern everybody,' it said. Meanwhile, though the Albanian scheme is stuck in legal limbo, Italy's overall effort to curb undocumented migration by sea has been successful. There have been 36,557 such migrant arrivals in the year to date, slightly up from the same period of 2024, but far below the 89,165 recorded over the same time span in 2023.
